Archives Scrapbooks

The image appears to be a page from a newspaper, specifically "The Christian Science Monitor," dated Wednesday, May 8, 1974, from page 4C. The headline reads, "Will the Busch oust German art?" The article discusses the potential shift in the Busch-Reisinger Museum at Harvard University from being a 70-year specialist museum focused on German art to being re-purposed as a space for contemporary art exhibitions.

The text mentions that the museum is facing scrutiny as it marks its 70th anniversary, with the controversy stemming from concerns about the museum's future as the only institution outside of Germany exclusively dedicated to the development of German and related northern European art. The article highlights opposition from Harvard faculty, students, the German community in New England, and members of the museum itself.

A photograph of the Harvard Germanic center is included, and there are excerpts from letters of protest sent to Harvard President Derek C. Bok, urging the continuation of the museum's focus on German art. The article also cites opinions from scholars like Charles L. Kuhn, emphasizing the importance of preserving the museum's significant art collection.

At the bottom of the page, there is a form for a savings certificate, partially visible, which might suggest the image has been cut from a larger document or publication.

This image is a scanned newspaper clipping placed on a beige folder or paper background. The clipping is from "The Christian Science Monitor," dated Wednesday, May 8, 1974, and is labeled as section 4C "arts/entertainment."

The headline of the article reads, "Will the Busch oust German art? Museum has been 70-year specialist," written by Caron Le Brun Danikian. The article discusses the potential shift in focus of the Busch-Reisinger Museum at Harvard University from Germanic art to contemporary art exhibitions. It mentions the museum's 70th anniversary and the debate surrounding its future direction.

There is a photograph in the article showing a building labeled "Harvard's Germanic center," which features a domed structure with steps leading up to the entrance.

The article is followed by an advertisement at the bottom, partially visible, with the text "Dile Your mon" and some other details about a purchase of Suffolk County Savings Certificates. The advertisement is bordered with dashed lines.

The clipping is slightly worn and has a pink binding or edge on the right side. There are two punch holes on the left side of the clipping, suggesting it was placed in a binder or folder.

This image shows a clipped newspaper article from The Christian Science Monitor, dated Wednesday, May 8, 1974, from page 4C in the "arts/entertainment" section.

The article is titled:

"Will the Busch oust German art?"

with the sub-headline:

"Museum has been 70-year specialist"

It is written by Caron Le Brun Danlikian.

Summary of the Article:

The article discusses a controversy at Harvard University surrounding its Busch-Reisinger Museum, which was celebrating its 70th anniversary. The museum is noted as the only institution outside Germany exclusively devoted to German and related Northern European art.

The central question is whether the museum’s mission — to focus on Germanic art — will be compromised by a proposed plan to turn it into an exhibition space for “heterogeneous contemporary art.” This proposal arose partly because of a lack of exhibition space in Harvard’s other museums.

The article highlights strong opposition from faculty, students, graduate students, art professionals, and the German community in New England. A preliminary subcommittee report had already recommended redirecting the museum’s focus toward contemporary art.

Charles L. Kuhn, the museum’s curator since 1931 and instrumental in building its collection, is quoted as saying the museum should remain dedicated to its original purpose — to serve as “a museum of all periods of central European art — Alsatian, Swiss, Austrian, and Netherlandish as well as German.” He emphasizes that the building's architecture reflects its Germanic character and that the university owes it to its students to preserve this “highly viable collection.”

The article concludes that changes are needed for the museum to succeed, but it should retain its financial and administrative support and advance its founding principles — which, at the time of the article, were described as “floundering.”

Visual Elements:

• A black-and-white photograph of the museum building is included, captioned: “Harvard’s Germanic center.” The building features classical architecture with columns, a central pediment, and a dome-like feature atop the roof. Trees and steps lead to the entrance.
• At the bottom of the clipping, part of a donation order form from The Christian Science Monitor is visible, with instructions to mail in contributions using a check or money order.
• The article is mounted on a light brown, paper-like backing with two punched holes on the left edge — suggesting it was stored in a binder or file.

Contextual Note:

This article reflects mid-20th century debates in academia and museums over preserving specialized collections versus adapting to contemporary artistic trends and space constraints. The Busch-Reisinger Museum later merged with the Fogg Museum and the Arthur M. Sackler Museum to form the Harvard Art Museums in 2008 — a move that both preserved and reconfigured its mission.

The image is a newspaper clipping from "The Christian Science Monitor" dated May 8, 1974. The clipping features an article titled "Will the Busch oust German art?" which discusses the future of the Busch-Reisinger Museum at Harvard University. The museum, founded 70 years ago by German patrons as a distinctive center for Germanic art, is facing the possibility of being turned into an exhibition space for heterogenous contemporary art exhibitions.

The article highlights the opposition from Harvard faculty members and the German community in New York, who are concerned about the museum's future. The opposition is led by Mr. Robbins, a curator at the museum, who has expressed his views on the situation. The article also mentions that the museum's building, with its unique architectural character, is a significant asset that should be preserved.

The clipping includes a photograph of Harvard's Germanic center, showcasing the building's architecture. The article emphasizes the importance of the museum as a center for European art, particularly German, Austrian, and Netherlandish art, and its role in protecting and showcasing a highly viable collection. The museum's future is uncertain, and the article concludes with a hope that it will remain a vital institution for the study and appreciation of Germanic art.

A piece of paper is attached to a folder, which seems to be a clipping from a newspaper. The newspaper clipping has a title that reads "Will the Busch oust German art?" and a photograph of a building with a tree in front of it. There is a text that reads "Harvard's Germanic center" below the photograph. There is also another piece of paper with a text that reads "YOUR NAME NOW" on it.

