Archives Scrapbooks

The image appears to be a page from a newspaper or magazine, dated February 11, 1982, and titled "The Fogg is understaffed, the staff is underpaid, the building is in repulsive physical condition." It is from the publication "Independent" and is page 5.

The page discusses a controversy surrounding the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University. The headline, attributed to Oleg Grabar, chairman of the Fine Arts Department at Harvard, expresses concern over the museum's poor condition. The article delves into issues such as the museum's funding, staffing, and the physical state of its buildings, raising questions about the adequacy of the institution's resources and its role in the university and the art world.

The text includes quotes from various individuals, including Oleg Grabar, Seymour Slive, and Dean Rosovsky, who express their opinions and concerns about the Fogg Museum's state and the university's response to these issues. The article also mentions the university's efforts to address the situation through fundraising and staffing changes.

A photograph of the Fogg Art Museum is included in the center of the page, showing the building's architectural features. The article concludes with a discussion of the university's priorities and the future of the Fogg Art Museum.

Overall, the page provides a detailed account of the controversy surrounding the Fogg Art Museum, highlighting the university's challenges in maintaining its facilities and the importance of the institution to the university and the art community.

This image is a newspaper article from the Independent dated February 11, 1982, discussing issues surrounding the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University. The article is titled "THE FOGG IS UNDERSTAFFED, THE STAFF IS UNDERPAID, THE BUILDING IS IN REPULSIVE PHYSICAL CONDITION," and it is attributed to Oleg Grabar, the Chairman of the Fine Arts Department.

The article is divided into several sections, each with its own subheading:

1. Like Selling One's Daughter: This section discusses the controversial plan to sell art from the Fogg's collection to raise funds. It mentions the Association of Art Museum Directors' opposition to the plan and their unanimous vote to condemn Harvard's actions.

2. Ignorance, Ignominy, or Prudence?: This section delves into the debate around the plan, discussing the opinions of various individuals involved, including Seymour Slive and Dean Rosovsky. It also mentions the concerns about the cost of the project and the university's financial situation.

3. Priorities Priorities Priorities: This section focuses on the prioritization of the Fogg project within the university's budget and the challenges it faces due to economic uncertainties and federal funding cuts.

4. The Future: This final section looks ahead to the future of the Fogg and the university's commitment to addressing the issues raised.

The article includes a photograph by Rich Guerra, showing an architectural detail of the building, likely to illustrate the "repulsive physical condition" mentioned in the title. The photograph shows an archway with decorative elements, but it is not clear from the image alone what specific issues it highlights.

The article concludes with a note directing readers to continue on page 8 for more information about the Fogg.

The image depicts a page from a newspaper or magazine, featuring an article about the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University. The headline reads, "THE FOGG IS UNDERSTAFFED, THE STAFF IS UNDERPAID, THE BUILDING IS IN REPULSE PHYSICAL CONDITION." This suggests that the article discusses issues related to the museum's operations, personnel, and facilities.

The article includes several sections with subheadings, such as "Chairman, Fine Arts Department," "Like Selling One's Daughter," "Ignorance, Ignominy, or Prudence?" and "The Future." These sections likely delve into different aspects of the problems faced by the museum, including leadership, financial challenges, and potential solutions or future prospects.

The article also contains a photograph of a building, possibly the Fogg Art Museum itself, which appears to be in a state of disrepair. The building's exterior shows signs of neglect, with visible cracks and deterioration. This visual element reinforces the article's claims about the museum's physical condition.

The text is dense and filled with details, suggesting a comprehensive exploration of the issues surrounding the Fogg Art Museum. The article likely provides insights into the challenges faced by the museum, the impact on its staff and operations, and potential avenues for improvement or resolution.

This image is a page from the February 11, 1982, edition of The Independent, a student newspaper at Harvard University. The page features a headline that reads, "The Fogg is Understaffed, the Staff is Underpaid, the Building is in Repulsive Physical Condition." The article discusses the cancellation of the Fogg Art Museum expansion project, which was intended to provide additional gallery space and improve the museum's facilities.

The article provides background on the Fogg project, including its proposed budget of $3 million and the University's decision to cancel it. It quotes various individuals involved in the decision-making process, such as Derek Bok, the University President, and Oleg Grabar, the Chairman of the Fine Arts Department. The article also touches on the financial challenges faced by the University and the potential consequences of the cancellation for the Fogg Museum and the broader Harvard community.

The page includes a photograph of the Fogg Art Museum, showing its exterior and some of its architectural features. The article is accompanied by a sidebar titled "Priorities, Priorities," which discusses the University's priorities and the challenges it faces in balancing them. The sidebar also mentions the Medical Area Total Energy Plant (MATEP) project, which faced similar financial difficulties and was eventually canceled.

Overall, the image provides a glimpse into the financial and administrative challenges faced by Harvard University in the early 1980s, as well as the impact of those challenges on the Fogg Art Museum and the broader Harvard community.

