Archives Scrapbooks

The image shows a page from a newspaper or magazine, dated February 9, 1982. The page contains several articles related to the Fogg Art Museum and its proposed expansion. Here are the main points of the articles:

1. Architect Calls Fogg Decision 'Tragic':

   • The article discusses the architect James Stirling's criticism of Harvard President Derek Bok's decision to abandon plans for the Fogg Art Museum expansion.
   • Stirling calls the decision tragic and notes that the project was already underway with significant planning and funding in place.
   • He mentions that the budget for the expansion was $16.5 million, and the project had already undergone several revisions to meet budget constraints.

2. May Hinder Director Search:

   • This article by Sarah Paul discusses the potential impact of Bok's decision on the search for a new director of the Fogg Art Museum.
   • Two members of the search committee resigned in protest.
   • The article mentions concerns about the museum's future and the potential difficulty in attracting a new director due to the uncertainty caused by Bok's decision.
   • It also highlights differing opinions within the committee and the broader community about the expansion plans.

3. Fogg Director:

   • This article continues the discussion on the challenges faced by the Fogg Art Museum in finding a new director.
   • It mentions the resignation of Seymour Slive, the current director, and the difficulties in finding a suitable replacement due to the museum's financial and operational issues.
   • The article also discusses the qualifications and preferences for the new director, including experience in fundraising and managing a museum.

4. Stirling Criticizes Bok's Move:

   • This article by Michael W. Miller provides further details on Stirling's criticism of Bok's decision.
   • Stirling argues that the decision was made without proper consultation and that it ignores the significant progress already made on the expansion project.
   • He also mentions the support from various architects and the potential long-term impact on the museum's ability to attract future directors and funding.

Overall, the articles highlight the controversy and disagreement surrounding the decision to halt the Fogg Art Museum's expansion plans and the potential implications for the museum's future.

The image displays a collection of newspaper clippings from February 1982, carefully arranged and taped onto a surface. The articles are primarily from the "Harvard Crimson" and focus on several key topics:

1. Fogg Art Museum Controversy:

   • The leading article titled "Architect Calls Fogg Decision 'Tragic'" criticizes a decision made by the Fogg Art Museum director, Philip Bok, to halt an addition to the museum. The architect, James Stirling, expressed his disappointment, stating that the decision was tragic and left the future of the museum uncertain.
   • Another article, "Stirling Criticizes Bok's Move," further details the architect's criticism, emphasizing that the decision was a setback for the museum and its expansion plans.
   • "Fogg Director" is another clipping that discusses the implications of Bok's decision, including the potential impact on the museum's operations and future development.

2. Search for a New Director at the Fogg Art Museum:

   • Several clippings discuss the challenges faced in the search for a new director for the Fogg Art Museum. The search committee, led by John Coolidge, grappled with finding a suitable candidate, with some members questioning the decision-making process and the criteria being used.

3. Other Articles:

   • There is an article titled "May Hinder Director Search," which discusses how the controversy might affect the search for a new director.
   • Another clipping, "Classics Professor to Deliver Jefferson Lecture," highlights a different topic, focusing on a professor being chosen to deliver a significant lecture.

The clippings are arranged in a way that suggests they are being preserved or compiled for reference, possibly indicating the significance of these issues within the Harvard community and the broader academic world at the time.

The image shows a collection of newspaper clippings from February 1982, focusing on the controversy surrounding the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University.

1. Top Left Article (by Sarah Paul):

   • Title: "Architect Calls Fogg Decision 'Tragic'"
   • The article discusses the decision by the Fogg Art Museum to abandon plans for an extension, citing economic difficulties and the potential impact on the search for a new director. It mentions the concerns of committee members regarding the timing and feasibility of starting a new building project amidst a tough financial climate.

2. Top Right Article (by Michael W. Miller):

   • Title: "Stirling Criticizes Bok's Move"
   • This piece highlights architect James Stirling's criticism of President Bok’s decision to abandon the Fogg Art Museum’s extension. Stirling expresses disappointment and concern over the impact this decision might have on future fundraising and the museum's ability to secure a new director.

3. Bottom Left Article (by Davidine Rosenfield):

   • Title: "May Hinder Director Search"
   • This article examines how the decision to halt the extension could complicate the search for a new director. It discusses the implications of the potential economic constraints and the possibility of an interim director, suggesting that the decision might delay or complicate the process of finding a suitable candidate.

4. Bottom Center Article:

   • Title: "Classics Professor Veiled To Deliver Jefferson"
   • This article is less directly related to the museum's issues but provides some background on the historical context of the Jefferson statue and its significance. It mentions a professor and his involvement in delivering the statue.

5. Additional Context (bottom right):

   • The clippings also include other news items, such as mentions of the Fogg Art Museum’s financial struggles, the potential impact on the museum’s operations, and the broader implications for Harvard University's art collections and future plans.

The main focus is on the financial and operational ramifications of the decision to halt the Fogg Art Museum’s expansion project and its implications for the institution's future plans and director search.

