Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V. Rinse, repeat.
ARCH.2003.39, Rendition: 806656
The image shows a newspaper clipping from the Harvard Independent, dated April 17-23, 1975. The article, written by Maud Lavin, discusses Harvard's Fogg Museum and its museum training program, which was established in the 1920s. The article highlights that over 300 of the museum's graduates have become directors and curators worldwide. However, it also notes that the museum sometimes faces criticism due to its role in training future directors, citing the example of former Director Daniel Robbins, who was known for his public-minded approach.
The article mentions that in 1971, an influx of new and controversial museums were introduced, which led to a reevaluation of traditional museum practices. The Fogg Museum, under new management, faced challenges such as financial constraints and conflicts with the Fine Arts Department. The article also discusses Daniel Robbins' tenure as director, his resignation, and the subsequent appointment of a new director, Agnes Mongan.
The article further explores the museum training program, noting that while it is highly regarded, it has faced criticism for not being as innovative as some other programs. The program's focus on public responsibility and community engagement is highlighted, with Robbins' efforts to make the museum more accessible to the public being particularly noted. The article concludes by discussing the ongoing debates about the role and function of museums in society.
The image depicts a newspaper clipping from the Harvard Independent dated April 17, 1973. The article is titled "Harvard's Fogg Museum" and is authored by Maud Lavin.
The article discusses the history and educational role of Harvard's Fogg Museum. It highlights that Harvard's Fogg Museum was the first to offer museum training courses in the United States in the 1920s, with many graduates becoming influential museum directors and curators.
The text notes a significant influx of young museum personnel in 1971, which led to the Boston Phoenix expressing enthusiasm for a new generation of enthusiasts. However, the article also mentions conflicts within the museum community, particularly the tension between the museum's educational mission and its role as a public institution.
The focus then shifts to the appointment of Daniel Robbins as the Fogg Museum's new director. Robbins' background and goals are described as somewhat incompatible with the faculty of the Harvard Art Museums, which includes the Fogg. Robbins was previously the director of the Institute of Fine Arts at the University of Chicago and Yale. The article points out that Robbins' appointment was a result of a complex set of circumstances involving Harvard, the University of Chicago, and Yale.
Robbins' public statements are also quoted, expressing his belief in the importance of visual culture and the museum's role in educating the public. The article concludes with Robbins' public responsibility to the community and the museum's continued relevance and public engagement, despite some concerns over its summer operations.
Harvard Independent, 4/17/23, 175
Harvard's Fogg Museum instituted the first museum training course in the country in the 1920s. Since then more than 300 of its graduates have risen to power in the art world, as museum directors and curators. But sometimes the educational role of the museum causes problems when its role of training future wheeler-dealers clashes with the public-minded Big Wheels like former Director Daniel Robbins.
By MAUD LAVIN
In 1971 an influx of new and comparatively young museum personnel and a spate of critical articles in the Boston Phoenix and other local papers, have been interpreted by some as an attack on the Fogg. The Boston Phoenix article, for example, welcomed an anti-establishment attitude in the new museum directors, but was critical of what they saw as the Fogg's conservative policies. The article, which was widely read, was a factor in the recent resignation of Daniel Robbins as director of the Fogg. Robbins, who had been at the Fogg for three years, had been a controversial figure from the start. It is too simple to blame Robbins for the Fogg's problems. Differences with any director at the Fogg would be inevitable because of the unique set of factors which shape its administration.
The Fogg is a rarity among museums because it is administered by the University, and its purpose is to serve as a teaching museum. Educational exhibits are planned in the director's office, scheduled, and approved by the faculty. The director is a faculty member, and the Fogg is a faculty museum. The Fogg's reputation for excellence is based on the quality of its faculty, and the fact that it is a teaching museum. The first museum training course in the US began at the Fogg in the 1920s, and since then over 300 of its students have become museum directors and curators.
Almost all the museum directors in the United States have attended Harvard, and approximately 47 per cent of all museum directors went to Harvard. So not only are the faculty members who run the Fogg themselves, but the students who have been trained there have gone on to run other museums. This has been a source of pride for the Fogg, but it has also been a source of criticism. The Fogg has been accused of being a training ground for the elite, and of not being open to the public. The Fogg is open to the public, but its hours are limited, and its collections are not as well known as they could be.
