Archives Scrapbooks

The image shows a newspaper article titled "Modern Art Void." The article discusses the challenges faced by the Fine Arts Department at Harvard due to the lack of a senior medievalist and the difficulty in finding a qualified modern art scholar. The text mentions Professor Henri Zerner, who heads the search committee, and his views on the importance of intellectual pursuits and the need for a critical establishment in modern art. The article also references the departure of Fried, a former candidate for tenure, and the department's struggle to find a suitable replacement. The text highlights the concerns of some faculty members, such as Grabar, who believe that the department should not rush into hiring just to fill a position but should wait for the right candidate. The article concludes with the committee's hope of finding a suitable candidate within the next fifteen years.

The image is a newspaper article titled "Modern Art Void," which discusses the challenges and concerns within the Fine Arts Department at Harvard University regarding the hiring and retention of modern art scholars.

1. Context and Background:

   • The article mentions an informal search committee formed by the Fine Arts Department to consider candidates for tenure.
   • Fred, a prominent candidate, is mentioned in connection with this committee, although his position is uncertain.

2. Fred's Candidacy:

   • Rosenfield, a faculty member, states that Fred was long considered for the position but ultimately resigned.
   • The article highlights mixed opinions about Fred’s qualifications and the department's approach to his candidacy.

3. Professor Henri Zerner’s Perspective:

   • Zerner, chairing the committee, states that Fred was discussed but not immediately considered for an immediate tenure position.
   • He also mentions that some questions about Fred’s scholarship were raised, though not all were negative. Zerner adds that Fred's work was controversial but recognized.

4. Criticism and Bias:

   • Professor Murphy, a graduate student, criticizes the Fine Arts Department’s actions, stating Fred was not particularly competent for tenure but was controversial and had a significant voice.
   • Murphy suggests there might be political factors influencing the department’s decisions.

5. Fred's Departure:

   • Fred, interviewed in Baltimore, decided to leave Harvard due to personal reasons and has been teaching elsewhere for seven years.

6. Challenges in Hiring Modern Art Scholars:

   • The article highlights the difficulty in finding a suitable modern art scholar. Rosenfield notes that the department has been without a senior medievalist and has faced long-term challenges in securing a qualified modern art scholar.
   • Grabar, another faculty member, expresses concern that modern art scholarship is not in high esteem, and there is a lack of critical establishment defining good scholarship.

7. Specifics on Hiring:

   • Rosenfield mentions that while there are qualified prospects, the department has been waiting for fifteen years without securing the right individual.
   • Grabar emphasizes the need for a critical approach to modern art, which is often neglected.

8. General Commentary:

   • The article suggests that the department is facing significant challenges in maintaining a robust and diverse faculty in modern art.

Overall, the article captures the internal debates, challenges, and the broader issues within the Fine Arts Department at Harvard regarding modern art scholarship.

The image is a clipping from a newspaper article titled "Modern Art Void." The article discusses the challenges faced by the Fine Arts Department at Harvard in filling a tenure-track position in modern art.

Key points from the article include:

1. Committee Composition: A committee composed of three or four faculty members from the University and three or four outside scholars was formed to evaluate candidates for the tenure position.

2. Candidacy of Fried: Fried, a controversial scholar, was initially considered but ultimately rejected for tenure. His rejection was due to various factors, including political considerations within the department. Fried's departure was attributed to personal reasons, and he left for Johns Hopkins.

3. Departmental Politics: The article highlights the internal politics and controversies within the Fine Arts Department. There was a significant amount of debate and differing opinions about Fried's qualifications and the reasons for his rejection.

4. Difficulty in Hiring: The article emphasizes the difficulty of finding qualified scholars in modern art. It mentions that the department has been waiting for up to fifteen years to find an outstanding scholar, and it has had periods without a senior medievalist.

5. Low Esteem of Modern Art: The article notes that modern art scholarship is not held in high esteem. It points out that modern art scholars often lack the critical establishment and traditional support seen in other fields, which can deter qualified candidates.

6. Language Barriers: The article discusses the language barriers and the snobbery within the profession, suggesting that the lack of fluency in languages other than English can be a disadvantage for modern art scholars.

7. Current Search: The search committee is looking for a qualified candidate to fill the position, but the process is challenging due to the low esteem and the unique difficulties in the field of modern art.

