Archives Scrapbooks

The image is a newspaper article from the "Independent" dated February 11, 1982, titled "What happened to the Fogg Addition?" by Charles Fishman. The article discusses the cancellation of a planned addition to the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University.

Key points from the article:

1. Cancellation Announcement: The article begins by quoting Paul S. Spreiregen, a Harvard University official, who announced the cancellation of the Fogg Art Museum's addition, citing financial constraints.

2. Financial Issues: The University faced a significant budget deficit, which led to the cancellation. The project was estimated to cost $16.5 million, but the University could only afford $3.4 million.

3. Funding and Endowment: The article highlights the challenges of operating and maintaining the existing Fogg building, which required substantial funds for upkeep and endowment. The University needed to raise $21.5 million for construction and an additional $12.3 million for operating endowment.

4. Fundraising Efforts: The Fogg had raised $21.5 million through a campaign, but this was insufficient to cover both construction and endowment costs. The University decided to use these funds to support the existing building rather than proceed with the addition.

5. Reactions and Criticism: The decision was met with disappointment and criticism. Some felt that the University had not adequately planned for the financial requirements of the project.

6. Future Plans: The article mentions that the Fogg would need to raise an additional $100 million to proceed with the addition in the future.

7. Quote from Hugh Calkins: The article concludes with a humorous quote from Hugh Calkins, a Corporation member, stating that while the idea of expansion is always on their minds, the financial reality (the "shadow of MATEP") prevented the Fogg addition from moving forward.

The article is accompanied by an illustration showing what the new Fogg building would have looked like if the addition had been completed.

The image is a newspaper article titled "What happened to the Fogg Addition?" by Charles Fishman, published in the February 11, 1982 issue of the Independent. The article discusses the cancellation of plans for a new addition to the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University.

Key points from the article include:

1. Financial Shortfall: The project faced significant financial issues, with the university initially estimating a cost of $32.5 million and later raising it to $78 million. The project had $3 million shortfall in operating funds and was estimated to need $300,000 more to complete.

2. University and Academic Concerns: There were discussions and concerns among university officials, including Harvard’s president and the Fogg’s director, about the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of the project. The university had to reconsider priorities and budgets.

3. Operating Deficit and Budget Constraints: The article highlights that the university was facing a $3 million operating deficit, and the funds required for the Fogg addition were not easily available. The financial constraints were partly due to the economic downturn and competing demands for university funds.

4. University and Public Reaction: The cancellation of the project was met with mixed reactions, with some university members questioning the project’s necessity and the allocation of funds. The cancellation was seen as a tough decision given the project's importance and the university's financial situation.

5. Specific Figures and Costs:

   • The initial cost estimate was $32.5 million.
   • The revised cost estimate went up to $78 million.
   • There was a $3 million operating shortfall.
   • The university's overall financial situation was described as being in a state of "never-never land."

6. Background on the Fogg Museum: The Fogg Art Museum was already an established institution, and the proposed addition was intended to significantly expand its facilities.

The article also includes a quote from Hugh Calkins, a corporation member, emphasizing that while the project's shadow of "MATEP" (presumably a hypothetical or metaphorical concept) did not fall on the Fogg, it did highlight the financial and strategic challenges faced by the university in managing its resources.

The image is a newspaper article from the Harvard Independent, dated February 11, 1982. The headline reads, "What happened to the Fogg Addition?" The article discusses the cancellation of the Fogg Art Museum addition, which was estimated to cost $2.15 million. The piece explores the reasons behind the cancellation, including financial issues and the university's decision-making process. It features an illustration of what the new Fogg building would have looked like and includes quotes from various university officials and faculty members. The subheadlines are "Abortion in Never-Never Land," "Dollars and Sense," and "Garage Sale at the Fogg." The article is written by Charles Fishman, and there is a related quote by Hugh Calkins, a corporation member, at the bottom of the page.

The image is an article from The Harvard Independent, dated February 11, 1982, titled "What happened to the Fogg Addition?" by Charles Fishman. The article discusses the aborted plans for the expansion of the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University.

Summary:

1. Introduction and Initial Plans:

   • The Fogg Art Museum at Harvard was planning a significant expansion.
   • The envisioned project was a $7.8 million, six-story addition designed by Stirling and Wilford, featuring a prize-winning architectural design.
   • The addition was to include modern museum amenities such as conservation labs, seminar rooms, climate control systems, and more.

2. Cancellation:

   • Despite initial excitement and plans, Harvard University officials abruptly canceled the project.
   • The cancellation was communicated through a simple telephone message, leaving many stakeholders shocked and disappointed.

3. Reasons for Cancellation:

   • The primary reason cited was the cost. The projected budget of $7.8 million was deemed unsustainable.
   • Harvard faced a shortfall of $3 million in construction funds.
   • An additional $500,000 annually would have been required for operating endowments, which was not feasible.

