Archives Scrapbooks

This image displays a physical, aged clipping from The Harvard Crimson, the student newspaper of Harvard University.

Here is a detailed description:

• Publication and Date: The newspaper is identified as "The Harvard Crimson," Volume CLXXV, No. 7, dated "CAMBRIDGE, MASS., MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 1982." It is marked as a "FREE COPY."
• Headline: The main headline reads: "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum’s Future."
• Byline: The article is written by Michael W. Miller.
• Context: This is labeled as "Fogg Special Report, Page Three," indicating it is part of a larger series of articles. A small column on the top right is titled "The Weather" by S. Foggy.
• Content Summary: The article reports on a major crisis at the Fogg Art Museum. The museum's plans for a $16.5 million expansion—a new wing on the site of the Allston Burr Lecture Hall—were cancelled by President Bok. This decision threw the museum, which was already operating under "severely cramped conditions," into uncertainty. The article details the disappointment and dismay of museum supporters, including members of the Overseers' Visiting Committee, faculty, and administrators. Key figures like Charles C. Cunningham Jr., Seymour Slive, Oleg Grabar, and Konrad Oberhuber are quoted expressing their unhappiness and frustration. The article also mentions that donations, including a $7.9 million contribution from Arthur M. Sackler, might need to be returned to benefactors. It concludes with a note that no specific plans have been made yet for the Burr Hall building.
• Physical Appearance: The clipping is on yellowed newsprint, typical of papers from the early 1980s. It has been cut and is placed on a neutral gray surface. The edges of the paper are ragged, suggesting it was torn from the original newspaper. A small, torn piece of paper is visible in the top left corner, also bearing text including "FEBRUARY 8, 1982".

In essence, the image captures a historical newspaper report detailing a significant and controversial administrative decision at Harvard University that deeply impacted the Fogg Art Museum and its community of supporters.

The image features a page from "The Harvard Crimson," a newspaper, dated Monday, February 8, 1982. It is page three of the "Fogg Special Report." The headline reads "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future." The article discusses the uncertainties surrounding the future of the Fogg Art Museum, which at the time was operating under cramped conditions. The announcement of a $16.5 million project to build a new wing for the museum was canceled by President Bok, leading to confusion and disappointment among supporters and benefactors of the museum. The article includes quotes from various individuals, such as the chairman of the Fine Arts Department and faculty members, expressing their feelings of disappointment and the need for support from President Bok and Dean Rosovsky. The article also mentions that numerous letters were written to President Bok to express dissatisfaction with the cancellation of the project.

This image is a photograph of a page from the newspaper The Harvard Crimson. The page is dated Monday, February 8, 1982, and is labeled as "Fogg Special Report, Page Three." The headline reads, "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum’s Future." The article is written by Michael W. Miller and discusses the future of the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University, which was under "severely cramped conditions" in its Quincy Street building.

The article mentions that the Overseers' Visiting Committee to the Fogg Art Museum, consisting of about 35 supporters and benefactors, would likely meet in the next few weeks to map out a strategy for the museum's future following President Bok's decision to cancel plans for a major new Fogg building. The committee's chairman, Charles C. Cunningham Jr., expressed uncertainty about the future, saying, "We’ll have to see what to do—where to go from here."

The article also notes that the future of the museum was thrown into uncertainty when President Bok announced the cancellation of a $16.5 million project to build a new Fogg wing on the site of the Allston Burr Lecture Hall. This decision ended three years of intensive planning and fundraising. The article mentions significant financial contributions, including $7.9 million from Arthur M. Sackler, a prominent New York medical researcher and art collector.

The article includes quotes from various individuals, including Fogg Director Seymour Slive, who stated that about $11 million in pledges and contributions would have to be returned to Harvard benefactors following Bok's decision. George Putnam '49, treasurer of the College, called Slive's figure "absolutely fictitious" and placed the total loss at about $1.1 million.

The article also discusses letters written by the chairman of the Fine Arts Department and a curator at the Fogg, as well as other Fine Arts faculty members, expressing their disappointment and seeking support from President Bok and Dean Rosovsky. The article ends with a note that the University has not yet made specific plans for Burr Hall, which was to have been razed to make room for the Fogg addition. The article is continued on page 4.

The top right corner of the page has a small section titled "The Weather," which simply states "Still Foggy." The page is labeled as a "FREE COPY."

A torn page from a newspaper is placed on a gray surface. The newspaper is titled "The Harvard Crimson," with a date of February 8, 1982, and a volume number. The headline reads "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future," and it is written by Michael W. Miller. The article is about the Fogg Art Museum's future and the cancellation of plans to build a new Fogg wing. The article also mentions the disappointment and dismay of the museum's supporters.

The image is a scanned page from the Harvard Crimson newspaper, dated February 8, 1982. The page contains an article titled "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future," discussing the uncertain future of the Fogg Art Museum due to funding and planning issues. The article mentions a Visiting Committee that has been tasked with mapping out a strategy for the museum's future. The page also includes a weather report at the top and is part of a larger special report on the Fogg Museum. The paper appears aged, with visible creases and a slightly yellowed hue.

