Archives Scrapbooks

The image shows a newspaper article titled "Funding flap worries Massachusetts arts groups." The article discusses concerns about funding for arts organizations in Massachusetts, particularly focusing on the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and the controversy surrounding its funding decisions.

Key points from the article include:

1. Controversy Over NEA Funding:

   • There is a dispute over the NEA's decision to fund a performance piece titled "Prelude" by Robert Berman, which was criticized for its content.
   • The article mentions that the NEA's selection process and criteria have come under scrutiny.

2. Reactions from the Arts Community:

   • Robert Orchard, executive director of the American Repertory Theatre, expresses concern about the politicization of arts funding.
   • There is a sense of unease within the arts community about the potential impact of political pressures on future funding.

3. Funding for the Arts:

   • A list of the top 10 recipients of NEA grants in Massachusetts for the fiscal year 1990 is provided, including organizations like the New England Foundation for the Arts, the Museum of Fine Arts, and the Boston Symphony Orchestra.
   • The amounts granted range from $140,000 to $20,000.

4. Statements from Arts Leaders:

   • Robert Brustein, artistic director of the American Repertory Theatre, criticizes the NEA's decision-making process and the influence of political considerations.
   • Patricia Funder, director of the Massachusetts Council on the Arts and Humanities, expresses disappointment with the NEA's handling of the situation.

5. Future of Arts Funding:

   • There is a general concern that the controversy could lead to reduced federal funding for the arts.
   • The article highlights the importance of federal grants for arts organizations and the potential impact of political interference on artistic freedom.

Overall, the article underscores the tension between artistic expression and political oversight in the context of public funding for the arts.

The image is a newspaper article titled "Funding flap worries Massachusetts arts groups," dated June 17, 1989. The article discusses concerns among arts organizations in Massachusetts about changes in funding policies by the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) under the leadership of John Frohman. Key points include:

1. Context and Reactions:

   • Frohman's decision to withhold $30,000 from the Boston Shakespeare Theater, which had displayed homosexual themes, has raised concerns about political interference in funding decisions.
   • Robert Orchard, managing director of the Boston Shakespeare Theater, expressed disappointment but decided to return the entire grant to assert artistic independence.

2. Broader Implications:

   • Many arts groups in Massachusetts, which receive significant NEA funding, are worried about the potential impact on their future grants.
   • The article highlights that the state's arts organizations are prominent recipients of NEA funds, with institutions like the Boston Symphony Orchestra, American Repertory Theater, and Harvard University's arts programs receiving substantial grants.

3. Quotes and Opinions:

   • Jane M. Spilman, NEA chair, is quoted defending the decision, stating that the NEA has always avoided political entanglements.
   • Local artists and arts administrators express concerns about the chilling effect on free expression and the potential for future funding cuts.

4. Financial Data:

   • A table lists the top 10 recipients of NEA grants in Massachusetts for the fiscal year 1989, with the Boston Shakespeare Theater receiving $30,000, the New England Foundation for the Arts receiving $839,600, and other notable institutions receiving varying amounts.

5. Concerns About Censorship:

   • The article mentions fears that the NEA's decisions signal a shift towards censorship and self-censorship, with some artists worrying about how their work might be perceived by the NEA.

6. Local vs. Federal Concerns:

   • Some, like Jesse Helms, are seen as using these concerns to argue for the elimination of the NEA, while others advocate for the NEA's importance in supporting artistic freedom.

The overall tone of the article is one of uncertainty and concern among the arts community in Massachusetts about the future of their funding and the potential impacts on artistic freedom and expression.

The image is a newspaper clipping titled "Funding flap worries Massachusetts arts groups," focusing on a controversy surrounding the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and its decision-making process regarding funding for arts projects.

Here are the key points from the article:

1. Chairman's Decision Reversal:

   • The chairman of the NEA reversed his decision to cancel the endorsement grant for the Boston Arts Festival after it was initially proposed by Prohmer, a member of the NEA.
   • This reversal was motivated by concerns that the decision might be seen as politically motivated.

2. Orchard's Concerns and Public Response:

   • Robert Orchard, the managing director of the Boston Arts Festival, expressed his concerns about the reversal, stating that it was not a good move and that the decision should not be influenced by political considerations.
   • Orchard was concerned about the precedent set by the NEA's actions and the potential impact on other artists and arts groups.

3. Political and Professional Controversy:

   • The article highlights the political implications and the perceived influence of political considerations on the NEA's funding decisions.
   • There's mention of the ongoing debate within the arts community about whether the NEA's funding is being influenced by political pressures.

