Archives Scrapbooks

The image is a collection of newspaper clippings and articles related to the theft of paintings from the residence of President Bok in July 1976. Here's a detailed summary of the contents:

1. Main Article (Harvard Crimson, July 13, 1976):

   • Title: "Paintings Stolen From Bok Residence Were Not Covered by Insurance Firm But 'Self-Insured,' According to Slive"
   • Author: Peter Frawley
   • Content: The article discusses the theft of five paintings worth $151,000 from President Bok's residence. The paintings, which were on loan from the Fogg Art Museum, were not covered by a special insurance policy but were "self-insured." Seymour Slive, director of the Fogg Art Museum, explains that "self-insurance" means the museum uses its own funds to cover losses. The stolen paintings include works by notable artists such as Bierstadt, Homer, Gifford, and Church. The article also mentions that the FBI, State Police, and Cambridge Police are investigating the theft.

2. Additional Clippings:

   • New York Times (July 17, 1976):
     • Title: "Harvard Offers Reward in Theft"
     • Content: Harvard University is offering a $5,000 reward for information leading to the recovery of the stolen paintings. The paintings were on loan from the Fogg Art Museum and were stolen from President Bok's residence. The article mentions that the paintings are valued at $100,000.
   • Harvard Divided (Date not visible):
     • Content: This clipping discusses the political implications of the theft and the involvement of various law enforcement agencies. It mentions that the FBI, State Police, and Cambridge Police are cooperating in the investigation.
   • Handwritten Note (Date not visible):
     • Content: A handwritten note that appears to be a personal reflection or commentary on the theft, mentioning the involvement of historical societies and the impact on the community.

The clippings are arranged on a board, likely for display or archival purposes, and provide a comprehensive overview of the theft and the subsequent investigations.

The image is a collage of two news articles from the Harvard Crimson, dated July 13, 1976, and the New York Times, dated July 17, 1976, detailing the theft of five Harvard-owned paintings from the residence of President Derek Bok.

1. Harvard Crimson Article (July 13, 1976):

   • Title: "Paintings Stolen From Bok Residence Were Not Covered by Insurance Firm But 'Self-Insured,' According to Slive"
   • Author: Peter Frawley
   • Summary: The article explains that five Harvard-owned paintings worth $370,000 were stolen from President Derek Bok’s home. According to Seymour Slive, director of the Fogg Art Museum, the theft was not covered by insurance, as the paintings were "self-insured." Slive suggested that Harvard might need to establish a special fund for such self-insurance.
   • Details: The stolen paintings included works by Beckeyde, Bouddi, Gifford, and Twachtman. Robert S. Mullen, director of purchasing and insurance, confirmed Harvard had insured these paintings through the American Insurance Association. Harvard's investigation into the theft is ongoing, with the FBI and other agencies involved.

2. New York Times Article (July 17, 1976):

   • Title: "Harvard Offers Reward in Theft"
   • Summary: This article reports Harvard's decision to offer a reward of $25,000 for information leading to the recovery of the stolen paintings. The paintings were part of a loan to the Fogg Art Museum, valued at $100,000 each. Harvard’s investigation includes discussions with the FBI, the Massachusetts State Police, and the Cambridge Police Department.
   • Additional Context: The article mentions the broader significance of the theft, noting the paintings were part of a bicentennial exhibition on the American Revolution.

The images also include photographs of the stolen paintings and a news clipping from the same period, which provides further context and visual evidence of the theft.

The image shows a framed newspaper article from the Harvard Crimson, dated July 13, 1976. The headline reads, "Paintings Stolen From Bok Residence Were Not Covered by Insurance Firm But 'Self-Insured,' According to Slive." The article, written by Peter Rawley, reports that five Harvard-owned paintings, worth $370,000, were stolen from President Bok's house. The article explains that these paintings were not covered by an insurance policy but were considered 'self-insured,' a term that generally means the university assumes the risk of loss or damage and reimburses itself from a special fund. The stolen paintings included works by Frederick Church, John C. Adams, and Edward Hopper, among others. The article also mentions that the Harvard police and the FBI were involved in the investigation.

Additionally, there is a related clipping from the New York Times, dated July 17, 1976, which reports that Harvard University offered a $50,000 reward for information leading to the recovery of the stolen paintings. This reward was part of a broader effort by the university to enhance security and recover the valuable artworks.

The image contains two newspaper articles from July 1976, reporting on the theft of valuable paintings from the residence of former Harvard University President Nathan M. Pusey, which was now occupied by Derek Bok, the current president.

