Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V. Rinse, repeat.
ARCH.2003.39, Rendition: 806769
This image displays two newspaper articles from the Harvard Crimson and the Harvard Independent, both dated October 7, 1976, mounted on a single, light-brown, archival-quality paper sheet with three punched holes along the left edge, suggesting it was stored in a binder.
The articles are printed on standard newsprint and cover two separate but culturally significant stories related to Harvard University.
The mounted pages juxtapose two very different facets of the Fogg Art Museum’s 1970s history: the lingering shadow of a major criminal case and the high-profile cultural coup of acquiring a priceless masterpiece. The physical presentation—the aged paper, the punch holes, the slightly creased clipping—adds a historical, archival quality to the documents. Both articles reflect the museum’s national prominence and the drama surrounding its operations during that era.
The image appears to be a scanned or photographed page from a document or booklet. It contains two newspaper clippings placed on a beige surface. The clippings are from two different newspapers:
Harvard Crimson, October 7, 1976: The headline reads "Fogg Robbery Lawyers Appeal Judge's Ruling." The article discusses a lawsuit by the defense team in the Fogg Museum coin robbery trial, challenging the judge's decision to allow evidence from a key prosecution witness.
Harvard Independent, October 7, 1976: The headline "Fogg’N Hammer" mentions the acquisition of a valuable Rembrandt painting, titled "Juno," by Armand Hammer. It provides details about the painting's purchase and its significance, including its value and the involvement of museum director Seymour Slive and other individuals.
Additionally, there is a photograph of three men standing in front of a painting, although the identity of the individuals is not provided. The document seems to be a collection of news articles and a photo related to the topic of the Fogg Museum robbery and the subsequent trial.
This image appears to be a collection of news clippings from the Harvard Crimson and Harvard Independent, both dated October 7, 1976. The clippings are pasted on a beige or light brown paper.
The left clipping is from the Harvard Crimson and has the headline "Fogg Robbery Lawyers Appeal Judge's Ruling." It discusses a legal case involving a robbery at the Fogg Museum. The article mentions that lawyers for the defendants will appeal a judge's ruling, alleging that a key prosecution witness was beaten and coerced into testifying. The article also provides background on the robbery, which took place in December 1973, where four men stole 5762 ancient Greek and Roman coins.
The right clipping is from the Harvard Independent and has the headline "Fogg'N Hammer." This article describes the arrival of a Rembrandt painting titled "Juno," valued at $3.25 million, at the Fogg Art Museum. The painting was delivered in a taped cardboard box from a private jet. The article mentions museum director Seymour Slive and art collector Armand Hammer, who purchased the painting. It also describes Hammer's tour of the museum and his reaction to the museum's collection. There is a photograph accompanying this article showing three men standing in front of a painting.
The overall theme of the clippings seems to be events related to the Fogg Art Museum, including a legal case about a robbery and the arrival of a significant artwork.
The image shows a piece of paper with two newspaper clippings pasted on it. The clipping on the left is from the Harvard Crimson, October 7, 1976, and is titled "Fogg Robbery Lawyers Appeal Judge's Ruling." It describes the appeal of lawyers for the defendants in the Fogg Museum robbery case, seeking to dismiss charges or suppress evidence due to alleged prosecutorial misconduct. The clipping on the right is from the Harvard Independent, October 7, 1976, and is titled "Fogg'N Hammer." It discusses the theft of a cardboard box containing valuable art pieces from the Fogg Art Museum, including works by Rembrandt and Picasso, and the subsequent investigation involving Armand Hammer, a prominent art collector and industrialist.
The image is a newspaper clipping with two articles. The first article is titled "Fogg Robbery Lawyers Appeal Judge's Ruling" and is dated October 7, 1976. The article discusses the trial of four individuals accused of stealing coins from the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University. The article mentions that the lawyers for the defendants have appealed the judge's decision to dismiss charges against them, citing insufficient evidence. The second article is titled "Harvard Independent October 7, 1976" and features an image of three men standing in front of a building. The article discusses Armand Hammer, a wealthy businessman and art collector, who had recently purchased a painting by Rembrandt for $3.95 million. The article mentions that Hammer had requested the painting to be displayed in the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, but the museum had declined the offer. The image of the three men is not clearly visible, but it appears to be a photograph of Armand Hammer and two other individuals.
The image is a scanned page from a newspaper, dated October 7, 1976, featuring two articles from the Harvard Independent. The layout includes the following key elements:
The page captures a significant event involving art theft and the subsequent legal proceedings, alongside a high-profile visit by a prominent art collector to the Fogg Art Museum. The articles highlight the intersection of crime, art, and legal challenges, providing insight into the cultural and legal landscape of the time.
The image shows two clipped newspaper articles and a photograph affixed to a cardboard backing. The articles appear to be from "The Harvard Crimson," dated October 7, 1976, and "The Harvard Independent," with the same date.
The article on the left is titled "Fogg Robbery Lawyers Appeal Judge's Ruling" by Marc M. Sadowsky, indicating that it covers some legal proceedings related to an incident at the Fogg Art Museum.
The article on the right mentions "Fogg 'N Hammer," which seems to play on words related to the Fogg Art Museum and possibly a theft or legal case involving it, judging by the context of the articles.
There is writing present on the photograph, but the specific content is not fully discernible. The photograph appears to show an outdoor scene with structures and partial views of individuals. However, due to the specific instructions, further details about the individuals cannot be provided.
Overall, the displayed materials suggest a historic context related to an event or series of events from 1976, likely involving the Fogg Art Museum, and the materials seem to be arranged for archival or display purposes.
This is a newspaper clipping mounted on a sheet of brownish paper.
The article is titled "Fogg Robbery Lawyers Appeal Judge's Ruling" on the left side and "Fogg 'N Hammer" at the top of the center text. It appears to be dated October 7, 1976, from the Harvard Crimson and Harvard Independent publications. The text discusses legal proceedings and circumstances surrounding the Fogg Museum's robbery case, including names of individuals and details about the stolen items.
To the right, there's a small black-and-white photograph of three men standing together, possibly related to the article's subject. The paper has a hole punched in the right margin for organization in a binder or similar storage.
The image shows a piece of brown paper or cardboard with three clippings glued onto it, dated October 7, 1976, from two publications, "Harvard Crimson" and "Harvard Independent."
The clipping on the left is an article titled "Fogg Robbery Lawyers Appeal Judge's Ruling" by Marc M. Sadowsky. It discusses the defense attorneys for the $5 million Fogg Museum coin robbery trial planning to appeal a state Supreme Court ruling about the prosecution's evidence. The article provides details on the legal proceedings and the robbery incident itself, including information about the suspects.
The clipping in the middle is titled "Fogg'N Hammer." It narrates an incident involving a taped cardboard box stolen from a private jet at Logan Airport and taken to Harvard's Fogg Art Museum. It mentions a director named Slive, an art collector named Armand Hammer, and includes discussion about an expensive Rembrandt painting called "Juno." The article describes the museum's security reaction, the painting's value ($3.25 million), and mentions Hammer's involvement with the museum and his interest in the painting.
On the right side is a small black-and-white photo showing three men in suits standing next to a large artwork. The man in the middle is holding or gesturing toward the artwork. The artwork appears to be abstract with textured, possibly sculptural elements.
The combination of clippings and the photo suggests a connection between the art theft, the legal case, and the individuals involved in the art community or investigation.
The image shows a vintage scrapbook page with two newspaper clippings attached to a light brown backing.