Archives Scrapbooks

The image shows a newspaper clipping from the Boston Sunday Globe, dated November 19, 1989. The headline reads "NEA Controversy: Funding flap worries Mass. arts groups." The article is written by DeeDee Frosch, a Globe staff writer.

The article discusses the concerns of Massachusetts arts groups following the recent changes in the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) funding policies. The new chairman of the NEA, John Frohnmayer, had announced that the organization would no longer fund certain controversial art projects, leading to worries among local arts groups about potential funding cuts.

Key points from the article include:

• The NEA's decision to withdraw funding from two controversial exhibitions.
• Representatives of the state's larger arts organizations expressing concerns about the potential impact on their funding.
• The NEA's $175 million budget and the significance of its grants to arts groups in Massachusetts.
• Comments from various arts leaders and politicians about the situation, including reactions from Boston Mayor Raymond Flynn and Senator Edward Kennedy.
• The broader context of political pressure on the NEA due to controversies over publicly funded art.

The article highlights the tension between artistic freedom and political oversight, as well as the financial implications for arts organizations reliant on NEA grants.

The image shows a newspaper article from the Boston Sunday Globe, dated November 19, 1989. The headline of the article is "Funding flap worries Mass. arts groups," and it is written by Desiree Funch. The article discusses concerns among arts organizations in Massachusetts following the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) chairman's decision to withhold funds from a New York art show that included works addressing the AIDS crisis. The decision raised fears among local arts groups about potential challenges to their own funding. The article highlights reactions from various stakeholders, including praise for the chairman's reversal of the decision and concerns about the broader implications for government support of the arts. It also mentions specific events and statements from local figures, such as the director of the Boston Center for the Arts, who expressed relief and understanding of the chairman's position.

The image is a newspaper clipping from the Boston Sunday Globe, dated November 19, 1989. The article is titled "NEA Controversy: Funding flap worries Mass. arts groups."

Here's a detailed summary:

1. Title and Subtitle:

   • The headline reads, "Funding flap worries Mass. arts groups."

2. Main Article:

   • The article by Desiree French discusses a controversy surrounding the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) funding decisions.
   • Two weeks prior, Massachusetts arts groups were upset about the new chair of the NEA, who reversed funds for 10 organizations, including the Boston Arts Alliance, which received $60,000 in 1988.

3. Key Points:

   • The article highlights that Massachusetts arts groups were concerned about the potential loss of funding, especially since the NEA's original decision was to withdraw funds from a few organizations in New York for not meeting the requirements.
   • The decision sparked outrage and raised concerns that the NEA was overly focused on high-profile agencies and institutions, potentially neglecting smaller organizations.
   • There is mention of various reactions from Boston to Los Angeles, with a focus on the political and financial impact of these changes on the arts community.

4. John F. Frohnmayer:

   • The article references John Frohnmayer, the new NEA chairman. Frohnmayer is criticized for his decision to cancel funding for several organizations, including the Fine Arts Center of Massachusetts, which received $20,000 in 1988.
   • Frohnmayer is quoted as saying, "It's not good" about the cancellation of grants for these organizations.

5. Community Reaction:

   • The Boston arts community has expressed concerns about the cancellation of grants, indicating that the decision was not well-received and was seen as a step away from supporting smaller and local arts organizations.
   • The article also mentions that some of the organizations affected by the cancellation are appealing the decisions, while others are seeking legal advice.

6. Additional Context:

   • There is mention of a new federal law, the "Witnesses Against Obscenity" law, which was passed to restrict government support for "obscene" works of art. This law is viewed critically by the arts community as potentially affecting the distribution of NEA funds.

7. Exhibitions and Support:

   • The article notes that Frohnmayer has been criticized for his handling of the NEA's budget and for not adequately supporting smaller arts groups.
   • There is mention of an open letter from artists and arts supporters to President Bush, urging him to support the NEA and its funding.

8. Conclusion:

   • The article concludes with a statement that the NEA's actions have raised significant concerns and that the community is now looking for ways to ensure that the NEA continues to support a broad spectrum of arts activities, including those of smaller organizations.

