Archives Scrapbooks

The image shows a newspaper clipping from the "Harvard Crimson" dated October 7, 1976, with the headline "Fogg Robbery Lawyers Appeal Judge's Ruling." The article, written by Marc M. Sadofsky, discusses the appeal by lawyers for the defendants in the 1973 Fogg Art Museum robbery case. The defendants, who were convicted of stealing and receiving stolen artworks, are appealing the judge's decision to deny their motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. The article mentions that the private detective hired by Harvard to recover the stolen art has been charged with receiving stolen goods.

Additionally, there is a smaller article titled "Fogg'N Hammer" from the "Harvard Independent" dated October 7, 1976. This article describes a cardboard box containing a painting being wheeled into the Fogg Art Museum. The painting, "Three Musicians" by Pablo Picasso, had been stolen in 1973 and was returned anonymously. The article includes a photograph of three individuals, including Armand Hammer, an industrialist and art collector, who was visiting the museum. Hammer is quoted discussing the museum's security and his donation towards a planned extension. The article also mentions other notable visitors to the museum.

The image shows a newspaper page from the Harvard Independent, dated October 7, 1976. The page features two articles. The first article, titled "Fogg Robbery: Lawyers Appeal Judge's Ruling," discusses the appeal filed by lawyers for the defendants in the $5 million Fogg Museum coin robbery trial. The appeal challenges the denial of a motion to dismiss charges and questions the judge's impartiality due to his alleged ties to Harvard. The article also mentions the involvement of a private detective, Martin G. Richards, and the potential implications of the appeal on the trial.

The second article, titled "Fogg'N Hammer," describes the return of a stolen Rembrandt painting, "Juno," worth $3.25 million, to the Fogg Art Museum. The painting, which was taken during the robbery, was found in a cardboard box at Logan Airport. The article details the reaction of the museum's director, Seymore Slive, and the plans for enhanced security, including the installation of a sophisticated alarm system. The article also highlights the potential sale of the painting to industrialist Armand Hammer and the ongoing police investigation into the robbery.

The image shows a newspaper clipping from the Harvard Crimson and the Harvard Independent, dated October 7, 1976. The headlines and articles discuss two related legal cases involving the Fogg Museum and the theft of valuable artwork.

1. Left Side: "Fogg Robbery: Lawyers Appeal Judge's Ruling"

   • By Marc M. Sadowsky
   • The article discusses the appeal by the defendants in the $5 million coin robbery trial of the Fogg Museum. The lawyers argue that the state Supreme Court should review Judge Herbert F. Travers Jr.'s decision to dismiss charges against the defendants due to alleged coercion and suppression of evidence. The lawyers contend that the state detective allegedly intimidated a witness, which affected the prosecution's case.

2. Right Side: "Fogg'N Hammer"

   • This article recounts the story of a stolen painting, "Juno," valued at $3.25 million, which was part of a taped cardboard box driven from Logan Airport to Harvard's Fogg Art Museum.
   • The box was discovered by Seymour Slive, the director of Harvard's Art Museums, who had been worried about the safety of the valuable painting. The painting, described as a Rembrandt, had been displayed at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art and is now allegedly missing.
   • Armand Hammer, the owner of Occidental Petroleum and a prominent art collector, had commissioned the painting and wanted to display it in his home. Slive and Hammer had a strained relationship, with Slive concerned about the painting's security.
   • The article mentions that Hammer had originally asked for $8 million for the painting but changed his mind after seeing it, and it was eventually valued at $3.25 million.

The newspaper clipping provides a detailed account of the legal and art-related controversies surrounding the Fogg Museum and the theft of significant artwork.

The image shows a newspaper clipping from the Harvard Independent, dated October 7, 1976. The clipping is divided into two main articles:

1. Left Article: "Fogg Robbery Lawyers Appeal Judge's Ruling"

   • The article discusses the appeal filed by the lawyers for the defendants in the $5 million Fogg Museum coin robbery case.
   • The defendants are appealing a state Supreme Court decision that allowed the state to use evidence obtained through coercion.
   • The case involves the alleged beating and torture of a private detective by Harvard University officials, who were attempting to recover coins stolen from the Fogg Art Museum.
   • Judge Herbert P. Travers Jr. allowed the state to use the evidence, and the lawyers have filed an appeal.
   • The article mentions that the trial is scheduled to begin in December 1976.

