Archives Scrapbooks

The image is a newspaper clipping from "The Harvard Crimson," dated May 25, 1983. The headline reads "City Criticizes Harvard For New Housing Policy." The article, written by Catherine I. Schmidt, discusses the Cambridge City Council's criticism of Harvard University's new off-campus housing policy.

Key points from the article include:

1. Council's Concerns: The City Council is concerned that Harvard's new policy, which requires students to move off campus after their sophomore year, will increase the demand for housing in Cambridge, potentially leading to higher rents and displacement of low-income residents.

2. Orders Issued: Two orders were presented. The first, by Councilor David E. Sullivan, asks Harvard to reconsider its policy and keep students on campus. The second, by Councilor Kenneth E. Reeves, requests Harvard to consult with the city on housing issues.

3. Harvard's Response: Harvard officials have denied the city's claims, stating that the new policy aims to encourage off-campus living and will not significantly impact the local housing market.

4. Community Involvement: Robin Schmidt, vice-president of the Cambridgeport Community Association, and John B. Fox Jr., president of the Riverside Neighborhood Association, have expressed concerns about the policy's potential effects on the community.

5. City Officials' Reactions: Mayor Alfred E. Vellucci and Councilor Francis H. Duehay '25 also criticized Harvard for not consulting with city officials before implementing the policy.

6. Additional Issues: The article also mentions a recommendation by Councilor David A. Wylie to reject the Fogg Museum's proposed bridge over Broadway, citing concerns about the museum's lack of community consultation.

The article highlights the tension between Harvard University and the city of Cambridge over housing policies and community engagement.

The image is a newspaper clipping from the "New England Newsclip" dated May 25, 1983. The headline reads "City Criticizes Harvard For New Housing Policy."

The article discusses concerns raised by Cambridge city officials about Harvard University's new off-campus housing policy. The policy, which was approved by the student-faculty committee on housing, allows off-campus juniors and seniors to live in certain areas of the city, provided they meet specific criteria.

Key points from the article include:

1. Concerns and Opposition:

   • Councilor David E. Sullivan introduced an order expressing the city's "strong opposition" to the policy.
   • Councilors argued that the policy creates incentives for students to move off campus and could lead to an influx of low-income housing.
   • Harvard officials have denied the city's charges, stating that the policy is meant to encourage students to move off campus and that it would not significantly affect the city's population.

2. University Response:

   • Dean of the College John B. Fox Jr. acknowledged the policy's intent to encourage students to move off campus but noted that it would not significantly change the off-campus population.
   • He also stated that it would not be financially feasible for the College to lose the revenue from students living in University housing.

3. City Council Actions:

   • Councilor Francis H. Duehay argued that Harvard had not consulted city officials before making the policy change.
   • Mayor Alfred E. Vellucci expressed his disapproval, stating that the policy could disrupt Cambridge's efforts to encourage students to live on campus and jeopardize the city's plans.

4. Additional Context:

   • There was also a mention of the University-City communication regarding the design consultation for the proposed bridge over Broad Street for the Fogg Museum's new addition.
   • John M. Rosenfeld, acting director of the Fogg Museum, mentioned that the museum had consulted with local community groups like the Mid-Cambridge Association.

The article highlights the ongoing tensions between Harvard University and the city of Cambridge regarding housing policies and their impact on the local community.

The image is a newspaper clipping from the Harvard Crimson, dated May 25, 1983. The headline reads "City Criticizes Harvard for New Housing Policy." The article is written by Catherine I. Schmidt.

Key points from the article include:

1. Policy Decision and Criticism:

   • Harvard is accused of making decisions that affect Cambridge residents without consulting the city.
   • The university's new off-campus housing policy was introduced by Councilor David E. Sullivan, which allows low- to moderate-income students to live off-campus.

2. Student and Faculty Concerns:

   • The policy was criticized by Harvard officials and city officials. Harvard's Dean of the College, John B. Fox Jr., expressed concern that the policy could create incentives for students to move off-campus, potentially leading to a decrease in on-campus housing availability.
   • The student-faculty Committee on Housing, which approved the policy, was criticized for not consulting Cambridge city officials.

