Archives Scrapbooks

The image shows a newspaper clipping from the Boston Herald American, dated Tuesday, December 4, 1973. The headline reads "Charlestown Man Believed Mastermind in Huge Coin Theft."

The article reports on a coin robbery that took place at Harvard's Fogg Art Museum. The coins, valued at over $1 million, were stolen from a vault. The police believe the heist was masterminded by Daniel Robbins, a 31-year-old man from Charlestown. Robbins had previously been convicted of robbery and was known to the police.

The article also includes a section titled "How Bandits May Profit From Coin Loot," which outlines several ways the thieves could potentially profit from the stolen coins:

1. Melt the coins down into gold and silver, which is unlikely because coins are made of different metals.
2. Sell the coins in small lots or one at a time to avoid suspicion.
3. Sell the entire lot to an art collector who would keep the coins for personal gratification.
4. Sell the coins to collectors who want to increase their status symbol and prestige.
5. Sell the coins back to the university for a ransom.
6. Return the coins to the museum once the list is made public.
7. Sell the insured pieces to the insurance companies.

The article mentions that the coins are believed to be in a green-colored truck and a dark-colored Thunderbird. The police are working with international authorities to recover the stolen coins.

The article also includes a small illustration of various coins, likely representing the types of coins that were stolen.

The image shows a newspaper article from the Boston Herald American, dated Tuesday, December 4, 1973. The headline reads, "Charlestown Man Believed Mastermind in Huge Coin Theft." The article discusses a significant heist involving a large collection of coins, including rare Greek and Roman coins, from the Fogg Museum at Harvard University. The suspected mastermind, Daniel Robbins, is mentioned, along with details about the types of coins stolen, which include a 1786 cent, an 1804 silver dollar, and other valuable pieces.

The article also features a sub-section titled "How Bandits May Profit From Coin Loot," which speculates on how the thieves might try to sell or melt down the coins. There are accompanying images of some of the stolen coins.

The article provides context on the value and historical significance of the stolen items, and mentions the challenges faced by law enforcement in recovering the stolen coins due to their small size and potential to be easily transported or melted down. The investigation is still ongoing, with police searching for more clues and considering the possibility of an inside job.

The image is a newspaper clipping from the Boston Herald American dated December 4, 1972. The headline is "Charlestown Man Believed Mastermind in Huge Coin Theft."

The article discusses a massive coin robbery at the Fogg Museum in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The article details several points:

1. The Theft: The robbery involved over 3,000 coins, including Greek, Roman, and medieval gold, silver, bronze, and copper coins. The coins had been in the Fogg Museum's collection for centuries.

2. Investigation: The FBI and local police were involved in investigating the theft. The director of the Fogg Museum, Daniel Robbins, believed the theft was meticulously planned and executed.

3. Potential Profit: The article explores how the coin bandits might profit from the stolen coins:

   • Melt the coins down into gold and silver.
   • Sell the coins in small lots to collectors.
   • Sell the entire lot to a dealer for a lump sum.
   • Sell the coins to private collectors for private display.

4. Security Measures: The article mentions the museum's security measures, including rigid security at the museum and the use of display cases to keep the coins safe.

5. Perspective on the Theft: The article also discusses the challenges faced by law enforcement in tracking down the thieves due to the sheer volume and value of the coins involved, suggesting that the coins might be sold in small quantities or melted down to avoid detection.

Additionally, the article includes a box titled "How Bandits May Profit From Coin Loot," outlining several methods that thieves could use to monetize the coins.

The images in the clipping include photographs of the coins that were stolen, illustrating the types of coins involved in the heist.

The image is a newspaper clipping from the Boston Herald American, dated Tuesday, December 4, 1973. The article is titled "Charlestown Man Believed Mastermind in Huge Coin Theft." Here is a detailed summary:

1. Headline and Context:

   • The headline indicates that a Charlestown man is suspected of orchestrating a large-scale coin theft.
   • The article continues from an earlier page, suggesting it is part of a larger series.

2. Incident Description:

   • The theft involved a significant number of rare coins from the Fogg Museum at Harvard University.
   • The coins included Greek, Roman, and Byzantine pieces, among others.
   • The total value of the stolen coins was estimated to be over $200,000.

3. Suspect and Investigation:

   • Daniel Robbins, the director of the Fogg Museum, is mentioned as having been interviewed.
   • Robbins revealed that the stolen coins were mostly from private collections loaned to the museum.
   • Robbins also indicated that the thieves were highly sophisticated, having taken the coins without triggering alarms.

4. Potential Profits for Thieves:

   • A section titled "How Bandits May Profit From Coin Loot" lists possible methods for thieves to profit from the stolen coins:
     • Selling the coins to private collectors.
     • Selling in small lots to maximize returns.
     • Selling the entire lot to a collector.
     • Melting down the coins for their gold and silver content.
     • Ransoming the coins back to the university.
     • Selling insurance pieces to insurance companies.