Main Article from Harvard Crimson (July 13, 1976):

Title: Paintings Stolen From Bok Residence Were Not Covered by Insurance Firm But 'Self-Insured,' According to Slive

Content Summary:

• Five Harvard-owned paintings worth $370,000, stolen from President Bok's home, were not insured by an outside insurance company.
• Seymour Slive, director of the Fogg Art Museum, stated that the paintings were "self-insured," meaning Harvard would cover its own losses.
• The stolen works included paintings by notable artists such as Gilbert Stuart, Charles Willson Peale, John Singleton Copley, and Maurice Prendergast.
• The stolen paintings were on loan from the Fogg Art Museum and had been in the Bok residence for aesthetic reasons.
• The FBI and local police were investigating the theft.

Secondary Article from New York Times (July 17, 1976):

Title: Harvard Offers Reward in Theft

Content Summary:

• Harvard University announced a $5,000 reward for information leading to the recovery of the stolen paintings.
• The theft occurred during the night of July 7 from the residence of Harvard's president, Derek Bok.
• The paintings, valued at approximately $1 million, were on loan from the Fogg Art Museum.
• Harvard's insurer would not cover the loss, as the university self-insures its art collection.
• The FBI and local authorities were involved in the investigation, focusing on the security and historical value of the stolen pieces.

Additional Details:

• The paintings included works by Gilbert Stuart, Charles Willson Peale, John Singleton Copley, Maurice Prendergast, and George Bellows.
• The theft raised concerns about security and the handling of valuable art pieces by the university.

The articles together highlight the circumstances of the theft, the financial implications, and the ongoing efforts to recover the stolen artworks.

The image is a collage of newspaper clippings from the Harvard Crimson dated July 13, 1976, and the New York Times dated July 17, 1976, concerning the theft of five valuable paintings from President Derek Bok's residence at Harvard University.

Harvard Crimson Clipping (July 13, 1976):

• Title: "Paintings Stolen From Bok Residence Were Not Covered by Insurance Firm But 'Self-Insured,' According to Slive"
• Author: Peter Frawley
• Summary:
  • Five paintings worth $370,000 were stolen from President Derek Bok's house last week.
  • Seymour Slive, director of the Fogg Art Museum, stated that the paintings were not covered by insurance but were "self-insured."
  • "Self-insurance" is described as a broad term for a special fund created to cover losses.
  • The paintings were on loan from the Fogg Art Museum and had been valued at $100,000 each.
  • The director of purchasing and insurance for Harvard, Robert S. Mullen, mentioned that the university had made arrangements for insurance through a special fund.
  • The investigation into the theft was being led by the Cambridge Police Department and the Harvard Police Department.

New York Times Clipping (July 17, 1976):

• Title: "Harvard Offers Reward in Theft"
• Summary:
  • Harvard University offered a $5,000 reward for information leading to the recovery of the stolen paintings.
  • The paintings were taken from President Bok’s residence on July 8.
  • The reward was announced by the university’s assistant to the president for public affairs, William R. Smith.
  • The paintings included works by Boudin, Beckheyde, Giffard, Twachtman, and another Boudin.
  • The paintings were valued at $100,000 each.
  • The investigation was ongoing with involvement from the FBI, Cambridge Police, and Harvard Police.

Additional Information:

• The Harvard Crimson clipping also includes images of the stolen paintings.
• The New York Times clipping mentions the Harvard Art Museums and their involvement in the investigation.

Overall, the clippings detail the theft, the university's response, and the ongoing investigation into the recovery of the valuable artworks.

The image contains a collection of newspaper clippings related to a significant art theft incident at Harvard University in July 1976.

1. Main Clipping (Top Section):

   • Headline: "Paintings Stolen From Bok Residence Were Not Covered by Insurance Firm But 'Self-Insured,' According to Slive"
   • Date: July 13, 1976, from Harvard Crimson
   • Content: The article reports that five valuable paintings worth $37,000, stolen from President Derek Bok's residence, were not insured by an insurance company but were 'self-insured.' The term 'self-insurance' is explained as a special fund created to cover losses. The paintings were on loan from the Fogg Art Museum and were worth $10,000 each. The article also mentions that the university had no knowledge of the insurance status until the theft was reported.

2. Inserted Clippings:

   • Left Inserted Clipping:

     • Headline: "Harvard Offers Reward in Theft"
     • Date: July 17, 1976, from New York Times
     • Content: Harvard University announced a $5,000 reward for information leading to the recovery of stolen paintings. The article states that the paintings were part of an exhibition and highlights the involvement of the FBI, Cambridge Police, and Harvard Police in the investigation.