Daniel Robbins was appointed Fogg Director in March 1971, following a period as acting director of the RISD Museum. Interested in the social relevance of art, he had been a curator at the Pasadena Art Museum, and the Fogg. His appointment was generally welcomed, and his plans for the Fogg included a greater emphasis on contemporary art, and a more active role for the Fogg in the community. But his plans were not always welcomed by the faculty, and his attempts to change the Fogg's traditional policies were often met with resistance.
One of the main areas of conflict was the Fogg's policy on loans. Robbins wanted to make more of the Fogg's collections available for loan to other museums, but the faculty was reluctant to allow this, fearing that the Fogg's collections would be depleted. Robbins also wanted to make more of the Fogg's collections available to the public, but the faculty was concerned that this would lead to a decline in the quality of the collections.
Another area of conflict was the Fogg's policy on acquisitions. Robbins wanted to acquire more contemporary art, but the faculty was more interested in acquiring old masters. Robbins also wanted to acquire more American art, but the faculty was more interested in acquiring European art.
Robbins' tenure at the Fogg was marked by a series of conflicts with the faculty, and his resignation was generally seen as a victory for the faculty. But it is important to remember that the Fogg is a unique institution, and that its problems are not simply the result of one man's policies. The Fogg's role as a teaching museum, and its relationship with the University, are factors that shape its policies in ways that are not always apparent.
Mr. Robbins' public statements are tinged with a recruiter's vocabulary: "I am looking for a museum director who is not a Harvard man, but who is interested in the Harvard system." He is looking for a director who will be more sensitive to the needs of the Boston community, and who will be able to work with the faculty. He is also looking for a director who will be able to raise money for the Fogg, which is in need of a major capital campaign.
The Fogg's problems are not unique, and they are not the result of one man's policies. The Fogg is a unique institution, and its problems are the result of its unique role as a teaching museum and its relationship with the University. The Fogg's problems are also the result of the changing role of museums in society, and the increasing demand for museums to be more responsive to the needs of the public.
The Fogg's problems are not likely to be solved by the appointment of a new director. The Fogg needs to re-examine its role as a teaching museum, and its relationship with the University. The Fogg also needs to re-examine its policies on loans and acquisitions, and to consider the needs of the Boston community. The Fogg's problems are not unique, and they are not the result of one man's policies. The Fogg is a unique institution, and its problems are the result of its unique role as a teaching museum and its relationship with the University. The Fogg's problems are also the result of the changing role of museums in society, and the increasing demand for museums to be more responsive to the needs of the public.
The image is a scanned page from the Harvard Independent newspaper, dated July 23, 1975. The article is titled "By MAUD LAVIN" and discusses the recent appointment of Daniel Robbins as the new director of the Fogg Museum at Harvard University.
Key points from the article include:
Background of Museum Training at Harvard:
Daniel Robbins' Appointment:
Concerns and Expectations:
Museum Directors' Education:
Robbins' Views on Museums:
The article provides a comprehensive overview of the significance of Robbins' appointment and the expectations and concerns associated with his new role at the Fogg Museum.
The image shows a newspaper clipping from an article titled "Harvard's Fog Museum" by Maud Lavin, published in The Independent on April 17, 1973. The article discusses the educational role of the Harvard's Fogg Museum, which was established in the 1920s and has trained numerous museum directors and curators.
Key points of the article include:
Historical Context: The Fogg Museum began the first museum training course in the United States in the 1920s, and over 300 graduates have gone on to become prominent museum directors and curators.
Recent Changes: In 1971, the museum experienced an influx of new, commercially oriented personnel, leading to conflicts and changes in the museum's administration. The Boston Phoenix, a local newspaper, criticized these changes, which included the appointment of new directors and the establishment of a new Contemporary Art Department.
Conflict and Criticism: The article highlights tensions between the museum's traditional educational role and its new commercial direction. The new director, Daniel Robbins, faced criticism for his management style and perceived incompatibility with the museum's academic goals.
Daniel Robbins' Appointment: Robbins was appointed director in March 1971 following a period of administrative turmoil. He brought experience from the RISD Museum and was interested in building a relationship with the Boston community. However, he was criticized for his approach to managing the museum, including his handling of public relations and the museum's finances.
Public Statements and Criticism: Robbins' public statements were criticized for being overly ambitious and not adequately addressing the museum's core issues. He was seen as more interested in expanding the museum's public relations efforts rather than focusing on its educational mission.
Faculty Concerns: The faculty at Harvard expressed concerns about Robbins' leadership and the direction of the museum, which they felt was moving away from its academic roots.
