Archives Scrapbooks

The image is a newspaper clipping featuring an article titled "Revising Art History." The article discusses the work of revisionist art historians, specifically focusing on T.J. Clark, a professor at Harvard University. The article is accompanied by a photograph of T.J. Clark and an image of a painting titled "Danaë" by Titian.

Key points from the article include:

1. Revisionist Historians: The article highlights the work of revisionist historians who challenge traditional interpretations of art history.
2. T.J. Clark: The focus is on T.J. Clark, who has been a significant figure in this field. He is known for his books "Image of the People" and "The Absolute Bourgeois."
3. New Generation: The article suggests that the ideas of these revisionists are influencing a new generation of art historians.
4. Criticism and Debate: There is mention of a tenured debate within the academic community regarding the validity and impact of these revisionist views.
5. Cultural Context: The revisionists argue that art should be understood within its social and political context, rather than purely aesthetically.

The article is continued from a previous page and is part of a larger discussion on how art history is being reinterpreted and taught in academic settings.

The image depicts a newspaper article titled "Revising Art History." The article discusses a movement among art historians, including figures like Thomas Crow, to re-examine and revise the traditional canon of art history. The revisionists, as they are called, argue that the traditional narrative, which often focuses on a select group of Western artists, should be expanded to include a broader range of artists and consider the social and political contexts of their work.

The article highlights several key points:

• The traditional art history canon, as taught by professors like Heinrich Wölfflin and Ernst Gombrich, is seen as outdated and in need of revision.
• Revisionists like Thomas Crow, Carol Duncan, and Serge Guégan are at the forefront of this movement, advocating for a more inclusive and contextually rich understanding of art.
• The debate extends to the role of museums, which are also being encouraged to diversify their collections and exhibitions to reflect a more global and diverse set of artistic voices.
• The article mentions specific institutions, such as the Whitney Museum, which has begun to include more contemporary and diverse artists in its programming.
• The debate is not without controversy, as some traditionalists resist the changes, fearing the loss of established artistic standards.

The article also touches on the broader implications of this revisionist approach, suggesting that it could reshape not only how art history is taught but also how art is valued and understood in society at large. The image of Thomas Crow, a prominent revisionist art historian, is included alongside the article.

The image shows a page from a newspaper or magazine article titled "Revising Art History" by Prof. Thomas Crow. The article discusses the impact of revisionist art historians on the understanding of art history, particularly focusing on the works of David A. Ross and Marie-Antonine-Préfontaine Lavallée.

Key points include:

1. Background and Context:

   • The article discusses how revisionists have challenged traditional narratives in art history.
   • It highlights the works of prominent figures like Thomas Crow and others who have contributed to the reevaluation of art history.

2. Revolution in Art History:

   • The text mentions how the methods of art historians have evolved, focusing on subjects like gender, race, and social history.
   • It references specific works and theories, such as those by Thomas Crow, who has been instrumental in reshaping the perception of art history.

3. Revised Art History:

   • Crow's work, as referenced, emphasizes the importance of considering the social and cultural contexts of art.
   • He is noted for his influential books, like "The Refinement of the Arts," which contribute to the broader discourse in art history.

4. Discussion Points and Controversies:

   • The article touches on debates within the art community, including the impact of these revisionist histories on the understanding of famous artists and artworks.
   • It mentions specific works and artists, such as those by the Impressionists, and how their histories are being re-evaluated.

5. Overall Theme:

   • The central theme revolves around how modern art historians are changing the narratives and interpretations of art, thereby impacting the way we view and understand art history.

The page also includes a section on "A Terrible Debate," where Crow discusses the controversy surrounding the inclusion and exclusion of certain artists and movements in the canon of art history, suggesting that these debates are ongoing and significant in the field.

The image shows a page from a newspaper or magazine article titled "Revising Art History." The article is an interview with Prof. Thomas Crow, a revisionist art historian, and it discusses his perspective on the history of art and its teaching.

Key points from the article include:

1. Introduction:

   • Prof. Thomas Crow, an art historian, is interviewed by David A. Ansen and Marie-Anne-Perrin Lavergne at the Met.
   • Crow is described as a revisionist, challenging traditional narratives of art history.

