Archives Scrapbooks

The image shows a newspaper clipping from "The Harvard Crimson," dated Monday, February 8, 1982. The headline reads "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future." The article is written by Michael W. Miller and discusses the reaction to the cancellation of plans for a new Fogg Museum building, following a controversial decision by Seymour Slive, the director of the Fogg Art Museum.

Key points from the article include:

1. Decision and Reaction: The Visiting Committee of the Overseers and the Fine Arts Department are planning to meet to discuss the future of the museum after Slive's decision to cancel the construction project.

2. Financial Context: The project was canceled due to a $16.5 million funding shortfall. The museum has been operating in cramped conditions, and there is disappointment and dismay among supporters.

3. Funding and Contributions: The Visiting Committee, foundations, and the Harvard Corporation had pledged significant funds. Slive's decision was influenced by a $7.9 million pledge from a donor that required immediate construction, which was not feasible.

4. University Benefactors: George Putnam, a major donor, expressed disappointment but placed the total funds raised at about $11 million.

5. Internal Reactions: The Fine Arts Department and the Fogg's curator, Konrad Oberhuber, have written letters expressing their disappointment. Oberhuber mentioned that the cancellation might lead to another building like Busch Hall.

6. Future Plans: Joe B. Wyatt, vice president for administration, indicated that specific plans for Busch Hall would be made to accommodate the art collection.

The article reflects the frustration and uncertainty within the Harvard community following the cancellation of the new museum building project.

The image shows a yellowed newspaper, "The Harvard Crimson," dated Monday, February 8, 1982, with a main headline that reads, "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future." The subheading indicates that this is a Fogg Special Report on Page Three. The article discusses the potential meeting of the Overseers' Visiting Committee to strategize the future of the Fogg Art Museum following the cancellation of plans for a new building. Key figures mentioned include Michael W. Miller, Charles C. Cunningham Jr., and others expressing their reactions to the decision. The article also mentions related developments such as the establishment of the Harvard University Fund and reactions from faculty and other supporters. The overall tone suggests a critical assessment period for the museum. The right side of the newspaper includes a weather note indicating "Still Foggy."

The image is a newspaper clipping from "The Harvard Crimson," dated February 8, 1982. The article is titled "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum’s Future" and is part of a special report.

Here's a detailed summary of the content:

Title:
Fogg Special Report, Page Three
The Harvard Crimson

Date:
Monday, February 8, 1982

Headline:
Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum’s Future

Article Content:
The article discusses the potential future of the Fogg Art Museum, which is facing severe financial and structural challenges. Supporters and benefactors of the museum will likely convene to strategize on how to proceed after the cancellation of a $16.5 million project to build a new wing on the Allison Barr Lecture Hall site.

Key Points:

1. Context and Decision:

   • The cancellation of the new wing project was announced by President Bok, leading to a significant blow to the museum’s financial future.
   • Charles C. Cunningham Jr., the museum’s chairman, expressed disappointment and a need to reassess the situation.

2. Fundraising Efforts:

   • The Visiting Committee, which included several donors and supporters, had been a major source of funds and advice for the Fogg.
   • The cancellation led to a loss of over $11 million in pledges and contributions that had been expected to be returned to Harvard benefactors.

3. Reactions:

   • Seymour Slive, the chair of the Fine Arts Department, criticized Bok's decision as a "shocking blow" and an "enormous loss."
   • George Putnam, treasurer of the Fogg, called Slive’s estimate of losses "absolutely fictitious."
   • Oleg Grabar, the museum’s chairman, expressed feelings of disappointment and suggested that the University’s policy towards museums needed reassessment.
   • Konrad J. Oberhuber, the curator of drawings, and other faculty members have written letters expressing their discontent and planning to seek alternatives.

4. Administrative Plans:

   • Joe B. Wyatt, vice president for administration, mentioned that no plans had yet been made for the Burr Hall project, indicating a pause in the immediate plans for that wing.

Additional Notes:

• The article emphasizes the need for the Fogg community to come together to address the financial and strategic challenges the museum faces post-cancellation.

This summary captures the essence of the article and the immediate reactions and strategies surrounding the future of the Fogg Art Museum as detailed in the Harvard Crimson of February 8, 1982.

The image is a newspaper clipping from The Harvard Crimson, dated Monday, February 8, 1982. The headline of the article is "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future."