   • Right Inserted Clipping:

     • Headline: Part of the New York Times article with a focus on the historical significance of the paintings.
     • Content: It discusses the historical context and importance of the paintings, emphasizing that they were part of a bicentennial exhibition and were loans from various institutions, including the Fogg Art Museum.

3. Images:

   • The top clipping includes two black-and-white photographs of the stolen paintings: one by Boudin and another by Beckeyde, Gifford, and Twachtman.

4. Additional Notes:

   • There are handwritten notes and annotations on the clippings, possibly indicating follow-up information or further details that were relevant to the investigation or recovery process.

The articles collectively highlight the theft of valuable artworks, the university's response, and the subsequent investigation and reward offer for their recovery.

This image displays a collection of newspaper clippings and notes pinned on a board. The primary article is from "The Harvard Crimson," dated July 13, 1976, with the headline "Paintings Stolen From Bok Residence Were Not Covered by Insurance Firm But 'Self-Insured,' According to Slive." Below this main article, there are other pieces including an excerpt from "The New York Times" dated July 17, 1976, with the headline "Harvard Offers Reward in Theft." Aside from these, there are two small handwritten notes, one of which appears to be dated September 1972, but the text is largely unintelligible from the image. Overall, this collection of documents appears to relate to a case of stolen paintings and associated matters such as insurance and a reward for information leading to their recovery.

The image shows a scrapbook page with several newspaper clippings attached to it. The primary and largest article, dated July 13, 1976, is from the Harvard Crimson and is headlined "Paintings Stolen From Bok Residence Were Not Covered by Insurance Firm But ‘Self-Insured,’ According to Slive."

The article discusses the theft of five Harvard-owned paintings valued at $370,000 from President Bok's house. These paintings were not insured by an outside company but were "self-insured," according to Seymour Slive, director of the Fogg Art Museum. The article notes that a sixth painting worth $10,000 was also stolen. There is mention of the investigation by various authorities and the possibility of a reward for information.

Below the headline and main text, there are five images of the stolen paintings with the caption: "The Harvard paintings stolen July 8. Clockwise from upper left: a Boudin, Beckwheyde, another Boudin, Gifford, and Twachtman."

Below this main article on the scrapbook page are smaller clippings, including one from the New York Times dated July 17, 1976, with the headline "Harvard Offers Reward in Theft." It mentions a $5,000 reward offered by Harvard University for information leading to the recovery of six stolen paintings from President Derek Bok's home.

There are also smaller text boxes about a Harvard University exhibition examining political and social upheaval caused by the American Revolution, titled "Harvard Divided," and some partially obscured text from a source identified as "Connoisseur" from September 1976.

The clippings are mounted on a brown paper background with two holes punched on the right side, suggesting this page could be part of a larger scrapbook or archival collection.

The image shows a newspaper clipping with a headline "Paintings Stolen From Bok Residence Were Not Covered by Insurance Firm But 'Self-Insured,' According to Slive" from the Harvard Crimson, dated July 13, 1976. The article discusses the theft of five Harvard-owned paintings worth $10,000, stolen from President Bok's residence by an outside company. Seymour Slive, director of the Fogg Art Museum, declined to cover the losses from a special fund meant for such types of losses. The article also mentions that the paintings were not insured, and the university had handled insurance for several valuable paintings in the past. The article also includes a smaller clipping from the New York Times dated July 17, 1976, which reports that Harvard University had offered a $3,500 reward for the recovery of the stolen paintings.

The image is a document that appears to be a newspaper clipping. It is mounted on a piece of cardboard with a beige background. The clipping is from the "Harvard Crimson" dated July 13, 1976, and features an article titled "Paintings Stolen From Bok Residence Were Not Covered by Insurance Firm But 'Self-Insured,' According to Slive." The article discusses the theft of five Harvard-owned paintings from President Bok's residence and the fact that they were not covered by an insurance firm but were "self-insured."

The article is accompanied by four small black-and-white photographs of the stolen paintings, which depict various scenes, including a cityscape, a river with boats, and a landscape with a large rock formation. The photographs are arranged in a grid format.

Below the main article, there is a smaller clipping from the "New York Times" dated July 17, 1976, titled "Harvard Offers Reward in Theft." This clipping announces that Harvard University has offered a $5,000 reward for the recovery of the stolen paintings.

Additionally, there is a handwritten note on the cardboard that reads "CANNOT BE SUR." This note is not clearly legible, but it appears to be a comment or annotation related to the document.

The document also includes a smaller clipping with a photograph of a man and a brief caption, but the content of this clipping is not fully visible in the image provided.