Funding and Operations: The article notes that the Fogg Museum is funded by Harvard and operates on a tight budget, with a significant portion of its space being used by the Fine Arts Faculty. The museum's operating costs are paid for by Harvard, and it is open to the public seven days a week.
Broader Impact: The article concludes by discussing the broader implications of the changes at the Fogg Museum, suggesting that the educational role of museums is at risk when commercial interests take precedence.
The overall tone of the article is critical of the changes taking place at the Fogg Museum, emphasizing the importance of maintaining its educational mission.
The image shows a page from an article in the Harvard Independent, dated April 17, 1975, titled "Harvard's Fog Museum." The article discusses the role of Harvard's Fog Museum (likely a reference to the Fogg Art Museum) in training museum professionals and its recent appointment of Daniel Robbins as its director.
Key points include:
The article conveys the tension between educational and administrative roles within the museum, as well as the broader public perception of Robbins' leadership.
This image shows a page of an article or a document that has been mounted on a larger piece of what appears to be brown cardboard or a similar material. The article mentions Harvard’s Fogg Museum and discusses aspects of its history and operations related to museum training courses, staff, and the roles of director Daniel Robbins and others. The headline on the page reads "Harvard's Fogg Museum," and there are handwritten notes on the top left corner of the page that say "Harvard Independent 4/17-23" and a drawing of an arrow pointing upwards. The article is attributed to an author named Maud Lavin. The article's text, dated from the 1970s based on the context, seems to provide an insight into museum administration and the educational role of the museum. There's also a small round label or sticker near the bottom right corner of the mount, but there isn't enough detail in the image to discern what it might indicate. The overall condition of the document suggests it could be an archival or reference copy of the article, preserved for historical or research purposes.
A newspaper clipping with a headline "Harvard Independent" from April 17, 1975, is on a brown background. It contains an article about Harvard's Fogg Museum and its role in the art world. The article discusses the museum's educational role and how it sometimes causes problems when its role of training future directors and curators is overshadowed by its public-minded Big Wheel role. It mentions the appointment of Daniel Robbins as the director of the Fogg Museum in 1971 and his approach to the museum's function as a teaching museum. The article also touches on the museum's financial situation, with its operating costs paid by Harvard and its endowment funded by the Boston community.
The image shows a scanned page from a document, likely an article or essay, discussing the role and history of the Fogg Museum at Harvard University. The page is titled "Harvard's Fogg Museum instituted the first museum training course in the country in the 1920s" and is attributed to Maude Lavin. The text is typed and appears to be from a printed or published source, as indicated by its structured layout and formal tone.
Content: The page discusses the Fogg Museum's significance in the art world, particularly its role in training museum professionals. It highlights the museum's establishment in the 1920s and its impact on the development of museum education and curation practices.
Handwritten Annotations: There are handwritten notes on the page:
Text Structure: The text is formatted in paragraphs, with clear headings and subheadings. It includes quotes and references to specific individuals, such as Daniel Robbins, who is mentioned as the former director of the Fogg Museum.
Visual Layout: The page is centered on a light-colored background, likely a file folder or document sleeve, with a slightly worn edge visible at the top and bottom. The text is clear and legible, with standard typewriter font.
Contextual Clues: The content suggests a focus on the evolution of museum practices, the influence of the Fogg Museum on museum education, and the challenges faced by museums in balancing educational, public, and professional roles.
The image depicts a page from a written article or essay discussing the historical and educational significance of the Fogg Museum at Harvard University. It includes typed text with handwritten annotations, indicating its use in research, study, or archival purposes. The content emphasizes the museum's pioneering role in museum training and its broader impact on the art world.
The image depicts a document, which appears to be a newspaper clipping, with a handwritten note in the upper left corner. The clipping is from the "Harvard Independent" dated April 17, 1975, and is titled "Harvard's Fogg Museum Instituted the First Museum Training Course in the Country in 1912." The article discusses the history and evolution of the Fogg Museum's training program for museum professionals, highlighting its pioneering role in the field.
The article notes that since the inception of the training course in the 1920s, the number of museum directors and curators has significantly increased. However, it also points out that the educational role of the museum sometimes conflicts with its public-minded mission, particularly under the leadership of former Director Daniel Robbins. The article suggests that Robbins's emphasis on the museum's educational function led to tensions with the institution's broader public responsibilities.
The document is printed on a beige-colored paper and is bordered by a darker, possibly brown, margin. The text is in black ink and is neatly aligned, indicating a professional publication. The handwritten note in the upper left corner is in cursive and appears to be a personal annotation or comment, possibly related to the content of the article.