8. Future Prospects: The department is cautiously optimistic about finding a suitable candidate for the tenure position next year but acknowledges the ongoing challenges in the field.

The article concludes with a note of frustration and a desire to avoid short-term solutions that might lead to long-term issues.

The image contains a newspaper clipping with an article titled "Modern Art Void." The article discusses the challenges faced by Harvard University's Fine Arts Department in securing tenure for a modern art scholar, Fried.

Key points from the article include:

1. Committee Composition: The tenure committee was composed of three or four faculty members from the University and three or four outside scholars. Fine arts professors could only testify for or against the candidate, not sit on the committee.

2. Departmental Support: Rosenfield, a department member, stated that the Fine Arts Department would have given Fried strong support for tenure. However, despite this support, Fried's tenure was not granted.

3. Criticism of Fried’s Work: Several faculty members expressed concerns about Fried's scholarship and the department's decision-making process. Professor Zerner, who led the search committee, mentioned that Fried was not considered for an immediate tenure position due to concerns about his scholarship.

4. Lack of Esteem for Modern Art: The article highlights the broader issue of modern art not being held in high esteem within academic circles. It mentions that modern art scholarship is often seen as less secure and intellectually rigorous compared to traditional fields.

5. Language and Training Barriers: Grabar, a professor, points out that within the profession, those dealing with modern art are often less considered, and there is a language barrier, with fewer people speaking multiple languages required for modern art scholarship.

6. Political and Personal Factors: Fried’s departure from Harvard was attributed to personal reasons, and he moved to Johns Hopkins University. The article suggests that political factors within the department may have influenced the decision against granting Fried tenure.

7. Future Prospects: The article notes that Harvard is waiting for an outstanding medievalist and is optimistic about finding a significant prospect for tenure in modern art in the future.

8. Long-term Strategy: The department aims to avoid short-term solutions and focuses on finding the right person for long-term positions in modern art.

The overall tone of the article reflects the challenges and controversies surrounding the appointment and tenure process for modern art scholars in prestigious academic institutions.

The image is a newspaper article discussing the status and issues within a university's Fine Arts Department, specifically focusing on the candidacy of Michael Fried for tenure and the overall scholarship environment in modern art.

Key points include:

1. Composition of Tenure Committee:

   • The tenure committee consisted of three or four faculty members from the University and three or four external scholars. No Fine Arts professors were included on this committee.

2. Michael Fried's Candidacy:

   • The Fine Arts Department had strong support for Michael Fried's tenure. However, Fried resigned his candidacy abruptly.
   • Professor Henri Zerner, head of an informal search committee, denied that Fried's position was definite or clear, despite some claims to the contrary.
   • Zerner mentioned that while Fried was discussed seriously, there were questions about his scholarship, and some members were unsure if recommending Fried for tenure would have been a mistake.

3. Criticism of Fried:

   • Siegfried Giedion, a graduate student under Fried, was more critical, suggesting that Fried might not have been competent for tenure due to his controversial nature and the perception of bias within the department.

4. Fried's Move:

   • Fried left for Johns Hopkins University for personal reasons, finding the opportunity too good to pass up.

5. Scholarship Environment:

   • The article discusses the overall low esteem of modern art scholarship, particularly at Harvard. Modern art is considered less secure and not as intellectually rigorous compared to traditional fields.
   • There is a fear among art historians that modern art is not taken seriously, and this sentiment affects the department's reputation and ability to attract qualified modernists.

6. Prospects for Tenure:

   • The department faces challenges in finding a qualified replacement for Fried. According to Professor Zerner, the department has gone many years without a senior medievalist and may continue without a senior modernist.
   • Zerner is pessimistic about the immediate future, indicating that the department's prospects for tenure-worthy candidates are slim.

Overall, the article highlights the complexities and challenges within the Fine Arts Department regarding tenure decisions, scholarship standards, and the academic environment for modern art.

The image contains a newspaper article discussing the challenges and controversies surrounding the appointment of a tenured professor in the Fine Arts Department at Harvard University. Key points include:

1. Committee Composition: A committee, which includes faculty members and outside scholars, is tasked with recommending a candidate for tenure. Fine arts professors can only testify for or against tenure candidates.