4. Financial Details:

   • Initial funding for the Fogg addition came from a $21.5 million fund left after the design and construction of Pusey Library.
   • Out of this, $14.5 million was allocated for the Fogg addition, with $3.5 million already spent on design and site preparation.
   • The remaining $8.3 million was insufficient to cover the revised budget of $13.1 million for construction and operating costs.

5. Alternatives and Future Plans:

   • Harvard considered reducing the scope of the project to fit the available budget but found it unworkable.
   • Seymour Slive, the director of the Fogg, suggested that the University might need to undertake a new fundraising campaign.
   • The article mentions that the University might explore other options, including selling part of the Fogg's collection, although this idea was not favored.

6. Impact on the University:

   • The cancellation was seen as a significant setback for the Harvard arts community, which had anticipated expanded facilities and resources.
   • The sentiment among stakeholders was one of frustration and disappointment, especially given the initial enthusiasm and high expectations.

Visual Elements:

• The article features illustrations showing what the new Fogg building would have looked like if completed.
• There is also a map or floor plan of the proposed addition.

Conclusion:

The article concludes with a reflection on the broader implications of the cancellation, emphasizing the financial constraints that led to the decision and the potential long-term impact on the arts at Harvard. The title of the conclusion, "MATEP is always on our minds, but the shadow of MATEP did not fall on the Fogg," hints at other financial pressures Harvard was facing at the time.

The image is a newspaper article from the February 11, 1982 edition of the Independent, titled "What happened to the Fogg Addition?" The article is by Charles Fishman and discusses the cancellation of the Fogg Art Museum addition at Harvard University.

Here are the key points detailed in the article:

1. Cancellation of the Project:

   • The article opens with a quote from a Harvard official who says the project was canceled because it was never going to be completed. The University was $33 million short, which is why it was abandoned.

2. Financial Shortfall:

   • The Fogg Museum was intended to be a $78 million project, but it faced a $33 million shortfall. The University had raised $45 million but needed an additional $33 million to complete the project.

3. Reasons for Cancellation:

   • The article mentions a mix of reasons for the cancellation, including a poor economy, competing claims for funds, and a Harvard administration that was not fully supportive.
   • The Harvard administration was described as having a "crackling fire" of criticism about the project's feasibility and the financial state of the university.

4. Reactions and Statements:

   • Seymour Slive, the director of the Fogg, and his assistant director, Suzanne Boorsch, expressed disappointment and frustration over the cancellation.
   • Slive pointed out that the project was at a critical stage and that the university had already spent a considerable amount of money, including $30 million on the design and construction of the new building.

5. Financial and Operational Concerns:

   • The article explains that the Fogg was facing a deficit of $3.3 million annually, which was not sustainable. The endowment was insufficient to cover the operating costs, leading to a deficit that was growing by $1.5 million each year.
   • The project's cancellation was seen as a significant setback for the museum's future and operations.

6. Expert Opinions:

   • Several experts, including Harvard faculty members, were quoted discussing the financial and operational challenges faced by the Fogg.
   • The article notes that the Fogg's endowment was inadequate and that the operating costs were too high for the museum to sustain itself without additional funds.

7. Future Prospects:

   • The article concludes with the implication that the Fogg would need to find alternative solutions, possibly including a garage sale of its art collection to raise funds, which would be a drastic measure.

8. Visuals:

   • There is an illustration showing what the new Fogg building would have looked like, emphasizing the scale and design of the proposed addition.

Overall, the article provides a detailed account of the financial and administrative challenges that led to the cancellation of the Fogg Art Museum addition, highlighting the significant shortfall and the broader economic context at the time.

The image is a newspaper clipping from the February 11, 1982, edition of the Independent. The article, titled "What happened to the Fogg Addition?" by Charles Fishman, discusses the cancellation of the Fogg Art Museum addition at Harvard University.

The article describes the Fogg Museum's plans for an addition that was supposed to cost $21.5 million, but ultimately faced significant financial and operational challenges. Initially, the project was approved, and construction began, but due to a combination of factors including economic conditions, federal funding priorities, and competing claims on funds, the project was eventually abandoned.

Key points mentioned include:

• The cancellation was a result of a $3 million shortfall in the initial budget.
• The University's administration and the Fogg Museum staff had differing views on the feasibility and necessity of the project.
• The Fogg Museum was left with a $3.3 million deficit, including $300,000 short in operating funds.
• The article also mentions a proposed garage sale to help offset some of the financial losses.
• The cancellation was likened to an "abortion" in the context of the project's progression.

The article also includes a quote from Hugh Calkins, a corporation member, who notes that while MATEP (likely a reference to another project or concern) was always on their minds, its shadow did not fall on the Fogg.

The article concludes with a graphic illustration of what the new Fogg building would have looked like.

The image shows a newspaper or magazine page featuring an article with the headline "What happened to the Fogg Addition?" written by Charles Fishman. The section is entitled "Abortion in Never-Never Land."

At the top of the page, above the headline, is a sketch of what the new Fogg building would have looked like. This sketch depicts a multi-story building with a modern architectural style situated beside an older classical-looking building with columns and pediments.

