Archives Scrapbooks

The image is a newspaper clipping from "The Christian Science Monitor," dated Wednesday, May 8, 1974. The article is titled "Will the Busch oust German art?" and is written by Carol Le Strange Danaher. The article discusses the potential changes at Harvard University's Busch-Reisinger Museum, which has been a specialist in German art for 70 years. The museum is considering whether to continue its focus on German art or to shift towards a more general contemporary art exhibition.

Key points from the article include:

• The museum's anniversary coincides with a conference on German art and education.
• There is a debate among Harvard faculty and the German community about the museum's future direction.
• Some faculty members propose a broader focus on contemporary art, while others, including the museum's director, advocate for maintaining the German art specialization.
• The article mentions financial and space issues at Harvard, which may influence the decision.
• The Busch-Reisinger Museum is known for its extensive collection of German and related Northern European art.

The article includes a photograph of Harvard's Germanic center, a building described as having a unique character. The caption mentions the museum's focus on central European art and its 40-year custodianship of the Busch-Reisinger collection. The article also includes quotes from Charles L. Kuhn, the museum's director, and other faculty members, highlighting the differing opinions on the museum's future direction.

The image is of a newspaper article from the Christian Science Monitor dated Wednesday, May 8, 1974. The article is titled "Will the Busch oust German art?" and focuses on the Busch-Reisinger Museum at Harvard University.

The article, written by Caron Le Brun Danisian, discusses the concerns surrounding the museum's 70th anniversary and its mission. The museum, established as a center for German art, is under scrutiny due to its shift towards exhibiting contemporary art.

The article highlights the following points:

1. The Busch-Reisinger Museum has been the sole institution in the United States dedicated to German art and related European art.
2. A controversy has arisen as the museum considers its future direction, specifically whether to focus more on contemporary art.
3. The museum's founder, President C. B. Ford, has signed a letter expressing concerns about the shift and the implications for Harvard’s academic community.
4. The article mentions the views of Mr. Robbins, the museum's former director, who has expressed strong opposition to the museum's potential changes.
5. It also notes that Harvard's German art collection is one of the most significant in the world and that its curator has been very active in preserving and promoting it.

The piece emphasizes the historical and cultural significance of the museum and its role in maintaining German artistic heritage. There is a photograph of the Busch-Reisinger Museum included in the article, depicting its German architectural style.

The image shows a newspaper article from "The Christian Science Monitor," dated Wednesday, May 8, 1974. The article, titled "Will the Busch oust German art?" is located in the arts/entertainment section and is written by Carol Le Brun Dankin. The article discusses the potential changes at the Busch-Reisinger Museum at Harvard University, which is celebrating its 70th anniversary. There is a debate over whether the museum should continue to focus on German art or shift to contemporary art. The article includes a photograph of a building, identified as "Harvard's Germanic center."

The article mentions that the museum's role as the only institution in the U.S. specializing in German art is being questioned. Some argue for a broader focus, while others advocate for maintaining the museum's German art specialization. The photograph in the article depicts a building that appears to be of traditional German architectural style. Additionally, there is a partially visible form at the bottom of the article, which seems to be a document or a letter, with sections for personal details such as name, address, and comments. The form includes instructions for sending contributions to the Christian Science Monitor.

The image is a newspaper clipping from The Christian Science Monitor, dated Wednesday, May 8, 1974. The section is titled "arts/entertainment," and the main article is headlined "Will the Busch oust German art? Museum has been 70-year specialist."

Article Summary:

By Garol Le Brun Danilov

The article discusses a controversy surrounding the Busch-Reisinger Museum at Harvard University. The museum is noted for being the only one in North America specifically dedicated to the study of art from the German-speaking countries of central and northern Europe.

Key Points:

1. Museum Background:

   • The Busch-Reisinger Museum was founded to promote Germanic art and culture.
   • It has been a prominent center for the study of art from German-speaking regions.

2. Current Considerations:

   • The museum's direction is under review starting in February.
   • By May 5, a preliminary report is expected to explore the museum's future role.
   • Options include expanding its scope to include heterogeneous contemporary art exhibitions.

3. Potential Changes:

   • The museum might shift its focus away from solely Germanic art.
   • This shift has raised concerns among Harvard's art community and individuals associated with the museum.

4. Firm Opposition:

   • There is strong opposition to changing the museum's mission, led by Charles L. Kuhn, the museum's curator since 1930.
   • Kuhn argues that the museum's unique focus on Germanic art should be preserved.
   • Kuhn's opposition is supported by a petition with signatures from many art historians and museum professionals, both in the U.S. and Europe.