4. Reactions from Various Figures:

   • The article includes quotes from several figures within the arts community, including:
     • Jandel Spita: Acting Executive Director of the Boston Arts Festival, who emphasizes the importance of the NEA's mandate.
     • Robert Orchard: Discusses the concerns over the precedent set by the NEA’s actions and the importance of maintaining artistic freedoms.
     • Jessica Helm: Who talks about her involvement in the arts community and the importance of not letting political pressures affect the NEA's decisions.

5. Funding and Grant Details:

   • The article lists the top recipients of NEA grants in Massachusetts for fiscal year 1989, providing the names of organizations, their locations, and the amounts of their grants.

6. Broader Context:

   • The broader context of the NEA's funding practices, including the potential erosion of artistic freedoms and the influence of political decisions, is discussed in the article.

The overall focus of the article is to explore the tension between artistic integrity and political pressures within the NEA's funding process, highlighting the concerns of various stakeholders in the Massachusetts arts community.

The image is a clipping from a newspaper, featuring an article titled "Funding flap worries Massachusetts arts groups." The article discusses concerns and controversies surrounding the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and its funding decisions.

Key points from the article include:

1. Funding Decision Reversal: The NEA initially rejected funding for an exhibition at Artspace, a Cambridge-based arts organization, due to its content being perceived as "political." However, the decision was later reversed, causing concern among arts groups.

2. NEA's Decision Process: The NEA's decision to initially deny the grant was based on the assumption that the show might display some artworks that could be seen as controversial or politically charged. The art in question, "The Homosexual Acts," by Robert Mapplethorpe, was a focal point of this debate.

3. Chairman's Decision: The chairman of the NEA, Robert Ochshorn, reversed his decision after consulting with members of the National Council on the Arts. He acknowledged that the initial decision was "too close to call" and was influenced by the council's advice.

4. Concerns Among Arts Groups: The article highlights the broader implications of the NEA's decision-making process, with many artists and arts organizations worried about the potential censorship and the pressures involved in securing federal arts funding.

5. Impact on Federal Funding: The article discusses the importance of federal funding for arts organizations, noting that a significant portion of the funding goes to various arts councils and institutions across Massachusetts.

6. Political and Community Concerns: The article mentions the community's reaction and the fear of further restrictions on artistic freedom, with some suggesting that the NEA's decision could set a precedent for more conservative funding criteria.

7. Specific Figures and Organizations: The article lists the top recipients of NEA grants in Massachusetts for the fiscal year 1989, indicating the substantial financial support provided to various arts organizations.

8. Challenges and Criticisms: There is a noted tension between the NEA's role in funding arts and the potential for political influence or bias in its decision-making processes.

Overall, the article reflects the anxieties and debates surrounding federal arts funding and the balance between artistic freedom and political considerations.

The image is a newspaper clipping featuring an article titled "Funding flap worries Massachusetts arts groups." The article discusses concerns among arts organizations in Massachusetts over funding from the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA).

Key points include:

1. Controversy Over NEA Funding:

   • The article highlights a controversy involving Robert Orchard, the managing director of the Boston Symphony Orchestra, who criticized the NEA's decision to fund Artists Space, a group that displayed controversial artwork.

2. Reaction from Arts Community:

   • Orchard expressed his disapproval, saying he would not accept NEA funding if it supported such displays, calling it a misuse of taxpayer funds. He also mentioned that the NEA's decision could lead to a precedent where artistic freedoms are restricted.
   • Orchard's views were echoed by others in the arts community, including the president of the Boston Museum of Fine Arts, who expressed concern about the potential impact on the arts community.

3. Support and Opposition:

   • There is a mix of reactions from the arts community, with some supporting the NEA’s funding decisions and others opposing them.
   • The article mentions that the controversy has led to calls for the NEA to reconsider its funding criteria, and some believe the NEA should focus on supporting more traditional forms of art.

4. Funding for Massachusetts Arts:

   • The article lists the top 10 recipients of NEA grants in Massachusetts for the fiscal year 1989, including organizations like the Boston Symphony Orchestra, the Museum of Fine Arts, and the American Repertory Theatre.
   • The total amount of NEA funding for these organizations is $494,690.

5. Broader Implications:

   • The flap has raised questions about the NEA's role and whether it should continue to fund potentially controversial projects.
   • The article includes quotes from individuals discussing the implications of the NEA's funding decisions, emphasizing the need for a clear policy to avoid future controversies.

6. Institutional Responses:

   • Some institutions have decided to take a more cautious approach to accepting NEA funds due to the controversy, while others remain steadfast in their support.

The clipping also features a sidebar listing the top recipients of NEA grants in Massachusetts for the fiscal year 1989, showing the specific organizations and the amounts they received.

The image is a newspaper article titled "Funding flap worries Massachusetts arts groups." The article discusses the controversy surrounding the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and its funding decisions, particularly involving an exhibition at the Institute of Contemporary Art in Boston.