Description of the Image:

The image shows a page from a publication, likely a newspaper or magazine, dated February 11, 1982, as indicated at the bottom right corner. The page is titled "THE FOGG IS UNDERSTAFFED, THE STAFF IS UNDERPAID, THE BUILDING IS IN REPULSIVE PHYSICAL CONDITION" and is attributed to OLEG GRABAR, who is identified as the CHAIRMAN, FINE ARTS DEPARTMENT.

Layout and Content:

1. Headline and Attribution:

   • The headline is prominently displayed at the top in bold, large text, emphasizing the critical state of the Fogg Art Museum.
   • Oleg Grabar's name and title are clearly stated below the headline, establishing his authority on the subject.

2. Main Text:

   • The article is structured into multiple paragraphs, discussing various issues related to the Fogg Art Museum.
   • Key Points Discussed:
     • Funding and Financial Mismanagement:
       • The article mentions a $3 million stabilization fund idea, which was explained as a "very sound one" but ultimately dismissed.
       • The university is criticized for not seriously considering the quality of the collection, which was sold off, raising concerns about the loss of valuable artifacts.
       • The university is accused of understaffing and underpaying the staff, leading to operational inefficiencies.
     • Physical Condition of the Building:
       • The building is described as being in a "repulsive physical condition," with issues such as inadequate lighting, poor ventilation, and general disrepair.
     • Selling the Collection:
       • The article discusses the controversial decision to sell parts of the museum's collection, including a daughter of an artist, to raise funds. This decision is criticized as a desperate measure, with concerns raised about the ethical and financial implications.
     • University's Response:
       • The university is portrayed as dismissive of the problems, with officials like Bok (presumably the university president) and others being criticized for their inaction or inadequate responses.
       • The article highlights the university's prioritization of financial gains over the preservation and proper functioning of the museum.
     • Future Prospects:
       • The article ends with a note of uncertainty about the museum's future, suggesting that the university may continue to prioritize financial solutions over genuine improvements.

3. Visual Elements:

   • There is a photograph embedded in the article, showing a person (likely Oleg Grabar) standing in front of what appears to be the Fogg Art Museum. The individual is dressed formally, and the background includes architectural details of the building, reinforcing the context of the article.
   • The photograph is placed centrally, drawing attention to the subject matter and providing a visual representation of the author or a key figure involved in the discussion.

4. Additional Textual Elements:

   • At the bottom of the page, there is a caption that reads: "Like Selling One's Daughter", which serves as a metaphor for the controversial decision to sell parts of the museum's collection.
   • The page number 5 is visible in the bottom right corner, indicating this is part of a larger article or series.

5. Design and Typography:

   • The text is set in a classic serif font, typical of newspapers or magazines from the early 1980s.
   • The layout is clean, with clear headings and subheadings to organize the content.
   • The use of bold and italicized text highlights key points and emphasizes the severity of the issues discussed.

Overall Impression:

The image presents a critical and passionate critique of the Fogg Art Museum's condition, focusing on financial mismanagement, understaffing, poor physical conditions, and controversial decisions regarding the sale of the museum's collection. The inclusion of Oleg Grabar's authoritative voice and the visual element of the photograph add weight to the argument, making the article a compelling call to action for the preservation and improvement of the museum. The tone is urgent and concerned, reflecting the gravity of the issues at hand.

The image is a scanned copy of an article from the Harvard Independent, dated February 11, 1982. The article discusses the deaccessioning of art from the Fogg Museum, with a subheading that reads "Like Selling One's Daughter." The article features a photograph of a building and includes quotes from various individuals, including the chairman of the Fine Arts Department, Ole Grabar.

• The article is written in a formal tone and provides information about the deaccessioning process, including the reasons behind it and the potential consequences.
• The photograph of the building is likely intended to illustrate the architectural style of the Fogg Museum or to provide a visual representation of the institution.
• The quotes from individuals such as Ole Grabar offer different perspectives on the deaccessioning decision, highlighting the complexity of the issue and the various factors that were considered.
• The article also includes a section titled "Priorities Priorities" which discusses the priorities of the Fogg Museum and how they relate to the deaccessioning decision.
• The article concludes with a section titled "The Future" which discusses the potential future implications of the deaccessioning decision and the potential consequences for the Fogg Museum.

Overall, the article provides a detailed and informative discussion of the deaccessioning decision at the Fogg Museum, highlighting the complexities and challenges involved in making such a decision.

The image depicts a newspaper article titled "The Fogg is Understaffed, the Staff is Underpaid, the Building is in Repulsive Physical Condition" by Oleg Grabar. The article discusses the challenges faced by the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University, including understaffing, underpayment of staff, and poor physical condition of the building.

Key Points:

• The article highlights the struggles of the Fogg Art Museum, including understaffing, underpayment of staff, and poor physical condition of the building.
• The museum's staff is described as being overworked and underpaid, with some employees working long hours without adequate compensation.
• The building is said to be in disrepair, with leaky roofs, broken elevators, and other maintenance issues.
• The article suggests that the museum's problems are due to a lack of funding and support from the university administration.
• The author argues that the museum's situation is unacceptable and that something needs to be done to address these issues.