Overall, the clipping captures the tension and debate within the arts community over the NEA's funding decisions and the perceived shift towards prioritizing high-profile projects over smaller, local efforts.

The image shows a newspaper clipping from the Boston Sunday Globe dated November 19, 1989. The article is titled "NEA Controversy: Funding flap worries Mass. arts groups" and is written by Desiree French of the Globe Staff.

The article discusses a controversy surrounding the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), where several arts institutions in Massachusetts were deeply concerned about the reversal of a decision to fund a New York art show about AIDS. The NEA initially planned to withhold $100,000 in funds from the show titled "The AIDS Quilt" but later reversed this decision. The article also mentions that the NEA's chairman, John Frohmayr, reversed his decision after receiving criticism.

The article highlights reactions from various Massachusetts arts groups, who were worried that the NEA's decision might set a precedent for future funding challenges. The article quotes several individuals, including Janet Spitz, the director of the Massachusetts Cultural Council, who expressed concern about the implications of the funding reversal. Spitz and others believe that the reversal could lead to the cancellation of other controversial grants, potentially impacting the arts community significantly.

The article also touches on the broader context of the NEA's role in funding and the political debates surrounding public funding for arts and cultural projects. It mentions that Frohmayr's decision was influenced by a mix of political pressure and public outcry. The piece notes that the reversal of the funding decision was a significant turnaround and had mixed reactions from the arts community.

The image shows a newspaper clipping from the Boston Sunday Globe, dated November 19, 1989. The headline of the article is "Funding flap worries Mass. arts groups," and it discusses a controversy involving the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA).

Key points of the article include:

1. NEA Controversy: The article focuses on the decision by the NEA to withhold funds from a New York arts collective, Gran Fury, due to concerns over their political and provocative artworks, particularly those related to AIDS awareness.

2. Impact on Massachusetts: The article highlights the concerns of arts groups in Massachusetts, who fear that the NEA’s decision might set a precedent for future funding challenges.

3. Funding Reversal: The NEA initially reversed its decision to cancel a grant to a group called "Witnesses: Against Our Vanishing," which was set to exhibit at Artists Space in New York. This reversal was due to pressure and concerns from the arts community.

4. Statement by NEA Chairman: John Frohnmayer, the NEA chairman, is quoted in the article. He mentions that the NEA's grant-making process is rigorous and that the agency is committed to supporting art, even if it is controversial or challenging.

5. Political Pressure: The article discusses political pressure on the NEA, particularly from conservative groups, and the potential impact on funding for arts organizations.

6. Artist and Community Reactions: Reactions from artists and arts administrators are included, reflecting their worries about the NEA's funding decisions and the broader implications for artistic freedom and support.

The clipping also includes a boxed quote from Janet Spitz, the executive director of Development at the Massachusetts Arts Consortium, who emphasizes the importance of the NEA's role in supporting arts and the potential negative impact of the funding flap on the arts community.

The image is a newspaper clipping from the Boston Sunday Globe, dated November 19, 1989. The article is titled "Funding flap worries Mass. arts groups" and is written by Desirée French.

Summary:

The article discusses concerns among Massachusetts arts organizations due to a controversy involving the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). The controversy arose after the NEA funded exhibitions that some members of Congress and the public found objectionable, leading to a debate over the appropriateness of using federal funds for certain artworks.

Key Points:

1. Background of the Controversy:

   • The NEA faced criticism for funding projects that some deemed inappropriate, sparking a national debate.
   • This controversy has led to worries about the future funding of arts in Massachusetts.

2. Impact on Massachusetts Arts Groups:

   • Massachusetts arts institutions are deeply worried about the repercussions.
   • They fear that the controversy might lead to a reduction in NEA funding, which many rely on.
   • The New England Foundation for the Arts (NEFA) had recently received a significant grant, but concerns remain about future funding.

3. Specific Concerns and Statements:

   • Marilyn Hoffman from the Institute of Contemporary Art in Boston expressed concern that the NEA might not continue its funding.
   • Artists and organizations are worried about potential policy changes that could restrict artistic expression.
   • The article mentions that the NEA's congressional reauthorization might face challenges due to the ongoing debate.