5. Future Prospects:

   • The future of the museum is uncertain, with potential changes dependent on Harvard's decision.
   • Kuhn emphasizes the need to maintain the museum's distinct focus and suggests that financial support and acquisitions should continue to bolster its current mission.

Image:

The image accompanying the article shows a photograph of the Germanic center at Harvard, depicting the building's exterior.

Additional Information:

• The article includes a small section with a partial view of a donation form from The Christian Science Monitor at the bottom, encouraging readers to subscribe or donate.

The image is a newspaper clipping from The Christian Science Monitor, dated Wednesday, May 8, 1974. The headline of the article is "Will the Busch oust German art?" and it discusses the potential changes at the Busch-Reisinger Museum at Harvard University.

The article by Carol Le Brun Dankian addresses concerns about the museum's future as it marks its 70th anniversary. The Busch-Reisinger Museum, known for its specialization in German and related northern European art, is under review regarding its focus and direction.

Key points from the article include:

• The museum is considering whether to continue its specialization in German art or to expand its exhibition space to include more contemporary art.
• The museum's focus on German art has been challenged, with some suggesting it should diversify to include more modern and contemporary artworks.
• The article mentions a Preliminary Sub-Committee Report on Harvard's art museums, which suggests the Busch-Reisinger Museum might need to expand its scope.
• There is a firm opposition to the museum losing its focus on German art, with some arguing that the museum's unique collection of German art should remain a central part of its identity.
• The article quotes Mr. Robbins, a specialist in 19th-century art, who emphasizes the importance of the Busch-Reisinger Museum's German art collection.
• The museum's building is described as having a unique architectural character that complements its collection.

Additionally, there is a form at the bottom of the clipping, which appears to be a request for donations or information, though the details are partially obscured. The clipping also includes a photograph of the Busch-Reisinger Museum building, highlighting its architectural features.

The image shows a newspaper clipping from The Christian Science Monitor, dated Wednesday, May 8, 1974. The article is titled "Will the Busch oust German art?" and discusses the future of the Busch-Reisinger Museum at Harvard University.

Key points of the article include:

1. Museum's History and Focus: The Busch-Reisinger Museum, which is 70 years old, specializes in German and related northern European art. It is the only institution outside of Germany exclusively dedicated to this type of art.

2. Controversy: The article raises concerns about whether the museum will continue to focus on its original purpose. It mentions that the museum's future has been questioned as it approaches its 70th anniversary, specifically May 6.

3. Opposition: There is a challenge to the museum's direction, with some arguing that it should expand into other areas, such as contemporary art exhibitions, rather than maintaining its focus on German and northern European art.

4. Reactions and Concerns: The article notes that many people, including Harvard students, faculty, and the German community in New England, are concerned about the potential loss of the museum's unique focus. There is also a mention of a preliminary report by a sub-committee that offers options for the museum’s future.

5. Cultural Significance: The article highlights the importance of the Busch-Reisinger Museum as a cultural and educational resource, emphasizing its role in preserving and showcasing German art.

6. Institutional Leadership: The article quotes Derek C. Bok, the President of Harvard, who is noted as being open to a variety of opinions regarding the museum's future.

7. Curation and Expertise: The article mentions Mr. Robbins, a curator of the Busch-Reisinger Museum, who has been instrumental in maintaining its focus on German art.

8. Additional Context: The article includes a brief description of the museum’s building, which is noted for its unique architecture, and the importance of its collection.

Additionally, there is a partially visible form at the bottom of the image, which appears to be a subscription or membership form for the newspaper.

The image shows a clipping of a newspaper article mounted on a piece of cardboard. The newspaper is identified as "THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR," and the date of the issue is Wednesday, May 8, 1974. The section of the paper shown is the "arts/entertainment" section, with the headline "Will the Busch oust German art?" The article is about the Busch-Reisinger Museum at Harvard University, with a focus on whether it will continue to showcase German art.

Below the article's headline and byline, there is a black and white photograph of a building, presumably the Harvard's Germanic center referred to in the article. The text of the article is partially readable and discusses the museum's history, its direction, and its collection.

The cardboard on which the clipping is mounted has a brownish color, and there is a visible hole punch on the left side, suggesting that this cardboard was part of a binder or a filing system. The bottom part of the cardboard shows the top half of some turned upside-down text, which seems to be unrelated to the main article on display.