Visual Elements:

• The article features a black-and-white photograph of the museum's entrance, which appears to be in a state of disrepair.
• The text is written in a formal, journalistic style, with headings and subheadings used to break up the content.
• The article is printed on yellowed paper, giving it an aged appearance.

Overall Impression:

• The article presents a critical view of the Fogg Art Museum's situation, highlighting the challenges faced by the staff and the need for improved funding and support.
• The use of a formal, journalistic style and the inclusion of a photograph add to the article's credibility and impact.
• The article's message is clear: the Fogg Art Museum needs help, and something needs to be done to address its problems.

The image is a scanned newspaper page from the "Independent" dated February 11, 1982. The headline reads, "THE FOGG IS UNDERSTAFFED, THE STAFF IS UNDERPAID, THE BUILDING IS IN REPULSIVE PHYSICAL CONDITION."

The article is written by Oleg Grabar, Chairman of the Fine Arts Department, and discusses the condition of the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University. The article is divided into several sections, including "Like Selling One's Daughter," "Ignorance, Ignominy, or Prudence?", "A lingering feeling that art museums are for cocktail parties with old ladies who 'ooh' and 'aah'", "Priorities Priorities Priorities", and "The Future."

The article expresses concerns about the museum's staffing, funding, and physical condition, as well as the priorities of the university's administration. The tone is critical and advocacy-oriented, with the author arguing that the museum is undervalued and under-resourced.

A black and white photograph of the museum's interior is prominently displayed in the center of the page, showing a dimly lit hallway with a high ceiling and a large skylight. The overall design of the page is simple and straightforward, with clear headings and concise paragraphs.

The page is yellowed with age and has a rough texture, giving it a vintage appearance. The background behind the newspaper is a plain gray color.

The image presents a scanned page from an old newspaper or magazine, featuring a prominent article about the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University. The page is yellowed and worn, with visible signs of aging.

Header Section:

• A large "T" serves as the title, accompanied by the headline: "THE FOGG IS UNDERSTAFFED, THE STAFF IS UNDERPAID, THE BUILDING IS IN REPULSIVE PHYSICAL CONDITION."

Article Content:

The article discusses the challenges faced by the Fogg Art Museum, including:

• Understaffing
• Underpaid staff
• Poor physical condition of the building

Chairman's Statement:

A statement from Oleg Grabar, Chairman of the Fine Arts Department, is included, addressing the concerns and potential solutions.

Photograph:

A black-and-white photograph of the interior of the Fogg Art Museum is prominently displayed, showcasing its architecture.

Additional Articles:

Two smaller articles are situated on the right-hand side of the page, titled:

• "Priorities Priorities Priorities"
• "The Future"

These articles appear to discuss the museum's priorities and future plans.

Footer Section:

The footer includes the date "February 11, 1982" and the publication name "INDEPENDENT," along with a reference to continue reading on page 8.

Overall, the image provides a snapshot of the concerns and discussions surrounding the Fogg Art Museum in 1982, highlighting the need for improvement and change.

The image is a page from a newspaper or newsletter titled "Independent," dated February 11, 1982. The page discusses issues related to the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University. Here is a detailed summary of the content:

1. Headline and Main Issues:

   • The headline reads: "THE FOGG IS UNDERSTAFFED, THE STAFF IS UNDERPAID, THE BUILDING IS IN REPULSIVE PHYSICAL CONDITION."
   • The article highlights concerns about the Fogg Art Museum, including understaffing, underpayment of staff, and poor physical condition of the building.

2. Stabilization Fund Idea:

   • The article mentions a proposal for a $3 million stabilization fund for the Fogg Art Museum, which was discussed at a faculty meeting.
   • The idea was to use the fund to buy art and then sell it to generate income for the museum.
   • The article argues that this idea is flawed and that the museum should focus on maintaining and improving its current collection rather than buying and selling art.

3. Discussion of Condemnation:

   • The article discusses the condemnation of the Fogg Art Museum by the Association of Art Museum Directors.
   • The condemnation was due to the University's decision to sell a painting by Seymour Slive to raise funds.
   • The article argues that the condemnation was justified and that the University should not have sold the painting.

4. Financial and Operational Issues:

   • The article mentions that the Fogg Art Museum is underfunded and that the staff is underpaid.
   • It also highlights the poor physical condition of the building, describing it as "repulsive."

5. Opinions and Statements:

   • The article includes statements from various individuals, including Seymour Slive, who resigned as the Fogg Art Museum Director, and Derek Bok, the President of Harvard University.
   • It also includes a letter from Ralph T. Coe, a member of the Visiting Committee of the Fogg Art Museum, expressing his concerns about the museum's condition.

6. Future Plans:

   • The article mentions that the University plans to build a new museum to replace the Fogg Art Museum.
   • It argues that the University should focus on improving the current museum rather than building a new one.

7. Photograph:

   • The page includes a photograph of a deteriorating ceiling in the Fogg Art Museum, highlighting the poor physical condition of the building.

Overall, the article is a critical examination of the management and funding of the Fogg Art Museum, arguing for better support and maintenance of the existing museum rather than selling art or building a new museum.