4. Examples of Controversy:

   • The controversy includes funding for exhibitions featuring Robert Mapplethorpe and Andres Serrano, whose works have sparked debate over public funding for the arts.
   • The article notes that Congress is considering language to prevent the NEA from funding works similar to those that have caused controversy.

5. Local Reactions:

   • Prominent figures in the Massachusetts arts community, such as John Frohnmayer (then NEA chairman), are trying to reassure artists and organizations.
   • The article emphasizes the importance of the arts to the local economy and cultural landscape.

6. Future Outlook:

   • The article suggests that the coming months will be crucial in determining how the controversy will affect future NEA funding and arts support in Massachusetts.
   • There is a call for the arts community to rally together and communicate the value of the arts to policymakers.

The article underscores the anxiety within the Massachusetts arts community about the potential loss of NEA funding and the broader implications for artistic freedom and support.

The image shows a newspaper clipping from the Boston Sunday Globe, dated November 19, 1989. The article headline reads "Funding flap worries Mass. arts groups" and is authored by Desiree French, Globe Staff. The article discusses concerns within the Massachusetts arts community following a decision by the new chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), John E. Frohnmayer, to withhold funds from an art exhibition in New York about AIDS.

The article explains that representatives of the state’s largest recipients of NEA grants voiced their approval of Frohnmayer's decision but also expressed worry about potential future challenges with NEA funding. Several high-profile agencies and institutions were attempting to forgive Frohnmayer’s decision and gauge his future actions. The article includes a quote from Holly Sidford, executive director of the New England Foundation for the Arts, who reflects on Frohnmayer’s realization that withholding funds was an erroneous decision, which he later changed.

The article also highlights Frohnmayer's stance on government support restrictions for artworks considered "obscene," noting his description of an art show at Artists Space in New York as "political rather than artistic" due to its critical remarks about public figures.

The clipping has been partially cut off, with some continuation on another page referenced as "Page A4."

This is an image of a newspaper article from the "Boston Sunday Globe." The article, dated November 19, 1989, has the headline "NEA CONTROVERSY - Funding flap worries Mass. arts groups," which suggests it discusses concerns about funding for arts organizations in Massachusetts related to the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). It's a physical newspaper clipping, and we can see some crease marks on the paper, indicating it has been folded.

The article, written by Desiree French (as noted by the byline), appears to open with a mention of the tumultuous times for many arts institutions in Massachusetts and references a specific incident where the then-new chairman of the NEA reversed his decision for the AIDS Fund. It also mentions reactions to the NEA's chairman's decision-making regarding the distribution of funds and the broader implications for the art community.

There's a continuation note at the bottom of the visible section, indicating that the article continues on another page ("NEAR, Page A4"). The text in the image is partially obscured by the way the paper is folded, and the edges of the page are slightly worn, suggesting it has been handled or stored for some time.

The image is a scanned page from the Boston Sunday Globe, dated November 19, 1989. The article is titled "Funding flap worries Mass. arts groups" and discusses concerns among Massachusetts arts organizations regarding the funding decisions of the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). The article features a main headline with a smaller subheading and quotes from various individuals, including the chairman of the Massachusetts Arts Council, who expresses his worries about the funding situation. The article also mentions the NEA's original decision to withhold funds from certain organizations and the subsequent reversal of this decision. The image includes both the article's content and the newspaper's layout, with the article occupying the central portion of the page and additional text and images surrounding it.

The image shows a newspaper clipping with two articles on a page. The first article is titled "NEA Controversy Funding flap worries Mass. arts groups" by Denise French. The article discusses concerns among Massachusetts arts organizations about funding from the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). The article mentions that the NEA has been in turmoil due to controversies, and many arts groups are worried about the impact on their funding. The second article is titled "It worries Mass." and is a continuation of the first article. It discusses the potential impact of the NEA's funding issues on Massachusetts arts groups and the concerns of local arts organizations about the future of their funding. The articles are printed on a white background with black text, and the newspaper clipping appears to be from a local newspaper in Massachusetts.