Archives Scrapbooks

The image shows a page from a newspaper or magazine titled "Modern Art Void," dated October 4-10, 1975. The article discusses the tenure controversy surrounding a candidate named Fried at Harvard University's Fine Arts Department. Key points include:

1. Committee Composition: The committee evaluating Fried's tenure included three or four members from within the department and three or four outside scholars.

2. Departmental Support: Fine arts professors supported Fried's tenure, while tenured medievalists did not.

3. Rosenfeld's Stance: Dean Rosovsky and Dean Piskin were neutral. Professor Henri Zerner, who led the informal search committee, denied any political motivations in opposing Fried's tenure.

4. Fried's Qualifications: Fried was described as a competent scholar but not exceptional. He was noted for his published work and teaching but lacked administrative experience.

5. External Opinions: Outside scholars had mixed views on Fried's work, with some praising his scholarship and others finding it controversial.

6. Harvard's Decision: Fried left Harvard for Johns Hopkins due to the lack of tenure. He cited the university's reluctance to grant tenure to modern art scholars, noting that Harvard had not tenured a modern art scholar in fifteen years.

7. Departmental Dynamics: The article highlights the internal politics and disagreements within the Fine Arts Department, particularly between medievalists and modern art scholars.

8. Grabar's Role: André Grabar, a medievalist, was mentioned as a potential candidate for the position but was deemed unsuitable due to his lack of modern art expertise.

The article reflects the complexities and controversies surrounding academic tenure decisions, particularly in the field of fine arts.

The image shows a page from a newspaper or magazine article dated November 4-10, 1975, discussing the hiring and tenure process for a professor in the Fine Arts Department at Harvard University. Here are the detailed observations:

1. Context and Headline:

   • The main article is titled "Modern Art Void" and appears to be about the challenges in hiring qualified faculty members in the field of modern art.

2. Content Summary:

   • Tenure Committee and Candidates:

     • The committee, which includes Dean Rosovsky and Dean Pipkin, is made up of faculty members from the University and outside scholars.
     • No fine arts professors are on the committee, and they can only vote for or against candidates but not influence the hiring process directly.
     • The committee considered candidates like Fried, Ephraim Isaac, and others, with some concerns raised about Fried’s suitability for tenure.

   • Henri Zerner's Role:

     • Zerner heads an informal search committee for the Fine Arts Department. He expressed his view that Fried’s tenure was questionable due to his controversial and sometimes biased views.

   • Fred’s Background:

     • Fred (Fried) was considered a strong candidate but had reservations due to his controversial nature and past biases.
     • He was mentioned as a possible candidate but ultimately not recommended for tenure.

   • Criticism and Perspectives:

     • Rosenfield and other committee members had differing opinions on Fried’s qualifications and biases.
     • Fried’s departure from Harvard was discussed, and he had expressed personal reasons for leaving.

   • High Art Scholarship:

     • There is a general consensus that modern art scholarship is in low esteem, with some professors focusing more on French language studies than on the intellectual depth of modern art.

   • Commentary by Grabar:

     • Grabar points out that the difficulty lies in finding a qualified professor who can fulfill a long-term position in modern art. He mentions that waiting for the right person might take years.

3. Additional Notes:

   • There is mention of a debate on the value of waiting for the right candidate versus accepting a less qualified one, highlighting the long-term commitment required for faculty positions.

4. Overall Context:

   • The article reflects the difficulties and complexities in academic hiring, the need for a balance between qualified candidates and institutional biases, and the challenges of maintaining high standards in modern art scholarship.

This detailed summary encapsulates the main points and discussions regarding the hiring and tenure processes within the Fine Arts Department at Harvard University during that period.

The document is a news article discussing the tenure process of a professor, Fried, at a university. Key points include the formation of a search committee, with Dean Rosovsky and Dean Pipkin involved, and the possibility of including outside scholars. There is mention of potential bias due to Fried's previous work under Professor Henri Zerner, who also serves on the search committee. Concerns are raised about the difficulty of finding a suitable candidate for the Fine Arts Department, with modern art scholarship being particularly challenging. The article also notes that Fried has decided to leave for Johns Hopkins University, and there is speculation about the future of the medievalist position at the university. The difficulty in finding a long-term replacement is highlighted, with the possibility of waiting up to fifteen years for the right candidate.

The image is a newspaper clipping from November 10, 1975, containing an article titled "Modern Art Void." The article discusses the tenure denial of an art scholar named Fried at Harvard University and the broader implications for the field of modern art scholarship.