Key points include:

1. Concerns Among Arts Groups:

   • Massachusetts arts groups are worried about the potential loss of NEA funding due to political pressures.
   • The controversy stems from objections to specific artworks, leading to a review and possible revocation of NEA grants.

2. Incidents and Reactions:

   • The chairman of the Institute of Contemporary Art, Robert Orchard, initially defended the exhibition but later decided to return the NEA grant, which caused further concern among arts communities.
   • Prominent figures, including former NEA Chairman Francis S. M. Hodsoll and U.S. Senator Edward M. Kennedy, have voiced their support for maintaining NEA funding despite controversial works.
   • Orchard mentioned that the decision to return the grant was partly due to the threat of legal action from conservative groups and the need to protect other funding sources.

3. Political Context:

   • The article highlights the broader national debate on federal funding for the arts, with some political figures wanting to cut or control NEA funding based on contentious exhibitions.
   • The pressures on the NEA are significant, with calls for stricter guidelines or censorship of funded art.

4. Funding Details:

   • The sidebar lists top recipients of NEA grants in Massachusetts for the fiscal year 1989, including the New England Foundation for the Arts, Boston Symphony Orchestra, and several theaters and museums.

5. State and Local Concerns:

   • The state arts council is also impacted, as reduced NEA funding could affect the distribution of state grants.
   • There is a fear that controversy over specific exhibitions might lead to overall cuts in arts funding, affecting a wide range of institutions and artists.

Overall, the article underscores the tension between artistic freedom and political oversight, and the potential ramifications for arts funding in Massachusetts.

This image shows a newspaper article with the headline "Funding flap worries Massachusetts arts groups." The article appears to be discussing a controversy over funding for the arts, referring to cancellations, reversals of decisions, and the implications for Massachusetts cultural organizations. It contains quotes from individuals concerning the pressures and challenges faced by the arts community due to these funding issues. One prominent pull quote reads: "The pressures are in the air. The notion of not being free is frightening to me. It's something that one is definitely concerned about."

One section of the article provides a table titled "Funding for the Arts," listing organizations in various Massachusetts cities and the grant amounts they received. The photo captures a portion of the article and table, with some text and figures legible.

To the right, there is a sidebar with additional text and an “$” symbol which may relate to the topic of arts funding. The newspaper is slightly crumpled and appears as if it's been folded and handled. There is also a creased paper or receipt laying partially on top of the newspaper on the upper left, obscuring some of the text.

Description of the Image:

The image is a scanned page from a newspaper or magazine, featuring an article titled "Funding flap worries Massachusetts arts groups". The article is part of a section labeled "CONTROVERSY", indicating that the content deals with a contentious issue. The page is formatted in a typical newspaper style, with a headline, subheadings, and a body of text, along with a sidebar titled "Funding for the Arts" that lists top recipients of National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) grants.

Main Article Content:

1. Headline and Context:

   • The headline, "Funding flap worries Massachusetts arts groups," suggests that the article discusses concerns within the Massachusetts arts community regarding funding issues, likely related to the NEA or similar arts funding bodies.

2. Key Points in the Article:

   • Controversy Over Funding Decisions:
     • The article highlights a decision by the Massachusetts Arts Council to reverse a prior grant decision. This decision involved rejecting a grant for a performance by composer and conductor Leonard Bernstein, which sparked controversy.
     • The chairman of the council, David Ross, defended the decision, stating it was a "real good move."
   • Concerns from Arts Groups:
     • Several arts organizations and individuals, including Robert Orchard (managing director of the American Repertory Theatre in Cambridge), express concern over the decision. Orchard describes the situation as "pressures in the air" and "something that one is definitely concerned about."
     • Orchard mentions that the NEA had previously awarded a grant to support his theater, but the recent decision has created uncertainty and worry among artists and arts institutions.
   • Impact on Artists and Institutions:
     • The article discusses how the decision has affected artists and institutions, such as the American Repertory Theatre, which had previously received NEA funding. Orchard notes that the decision has led to financial instability and uncertainty about future funding.
     • Other stakeholders, including the Massachusetts Council on the Arts and Humanities, are also mentioned, indicating widespread concern.

3. Quotes and Opinions:

   • Robert Orchard:
     • Describes the situation as "pressures in the air" and expresses concern about the impact on artists and institutions.
     • Mentions that the NEA had previously awarded a grant to his theater, but the recent decision has created uncertainty.
   • David Ross (Chairman of the Massachusetts Arts Council):
     • Defends the decision to reverse the grant, stating it was a "real good move."
     • Acknowledges the controversy but emphasizes the council’s mandate to support the arts in a balanced way.
   • Jane Frohnmayer (NEA Director):
     • Expresses concern about the decision, stating that it is "very important" and that the NEA’s mandate is to support the arts.
     • Notes that the decision has created ambiguity and challenges for the NEA in fulfilling its mission.

