Archives Scrapbooks

The image shows a page from a newspaper, specifically from "The New York Times," dated March 10, 1983. The main headline reads "An Appellate Court Backs the City On Taxing of Nonprofit Institution." The article discusses a court decision that supports the city's right to tax a nonprofit organization, specifically the Asia Society.

Key points from the article include:

1. Court Decision: An appellate court has ruled in favor of the city, allowing it to tax the Asia Society, a nonprofit institution.
2. Impact on Museums: The decision could affect other museums and educational institutions that currently enjoy property-tax exemptions.
3. Legal Arguments: The court determined that the Asia Society did not qualify for a property-tax exemption because it did not conduct its activities in a manner that served a public purpose.
4. Reactions: The decision has sparked concern among other nonprofit organizations, which fear they may also lose their tax-exempt status.

Additional articles on the page include:

• Raphael Honored in Exhibit: An article about an exhibition celebrating the 300th anniversary of the birth of Raphael Sanzio, to be held at the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in Boston.
• Other News: There are smaller headlines and articles on the page, but their content is not fully visible in the image.

The layout of the page includes multiple columns of text, with the main article taking up the majority of the space. The page also includes a continuation notice from page 1 and a section titled "All the News That's Fit to Print."

The image depicts a two-page spread from a newspaper, dated March 10, 1983. The left page continues a story from page one about an appellate court decision supporting a city's right to tax a nonprofit institution. The right page features a similar article titled "A COURT APPROVES CITY'S RIGHT TO TAX NONPROFIT GROUP," which reports that the city's appeal was upheld, confirming the city's ability to tax the Asia Society. The article mentions that many museums could face losing their property-tax exemptions as a result. The text on the right page is from the "Lawrence Eagle-Tribune" dated February 25, 1983, and also includes a smaller article about an exhibition honoring Raphael. The overall theme of the articles revolves around legal challenges related to the taxation of nonprofit cultural institutions.

The image contains two newspaper clippings from March 10, 1983, and February 25, 1983, respectively, concerning tax issues related to nonprofit institutions.

Left Clipping (March 10, 1983)

Title: "An Appellate Court Backs the City On Taxing of Nonprofit Institution"

Details:

• The article discusses an appellate court decision that upheld a city's decision to tax some nonprofit institutions, including the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the American Museum of Natural History.
• The City Corporation Council, led by Mr. Schwartz, argued that the exemption of certain properties from taxation was not justified.
• The city argued that the exemption was not based on educational or cultural value but on political considerations.
• The Society for Asia's budget and property tax exemption were also discussed, with a mention of the city's intention to challenge the exemption.
• The article mentions a heated debate in the City Council about the fairness of the tax exemption, with arguments that such exemptions should be based on educational value rather than political influence.

Right Clipping (February 25, 1983)

Title: "A Court Approves City’s Right to Tax Nonprofit Group"

Details:

• This article discusses a court ruling that approved the city's decision to tax the Asia Society.
• The Asia Society was found to be "not sufficiently educational" to qualify for property tax exemptions.
• Michael Goodwin, the reporter, mentions that the Asia Society's property tax exemption was challenged by the city.
• The ruling was made after extensive hearings, with the city winning the final round of the dispute.
• The Asia Society's budget and its role in education were scrutinized, and the court concluded that the exemption was not warranted.
• The article also notes that the court found the society's claim of educational value insufficient to justify exemption.
• The Asia Society was found to be a nonprofit but was not classified as an educational institution under the state’s law, hence the court’s ruling.

Both articles highlight the tension between municipalities and nonprofit organizations regarding the justification for tax exemptions, emphasizing educational value and political influence in the decisions made by the courts and city officials.

The image shows a newspaper clipping dated March 10, 1983, and February 25, 1983, from the Lawrence Eagle, Lawrence, MA. The clipping is divided into two main articles:

1. Main Article (March 10, 1983):

   • Title: "An Appellate Court Backs the City On Taxing of Nonprofit Institution"
   • Content: This article discusses a ruling by an appellate court that supports the city's right to tax a nonprofit institution, the Asia Society. The city's Corporation Counsel, Mr. Schwarz, argues that the Asia Society has been exempt from property taxes unfairly. The society, founded in 1966, has been exempt from taxes on its property since 1981, despite its substantial budget and membership. The ruling indicates that the society should have been taxed from the beginning, and the city will pursue the back taxes owed. The article also mentions that other similar institutions could face similar tax demands.

2. Side Article (February 25, 1983):

   • Title: "A Court Approves City's Right to Tax Nonprofit Group"
   • Content: This article, also discussing the Asia Society, states that an appellate court has approved the city's right to tax the nonprofit group. The court ruled that the society was not a charitable institution as defined by state law and, therefore, should not have been exempt from property taxes. The ruling is significant because it could lead to other museums and cultural institutions losing their tax-exempt status. The court's decision is seen as a victory for the city in its effort to collect back taxes from the Asia Society, amounting to $1.2 million. The article mentions that the society's legal counsel, Mr. Schwarz, had argued that the society's exemption was unjustified.