The image is a scanned page from The Christian Science Monitor, dated Wednesday, May 8, 1974, under the Arts/Entertainment section. The headline prominently reads: "Will the Busch oust German art?" Below the headline, the subheading states: "Museum has been 70-year specialist", followed by the byline: "By Carol Le Brun Dankian".

Content Overview:

The article discusses the Busch-Reisinger Museum at Harvard University, which is described as a distinctive center for German and related Northern European art. The museum is undergoing a review as it marks its 70th anniversary on May 8, 1974, and is considering whether to shift its focus from its original purpose as a center for German art to a broader exhibition space for contemporary art exhibitions.

Key Points:

1. Historical Context:

   • The Busch-Reisinger Museum was founded by patrons of Harvard University to serve as a center for German art.
   • It is the only institution outside of Germany dedicated to the study and display of German and related Northern European art.

2. Current Debate:

   • The museum is facing a 70-year review, questioning whether it should continue its traditional focus on German art or pivot toward contemporary art.
   • The shift is partly due to financial and space problems at Harvard, as well as the shock of many Harvard faculty members and students in the German art community regarding the potential change.

3. Opposition:

   • There is firm opposition to the proposed change, particularly from the German art community in New England and those directly associated with the museum.
   • Critics argue that the Busch-Reisinger Museum has achieved and maintained its prominence as the largest collection of German art outside of Germany.
   • The museum is seen as a vital resource for scholars and students of German art, and any shift away from its core mission is met with resistance.

4. Architectural and Financial Concerns:

   • The museum's building is noted for its unique architecture, and some believe it reflects the character of the collection it houses.
   • The article mentions that the museum needs someone to administer it, bring in financial support, and advance its principles, indicating concerns about its sustainability and future direction.

5. Visual Element:

   • To the right of the article, there is a black-and-white photograph of the Busch-Reisinger Museum building. The building appears to be a historic structure with a prominent tower, reflecting its architectural significance.

Footer:

At the bottom of the page, there is a partially visible footer with the text: "Christian Science Monitor", indicating the source of the article.

Overall Impression:

The image captures a moment of cultural and institutional debate regarding the future direction of a significant museum dedicated to German art. The article highlights the tension between preserving a specialized collection and adapting to broader contemporary art trends, while also addressing practical concerns about funding and space. The inclusion of the museum's photograph adds a visual representation of the institution at the center of the discussion.

The image shows a clipping of a newspaper article mounted on a piece of cardboard. The newspaper is identified as "THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR," and the date of the issue is Wednesday, May 8, 1974. The section of the paper shown is the "arts/entertainment" section, with the headline "Will the Busch oust German art?" The article is about the Busch-Reisinger Museum at Harvard University, with a focus on whether it will continue to showcase German art.

Below the article's headline and byline, there is a black and white photograph of a building, presumably the Harvard's Germanic center referred to in the article. The text of the article is partially readable and discusses the museum's history, its direction, and its collection.

The cardboard on which the clipping is mounted has a brownish color, and there is a visible hole punch on the left side, suggesting that this cardboard was part of a binder or a filing system. The bottom part of the cardboard shows the top half of some turned upside-down text, which seems to be unrelated to the main article on display.

Lastly, there are four small brown dots on each corner of the newspaper clipping, which could be remnants of a previous mounting method or adhesive.

The image shows a newspaper clipping from "The Christian Science Monitor" dated Wednesday, May 8, 1974. It belongs to the arts/entertainment section and features a headline that reads, "Will the Busch oust German art?" The subheadline notes that the museum has been a 70-year specialist. The article is written by Caron Le Brun Danikian and discusses concerns about the Busch-Reisinger Museum at Harvard University potentially changing its focus from Germanic art.

There is a black-and-white photograph on the right side of the clipping showing a building identified as "Harvard's Germanic center," featuring an ornate entrance with arches, windows, trees on either side, and a small tower structure on the roof.

The article elaborates on issues surrounding the museum's future direction, mentioning opposition from various parties and highlighting concerns about maintaining the museum’s focus on German and northern European art. The layout includes text columns on both sides and below the photograph, with part of another, cropped newspaper piece visible at the bottom, upside down. The clipping is mounted on a brown background with two holes punched along the left edge.

This image is a scanned newspaper clipping mounted on a piece of light brown paper with a hole punched in the left-hand side for a binder. The clipping appears to be from The Christian Science Monitor newspaper, dated Wednesday, May 8, 1974, and falls under the "arts/entertainment" section.

The headline reads: "Will the Busch oust German art? Museum has been 70-year specialist", addressing a potential shift in the focus of Harvard's Busch-Reisinger Museum, historically dedicated to Germanic art.

The article contains:

1. Text discussing the museum's significance as a 70-year-old specialist in Germanic art and the possibility of a pivot to broader or different exhibitions, such as Dutch contemporary art.
2. A photograph depicting the exterior of a building identified as Harvard's Germanic center.

A smaller cut-out section of text is attached at the bottom, rotated upside down, showing an unrelated portion of a newspaper print.

A vintage newspaper clipping mounted on brown backing. The clipping is from The Christian Science Monitor, Arts/Entertainment, dated Wednesday, May 8, 1974. The bold headline reads: “Will the Busch oust German art?” with a subheading about the Busch-Reisinger Museum at Harvard. There is a black-and-white photo of a small, domed building labeled “Harvard’s Germanic center” on the right. The page is torn at the bottom, and part of another page is showing upside down beneath it. The whole is punched with holes on the left edge for filing.