2. Fried's Candidacy: The article focuses on a candidate named Fried, who has strong support from some faculty but faces opposition from others. Recent controversies, such as a dispute over Ephraim Isaac's candidacy, highlight the complexities of departmental support for tenure.

3. Rosenfield's Resignation: Professor Rosenfield, who was a candidate for tenure, resigned, which affected the department's dynamics. His resignation was seen as a significant loss by some faculty members.

4. Zerner's Search Committee: Professor Henri Zerner, heading the search committee, acknowledges that Fried's position was not as clear as claimed by Rosenfield. The committee considered Fried but did not unanimously support him.

5. Murphy's Criticism: Murphy, a graduate student who worked under Fried, criticizes the department's actions and questions Fried's competency for tenure, citing departmental politics and biases.

6. Fried's Response: Fried, currently at Johns Hopkins, comments on the situation, stating that personal reasons led to his departure from Harvard and declining to comment further.

7. Modern Art Scholarship: The article discusses the broader issue of modern art scholarship being undervalued at Harvard. Professor Grabar notes the difficulty in finding qualified scholars and the department's reluctance to fill the position quickly, preferring to wait for the right candidate.

8. High Art in Low Esteem: The article highlights the low esteem in which modern art scholarship is held, with fears that modern art historians are not grounded enough in intellectual pursuits. The language barrier, particularly the need for French, is also mentioned as a challenge.

Overall, the article underscores the political and academic challenges in appointing a tenured professor in the Fine Arts Department at Harvard, with a focus on the specific case of Fried and the broader issues of modern art scholarship.

This image shows an article or a piece of text printed on standard white paper with a header that reads "Modern Art Void." The document seems to have been intentionally arranged in a particular manner to fit within the frame of the image. On the left side, a slightly crumpled smaller piece of paper with some text on it overlaps onto the larger piece, partially covering the text beneath. The snippet of text visible on the smaller piece indicates that it's a continuation from another page.

The main text covers topics seemingly relating to academia, discussions of modern art, and possibly faculty considerations such as tenure and scholarly reputation. Names and direct quotations suggest an argument or discussion about the value of modern art in academic circles and the appointment of faculty members at an educational institution.

It's worth noting that this image seems to be staged for illustrative purposes, as the smaller piece of paper is placed in such a way to obscure some of the text, perhaps to draw attention to specific parts of the article or create a certain aesthetic. The text content appears to be concerned with professional opinions and judgments in the field of art studies, specifically modern art and its perceived importance or relevance within an academic setting.

The image depicts a section of a newspaper article titled "Modern Art Void" and "High Art in Low Esteem." The article discusses the challenges and difficulties in finding qualified scholars for a tenure position in modern art at an unnamed institution, likely Harvard University. The text is presented in a somewhat fragmented manner, with parts of the text cut off or obscured, giving it an antique, aged appearance.

The article highlights the skepticism and low esteem in which modern art scholarship is held, contrasting it with more traditional fields. It mentions Fried Rosenfield, a candidate for the tenure position, who was initially considered but ultimately not recommended due to concerns about his scholarship and political biases. The article quotes various faculty members expressing their doubts about the viability of modern art as a field of study and the lack of critical scholarship.

The article also touches on the personal reasons why Fried Rosenfield decided to leave Harvard, citing a desire for a change after teaching there for seven years. The overall tone of the article is one of concern and frustration regarding the state of modern art scholarship and the difficulty in finding suitable candidates for academic positions in this field.

Description of the Image:

The image shows a page from a printed document or newspaper, featuring a dense block of text. The content appears to be an article discussing academic and professional issues related to modern art scholarship and tenure decisions at Harvard University. Here’s a detailed breakdown:

Layout and Structure:

• Text Content: The page is filled with continuous text, formatted in a standard newspaper or magazine style. The text is arranged in justified columns, with clear paragraph breaks and headings.
• Headings: There are visible section headings, such as:
  • "Continued from page 3": Indicates that this is a continuation of a story or article from a previous page.
  • "Modern Art Void": A prominent heading at the top right, suggesting the main theme or title of the article.
• Page Number: The number "10" is visible at the top right corner, indicating this is page 10 of the publication.