The image displays a newspaper clipping from the February 9, 1982, issue of the Boston Globe, with the headline "Architect Calls Fogg Decision 'Tragic'." The article discusses the controversy surrounding the decision by the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University to abandon plans for a major expansion.

Key points from the article include:

1. Fogg Director's Decision:

   • The decision to abandon the $16.5 million expansion was made by President Bok and Director Seymour Slive.
   • This decision has been criticized by several parties, including the architect James Stirling, who called it "tragic."

2. Economic Difficulties:

   • The article mentions that the decision was made amid economic difficulties, with the museum facing a period of financial strain.
   • The committee searching for a new director faced significant challenges, including the potential for a difficult search and the impact on the museum’s operations.

3. Criticism from James Stirling:

   • Stirling, the architect, expressed shock and disappointment at the decision, calling it tragic and emphasizing the potential loss of funding and the uncertain future of the museum.
   • He also criticized the lack of transparency and the abrupt nature of the decision.

4. Reactions from Harvard:

   • Harvard officials, including David M. Rosenfield, a professor of history, and John M. Rosenfield, a professor of law, are quoted, though their specific comments are not detailed in the visible portion of the article.
   • Rosenfield also mentions the committee's difficulties in finding a new director and the potential for a prolonged search.

5. Economic Impact:

   • The article notes that the museum's decision could have far-reaching financial and operational impacts, including the potential loss of future funding and the uncertain future of the museum's facilities.

6. Further Articles:

   • The clipping also includes references to other articles in the same issue, such as "May Hinder Director Search," "Stirling Criticizes Bok's Move," and a piece about Professor D.E. Vermule's retirement and the appointment of Professor Jefferson.

The overall theme of the article is the controversy and disappointment surrounding Harvard's decision to halt the expansion of the Fogg Art Museum, highlighting the significant impact on the museum's future and the criticism from the architectural community.

The image displays several newspaper clippings from February 9, 1982, focusing on different articles related to the Fogg Art Museum.

1. Main Headline (Top Center):

   • The headline reads, "Architect Calls Fogg Decision 'Tragic'."
   • The article by Sarah Paul discusses the Fogg Art Museum's decision to abandon plans for a new building. The decision has been criticized by architect James Stirling, who called it "tragic." The article mentions that the museum's director, Seymour Slive, had planned to raise funds for the project but has now decided to cancel it.

2. Stirling Criticizes Bok's Move (Top Right):

   • This article by Michael W. Miller is titled "Stirling Criticizes Bok's Move."
   • James Stirling, the architect, is quoted saying that President Derek Bok's decision to abandon the Fogg Museum's expansion plans is a "tragic" decision. Stirling argues that the museum's future is uncertain without the new building.

3. May Hinder Director Search (Bottom Left):

   • The article by Sarah Paul titled "May Hinder Director Search" discusses the implications of the decision to cancel the Fogg Art Museum's expansion on the search for a new director. The committee members, including Simon Schama, are concerned that the decision could make the museum less attractive to potential candidates.

4. Fogg Director (Bottom Center):

   • This article by David Rosenfield is titled "Fogg Director."
   • It focuses on the search for a new director for the Fogg Art Museum and mentions the candidates being considered, including former Harvard dean Glenn Bowersock and others. It highlights the difficulties and challenges in finding a new director given the current circumstances.

5. Classics Professor Vehemently Opposes Jeffrey's Delivery (Bottom Right):

   • This article by Emily D. Vermuel titled "Classics Professor Vehemently Opposes Jeffrey's Delivery" discusses a different but related topic involving Harvard University. It mentions a protest by Professor G. E. F. Chilver against the delivery of the Gowland Collection to the Sackler Museum.

The articles collectively address significant issues and controversies surrounding the Fogg Art Museum's decision to abandon its expansion plans, the potential impact on the museum's future, and the search for a new director. The clippings reflect the broader implications of the decision on the museum's operations and public perception.

The image shows a page from a newspaper dated February 9, 1962. It contains several articles and columns related to Harvard University and its Fogg Art Museum. Here's a detailed summary:

1. Main Article: "Architect Calls Fogg Decision 'Tragic'"

   • By Sarah Paul
   • The article discusses the reactions of two committee members who were involved in the search for a new director for the Fogg Art Museum. President Bok's decision to appoint John M. Rosenfield as acting director has caused controversy.
   • Current Fogg director, Seymour Slive, expressed disappointment, suggesting that the decision might hinder the search for a permanent director due to the uncertainty it creates.
   • Hugh Hencken, another committee member, mentioned that Rosenfield is a competent interim choice but emphasized that the search for a new director should proceed without delay.

2. Opinion Piece: "Stirling Criticizes Bok's Move"

   • By Michael W. Miller
   • James Stirling, an architect associated with plans for the Fogg Museum, criticized President Bok’s decision.
   • Stirling felt that the decision undermined the planning process and future construction of the museum, which was intended to include modern art facilities.

