Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V. Rinse, repeat.
ARCH.2003.39, Rendition: 806763
This image displays a newspaper clipping mounted on a light brown file folder, likely for archival purposes. The collection of clippings details a high-profile theft of artworks from the residence of Harvard University President Derek Bok in July 1976.
Main Article (Harvard Crimson, July 13, 1976):
The dominant article, authored by Peter Frawley, is titled:
“Paintings Stolen From Bok Residence Were Not Covered by Insurance Firm But ‘Self-Insured,’ According to Slive”
It reports that five paintings, valued at $370,000, were stolen from President Bok’s home. The paintings, which were on loan from the Fogg Art Museum, were “self-insured” — meaning Harvard assumed the risk internally rather than purchasing insurance from an outside company.
The article features a composite image of the five stolen paintings, arranged in a 2x3 grid:
The article quotes Seymour Slive, director of the Fogg Art Museum, explaining “self-insurance” and noting that another painting, owned by President Bok and valued at $10,000, was also stolen. A Harvard official, Robert S. Mullen, acknowledged the office had previously arranged insurance for other loans.
New York Times Article (July 17, 1976):
A smaller clipping from the New York Times on the left side features the headline:
“Harvard Offers Reward in Theft”
It reports that Harvard offered a $5,000 reward for information leading to the recovery of the six stolen paintings. The article confirms the paintings were valued at $380,000, with five on loan from the Fogg Museum and one belonging to the Bok family. It notes the paintings were stolen on the night of July 8, and specifies that two were by the French Impressionist Eugène Boudin, each valued at $100,000.
Additional Clipping:
A third, partially obscured article headline reads “HARVARD DIVIDED” and discusses the Fogg Art Museum’s upcoming Bicentennial exhibition on political and social upheaval during the American Revolution. It mentions Linda Ayres assembling materials from the Fogg, Harvard College, the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, and other institutions.
Annotation:
There is a handwritten note on the folder beneath the clipping that reads:
“CANNONSBURG, Sept. 1976”
Overall:
The image captures a documented media response to a significant art theft from a university president’s residence, highlighting institutional risk management (“self-insurance”), the value and origin of the stolen works (mostly by Boudin and Twachtman), and the university’s public effort to recover them with a reward offer. The clipping is preserved as a historical record, potentially filed under an annotation referencing “Cannonsburg” in September 1976.
The image appears to be a collection of newspaper clippings and a typed note, all of which seem to be related to a theft incident involving paintings from the Bok Residence at Harvard University. Here is a breakdown of the content:
Headline: "Paintings Stolen From Bok Residence Were Not Covered by Insurance Firm But 'Self-Insured,' According to Slive"
Images: Four small photographs depict different paintings that were stolen, with captions identifying the artists: Boudin, Beckheyde, another Boudin, Gifford, and Twachtman.
The overall context of these clippings suggests that the image is part of a collection documenting the aftermath of the theft of paintings from Harvard University and the subsequent efforts by the university to recover them.
This image shows a collection of newspaper clippings and a handwritten note, all related to the theft of paintings from the Bok residence at Harvard University. The clippings are pasted on a brown sheet of paper.
Top Clipping (Harvard Crimson, July 13, 1976):
Bottom Left Clipping (New York Times, July 17, 1976):
Bottom Middle Clipping:
Handwritten Note:
The overall theme of the image is the theft of valuable paintings from the Bok residence and the subsequent investigation and reward offer by Harvard University.
The image is a document that appears to be a newspaper clipping. It is mounted on a piece of cardboard with a beige background. The clipping is from the "Harvard Crimson" dated July 13, 1976, and features an article titled "Paintings Stolen From Bok Residence Were Not Covered by Insurance Firm But 'Self-Insured,' According to Slive." The article discusses the theft of five Harvard-owned paintings from President Bok's residence and the fact that they were not covered by an insurance firm but were "self-insured."
The article is accompanied by four small black-and-white photographs of the stolen paintings, which depict various scenes, including a cityscape, a river with boats, and a landscape with a large rock formation. The photographs are arranged in a grid format.
Below the main article, there is a smaller clipping from the "New York Times" dated July 17, 1976, titled "Harvard Offers Reward in Theft." This clipping announces that Harvard University has offered a $5,000 reward for the recovery of the stolen paintings.
Additionally, there is a handwritten note on the cardboard that reads "CANNOT BE SUR." This note is not clearly legible, but it appears to be a comment or annotation related to the document.
The document also includes a smaller clipping with a photograph of a man and a brief caption, but the content of this clipping is not fully visible in the image provided.