3. Reactions and Responses:

   • Harvard's response was that the policy was not designed to encourage students to move off-campus but rather to provide more options for students who might not be able to afford on-campus housing.
   • Councilor Sullivan's order was opposed by several city officials and community members, including Mayor Alfred E. Vellucci, who expressed concerns about jeopardizing Harvard’s plans.

4. Fogg Museum Bridge:

   • Another part of the article discusses the Fogg Museum's proposal to build a bridge over Broad Street to connect the museum to its new off-campus section.
   • The City Council was consulted, and David A. Wylie was hired to provide design consultation, though the bridge was not approved immediately due to concerns about community relations.

5. Additional Comments:

   • The article mentions that officials were still deliberating on the specifics of the Fogg Museum addition, with concerns about maintaining good relations with the neighborhood.

Overall, the article highlights tensions between Harvard University’s new housing policies and the local city government's concerns over community impact and consultation.

The document is a news clipping from the New England Newsclip, specifically from the Harvard Crimson, dated May 25, 1983. The article, titled 'City Criticizes Harvard For New Housing Policy,' reports on the City Council of Cambridge passing two resolutions criticizing Harvard University's new off-campus housing policy. The policy, which encourages students to move off-campus to free up housing for others, has been met with opposition from city officials who argue that it could exacerbate the city's housing shortage and is unfair to both students and the community. City officials also expressed dismay that Harvard did not consult them before implementing the policy. The article includes quotes from City Councillor David E. Sullivan, Mayor Alfred V. Vellucci, and Harvard officials, including Dean of the College John B. Fox Jr., who defended the policy as a way to provide more students with the 'House experience.' The article also mentions a separate issue regarding the Fog Museum's proposed bridge, which the city is considering for design consultation.

The image is a newspaper article from May 25, 1983, published in the Harvard Crimson, titled "City Criticizes Harvard For New Housing Policy." The article discusses concerns raised by Cambridge city officials and residents regarding a new off-campus housing policy introduced by Harvard University.

Key points from the article include:

1. Criticism of the Policy: The Cambridge City Council criticized Harvard's new off-campus housing policy, which was intended to reduce the number of undergraduates living in non-Harvard housing. The city expressed its opposition in a resolution passed unanimously on a Monday night.

2. Details of the Policy: The policy, approved by Harvard's student faculty Committee on Housing (COHP), aimed to gradually move more students back into on-campus housing. The city's primary concern was that this policy would limit housing options for students who could not be accommodated in university dormitories.

3. City Council's Resolution: The City Council argued that the policy would negatively affect the local rental market and reduce the integration of students within the broader Cambridge community.

4. Harvard's Stance: Harvard officials defended the policy, stating that it was designed to enhance student life and community. They mentioned that the university had considered the impact on local government and community affairs but felt the policy was necessary.

5. University-City Communication: University-City communication was noted, specifically a letter from Harvard Dean of the College John B. Fox Jr. to the City Council. Fox stated that the university would try to ensure that the number of students moving off-campus would not significantly increase.

6. Councilor's Views: Cambridge City Councillor Francis H. Duehay and others felt that Harvard did not adequately consult city officials before changing its housing policy.

7. Mayor's Reaction: Mayor Alfred E. Vellucci expressed dissatisfaction with Harvard's unilateral decision and its potential to disrupt the local housing market.

8. Future Actions: The City Council passed Vellucci's order, indicating a need for further dialogue and consideration of community impact regarding the university's housing decisions.

The article highlights the tension between Harvard University and the City of Cambridge regarding the new housing policy and its broader implications for the community.

The image is a newspaper clipping from the "New England Newsclip" section of the Harvard Crimson, dated May 25, 1983. The headline of the article is "City Criticizes Harvard For New Housing Policy."