The article reports on a group of approximately 35 supporters and benefactors of the Fogg Art Museum, who are planning to meet soon to discuss the museum's future following President Bok's decision to cancel plans for a new wing. The meeting aims to strategize and determine the next steps.

Key points in the article include:

• Charles C. Cunningham Jr., the chairman of the Fogg's Visiting Committee, expressed disappointment and uncertainty about the future.
• The Visiting Committee, a major source of funds and advice for the Fogg, was reportedly devastated by Bok's decision.
• The cancellation of the $16.5 million project to build a new Fogg wing at the site of the Allston Barr Lecture Hall was met with criticism.
• The Visiting Committee is considering returning contributions to Harvard benefactors.
• Several faculty members, including Seymour Slive, Oleg Grabar, and Konrad J. Oberhuber, expressed their dismay and concerns over the decision.
• The article mentions that the University has not yet made specific plans for the future use of the Barr Lecture Hall space.

The article also notes that Joe B. Wyatt, vice president for administration, stated that the University has not made detailed plans for the Barr Lecture Hall but that the Fogg Museum has made its first steps in that direction.

The image shows a clipping from a newspaper titled "The Harvard Crimson," dated Monday, February 8, 1982. The headline of the article is "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future." The article is on page three of a special report titled "Fogg Special Report."

The main content of the article discusses the potential meeting of supporters and benefactors of the Fogg Art Museum, following the cancellation of a $16.5 million project to build a new wing by President Derek Bok. The article mentions that the Visiting Committee, which includes around 35 supporters and benefactors, will likely convene to strategize on the future of the museum.

Key points in the article include:

• The cancellation of the project has caused significant disappointment and dismay.
• The Visiting Committee is a major source of funds and advice for the museum.
• Chairman Charles C. Cunningham Jr. expresses concern about the decision, emphasizing the need to find new strategies.
• Seymour Slive, the museum's director, stated that about $11 million in pledges and contributions might need to be returned to Harvard benefactors.
• George Putnam, treasurer of the Fine Arts Department, criticized Slive's figures as "absolutely fictitious."
• Ole Grabar, the chairman of the Fine Arts Department, asserts that the university has not thought out its policy towards museums and the quality of the Fogg.
• Konrad Oberhuber, the museum's curator, has plans to write a letter to Bok expressing his concerns, but has not yet decided whether to send it.
• Joe B. Wyatt, vice president for administration, mentions that no specific plans have been made for the building, and no new plans for Fogg Hall have been discussed.

The weather in Cambridge, Massachusetts, is noted to be "Still Foggy" at the top right of the page.

The image is a scanned page from The Harvard Crimson, a student newspaper of Harvard University. The specific issue is dated Monday, February 8, 1982, and it is Volume CLXXV, Number 7.

The headline article on this page is titled "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum’s Future," written by Michael W. Miller.

Summary of the Article:

1. Context and Formation of the Committee:

   • The Fogg Art Museum's Visiting Committee, composed of approximately 35 supporters and benefactors, is likely to meet in the coming weeks to strategize the museum’s future amid President Bok's contemplation of closing the aging building.
   • Charles C. Cunningham Jr., the committee's chairman, mentioned that they need to determine their next steps.

2. Recent Events and Challenges:

   • The Quincy St. building, which has been under severe scrutiny due to cramped conditions, was supposed to undergo a $16.5 million renovation project that was canceled last week.
   • Bok announced the cancellation of the project and the formation of a new Fogg wing at the Allston site.
   • The Visiting Committee, a significant source of funds, was disappointed by the decision.

3. Financial Concerns:

   • Harvard's treasurer, Robert H. Scott, informed the committee that a $1 million pledge and around $11 million in planned contributions would be returned to donors unless the funds were redirected to other projects.

4. Reactions from Committee Members:

   • Oleg Grabar, Fine Arts Department chair, expressed his intent to resign if the decision to close the Fogg is finalized.
   • Other members, including Seymour Slive and John Coolidge, expressed disappointment and a lack of clarity about the future of the museum.

5. University’s Stance and Future Plans:

   • The University has not made definitive plans for the quality and preservation of the Fogg's collections.
   • Some members, like Konrad Oberhuber, proposed immediate solutions such as relocating parts of the collection.
   • Harvard's administration, including President Bok, has not made specific plans for the Fogg's collections beyond general statements.

The article concludes by noting that further discussion and planning are expected, with Joe B. Wyatt, Harvard's new provost, indicating that no definitive plans have been made yet regarding the Fogg Art Museum's future.