Key points include:

1. Denial of Tenure for Fried:

   • The Fine Arts Department at Harvard had strong support for Fried, but his candidacy for tenure was ultimately not approved by higher authorities.
   • Dean Rosovsky mentioned that while Fried had considerable support, it wasn't enough to secure tenure.
   • Fried was noted for his eminence in modern French art studies, particularly in the 19th century.

2. Critique of the Tenure Process:

   • Professor Henri Zerner, a member of the Fine Arts Department, expressed concerns about the tenure process, stating it was overly political and lacked consideration for the candidate's actual merits.
   • Zerner felt that the decision against Fried was unjust and criticized the criteria used for tenure decisions.

3. Implications for Modern Art Scholarship:

   • The article highlights a perceived lack of esteem for modern art scholarship at Harvard and other institutions.
   • It is suggested that modern art historians face more difficulty in gaining recognition compared to scholars in other fields, such as medieval art.
   • Zerner and others lament the shortage of qualified modernist scholars and the difficulty in filling such academic positions.

4. Personal Reactions and Future Plans:

   • Zerner expresses his discontent and considers leaving Harvard due to the decision.
   • The article mentions that Zerner's expertise and the department's needs are not being met by the current decision.
   • The situation reflects broader issues in the recognition and support of modern art as a legitimate academic field.

Overall, the article underscores a significant controversy within Harvard's Fine Arts Department over tenure decisions and the perceived undervaluation of modern art scholarship.

The image shows a page from a newspaper, specifically a section titled "Modern Art Void," dated November 4-10, 1975. The article discusses the tenure process of a professor named Fried within the Fine Arts Department at Harvard University.

Key points from the article include:

1. Committee Composition: The tenure committee, chaired by Dean Rosovsky and Dean Pipkin, consists of three to four faculty members from Harvard and three or four outside scholars.

2. Tenure Process: The committee can only testify for or against a candidate's tenure, not make the final decision. Dean Rosovsky mentions that the Fine Arts Department has strong support from members of the Harvard Corporation.

3. Fried's Candidacy: Fried, a candidate for tenure, was considered by the committee. Despite the controversy surrounding his work, the committee was divided on whether to recommend him for tenure. Some members were concerned about Fried's political biases and the nature of his scholarship.

4. Scholarship and Politics: Professor Henri Zerner, who led the search committee, believes Fried is not competent for tenure. He mentions that Fried’s work is controversial and politically charged. Fried himself stated that he was not offered tenure due to his political views and biases against him.

5. Harvard's Stance: Fried moved to Johns Hopkins after Harvard's decision, stating he had personal reasons for leaving. He was not given tenure, partly due to the political climate at Harvard.

6. Modern Art Scholarship: The article discusses the difficulty of finding qualified scholars in modern art who can meet the high standards for tenure. It highlights the challenges faced by Harvard in this regard, with some scholars being more suitable for smaller institutions.

7. Long-Term Perspective: The article also mentions the long-term implications of Harvard's modern art scholarship and the need for a more dedicated and secure position for such scholars.

The overall tone of the article reflects a critical view of the tenure process and the political influences within academic departments, particularly in the field of modern art.

The image shows a newspaper clipping from the Harvard Crimson, dated November 4-10, 1975, discussing the tenure decision for a professor of Fine Arts, identified as Fried. The article is titled "Modern Art Void."

Key points from the article include:

1. Tenure Committee Composition:

   • The committee consisted of three or four faculty members from the University and three or four outside scholars.
   • Dean Rosovsky and Dean Pipkin were part of this committee.

2. Reasons for Fried's Rejection:

   • Fried was not recommended for tenure, despite being considered a strong candidate initially.
   • The decision was not unanimous; some members had reservations about Fried’s work.
   • Fried’s work was seen as controversial and potentially not aligned with the traditional expectations of scholarship in the Fine Arts department.

3. Criticisms and Concerns:

   • Fried’s work was viewed as "too political" and "not in the department's mainstream."
   • There were concerns about Fried's methodology and the nature of his scholarship, particularly in relation to modern art.
   • Fried was accused of not having a clear position on modern art scholarship, and his work was seen as not being well-established enough in the field.

4. Fried's Response:

   • Fried resigned his position at Harvard and moved to Johns Hopkins, citing personal reasons and dissatisfaction with the tenure decision.

5. Opinions of Department Members:

   • Henri Zerner, head of the search committee, expressed that Fried was not considered competent for tenure.
   • Zerner and others mentioned the challenges in evaluating modern art, which they considered not to be held in high esteem within the department.
   • There were discussions about the difficulty of finding qualified scholars in modern art, with some faculty members expressing reluctance to support Fried’s scholarship.