The image shows a newspaper clipping with a headline "Paintings Stolen From Bok Residence Were Not Covered by Insurance Firm But 'Self-Insured,' According to Slive" from the Harvard Crimson, dated July 13, 1976. The article discusses the theft of five Harvard-owned paintings worth $10,000, stolen from President Bok's residence by an outside company. Seymour Slive, director of the Fogg Art Museum, declined to cover the losses from a special fund meant for such types of losses. The article also mentions that the paintings were not insured, and the university had handled insurance for several valuable paintings in the past. The article also includes a smaller clipping from the New York Times dated July 17, 1976, which reports that Harvard University had offered a $3,500 reward for the recovery of the stolen paintings.
The image is a collage of three newspaper clippings, each presenting different aspects of a significant art theft incident involving Harvard University and its associated institutions. Here is a detailed description of each section:
The collage highlights a major art theft incident at Harvard University, the university's response (including a reward offer), and a concurrent controversy over an upcoming exhibition at the Fogg Art Museum. The articles collectively illustrate the intersection of crime, institutional response, and academic debate within the university setting.
This is an archival-style arrangement of articles and clippings mounted on a brown sheet of paper. The main focus is a news article from Harvard Crimson dated July 13, 1976, with the headline, "Paintings Stolen From Bok Residence Were Not Covered by Insurance Firm But 'Self-Insured,' According to Slive." The text outlines details about stolen Harvard-connected paintings and how their insurance status was addressed by authorities.
Below the primary article are smaller clippings, including one from the New York Times (dated July 17, 1976) titled "Harvard Offers Reward in Theft," which details a $5,000 reward being offered for the recovery of the stolen artworks. There’s also a smaller piece labeled "Connoisseur Sept. 1976," which discusses related cultural or curatorial matters.
The articles prominently feature black-and-white reproductions of the missing paintings, credited to artists such as Claude Lorrain and Gifford. The images depict serene landscapes, seascapes, and classic pastoral scenes.
Two punched holes on the right side suggest the page was part of a binder. Overall, the display reflects an investigative and historical look into the theft of significant artworks and the institutional responses surrounding their recovery.
This image displays a collection of newspaper clippings and notes pinned on a board. The primary article is from "The Harvard Crimson," dated July 13, 1976, with the headline "Paintings Stolen From Bok Residence Were Not Covered by Insurance Firm But 'Self-Insured,' According to Slive." Below this main article, there are other pieces including an excerpt from "The New York Times" dated July 17, 1976, with the headline "Harvard Offers Reward in Theft." Aside from these, there are two small handwritten notes, one of which appears to be dated September 1972, but the text is largely unintelligible from the image. Overall, this collection of documents appears to relate to a case of stolen paintings and associated matters such as insurance and a reward for information leading to their recovery.
The image shows a scrapbook page with several newspaper clippings attached to it. The primary and largest article, dated July 13, 1976, is from the Harvard Crimson and is headlined "Paintings Stolen From Bok Residence Were Not Covered by Insurance Firm But ‘Self-Insured,’ According to Slive."
The article discusses the theft of five Harvard-owned paintings valued at $370,000 from President Bok's house. These paintings were not insured by an outside company but were "self-insured," according to Seymour Slive, director of the Fogg Art Museum. The article notes that a sixth painting worth $10,000 was also stolen. There is mention of the investigation by various authorities and the possibility of a reward for information.
Below the headline and main text, there are five images of the stolen paintings with the caption: "The Harvard paintings stolen July 8. Clockwise from upper left: a Boudin, Beckwheyde, another Boudin, Gifford, and Twachtman."
Below this main article on the scrapbook page are smaller clippings, including one from the New York Times dated July 17, 1976, with the headline "Harvard Offers Reward in Theft." It mentions a $5,000 reward offered by Harvard University for information leading to the recovery of six stolen paintings from President Derek Bok's home.
There are also smaller text boxes about a Harvard University exhibition examining political and social upheaval caused by the American Revolution, titled "Harvard Divided," and some partially obscured text from a source identified as "Connoisseur" from September 1976.
The clippings are mounted on a brown paper background with two holes punched on the right side, suggesting this page could be part of a larger scrapbook or archival collection.
A mounted collage of newspaper clippings. The central piece is a Harvard Crimson article (July 13, 1976) with a large headline: “Paintings Stolen From Bok Residence Were Not Covered by Insurance Firm But ‘Self-Insured,’ According to Slive,” by Peter Frawley. The page is flanked by several small black-and-white photos of paintings and related scenes. There are additional clippings at the bottom from the New York Times (July 17, 1976) and other cutouts with headings like “Harvard Divided” and a strip labeled “CONNOISSEUR.” The clippings are mounted on a tan/brown backing with binder holes visible along the sides, giving an archival display look.