3. Editorial: "Fogg Director"

   • This editorial argues that the decision to appoint an acting director might not be the best approach, as it could undermine the confidence of donors and the community in the museum's future.
   • It questions whether Harvard's administration has fully considered the potential consequences of this decision.

4. Additional Column: "Architect"

   • This section provides further commentary on the situation, discussing the implications of the Fogg Museum's stalled building plans.
   • The columnist expresses concern over the delay in construction and its impact on Harvard's ability to attract modern art collections.

5. Classics Column: "Classics Professor V... To Deliver Jefferson"

   • This brief column announces that Professor Herbert Bloch will deliver the Jefferson Lecture, mentioning the topic and date of the event.

6. Letters to the Editor

   • The bottom section features a letter to the editor from David M. Rosenberg discussing classical education and its relevance.

Overall, the newspaper page focuses heavily on the administrative and architectural issues surrounding the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University. The articles reflect concerns from various stakeholders about leadership decisions and the future of the museum's construction and operations.

This image displays a newspaper spread which appears to be from "The Harvard Crimson," based on the header. The newspaper is from February 9, 1982, as indicated in handwritten text at the top. The main article focuses on an architectural issue related to the Fogg Art Museum and reads "Architect Calls Fogg Decision 'Tragic'". The article discusses a contentious decision that may hinder the search for a new director for the museum.

The article is split into two columns and continues onto the adjoining page, where a secondary article titled "Fogg Director" can be seen beginning. The article includes the opinions of various individuals about the situation at the Fogg Museum, with quotes encapsulating their perspectives on the matter.

There is a visible vertical fold line that suggests the newspaper was folded in half at some point. The overall condition of the newspaper indicates regular wear and age, with yellowing of the paper and some fraying at the edges. The photo also captures a part of the surrounding environment with the corner of what seems to be a desk or a table visible in the bottom-left corner.

The image shows a scrapbook page containing multiple newspaper clippings related to the Fogg Art Museum from early 1982. The main headline at the top reads, "Architect Calls Fogg Decision 'Tragic'," with subheadings including "May Hinder Director Search" and "Stirling Criticizes Bok's Move." The articles discuss the Fogg Art Museum director search and controversy around President Bok's decision to cancel a $16.5 million addition to the museum. There is criticism from architect Michael W. Miller and issues related to funding, construction delays, and planning. There is a smaller section dated February 9, 1982, titled "Fogg Director," discussing difficulties in selecting a new director. Another clipping mentions a classics professor set to deliver a lecture at Jefferson. Handwritten notes at the top are dated "2-9-82." The articles are arranged with some overlapping and pasted on the page, showing some yellowing typical of aged newspaper.

The image shows an open book with newspaper clippings inside. The book appears to be a scrapbook or collection of articles. The clippings are related to the search for a new director at the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University. The articles discuss the controversy surrounding the search, the concerns about the cost and impact of the search, and the resignation of the current director, Seymour Slive.

The image shows an open book with two facing pages filled with dense text. The pages appear to be from a newspaper or magazine, dated February 9, 1982, as indicated at the top of the right page. The content is primarily composed of articles discussing architectural and institutional matters, with headlines and subheadings providing context for the text.

Left Page:

• Headline: "Architect Calls Fogg Decision 'Tragic'"
• Subheadline: "May Hinder Director Search"
• Byline: By SARAH PAUL
• The article discusses a controversy surrounding the Fogg Art Museum, a part of Harvard University. Key points include:
  • A decision by the museum's director, Seymour Silver, to cancel the addition of a new building.
  • The cancellation was due to financial difficulties and operational expenses.
  • The decision has sparked debate, with some critics viewing it as a setback for the museum's future.
  • The article mentions a committee searching for a new director and the challenges faced by the institution.

Right Page:

• Headline: "Stirling Criticizes Bok's Move"
• Subheadline: "Architect Calls Fogg Decision 'Tragic'"
• Byline: By MICHAEL W. MILLER
• This article continues the discussion of the Fogg Art Museum's decision, focusing on criticism from architect James Stirling. Key points include:
  • Stirling expresses disappointment with the decision to abandon plans for a new building.
  • He describes the decision as a "tragedy" for the museum.
  • The article also mentions financial constraints and the impact of the decision on the museum's future.
  • Additional commentary from other individuals, such as Arthur M. Sackler, is included, discussing the implications of the decision.

Visual Elements:

• The text is densely packed, with columns of print typical of newspaper layouts.
• There are visible column dividers and headlines that guide the reader through the articles.
• The page numbers at the top indicate this is part of a larger publication.
• The dates at the top of each page confirm the historical context (February 9, 1982).
• The font style is consistent with mid-20th-century print media, featuring serif typography.

Overall Impression:

The image captures a snapshot of a historical moment in the art and architectural world, focusing on a significant decision affecting the Fogg Art Museum. The articles highlight the tension between financial realities and institutional ambitions, with notable figures like James Stirling weighing in on the controversy. The layout and content suggest this is part of a broader discussion in a news publication from 1982.