6. Additional Context:

   • The article also discusses the broader challenges in modern art scholarship, with some faculty members expressing doubts about the quality and acceptance of Fried's work in the academic community.
   • There is mention of the department's preference for traditional scholarship and the difficulty in evaluating modern art's intellectual rigor.

The article reflects the internal debates and tensions within the Fine Arts department regarding the evaluation and acceptance of modern art scholarship at that time.

The image shows a newspaper clipping with an article that appears to be about academic discussions regarding faculty positions, with a specific focus on the arts and modern art in particular. The headline "Modern Art Void" draws attention to the main topic. The article includes direct quotations from individuals involved in the conversation.

At the top of the paper, we can see the continuation of an article from page 3, mentioning names like Dean Rosovsky and a committee that would be formed from three or four members from outside the university. It seems to discuss the hiring or appointment process for faculty and the challenges associated with it.

There's a reference to an "Especially Empty Slot," indicating a particular vacancy or need in the department that's being discussed. The article debates the qualifications and dynamics involved in appointing someone to a faculty position in the arts, potentially highlighting issues of hiring policies or disagreements about what constitutes a valid candidate. Furthermore, it appears to touch upon the philosophical debates about the value and interpretation of modern art in academic circles.

The date on the right side of the image suggests that this newspaper edition was from April 10, 1975. The layout, font, and style of the newspaper are consistent with publications from the mid-20th century, and the paper itself shows signs of age with slight discoloration and frayed edges.

The image shows a newspaper clipping with two articles. The first article is titled "Modern Art Void" and discusses the difficulty of finding qualified scholars in modern art at Harvard University. The second article is titled "Fried's Tenure" and discusses the tenure of Fried, a professor at Harvard, and the controversy surrounding his appointment. The image is blurry, and the text is difficult to read.

The image shows a page from a newspaper or magazine article titled "Modern Art Void", dated November 4-10, 1975. The page appears to be part of a larger article discussing academic and professional issues, particularly focusing on the Fine Arts Department at Harvard University.

Key Observations:

1. Content Overview:

   • The article discusses the tenure process and the challenges faced by faculty members, specifically mentioning Dean Rosofsky and Dean Pipkin, who were part of a committee evaluating candidates for tenure.
   • The text highlights the controversial nature of the Fine Arts Department, with debates over the quality of scholarship and the criteria for tenure.
   • It references Professor Henri Zerner, who was involved in an informal search committee to assess Fried's candidacy for tenure. Zerner is quoted as denying the existence of a "definitive prospect" for Fried's position, leading to tensions within the department.

2. Key Themes:

   • Tenure Controversy: The article delves into the debate surrounding the tenure of Fried, a scholar whose work is described as modern and controversial. There is criticism of the department's standards and the perceived lack of critical engagement with modern art.
   • Academic Politics: The piece touches on internal politics within the Fine Arts Department, including disagreements over Fried's qualifications and the department's direction.
   • Scholarly Standards: There is a discussion about the quality of scholarship and whether the department is adequately equipped to evaluate modern art, with some suggesting that the department lacks the necessary expertise.

3. Visual Elements:

   • The page is printed in black and white, typical of newspaper or magazine layouts from the 1970s.
   • The text is dense and formatted in a standard newspaper style, with justified alignment and clear headings.
   • The article is part of a larger issue, as indicated by the text at the top that reads "Continued from page 3", suggesting this is a continuation of a multi-page story.

4. Contextual Clues:

   • The mention of Harvard University and specific individuals (e.g., Rosofsky, Pipkin, Zerner, Fried) situates the article within an academic setting.
   • The date (November 4-10, 1975) places the discussion in a historical context, reflecting the academic and cultural debates of the mid-1970s.

Summary:

The image depicts a page from a newspaper or magazine article discussing a contentious tenure debate within Harvard University's Fine Arts Department. The article focuses on the challenges of evaluating modern art scholarship, the internal politics of the department, and the controversial candidacy of a scholar named Fried. The text is dense and analytical, reflecting the academic and cultural debates of the time.

The image appears to be a newspaper clipping from the past, likely from the 1970s, based on the date mentioned in the text. The clipping is printed on white paper and has a rectangular shape. The text is printed in black ink and is organized into columns. The headline at the top of the clipping reads "Modern Art Void." The article discusses the resignation of a professor named Fried from a university, and the controversy surrounding his departure. The text is written in a formal and academic tone, with references to modern art and scholarship. The clipping is likely from a newspaper or magazine that covered cultural and academic news.