Lastly, there are four small brown dots on each corner of the newspaper clipping, which could be remnants of a previous mounting method or adhesive.

The image shows a newspaper clipping from "The Christian Science Monitor" dated Wednesday, May 8, 1974. It belongs to the arts/entertainment section and features a headline that reads, "Will the Busch oust German art?" The subheadline notes that the museum has been a 70-year specialist. The article is written by Caron Le Brun Danikian and discusses concerns about the Busch-Reisinger Museum at Harvard University potentially changing its focus from Germanic art.

There is a black-and-white photograph on the right side of the clipping showing a building identified as "Harvard's Germanic center," featuring an ornate entrance with arches, windows, trees on either side, and a small tower structure on the roof.

The article elaborates on issues surrounding the museum's future direction, mentioning opposition from various parties and highlighting concerns about maintaining the museum’s focus on German and northern European art. The layout includes text columns on both sides and below the photograph, with part of another, cropped newspaper piece visible at the bottom, upside down. The clipping is mounted on a brown background with two holes punched along the left edge.

The image is a scanned page from The Christian Science Monitor, dated Wednesday, May 8, 1974, under the Arts/Entertainment section. The headline prominently reads: "Will the Busch oust German art?" Below the headline, the subheading states: "Museum has been 70-year specialist", followed by the byline: "By Carol Le Brun Dankian".

Content Overview:

The article discusses the Busch-Reisinger Museum at Harvard University, which is described as a distinctive center for German and related Northern European art. The museum is undergoing a review as it marks its 70th anniversary on May 8, 1974, and is considering whether to shift its focus from its original purpose as a center for German art to a broader exhibition space for contemporary art exhibitions.

Key Points:

1. Historical Context:

   • The Busch-Reisinger Museum was founded by patrons of Harvard University to serve as a center for German art.
   • It is the only institution outside of Germany dedicated to the study and display of German and related Northern European art.

2. Current Debate:

   • The museum is facing a 70-year review, questioning whether it should continue its traditional focus on German art or pivot toward contemporary art.
   • The shift is partly due to financial and space problems at Harvard, as well as the shock of many Harvard faculty members and students in the German art community regarding the potential change.

3. Opposition:

   • There is firm opposition to the proposed change, particularly from the German art community in New England and those directly associated with the museum.
   • Critics argue that the Busch-Reisinger Museum has achieved and maintained its prominence as the largest collection of German art outside of Germany.
   • The museum is seen as a vital resource for scholars and students of German art, and any shift away from its core mission is met with resistance.

4. Architectural and Financial Concerns:

   • The museum's building is noted for its unique architecture, and some believe it reflects the character of the collection it houses.
   • The article mentions that the museum needs someone to administer it, bring in financial support, and advance its principles, indicating concerns about its sustainability and future direction.

5. Visual Element:

   • To the right of the article, there is a black-and-white photograph of the Busch-Reisinger Museum building. The building appears to be a historic structure with a prominent tower, reflecting its architectural significance.

Footer:

At the bottom of the page, there is a partially visible footer with the text: "Christian Science Monitor", indicating the source of the article.

Overall Impression:

The image captures a moment of cultural and institutional debate regarding the future direction of a significant museum dedicated to German art. The article highlights the tension between preserving a specialized collection and adapting to broader contemporary art trends, while also addressing practical concerns about funding and space. The inclusion of the museum's photograph adds a visual representation of the institution at the center of the discussion.

The image is a newspaper clipping from "The Christian Science Monitor" dated May 8, 1974. The clipping features an article titled "Will the Busch oust German art?" which discusses the future of the Busch-Reisinger Museum at Harvard University. The museum, founded 70 years ago by German patrons as a distinctive center for Germanic art, is facing the possibility of being turned into an exhibition space for heterogenous contemporary art exhibitions.

The article highlights the opposition from Harvard faculty members and the German community in New York, who are concerned about the museum's future. The opposition is led by Mr. Robbins, a curator at the museum, who has expressed his views on the situation. The article also mentions that the museum's building, with its unique architectural character, is a significant asset that should be preserved.

The clipping includes a photograph of Harvard's Germanic center, showcasing the building's architecture. The article emphasizes the importance of the museum as a center for European art, particularly German, Austrian, and Netherlandish art, and its role in protecting and showcasing a highly viable collection. The museum's future is uncertain, and the article concludes with a hope that it will remain a vital institution for the study and appreciation of Germanic art.