2. Challenging Traditional Narratives:

   • Crow argues that the history of art has been shaped by the tastes of a new generation.
   • He criticizes the traditional focus on a select few canonical artists and their works, suggesting that this approach has been too rigid and limiting.

3. Re-evaluation of Art History:

   • Crow's work involves revisiting the history of art to incorporate previously overlooked artists and movements.
   • He mentions that he has been revising the history of the "Method of Art History" and the "History of Art History" itself, emphasizing the need for a more inclusive and dynamic understanding of art.

4. Critiques and Debates:

   • Crow's approach has been met with resistance, with critics questioning his methods and conclusions.
   • He acknowledges that his work can be challenging, particularly to those who have traditionally taught art history.

5. Art and Social Context:

   • The article mentions Crow's belief that art should be understood in its social and cultural context.
   • He discusses how art is influenced by the political and social climate of its time, and how this context is crucial to its interpretation.

6. Reception and Influence:

   • Crow's work is seen to have significant implications for how art history is taught and understood.
   • He highlights the importance of understanding art in relation to broader societal issues, which can lead to a more nuanced and comprehensive history of art.

The article includes references to specific artworks, artists, and historical contexts to support Crow's arguments, emphasizing the broader implications of his revisionist approach to art history.

The image shows a page from a newspaper or magazine featuring an article titled "Revising Art History." The article discusses a debate about how art history is taught and written, focusing on the role of revisionists.

The article begins by mentioning Prof. Thomas Crow, a revisionist art historian, and his contributions to the field. The author, David Ansen, notes that Crow and his colleagues are reshaping the tastes of a new generation of art historians and critics.

The article highlights that Crow and others are challenging traditional methods of teaching and writing about art history. It references the book "Methods of Art History" by Crow, which argues for a more inclusive and comprehensive approach to studying art. The author describes Crow's belief that the study of art history should not be confined to the traditional canon of Western art but should also include art from other cultures and periods.

The article mentions specific examples of revisionist works, such as the exhibition "Picturing the Modern World," curated by Crow, which included works from different regions and times. It also discusses the impact of Crow's work on the teaching of art history at various institutions, including the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).

The article further elaborates on a debate at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, where Crow and his colleagues discussed the need to broaden the scope of art history. The article includes quotes from various critics and historians, including Serge Guilbaut and Linda Nochlin, who are also part of this revisionist movement.

The article concludes by emphasizing that these revisionists are challenging the traditional narratives and practices of art history, encouraging a more inclusive and diverse understanding of art's history and significance.

The image is a newspaper clipping featuring an article titled "Revising Art History" by Charles Claark. The article discusses Professor Thomas Crow, an art historian, and his perspectives on the revision of art history, particularly concerning the roles and recognition of previously overlooked artists.

Key Points in the Article:

1. Introduction to the Topic:

   • The article begins by mentioning a photograph of a 19th-century artist's studio, which includes a Black servant. This image prompts a discussion on the racial biases in art history and how they have influenced the recognition of artists.

2. Professor Thomas Crow:

   • Prof. Thomas Crow, a noted art historian, is highlighted for his work in revising traditional art history narratives.
   • Crow's research focuses on recognizing artists who have been marginalized or overlooked, particularly women and minorities.

3. Teaching and Writing:

   • Crow and other revisionist historians are re-shaping the tastes of a new generation by incorporating previously ignored artists and movements into the curriculum.
   • He emphasizes the importance of contextualizing art within its socio-political environment.

4. A Tenure Debate:

   • The article mentions a controversy at Yale University, where Crow's tenure faced opposition.
   • Critics, including some senior faculty members, questioned his methodology and the relevance of his work.
   • Despite this, Crow's approach has been supported by many students and colleagues who appreciate his innovative perspective.

5. Educational Background and Career:

   • Crow studied at Pomona College and later received his Ph.D. from UCLA.
   • He has taught at prominent institutions, including the University of Sussex, Princeton, and the California Institute of the Arts.
   • His research includes significant contributions to understanding 18th-century French art and the broader socio-political implications of art movements.

6. Philosophy on Art:

   • Crow believes that art history should be inclusive and reflective of a broader range of cultural experiences.
   • He argues for a more democratic approach to art history that values the contributions of all artists, not just those traditionally celebrated.