Content Overview:

The article discusses the challenges faced by modern art scholars in securing tenure positions, particularly at prestigious institutions like Harvard. Key points include:

1. Tenure and Academic Standards:

   • The article highlights the difficulty of obtaining tenure in modern art, especially compared to traditional fields.
   • It mentions the case of a scholar named Fried, who resigned from Harvard, and the subsequent search for a replacement.

2. Controversy and Debate:

   • There is discussion about Fried’s qualifications and the controversy surrounding his tenure candidacy.
   • Quotes from various individuals, including faculty members and department heads, provide insights into the internal debates and opinions.

3. Modern Art Scholarship:

   • The article critiques the perceived lack of rigor or intellectual depth in modern art scholarship.
   • It contrasts modern art with traditional fields, suggesting that modern art is often viewed as less scholarly or rigorous.

4. Harvard’s Position:

   • The article addresses Harvard’s stance on modern art scholarship, noting that the university has struggled to find qualified candidates for tenure positions in this field.
   • There is mention of a search committee and the challenges of identifying suitable scholars.

5. Quotes and Perspectives:

   • The text includes direct quotes from individuals such as Professor Henri Zerner, Dean Pipkin, and others, providing diverse viewpoints on the issue.
   • The quotes reveal tensions between academic standards, political considerations, and institutional priorities.

Visual Elements:

• Text Density: The page is densely packed with text, leaving little white space, which is typical of newspaper or academic publications.
• Typography: The font appears to be a standard serif typeface, commonly used in printed media for readability.
• Overlapping Pages: In the top-left corner, there is a glimpse of another page or sheet of paper, slightly overlapping the main page. This suggests the image may have been taken from a stack of printed materials or a bound document.

Themes and Tone:

• Critical Tone: The article adopts a critical tone, questioning the value and rigor of modern art scholarship.
• Academic Debate: It reflects ongoing debates within academia about the legitimacy and standards of modern art as a scholarly discipline.
• Institutional Challenges: The focus on Harvard highlights broader issues faced by universities in recruiting and retaining scholars in niche or controversial fields.

Summary:

The image depicts a page from a publication discussing the challenges of modern art scholarship and tenure decisions at Harvard University. The article critiques the perceived lack of rigor in modern art studies, highlights internal controversies surrounding a specific scholar’s tenure, and explores the difficulties institutions face in recruiting qualified scholars for such positions. The dense text, structured layout, and inclusion of direct quotes suggest a journalistic or analytical approach to the topic.

The image depicts a collage of newspaper clippings, with the main focus on an article discussing the challenges and controversies surrounding the appointment of a tenure candidate in the Fine Arts Department of an institution, possibly Harvard University. The article highlights the debate over the qualifications and suitability of the candidate, named Fried, for a tenured position.

The topmost clipping is a headline that reads "Modern Art Void," suggesting a critique or discussion about the state of modern art education or scholarship. Below this, there are several smaller clippings, each containing fragments of text that contribute to the overall narrative.

The main article, which is the most prominent clipping, discusses the Fine Arts Department's tenure committee's decision-making process. It mentions that Fried, who has been a tenure candidate, has faced opposition from some faculty members, including Dean Pipkin and Professor Henri Zerner. The article quotes various faculty members expressing their opinions on Fried's candidacy.

Dean Pipkin is quoted as saying that Fried's tenure would have been supported by a committee composed of faculty from outside the university and scholars from within. However, the article also notes that Fried's mental support has not necessarily led to a tenured appointment.

Professor Henri Zerner, who heads an informal search committee formed by the Fine Arts Department, is quoted as denying that Fried's tenure position was as definite or as clear as Rosenfeld claims. Zerner mentions that Fried was discussed seriously but not for an immediate position. He also mentions that there were questions about Fried's scholarship and some justified criticism of the Fine Arts Department's actions.

The article also includes comments from other faculty members, such as Murphy, who did graduate work under Fried. Murphy is quoted as saying that Fried was not competent for tenure and that he was a competent scholar but sometimes considered too formalist.

Fried himself is quoted as stating that he left Harvard for personal reasons and that it made sense to change when he did. He declined to comment on his time at Harvard.

The article reflects a complex and contentious debate within the Fine Arts Department regarding the appointment of a tenure candidate, highlighting the challenges of finding a qualified scholar in modern art and the difficulties of maintaining long-term scholarly continuity.