The article, written by Catherine I. Schmidt, discusses a conflict between Harvard University and the City Council of Cambridge, Massachusetts, over a new off-campus housing policy. The City Council had introduced an order to prevent Harvard from implementing a policy that encourages students to move off-campus, which Harvard officials argue would reduce the number of low-income students living on campus.

Key points from the article include:

1. City Council's Opposition: The City Council passed an order to prevent Harvard from implementing its new policy, which was introduced by Councilor David E. Sullivan. The order was approved by a 6-1 vote.

2. Harvard’s Stance: Harvard officials, including Dean of the College John B. Fox Jr., have argued that the policy is not designed to encourage students to move off-campus but to address housing issues on campus. They believe the policy will not significantly change the off-campus population and will not impact the revenue provided by students living in university housing.

3. Concerns: The city officials are concerned that Harvard's decision-making process did not include sufficient consultation with the city. Councilor Francis H. Duebay mentioned that Harvard had changed its policy without consulting city officials.

4. University-City Communication: The article also mentions that Harvard University communication was the focus of a meeting with Councilor David A. Wylie, who recommended hiring an architect for a bridge project over Broad Avenue. The museum's director, John M. Rosenfield, stated that the museum had been in contact with the Mid-Cambridge Association and was concerned about community relations.

5. City Manager's Role: City Manager Robert W. Healy expressed his disapproval of Harvard's actions and suggested that the city might need to hire an architect to find funds for the bridge project within the city budget.

The article highlights the tension between Harvard University and the City of Cambridge over housing policies and the importance of communication and consultation between the two entities.

This is an image of a newspaper clipping. The text at the top indicates that it was published on "MAY 25 1983" under the section "NEW ENGLAND NEWSCLIP" from the "HARVARD CRIMSON HARVARD UNIVERSITY CAMBRIDGE, MA." The article is headlined "City Criticizes Harvard For New Housing Policy" and is attributed to an author named Catherine I. Schmidt. The article discusses the concerns over Harvard's policies potentially displacing Cambridge residents and the City Council's response. A portion of the newspaper clipping features an annotation handwritten in what appears to be blue ink, which reads "Extra".

The actual content of the article is cut off, so only portions of the text on the left and right-hand sides are visible. The visible content refers to various individuals and issues connected with Harvard University's housing policy, city council reactions, and other related community concerns. The article also appears to discuss the impact of these policies on student housing, community action, and local governance.

This is a page from the New England Newsclip, a Harvard University newspaper, dated May 25, 1983. The headline reads "City Criticizes Harvard for New Housing Policy," and the subheading reads "Catherine L. Schmidt." The article discusses the city's criticism of Harvard's new housing policy, which aims to encourage students to move off-campus. The article mentions that the city council passed an order to oppose the policy, and Harvard officials have denied that the city's main concern was not that Harvard changed its policy, but that it had done so without consulting city officials. The article also mentions that the city council hired an architect to give design consultation on the Fogg Museum's proposed bridge over Broadway.

The image is a scanned page from a newspaper titled "NEW ENGLAND NEWSCLIP", dated May 25, 1983. It is from the Harvard Crimson, the student newspaper of Harvard University, located in Cambridge, MA. The page features an article titled "City Criticizes Harvard For New Housing Policy", written by Catherine L. Schmidt.

Key Details from the Article:

Headline and Context:

• The article discusses Harvard University's new housing policy and the city of Cambridge's criticism of it.
• The policy involves moving off-campus housing for students, which has sparked controversy and concern among city officials and residents.

Main Points of the Article:

1. Introduction of the Policy:

   • The policy was introduced last week by Councilor David A. Sullivan as part of two orders.
   • The first order exempts the city’s strong opposition to the plan, approved on May 2.
   • The second order allows off-campus juniors, as well as seniors, to remain affiliated with the college but on a new original house-to-house basis.

2. Opposition to the Policy:

   • The city council and Cambridge residents oppose the policy, arguing that it will “create incentives for students to move off campus” and “flood the already tight Cambridge market for low- to moderate-income housing.”
   • Harvard officials deny the city’s charges, stating that they are “really aren’t encouraging students to move off” and that they are not responsible for encouraging off-campus living.