2. Right Article: "Fogg 'N Hammer"

   • This article describes an incident involving a taped cardboard box containing a valuable painting, "Juno," which was stolen from the Fogg Art Museum.
   • The box was driven off from Logan Airport and rolled into Harvard's Fogg Art Museum.
   • Seymour Slive, the museum's director, and Armand Hammer, the painting's owner, are involved in the story.
   • Slive had been worried about the painting's safe return and was relieved when the box arrived.
   • The painting "Juno," originally valued at $5 million, is now considered more valuable.
   • The article also mentions that Slive and Hammer were involved in a tour of the storage rooms, with Slive showing Hammer the storage conditions for the works of art.
   • Slive’s assistant, Michael Michelangelo, is mentioned as being present during the event.

The articles are accompanied by a black-and-white photograph of a group of people, which seems unrelated to the main text but is included in the clipping. The newspaper appears to have been cut into sections and pasted onto a backing sheet.

The image is a newspaper clipping from the Harvard Independent, dated October 7, 1976. It consists of two articles:

1. Fogg Robbery Lawyers Appeal Judge’s Ruling (by Marc M. Sadovsky)

   • This article discusses the appeal of a judge’s ruling in the Fogg Museum coin robbery trial. Lawyers for the defendants are appealing before the state Supreme Court to have charges dismissed based on the claim that a private detective allegedly beat and terrorized a witness.
   • The article mentions that the private detective, who was hired by Harvard, was charged with assault and battery and entered into an immunity agreement with the prosecution.
   • The defense argues that the judge’s decision to allow the detective’s testimony was in error. They claim that the detective was not properly vetted and his actions were coercive.
   • The case involves the robbery of $5 million in coins from the Fogg Museum. Three men, Anthony B. Vaglica, Louis R. Mathis, and Carl R. Lydson, are charged with armed robbery and conspiracy.

2. Fogg 'N Hammer

   • This article describes an incident involving a cardboard box containing a valuable painting, "Juno," by Michelangelo. The box was wheeled off a private jet at Logan Airport and driven through a Cambridge drizzle into the Fogg Art Museum.
   • Armand Hammer, the owner of the painting, was present and expressed his delight at being able to "get the painting for him" (referring to Seymour Slive, the museum's director).
   • The painting, "Juno," was originally asked for $5 million and is part of a collection that includes works by other famous artists. The painting is described as a Roman goddess of wealth.
   • The article mentions that Slive had managed Hammer's introduction to the Fogg and had been working to secure a loan for the acquisition of the painting.
   • Hammer, who was with his wife Frances and others, was visibly pleased and expressed gratitude for Slive’s efforts in securing the loan and arranging the transport of the painting.

The clipping also includes a small black-and-white photograph of Armand Hammer with some of his associates.

The image shows two pages from the Harvard Independent newspaper, dated October 7, 1976. The main articles featured are related to the legal proceedings concerning the 1975 theft of artworks from the Fogg Museum at Harvard University.

Left Page:

Headline: "Fogg Robbery: Lawyers Appeal Judge's Ruling"
Subheading: By Marc M.adowsky

Summary:
The article discusses a legal development in the case of the $5 million art robbery from the Fogg Museum. Lawyers for the defendants, who allegedly beat and forced a security guard to open the museum in December 1974, are appealing a Superior Court judge's decision. Judge Herbert F. Travers had denied a motion to dismiss charges based on the lawyers' contention that their clients were coerced into confessing.

The lawyers argue that their clients were improperly detained and coerced into confessing under duress. Specifically, they claim that Myles J. Connor was granted immunity from prosecution for other crimes, and Daniel J. Regan was allegedly beaten by the police.

Regan and Connor were also involved in another incident where they allegedly stole coins from Harvard's Semitic Museum in December 1974.

The defendants involved in the Fogg robbery include Anthony B. Vaglica, Louis R. Mathias, and Carl R. Lizzio.

Right Page:

Headline: "Fogg 'N Hammer"

Summary:
The article describes a strange twist involving a Rembrandt painting stolen from the Fogg Museum. A cardboard box containing a $3.25 million Rembrandt painting was left on a private jet at Logan Airport. The person who left the box reportedly wanted to make a deal for the return of the stolen artwork.