5. Security Measures:

   • The museum had ordered additional security measures, including rigid security checks and the removal of display cases from the vault.

6. Museum Response:

   • The Fogg Museum's curator, George Handmann, and another individual named Mr. Ryan, are mentioned as part of the investigation.
   • Mr. Ryan is described as a former museum employee who had access to the coin vault.

7. Additional Details:

   • The article mentions that the thieves might have used a back door to enter the museum.
   • The coins were reportedly found in a gold-colored Buick and a dark-colored Thunderbird.
   • Police officers, including one named Pearson, are mentioned in the context of the investigation.
   • The investigation is ongoing, and law enforcement officials are looking into various aspects, including the possibility of inside help.

8. Visuals:

   • The article includes images of some of the stolen coins, which appear to be ancient Greek and Roman coins.

This detailed summary captures the essence of the newspaper article, highlighting the theft, the investigation, and potential motives behind the crime.

The image is a newspaper clipping from the Boston Herald American, dated Tuesday, December 4, 1973. The headline reads "Charlestown Man Believed Mastermind in Huge Coin Theft."

The article details the theft of a significant number of coins from the Fogg Museum at Harvard University, valued at around $200,000. The thief, Daniel Robbins, is described as having orchestrated the robbery by exploiting the trust of museum officials and using his expertise in coin collecting.

Key points of the article include:

• Robbins was the director of the Fogg Museum and had access to the coins.
• The stolen coins included ancient Greek and Roman gold, bronze, and silver coins, as well as modern coins.
• Robbins had previously worked with the FBI and was involved in the International Police (Interpol).
• The FBI connected Robbins to the theft due to his sophisticated and premeditated actions.
• Robbins is believed to have sold the coins to various collectors and museums worldwide, including a self-styled "Mr. Ryan" who was described as being about 5 feet 8 inches tall, with brown wavy hair, and wearing a beige trench coat.
• Police are investigating how Robbins and his accomplices profited from the theft, considering various options such as selling the coins in small lots, melting them down, or selling them to private collectors.
• The article also mentions the potential ramifications for the insurance companies and the possibility of the coins being found in private collections or museums.

The clipping includes images of the stolen coins and a diagram illustrating potential methods for profiting from the coin loot. The article is a continuation from Page One and provides detailed insights into the investigation and the nature of the theft.

The image is a newspaper clipping from the Boston Herald American, dated Tuesday, December 4, 1973. The headline reads "Charlestown Man Believed Mastermind in Huge Coin Theft."

Summary of the Article:

Main Story:

• A significant coin theft occurred at the Foggy Bottom station of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA).
• The stolen goods include rare and valuable coins estimated to be worth around $250,000.
• The theft was discovered when the director of the Foggy Bottom station, Daniel Rubloff, noticed that the display cases containing the coins had been tampered with until the early hours.
• Authorities believe the robbers hid until the station closed, then broke into the coin room and escaped through a vent.
• The FBI, along with local police, are conducting an investigation.
• The stolen coins belonged to a collector named Harold V. Flynne, who was exhibiting them at the station.
• The police and investigators believe the robbery was an inside job due to the precision and knowledge required to bypass the museum’s security measures.

Suspects:

• Police have a lead suspect from Charlestown, identified as "Mr. Ryan," who was seen around the display cases with another man.
• The Charlestown man is believed to be the mastermind behind the theft.

How the Bandits May Profit:
The inset box titled "How Bandits May Profit From Coin Loot" outlines several ways the thieves might try to sell the stolen coins:

1. Selling to Dishonest Collectors:

   • The coins could be sold to collectors who purchase stolen property, often through private sales to avoid scrutiny.

2. Melting Down Gold Coins:

   • Gold coins could be melted down to sell as bullion, though this would diminish their value since their worth is often higher as collectibles.

3. Selling to Fences:

   • The entry of the coins into a "fence" or illegal network could see them dispersed over a period of 10 to 15 years.

4. Returning Coins for Reward:

   • Thieves might return some coins to claim a reward offered by the owner.

5. Breaking into Smaller Lots:

   • Selling the coins in smaller lots to avoid attention and maximize profit.

6. Using "Bumper" Collections:

   • Some coins might be mixed with less valuable collections to increase their apparent value.

The article concludes with a note that museum officials and police have taken measures to track the stolen coins, and insurance companies are involved in the investigation. The coins are cataloged, and their unique characteristics are documented to help in their recovery.

This image shows a newspaper article pinned onto a cork board. The headline reads "Charlestown Man Believed Mastermind in Huge Coin Theft" and it's from the "BOSTON HERALD AMERICAN, TUESDAY, DEC. 4," though the year is not fully visible in the provided image. The article appears to continue from a previous page and includes text that details the story.