Overall, the article presents Prof. Thomas Crow as a pivotal figure in the movement to revise and expand the scope of art history to include marginalized voices and re-evaluate the cultural significance of art.

The image depicts a newspaper article with the headline "Revising Art History". The article appears to discuss a shift in art history scholarship and teaching, highlighting the impact of revisionist art historians on the field. The image also features a smaller photograph of an individual standing reading or examining a large painting in an exhibition setting. The newspaper article continues with further text discussing various viewpoints and debates within the discipline of art history, including topics such as tenured teaching positions, the methods of teaching art history, and the influences revisionist historians have on changing perceptions and tastes in art. There is mention of specific names related to the field, as well as titles of books and descriptions of arguments within the academic art history community. The article seems to be a part of a larger conversation on the evolution of how art is interpreted and taught in academic circles.

Description of the Image

The image shows a scanned page from a magazine or publication, likely from an art or cultural journal. The page is titled "Revising Art History" and features a photograph of a man, presumably Prof. Thomas Crow, a renowned art historian. The photograph shows him standing in front of a blurred background, which appears to depict an art gallery or museum setting. He is dressed in a dark sweater and has a beard, giving him a scholarly and intellectual appearance.

Layout and Content:

1. Header:

   • The top of the page includes a caption that reads:
     "Prof. Thomas Crow, a revisionist art historian, stands before the Degas' 'Arranging Marie-Ambroise-Perret Lavoisier' at the Met."
     This indicates that the photograph was taken at the Metropolitan Museum of Art (the Met), with the subject standing in front of a specific artwork by Degas.

2. Main Text:

   • The page is divided into two main columns of text. The left column discusses revising art history, focusing on the work of Thomas Crow and other art historians who challenge traditional narratives. Key points include:

     • Crow's contributions to re-evaluating art history, particularly in relation to 19th-century French art.
     • References to other scholars, such as T.J. Clark, who have also contributed to rethinking art history.
     • Discussion of how these scholars critique conventional interpretations and offer new perspectives.

   • The right column is titled "A Tenure Debate" and explores issues related to academic tenure, particularly in the context of art history and cultural studies. It references:

     • The publication of Crow’s work and its impact on academic discourse.
     • Debates surrounding tenure and academic freedom, especially in relation to controversial or revisionist scholarship.
     • Mentions of other scholars, such as Michael Fried, and their contributions to the field.

3. Visual Elements:

   • The photograph of Thomas Crow is prominently placed at the top left of the page, drawing immediate attention.
   • The background behind Crow is out of focus but suggests an art gallery or museum environment, reinforcing the theme of art history and critique.

4. Typography and Design:

   • The text is typeset in a classic serif font, typical of academic or intellectual publications.
   • The layout is clean and structured, with clear headings and subheadings to organize the content.
   • There are no additional images or graphics beyond the photograph of Crow.

5. Contextual Clues:

   • The page references specific artworks (e.g., Degas' Arranging Marie-Ambroise-Perret Lavoisier) and scholars (e.g., T.J. Clark, Michael Fried), indicating a focus on art history and critical theory.
   • The mention of "tenure" suggests a discussion of academic politics and the challenges faced by scholars who challenge established narratives.

Overall Impression:

The page presents a scholarly and intellectual discussion centered around the revision of art history, with Thomas Crow as a key figure. The combination of the photograph, the detailed text, and the references to specific artworks and scholars creates a rich, thought-provoking piece that highlights the evolving nature of art historical scholarship and the debates surrounding academic tenure and intellectual freedom. The design and layout reflect a serious, academic tone appropriate for a journal or magazine focused on art and cultural studies.

The image is a page from a newspaper or magazine, featuring a monochrome photograph of a man with a beard and mustache. The text on the page reads "Revising Art History" and includes an article discussing the work of Professor Thomas Crow, a revisionist art historian. The article highlights the debate surrounding the teaching and writing of art history and the impact of revisionists on the field. The image also includes a black-and-white photograph of a man and a woman in a room with a desk and a lamp.

The image shows a newspaper clipping with the title "Revising Art History" and a picture of a man with a beard and mustache. The article talks about the revision of art history and how it is being taught and written about. The man in the picture is likely a professor or historian who is involved in the revision process. The article also mentions the importance of considering the context and social implications of art, as well as the need for a more inclusive and diverse approach to art history.