4. Sidebar: "Funding for the Arts"

   • The sidebar lists the Top 10 recipients of National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) grants in Massachusetts for the fiscal year 1989. It includes:
     • Organization
     • City
     • Grant Amount
   • Examples include:
     • New England Foundation for the Arts (Cambridge) - $359,000
     • Massachusetts Council on the Arts & Humanities (Boston) - $494,690
     • American Symphony Orchestra Inc. (Boston) - $366,500
     • Boston Repertory Theatre (Cambridge) - $363,300
     • Jacob’s Pillow Dance Festival Inc. (Lee) - $200,400
     • President & Fellows of Harvard College (Cambridge) - $170,550
     • Boston Film/Video Foundation Inc. (Boston) - $161,100
     • WGBH Education Foundation (Boston) - $141,000
     • Institute of Contemporary Art (Boston) - $125,500

5. Visual Layout:

   • The page is divided into two main sections:
     • The left side contains the main article text, with a headline, subheadings, and body text.
     • The right side includes the sidebar titled "Funding for the Arts", which provides a chart of NEA grant recipients.
   • The article is presented in a clean, readable format with clear typography and structured paragraphs.

6. Additional Details:

   • The article includes a byline or credit at the bottom: "GLOBE STAFF CHART / N. P. NICHOLL."
   • The page number is visible at the top left corner, indicating it is part of a larger publication.

Overall Impression:

The image portrays a news article focused on a significant controversy surrounding arts funding in Massachusetts. It highlights the tension between funding decisions and the concerns of artists and arts institutions, with quotes from key stakeholders and a detailed list of NEA grant recipients. The layout is professional and informative, typical of a newspaper or magazine covering a current issue.

The image is a page from a newspaper with a headline that reads "Funding flap worries Massachusetts arts groups." The article discusses concerns among Massachusetts arts organizations about funding decisions made by the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). The article features a table listing the top 10 recipients of National Endowment for the Arts grants in Massachusetts for fiscal year 1989, with the New England Foundation for the Arts at the top with a grant of $839,600.

The article also includes quotes from various individuals, including Robert Orchard, managing director of the American Repertory Theatre, who expressed concern about the notion of not being free to receive funds from the NEA without endorsing the artistic quality of the groups that receive aid. The article also discusses the controversy surrounding the decision to reverse funding for a show by composer and conductor Leonard Bernstein, which had been cut due to concerns about political content.

The image is a photograph of a newspaper clipping. The clipping is from a newspaper, and it is about a funding flap that worries Massachusetts arts groups. The clipping is from the "CONTROVERSY" section of the newspaper, and it has a headline that reads "Funding flap worries Massachusetts arts groups."

The clipping has a black-and-white image of a box with a dollar sign on it, and it has a table that lists the top 10 recipients of National Endowment for the Arts grants in Massachusetts for fiscal year 1989. The table lists the names of the recipients, the city where they are located, and the amount of money they received.

The clipping also has a quote from Robert Orchard, managing director of the American Repertory Theatre in Cambridge, who says, "The pressures are in the air. The notion of not being free is frightening to me. It's definitely something that one is concerned about."

The clipping also has a quote from Janet Spitz, director of development at the Museum of Fine Arts, who says, "That's great. I think it's very important. That law is so ambiguous. It makes the mandate of the NEA almost impossible. Their job is to support and help the arts. But to be successful with Congress, the arts community is in agreement that Frohmayer has to make a strong statement on behalf of the arts. He cannot vacillate."

The clipping also has a quote from David Ross, director of the Institute of Contemporary Art, who says, "It's really important for American artists and American arts institutions to show that what is critical of America, in an exhibition of dialogue. This is one of the reasons that we were critical of the Soviet Union and the way that they treated their artists."

The clipping also has a quote from Kenneth Haas, managing director of the Boston Symphony Orchestra, who says, "I'm not really on its peer panel review process to ensure quality. Only high-quality art gets funded. BSO recently received $865,500 for its endowment funds and a fellowship program at Tanglewood. Despite the warm sentiments that the small arts gallery may or may be expressed for Frohmayer, it wishes now or that once again being."

The clipping also has a quote from Samuel Miller, managing director of Jacob's Pillow Dance Festival in Lee, who says, "We should not be arguing for ever against this issue. Against, we should be arguing for ever against this issue. Against, we should be arguing for ever against this issue."

The clipping also has a quote from Jesse Helms, who says, "I think we have to pass this through now for the bigger question. A reach for the higher ground. A what's Jesse Helms going to do?"