The image depicts the front page of The Harvard Crimson, a student newspaper, dated Monday, February 8, 1982. The headline prominently reads:

"Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future"

Key Details from the Image:

1. Header Information:

   • The top of the page features the newspaper's title, The Harvard Crimson, along with the volume and issue number: Volume CLXXV, No. 7.
   • The location is listed as Cambridge, Mass., and the date is clearly marked as Monday, February 8, 1982.
   • The page is labeled as Page Three of a Fogg Special Report.
   • The newspaper is marked as a FREE COPY.

2. Main Story:

   • The article is authored by Michael W. Miller and focuses on the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University.
   • The story discusses the aftermath of a controversial decision by President Bok to cancel plans for a new wing of the Fogg Museum, which had been under severe financial and planning challenges.
   • A group of about 35 supporters, referred to as the Visiting Committee to the Fogg Art Museum, is planning to meet in the coming weeks to assess the museum's future and develop a strategy for the next few years.
   • The article highlights the disappointment among museum supporters, including faculty, donors, and members of the Visiting Committee, due to the cancellation of the expansion plan.
   • Key figures mentioned include:
     • Charles C. Cunningham Jr., the chairman of the Visiting Committee, who expresses concerns about the museum's future.
     • Arthur M. Sackler, a prominent collector and donor who contributed significantly to the museum.
     • Slive, the director of the Fogg, who had pledged $11 million in contributions.
     • George Putnam, treasurer of the College, who criticized the decision as "absolutely fictitious."
     • Oleg Grabar, chairman of the Fine Arts Department, who described the decision as a "blow" to the university and the museum.

3. Contextual Details:

   • The article mentions that the Fogg's expansion plan had been in development for over three years and involved significant planning and fundraising efforts.
   • The cancellation of the project is attributed to severe funding issues and the university's decision to redirect resources.
   • The article also notes that the museum's future is uncertain, with supporters planning to meet to reassess the situation and explore alternative strategies.

4. Visual Layout:

   • The page has a classic newspaper layout with a clear hierarchy of information.
   • The headline is bold and centered, drawing immediate attention to the main story.
   • The article is written in a formal, journalistic style, with quotes from various individuals involved in the issue.
   • The page also includes a small section labeled "The Weather", indicating that weather information is part of the newspaper's content.

Summary:

The image shows the front page of The Harvard Crimson from February 8, 1982, focusing on a significant controversy surrounding the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University. The article details the cancellation of a major expansion plan, the disappointment among supporters, and the upcoming meeting of a visiting committee to assess the museum's future. The page is part of a Fogg Special Report and includes standard newspaper elements such as the date, volume/issue number, and weather information.

The image displays a partial newspaper page that appears to have been physically cut or torn. It is from "The Harvard Crimson," specifically labeled as "Fogg Special Report, Page Three" in a banner strip at the top. The headline reads "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future," and the byline indicates the report was written by Michael W. Miller. This snippet includes the beginning of the article with text that gives context to the discussion around the future of the Fogg Museum, though much of the article content is missing because the paper is incomplete.

The date of publication is shown in the top right corner as "CAMBRIDGE, MASS.-MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 1982." There is also a box that says "FREE COPY," suggesting the issue was distributed without charge. In the top right corner is a section marked "The Weather" with the forecast being "Still Foggy," which cleverly plays on the name of the museum.

Because the paper is only partially visible, with the right half of it not shown and the text cut off, we cannot read the entire article or know the full context of the piece from this image alone.

The image shows a partial page from "The Harvard Crimson" newspaper, dated Monday, February 8, 1982. The headline reads "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum’s Future." The article is written by Michael W. Miller and discusses the uncertainty and disappointment among supporters of the Fogg Art Museum following the cancellation of a $16.5 million project to build a new Fogg wing on the site of the Allston Burr Lecture Hall, a decision announced by Bok. The article includes quotes from various individuals including Charles C. Cunningham Jr., Fogg Director Seymour Slive, George Putnam, Oleg Grabar, Konrad J. Oberhuber, and Joe B. Wyatt. It talks about the museum’s cramped conditions, fundraising efforts, and concerns about the future plans for the Fogg building and Burr Hall. The weather note on the top right corner says "Still Foggy." The newspaper is labeled as a free copy and is Volume CLXXV, No. 7. There is some tearing on the top left corner of the page.

This image shows a newspaper article clipping from "The Harvard Crimson," dated Monday, February 8, 1982. The publication is titled "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future." It appears to discuss the future and challenges faced by the Fogg Art Museum and its related planning under financial and structural pressures. The article mentions efforts by supporters to strategize and address the museum's future plans, referencing the Visiting Committee and its role. Prominent figures like Charles Cunningham are cited, expressing concern yet determination to move forward.

The piece is presented on aged, slightly yellowed paper with sections cut cleanly into the text, suggesting it is preserved as a partial document. Subheadings, detailed quotes, and perspectives from stakeholders are included within this article to highlight the situation.

A vintage newspaper collage laid on a gray background. It uses torn clippings to form a big “T” shape: a wide horizontal strip at the top with the masthead “The Harvard Crimson” and small captions (Fog Special Report, Page Three on the left; The Weather Still Foggy on the right). A narrow vertical strip hangs down from the middle, forming a long column of text. The visible headline reads “Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum’s Future” with a byline, giving the look of an old campus newspaper. The paper is aged with yellowed, torn edges, giving a nostalgic, editorial vibe.