Below the main headline, there is a subheading "How Bandits May Profit From Coin Loot" with an explanation of the potential ways the thieves might be able to benefit from the stolen coins. Accompanying the text are images of various old coins with captions that describe their respective value and importance.

The condition and appearance of the newspaper suggest age, but the actual date and the full context of the theft are not discernable from the given portion of the article. The article text and coin images would provide more insight into the story being reported.

The image shows a newspaper clipping from the Boston Herald American dated Tuesday, December 4, 1973. The main headline reads, "Charlestown Man Believed Mastermind in Huge Coin Theft." The article details a significant coin theft, with references to investigators, suspects, and the investigation process.

There is a subheading titled "How Bandits May Profit From Coin Loot," explaining methods thieves might use to sell or launder stolen coins, including melting them down, selling to collectors, or ransom back to the university or insurance companies.

The clipping also includes a sequence of images of coins, likely related to the stolen items. The overall content focuses on a high-profile coin theft case, suspects involved, and challenges faced by law enforcement in recovering and identifying the stolen coins. The article mentions specific details about the crime's circumstances, like the involvement of "Ryan" and the value and rarity of the coins taken.

A newspaper clipping is placed on a beige background. The clipping is from the Boston Herald American, dated Tuesday, December 4, 1973. The headline reads, "Charlestown Man Believed Mastermind in Huge Coin Theft." The article discusses a significant coin theft that occurred at the Fogg Museum at Harvard University. The stolen coins, valued at around $22 million, were made of gold, silver, and bronze and originated from various ancient civilizations. The article mentions that the coins were insured, but the insurance company was not disclosed.

Description of the Image

The image is a scanned newspaper clipping from the Boston Herald American, dated Tuesday, December 4, 1973. The headline prominently reads:
"Charlestown Man Believed Mastermind in Huge Coin Theft."

Main Article Content:

The article details a significant coin theft that occurred at the Fogg Art Museum in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Key points from the article include:

1. The Theft:

   • Nearly more than half of the nearly 6000 stolen coins were owned by the museum itself.
   • The stolen coins were valued at $250,000 at the time of the theft.
   • The coins included artifacts from Greek, Roman, and Byzantine periods, dating back to the 7th century B.C.

2. The Mastermind:

   • A man named Daniel Robbins, described as a Charlestown resident, is believed to be the mastermind behind the theft.
   • Robbins was a former employee of the Fogg Museum and had intimate knowledge of the museum's layout and security systems.
   • He was arrested and charged with the theft, having fled to Europe after the robbery.

3. The Robbery:

   • The theft occurred in the early morning hours when the museum was closed to the public.
   • Thieves used a pistol to force a watchman into a back room, tied him up, and escaped with the coins.
   • The thieves entered through a basement window, took the coins from display cases, and left the museum without triggering alarms.

4. The Investigation:

   • FBI cooperation was involved in tracking down the thieves.
   • The Harvard University Police and local authorities were also involved in the investigation.
   • Charles Daly, the museum's director, confirmed that the thieves had masterminded the robbery with precision.

5. The Coins:

   • The stolen coins were highly valuable, with some being private collections from around the world.
   • The coins were not insured, which raised questions about the museum's security measures.

Sidebar: "How Bandits May Profit From Coin Loot"

The article includes a sidebar titled "How Bandits May Profit From Coin Loot," which outlines seven ways thieves could profit from the stolen coins:

1. Melt the coins down into gold and silver.
2. Sell the coins in small lots or one at a time.
3. Sell the entire lot to an art collector.
4. Sell the coins back to the university.
5. Sell the coins to individuals who looted the pieces from the museum.
6. Sell the insured pieces to the insurance companies.
7. Sell the coins to known art collectors.

The sidebar emphasizes that some collectors might be willing to pay a premium for rare or historically significant coins, even if it means increasing their status symbol.

Visual Elements:

• Photographs of Coins:
  The article includes six images of ancient coins, showcasing the types of artifacts stolen. These coins appear to be from various historical periods, including Greek, Roman, and Byzantine designs, with intricate engravings and inscriptions.

• Layout:
  The article is formatted in a classic newspaper style, with a bold headline, subheadings, and columns of text. The sidebar is placed below the main article, providing additional context.

Contextual Details:

• The article highlights the complexity of the theft, noting that the thieves had to navigate the museum's security systems and avoid detection.
• It also touches on the ethical and legal implications of the theft, mentioning that some collectors might be willing to buy stolen coins, which could complicate law enforcement efforts.

Overall Impression:

The image captures a historical news story about a high-profile coin theft, emphasizing the sophistication of the crime, the value of the stolen artifacts, and the potential methods thieves might use to profit from such a heist. The inclusion of coin images adds visual interest and underscores the significance of the stolen items. The article reflects the 1970s media style, with detailed reporting and a focus on investigative journalism.