Both articles emphasize the legal and financial implications of the court's decision, indicating that the Asia Society and potentially other nonprofit institutions might face increased tax obligations.

The image displays newspaper clippings from February 25, 1983, and March 10, 1983, with the following main articles:

1. "An Appellate Court Backs the City On Taxing of Nonprofit Institution" (March 10, 1983):

   • The article discusses a ruling by an appellate court that supports the city's decision to tax the Asia Society, a nonprofit institution, for its exempt properties.
   • The city's Corporation Counsel, Mr. Schwarz, argues that the Asia Society, among other museums, should pay taxes because they are not sufficiently educational institutions.
   • The city had billed the society for taxes amounting to $2,000 for each of the last two fiscal years.
   • The Asia Society's counsel, Robert B. Orman, expressed that the decision was a difficult one but acknowledged that the ruling was likely correct.
   • The article also mentions that Mayor Koch has threatened to cut funding to other exempt properties if the Asia Society does not comply with the tax ruling.

2. "A Court Approves City's Right to Tax Nonprofit Group" (February 25, 1983):

   • This article details a court decision that allows the city to tax the Asia Society for its exempt properties.
   • The decision was made by an appellate court, which upheld the city's right to impose taxes on nonprofit institutions that do not meet the criteria for educational exemptions.
   • The Asia Society had been contesting the tax, arguing that it was an educational institution.
   • The court ruled that the society was not eligible for the exemption because it did not meet the required standards for educational institutions.
   • The article also notes that the decision could impact other nonprofit institutions and their property-tax exemptions.

Additionally, there is a small note on the right side of the image about Raphael's work being honored in an exhibit at the Fogg Art Museum, celebrating the 500th anniversary of Raphael's birth. The exhibit features drawings and prints by Raphael and his contemporaries. The exhibit runs from February 9 to April 3, with a viewing fee required.

The clippings are from the newspaper "The Eagle" published in Lawrence, MA.

The image is a newspaper clipping from The New York Times, dated February 25, 1983. The headline reads, "An Appellate Court Backs the City on Taxing of Nonprofit Institution." The main article discusses a legal decision regarding the taxation rights of New York City over nonprofit institutions.

Detailed Summary:

Headline:

• "A Court Approves City's Right to Tax Nonprofit Group"

Sub-Headlines and Key Points:

1. Main Article (Left Side):

   • The New York City Corporation Counsel, Frederick A.O. Schwarz Jr., stated that the city could tax nonprofit institutions if they operate similarly to for-profit entities.
   • The Metropolitan Museum of Art and the American Museum of Natural History were mentioned as examples where such taxing might be applicable.
   • The ruling specifically pertained to a case involving the Asia Society, founded in 1956, which had been tax-exempt but was challenged by the city.
   • The Asia Society, according to Robert B. O'Brien (its president), had been paying taxes until 1979 when it stopped due to its nonprofit status.
   • The decision by Mayor Koch's administration was to tax parts of the society's building used for commercial purposes.

2. Further Details (Right Side):

   • The court decision was unanimous, with Judge Buggs hearing the case initially and the Appellate Division affirming it.
   • The ruling affects many museums that might lose property-tax exemptions if they generate income from unrelated business activities.
   • The decision was seen as a potential model for other nonprofit institutions, raising concerns about the future of their tax-exempt status.

3. Commentary by Michael Goodwin:

   • Goodwin discusses the implications of the ruling, suggesting that it could lead to a significant change in how nonprofits operate financially.
   • He notes that while the ruling was seen as fair by some, it introduces uncertainty for many educational and cultural institutions.

4. Exhibition Announcement:

   • There is a small section announcing an exhibit honoring the Fogg Art Museum's contributions to the celebration of the 350th anniversary of Harvard University. The exhibit was to run from April 3 through June 19, with visiting hours and admission details provided.

Contextual Note:

• The article also mentions that the Asia Society failed to meet the criteria for an educational institution as defined by state law, leading to the court's decision to uphold the city's tax ruling. The broader implications of this decision could impact many nonprofits in New York City.

The image shows a scrapbook or album page with two newspaper clippings attached to it. The larger clipping on the left is a newspaper article with the headline "An Appellate Court Backs the City On Taxing of Nonprofit Institution." This article discusses a legal decision regarding the city's right to tax a nonprofit institution, specifically mentioning an appellate court's backing, the Asia Society, and discussions about tax exemptions or payments.