Armand Hammer, an industrialist and art collector, was involved in the recovery of the painting. Hammer had connections to the stolen art and was in negotiations to retrieve it. The article also mentions that Hammer's business practices were questioned, especially regarding his dealings with Occidental Petroleum and his introduction of a forged painting into the Fogg.

The article includes a photograph of Armand Hammer with his wife, Frances, and an unidentified man, and it details the complex and suspicious nature of the events surrounding the recovery of the Rembrandt painting.

The content of both articles highlights the intricate and controversial aspects of the Fogg Museum art heist and the subsequent legal and recovery efforts.

The image shows two clipped newspaper articles and a photograph affixed to a cardboard backing. The articles appear to be from "The Harvard Crimson," dated October 7, 1976, and "The Harvard Independent," with the same date.

The article on the left is titled "Fogg Robbery Lawyers Appeal Judge's Ruling" by Marc M. Sadowsky, indicating that it covers some legal proceedings related to an incident at the Fogg Art Museum.

The article on the right mentions "Fogg 'N Hammer," which seems to play on words related to the Fogg Art Museum and possibly a theft or legal case involving it, judging by the context of the articles.

There is writing present on the photograph, but the specific content is not fully discernible. The photograph appears to show an outdoor scene with structures and partial views of individuals. However, due to the specific instructions, further details about the individuals cannot be provided.

Overall, the displayed materials suggest a historic context related to an event or series of events from 1976, likely involving the Fogg Art Museum, and the materials seem to be arranged for archival or display purposes.

The image shows a piece of brown paper or cardboard with three clippings glued onto it, dated October 7, 1976, from two publications, "Harvard Crimson" and "Harvard Independent."

1. The clipping on the left is an article titled "Fogg Robbery Lawyers Appeal Judge's Ruling" by Marc M. Sadowsky. It discusses the defense attorneys for the $5 million Fogg Museum coin robbery trial planning to appeal a state Supreme Court ruling about the prosecution's evidence. The article provides details on the legal proceedings and the robbery incident itself, including information about the suspects.

2. The clipping in the middle is titled "Fogg'N Hammer." It narrates an incident involving a taped cardboard box stolen from a private jet at Logan Airport and taken to Harvard's Fogg Art Museum. It mentions a director named Slive, an art collector named Armand Hammer, and includes discussion about an expensive Rembrandt painting called "Juno." The article describes the museum's security reaction, the painting's value ($3.25 million), and mentions Hammer's involvement with the museum and his interest in the painting.

3. On the right side is a small black-and-white photo showing three men in suits standing next to a large artwork. The man in the middle is holding or gesturing toward the artwork. The artwork appears to be abstract with textured, possibly sculptural elements.

The combination of clippings and the photo suggests a connection between the art theft, the legal case, and the individuals involved in the art community or investigation.

The image is a newspaper clipping with two articles. The first article is titled "Fogg Robbery Lawyers Appeal Judge's Ruling" and is dated October 7, 1976. The article discusses the trial of four individuals accused of stealing coins from the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University. The article mentions that the lawyers for the defendants have appealed the judge's decision to dismiss charges against them, citing insufficient evidence. The second article is titled "Harvard Independent October 7, 1976" and features an image of three men standing in front of a building. The article discusses Armand Hammer, a wealthy businessman and art collector, who had recently purchased a painting by Rembrandt for $3.95 million. The article mentions that Hammer had requested the painting to be displayed in the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, but the museum had declined the offer. The image of the three men is not clearly visible, but it appears to be a photograph of Armand Hammer and two other individuals.

The image shows a piece of paper with two newspaper clippings pasted on it. The clipping on the left is from the Harvard Crimson, October 7, 1976, and is titled "Fogg Robbery Lawyers Appeal Judge's Ruling." It describes the appeal of lawyers for the defendants in the Fogg Museum robbery case, seeking to dismiss charges or suppress evidence due to alleged prosecutorial misconduct. The clipping on the right is from the Harvard Independent, October 7, 1976, and is titled "Fogg'N Hammer." It discusses the theft of a cardboard box containing valuable art pieces from the Fogg Art Museum, including works by Rembrandt and Picasso, and the subsequent investigation involving Armand Hammer, a prominent art collector and industrialist.