3. Harvard’s Response:

   • Robin Schmidt, vice-president for government affairs, defends the policy, stating that the university is “not encouraging off-campus living” and that it is “a vital part of undergraduate life”.
   • John B. Fox Jr., dean of the college, sent a letter to the council on May 17, agreeing with Schmidt and stating that the policy is designed to “enable students to move off campus” but “a few students who currently live off campus” will be affected.

4. City Council Reaction:

   • Councilor H. Duchey expressed concern that Harvard had changed its policy without consulting city officials.
   • Mayor Alfred E. Vellucci disapproved of the policy, encouraging all municipal departments to “introduce opposition to Harvard University” and to “stop them in their tracks.”
   • The council passed Vellucci’s order, showing strong disapproval of the university’s actions.

5. Additional Context:

   • The article also mentions a proposal by the Fogg Museum to build a bridge connecting the museum to the older bridge over Broadway.
   • John M. Rosenfeld, acting director of the Fogg Art, stated that the museum is considering a consultative process to “keep in contact with neighborhoods and city officials” regarding the addition.

Visual Elements:

• The page is a typewritten document with a clean, formal layout typical of newspapers from the 1980s.
• The date (May 25, 1983) is prominently displayed at the top.
• The headline is bold and centered, emphasizing the main topic.
• The article is structured with clear paragraphs, and the byline (“Catherine L. Schmidt”) is included.
• There is a handwritten note at the top right corner that reads “Extra”, possibly indicating that this is an additional or supplementary page.

Overall Impression:

The image captures a moment of tension between Harvard University and the city of Cambridge over housing policies, highlighting the concerns of local officials and residents about the impact of university decisions on the local community. The article reflects the public discourse surrounding urban planning, student housing, and institutional responsibility in the early 1980s.

The image is a newspaper clipping from the "New England Newsclip" dated May 25, 1983, featuring an article titled "City Criticizes Harvard For New Housing Policy." The clipping is from the Harvard Crimson, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and is marked with a price of $5.00. The article is written by Catherine I. Schmidt and focuses on the criticism directed at Harvard University by the City of Cambridge for its new off-campus housing policy.

The article begins by noting that the City Council introduced a resolution last week, expressing concern over Harvard's new policy, which they believe creates incentives for students to move off-campus and could adversely affect the local housing market for low- to moderate-income residents. The resolution was passed unanimously, with Councilor David E. Sullivan, the first of two orders presented to the city, approving it on May 2. The City Committee on Housing unanimously passed the order, allowing off-campus juniors, as well as seniors, to remain affiliated with their original house.

Harvard officials have denied the city's charges, stating that they have not encouraged students to move off-campus. Robin Schmidt, vice president for government and community affairs, emphasized that they consider the House experience vital for undergraduate life and are responsible for encouraging off-campus living.

The article also mentions a letter sent by the college to the dean of the college, John B. Fox Jr., encouraging a few students to move off-campus to enable more on-campus students to live on-campus. Fox stated that it is unlikely that there will be significant net changes in the size of the off-campus population and that the college could not be financially responsible for students living in university housing.

Councilor Francis H. Duehay expressed his disapproval of Harvard's policy, stating that it changed without consulting city officials. Mayor Alfred E. Vellucci also expressed his disapproval by introducing a second order condemning all municipal departments in Cambridge University to jeopardize its plans and to stop them in their tracks. The council passed Vellucci's order.

The article concludes with a note about the University-City communication, focusing on Councilor David A. Wylie's recommendation that Cambridge hire an architect to give design consultation on the Fogg Museum's proposed bridge over Broadway. John M. Rosenfield, acting director of the Fogg and Rockefeller professor of Oriental Art, mentioned that the museum had already been in touch with the Mid-Cambridge Association, a local community group, and that officials had not yet decided on a specific plan but were concerned about community relations and would keep in contact with neighborhoods and city officials.

City Manager Robert W. Healy decided to request that the city hire an architect and would try to find funds to do so in the city budget.