The article text discusses the situation surrounding the cancellation of an addition to the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University, mentioning financial aspects like fundraising and expenses, management decisions, and perhaps some controversy or issues that led to the project's halt.

Below the article is a bold statement in capital letters: "MATEP IS ALWAYS ON OUR MINDS, BUT THE SHADOW OF MATEP DID NOT FALL ON THE FOGG." followed by "Hugh Calkins CORPORATION MEMBER." This statement might be a separate note or commentary related to the main article, and Hugh Calkins is identified as a member of the corporation, presumably related to the discussed situation.

The date "February 11, 1982" is visible at the bottom of the page, indicating when the article was published.

The image is a scanned page from a newspaper or magazine called "INDEPENDENT" dated February 11, 1982. The page features an article titled "What happened to the Fogg Addition?" written by Charles Fishman. The subtitle of the article reads "Abortion in Never-Never Land."

At the top of the page, there is a black and white architectural sketch labeled "What the new Fogg building would have looked like." The sketch shows the proposed design for the Fogg Art Museum addition, depicting a multi-story building with a modern style, alongside some trees and an older building.

The article discusses the abrupt cancellation of the Fogg Art Museum's addition by Harvard University, addressing the financial and administrative reasons behind the decision. It mentions funding issues, budgeting problems, and the university's challenges in maintaining the project. Several officials and experts, including Seymour Slive and Prof. Oleg Grabar, are quoted offering their insights on the cancellation and its impact.

There is a section titled "Dollars and Sense" within the article, which provides details about the planned construction costs, funding shortfalls, and budget reallocations related to the project.

An additional smaller section titled "Garage Sale at the Fogg" talks about efforts to raise funds by selling part of the Fogg's collection.

At the bottom of the page, there is a large quotation attributed to Hugh Calkins, a corporation member, which reads: "'MATEP IS ALWAYS ON OUR MINDS, BUT THE SHADOW OF MATEP DID NOT FALL ON THE FOGG.'"

The overall theme is the financial and logistical challenges that led to the halting of the Fogg Art Museum addition project.

The image is a page from a newspaper with a title "What happened to the Fogg Addition?" The page contains a sketch of a building, probably the Fogg Art Museum. The text below the sketch reads "Abortion in Never-Never Land." The text on the page discusses the cancellation of the Fogg Art Museum addition and the reasons behind it. The article mentions that the project was canceled due to budget constraints and the need for renovation of the existing Fogg building.

The image is a scanned page from a publication titled "What happened to the Fogg Addition?" by Charles Fishman, published in The Independent on February 11, 1982. The page features a headline, subheading, and accompanying text, along with an illustration and a caption.

Key Elements of the Image:

1. Headline and Subheading:

• Headline: "What happened to the Fogg Addition?"
• Subheading: "Abortion in Never-Never Land"
• Author: By Charles Fishman

2. Illustration:

• Top Left: A detailed architectural drawing of a building labeled "What the new Fogg building would have looked like." The building appears to be a modern structure with a symmetrical design, featuring a central entrance, multiple windows, and a flat roof. The illustration is in black and white, giving it a schematic or blueprint-like appearance.

3. Main Text:

• The article discusses the cancellation of the Fogg Art Museum's addition project at Harvard University. Key points include:
  • The project was canceled due to financial and logistical challenges.
  • The estimated cost of the addition was $16.5 million, but the actual construction and operating costs were significantly higher.
  • The university faced a $3.3 million shortfall, and the project was deemed financially unsustainable.
  • The article highlights the political and financial pressures surrounding the project, including concerns about budget deficits, inflation, and competing priorities.
  • Quotes from university officials, including Prof. Seymour Slive and Assistant Director Suzanna Fabry, are included, emphasizing the decision-making process and the reasons for cancellation.

4. Sidebar Text:

• Dollars and Sense: A section summarizing the financial aspects of the project, including:
  • Initial estimates vs. actual costs.
  • The impact of inflation and rising construction costs.
  • The shortfall in funding and the decision to abandon the project.

5. Additional Text:

• Garage Sale at the Fogg: A smaller section discussing the university's efforts to raise funds by selling surplus items, including a proposed "involuntary selling" of 53% of the Fogg's collection to cover deficits.
• Quote at the Bottom: A poignant quote that reads:
  "MATEP IS ALWAYS ON OUR MINDS, BUT THE SHADOW OF MATEP DID NOT FALL ON THE FOGG."
  This quote is attributed to Hugh Calkins, a Corporation Member.

6. Layout and Design:

• The page has a clean, newspaper-like layout with clear typography.
• The illustration is placed above the main text, providing a visual representation of the proposed building.
• The article is structured with headings, subheadings, and a sidebar, making it easy to follow.

Overall Context:

The image conveys a narrative about the cancellation of a significant architectural and cultural project at Harvard University. It highlights the financial, political, and logistical challenges that led to the project's abandonment, as well as the broader implications for the university's budget and priorities. The inclusion of quotes, financial data, and a visual representation of the proposed building adds depth and context to the story.