The smaller clipping on the right is titled "A COURT APPROVES CITY'S RIGHT TO TAX NONPROFIT GROUP" with a subtitle "DECISION ON ASIA SOCIETY." It appears to be by Michael Goodwin and conveys similar information about the court's decision supporting the city's tax authority over nonprofit organizations, focusing on the Asia Society case and mentioning concerns about many museums facing property-levy exemptions.

Above the title of the smaller clipping, there is a box with the slogan "All the News That's Fit to Print." On the very right edge of the page, there's a small note from the "LAWRENCE EAGLE-TRIBUNE" dated February 25, 1983, mentioning a Raphael exhibit with details about the event's timing and location.

Handwritten text near the top of the page reads "N.Y. times March 10, 1983," indicating the date of the articles. The page background is a beige or light yellow color, typical of archival or scrapbook pages.

The image shows a newspaper clipping that appears to be pasted onto a scrapbook or album page. There are two columns of text, indicating this is a continuation of articles from what appears to be the front page, as one column includes the text "Continued From Page 1." The headline of the left column reads, "An Appellate Court Backs the City On Taxing of Nonprofit Institution." This article discusses a court case relating to the taxation of nonprofit organizations.

The right column has a smaller article with the headline "A COURT APPROVES CITY'S RIGHT TO TAX NONPROFIT GROUP" and subheading "DECISION ON ASIA SOCIETY" followed by "Many Museums Face Losing Property-Tax Exemptions."

Above these headings, in smaller font, is the phrase "All the News That's Fit to Print," which suggests that this newspaper could be The New York Times.

On the upper left, there is a handwritten note with the date "March 10, (19)83." On the upper right, there's an article extracted from a different newspaper, the "Lawrence Eagle-Tribune" dated "FEB 25 1983," with the headline "Raphael honored in exhibit," denoting an event related to Raphael.

The visible content and layout indicate it is an archive or record compilation of newspaper articles possibly related to a specific research topic or area of interest.

The image depicts two pages from a newspaper, likely from a publication dated March 10, 1983, as indicated by the handwritten note at the top of the left page. The pages are from a section titled "All the News That's Fit to Print," suggesting they are from The New York Times.

Left Page:

• Headline: "An Appellate Court Backs the City On Taxing of Nonprofit Institution"
• Subheadline: "Continued From Page 1"
• Content: The article discusses a legal decision in which an appellate court upheld the city's right to tax a nonprofit institution, specifically the Asia Society. Key points include:
  • The city had billed the Asia Society for taxes on its property, which the society contested.
  • The court ruled that the society, as a nonprofit educational institution, could be taxed by the city, despite its nonprofit status.
  • The ruling was seen as a significant victory for the city, which argued that the society was not operating under the typical conditions of a tax-exempt nonprofit.
  • The article quotes various stakeholders, including city officials, the society's president, and legal representatives, discussing the implications of the ruling.
  • The Asia Society had been founded in 1956 and was dedicated to promoting understanding of Asia. The ruling raised concerns about the financial stability of the society and other similar institutions.

Right Page:

• Headline: "A COURT APPROVES CITY'S RIGHT TO TAX NONPROFIT GROUP"
• Subheadline: "DECISION ON ASIA SOCIETY"
• Content: This page continues the story, providing further details on the court's decision and its broader implications:
  • The article elaborates on the court's reasoning, stating that the Asia Society failed to meet the definition of an educational institution as set by state real property tax law.
  • The ruling was based on the society's failure to provide sufficient educational programming, such as classes, lectures, or teaching, which are required under the law.
  • The article also mentions that the ruling could have broader implications for other nonprofit institutions in New York City, potentially affecting their tax-exempt status.
  • Additional context is provided, including quotes from Michael Goodwin, an appellate judge, and other legal experts, discussing the ruling's significance.

Additional Notes:

• The right page also includes a smaller article titled "Many Museums Face Losing Property-Levy Exemptions, a Top Koch Aide Says," which discusses the potential impact of the ruling on museums and other cultural institutions.
• The layout includes typical newspaper elements such as column headings, bylines, and page numbers ("VOL. CXXXII... No. 45,608").
• The handwritten note "NYTine" and the date "March 10, 1983" at the top of the left page suggest this is a clipping or preserved page from the newspaper.

Overall, the image shows a detailed news report on a significant legal decision regarding the taxation of nonprofit institutions in New York City, focusing on the Asia Society case.

The image is of a newspaper clipping from March 10, 1983, featuring two articles. The first article is titled "An Appellate Court Backs the City On Taxing of Nonprofit Institution," discussing a court ruling that allowed the city to tax the Asia Society, a nonprofit institution. The second article is titled "A Court Approves City's Right to Tax Nonprofit Group," focusing on the same court ruling and its implications for other nonprofit organizations in the city. The clipping is part of a larger collection, as indicated by the volume and page number (Vol. CXXXI, No. 45,608).