Additionally, there is a small section titled "The Weather" by Bill Fogg, providing a brief weather report.

The image displays a partial newspaper page that appears to have been physically cut or torn. It is from "The Harvard Crimson," specifically labeled as "Fogg Special Report, Page Three" in a banner strip at the top. The headline reads "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future," and the byline indicates the report was written by Michael W. Miller. This snippet includes the beginning of the article with text that gives context to the discussion around the future of the Fogg Museum, though much of the article content is missing because the paper is incomplete.

The date of publication is shown in the top right corner as "CAMBRIDGE, MASS.-MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 1982." There is also a box that says "FREE COPY," suggesting the issue was distributed without charge. In the top right corner is a section marked "The Weather" with the forecast being "Still Foggy," which cleverly plays on the name of the museum.

Because the paper is only partially visible, with the right half of it not shown and the text cut off, we cannot read the entire article or know the full context of the piece from this image alone.

The image is a scanned page from the Harvard Crimson newspaper, dated February 8, 1982. The page contains an article titled "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future," discussing the uncertain future of the Fogg Art Museum due to funding and planning issues. The article mentions a Visiting Committee that has been tasked with mapping out a strategy for the museum's future. The page also includes a weather report at the top and is part of a larger special report on the Fogg Museum. The paper appears aged, with visible creases and a slightly yellowed hue.

The image depicts the front page of The Harvard Crimson, a student newspaper, dated Monday, February 8, 1982. The headline prominently reads:

"Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future"

Key Details from the Image:

1. Header Information:

   • The top of the page features the newspaper's title, The Harvard Crimson, along with the volume and issue number: Volume CLXXV, No. 7.
   • The location is listed as Cambridge, Mass., and the date is clearly marked as Monday, February 8, 1982.
   • The page is labeled as Page Three of a Fogg Special Report.
   • The newspaper is marked as a FREE COPY.

2. Main Story:

   • The article is authored by Michael W. Miller and focuses on the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University.
   • The story discusses the aftermath of a controversial decision by President Bok to cancel plans for a new wing of the Fogg Museum, which had been under severe financial and planning challenges.
   • A group of about 35 supporters, referred to as the Visiting Committee to the Fogg Art Museum, is planning to meet in the coming weeks to assess the museum's future and develop a strategy for the next few years.
   • The article highlights the disappointment among museum supporters, including faculty, donors, and members of the Visiting Committee, due to the cancellation of the expansion plan.
   • Key figures mentioned include:
     • Charles C. Cunningham Jr., the chairman of the Visiting Committee, who expresses concerns about the museum's future.
     • Arthur M. Sackler, a prominent collector and donor who contributed significantly to the museum.
     • Slive, the director of the Fogg, who had pledged $11 million in contributions.
     • George Putnam, treasurer of the College, who criticized the decision as "absolutely fictitious."
     • Oleg Grabar, chairman of the Fine Arts Department, who described the decision as a "blow" to the university and the museum.

3. Contextual Details:

   • The article mentions that the Fogg's expansion plan had been in development for over three years and involved significant planning and fundraising efforts.
   • The cancellation of the project is attributed to severe funding issues and the university's decision to redirect resources.
   • The article also notes that the museum's future is uncertain, with supporters planning to meet to reassess the situation and explore alternative strategies.

4. Visual Layout:

   • The page has a classic newspaper layout with a clear hierarchy of information.
   • The headline is bold and centered, drawing immediate attention to the main story.
   • The article is written in a formal, journalistic style, with quotes from various individuals involved in the issue.
   • The page also includes a small section labeled "The Weather", indicating that weather information is part of the newspaper's content.

Summary:

The image shows the front page of The Harvard Crimson from February 8, 1982, focusing on a significant controversy surrounding the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University. The article details the cancellation of a major expansion plan, the disappointment among supporters, and the upcoming meeting of a visiting committee to assess the museum's future. The page is part of a Fogg Special Report and includes standard newspaper elements such as the date, volume/issue number, and weather information.

A torn page from a newspaper is placed on a gray surface. The newspaper is titled "The Harvard Crimson," with a date of February 8, 1982, and a volume number. The headline reads "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future," and it is written by Michael W. Miller. The article is about the Fogg Art Museum's future and the cancellation of plans to build a new Fogg wing. The article also mentions the disappointment and dismay of the museum's supporters.