Archives Scrapbooks

The image features a page from "The Harvard Crimson," a newspaper, dated Monday, February 8, 1982. It is page three of the "Fogg Special Report." The headline reads "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future." The article discusses the uncertainties surrounding the future of the Fogg Art Museum, which at the time was operating under cramped conditions. The announcement of a $16.5 million project to build a new wing for the museum was canceled by President Bok, leading to confusion and disappointment among supporters and benefactors of the museum. The article includes quotes from various individuals, such as the chairman of the Fine Arts Department and faculty members, expressing their feelings of disappointment and the need for support from President Bok and Dean Rosovsky. The article also mentions that numerous letters were written to President Bok to express dissatisfaction with the cancellation of the project.

This image is a photograph of a page from the newspaper The Harvard Crimson. The page is dated Monday, February 8, 1982, and is labeled as "Fogg Special Report, Page Three." The headline reads, "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum’s Future." The article is written by Michael W. Miller and discusses the future of the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University, which was under "severely cramped conditions" in its Quincy Street building.

The article mentions that the Overseers' Visiting Committee to the Fogg Art Museum, consisting of about 35 supporters and benefactors, would likely meet in the next few weeks to map out a strategy for the museum's future following President Bok's decision to cancel plans for a major new Fogg building. The committee's chairman, Charles C. Cunningham Jr., expressed uncertainty about the future, saying, "We’ll have to see what to do—where to go from here."

The article also notes that the future of the museum was thrown into uncertainty when President Bok announced the cancellation of a $16.5 million project to build a new Fogg wing on the site of the Allston Burr Lecture Hall. This decision ended three years of intensive planning and fundraising. The article mentions significant financial contributions, including $7.9 million from Arthur M. Sackler, a prominent New York medical researcher and art collector.

The article includes quotes from various individuals, including Fogg Director Seymour Slive, who stated that about $11 million in pledges and contributions would have to be returned to Harvard benefactors following Bok's decision. George Putnam '49, treasurer of the College, called Slive's figure "absolutely fictitious" and placed the total loss at about $1.1 million.

The article also discusses letters written by the chairman of the Fine Arts Department and a curator at the Fogg, as well as other Fine Arts faculty members, expressing their disappointment and seeking support from President Bok and Dean Rosovsky. The article ends with a note that the University has not yet made specific plans for Burr Hall, which was to have been razed to make room for the Fogg addition. The article is continued on page 4.

The top right corner of the page has a small section titled "The Weather," which simply states "Still Foggy." The page is labeled as a "FREE COPY."

A torn page from a newspaper is placed on a gray surface. The newspaper is titled "The Harvard Crimson," with a date of February 8, 1982, and a volume number. The headline reads "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future," and it is written by Michael W. Miller. The article is about the Fogg Art Museum's future and the cancellation of plans to build a new Fogg wing. The article also mentions the disappointment and dismay of the museum's supporters.

The image is a scanned page from the Harvard Crimson newspaper, dated February 8, 1982. The page contains an article titled "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future," discussing the uncertain future of the Fogg Art Museum due to funding and planning issues. The article mentions a Visiting Committee that has been tasked with mapping out a strategy for the museum's future. The page also includes a weather report at the top and is part of a larger special report on the Fogg Museum. The paper appears aged, with visible creases and a slightly yellowed hue.

The image depicts the front page of The Harvard Crimson, a student newspaper, dated Monday, February 8, 1982. The headline prominently reads:

"Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future"

Key Details from the Image:

1. Header Information:

   • The top of the page features the newspaper's title, The Harvard Crimson, along with the volume and issue number: Volume CLXXV, No. 7.
   • The location is listed as Cambridge, Mass., and the date is clearly marked as Monday, February 8, 1982.
   • The page is labeled as Page Three of a Fogg Special Report.
   • The newspaper is marked as a FREE COPY.

2. Main Story:

   • The article is authored by Michael W. Miller and focuses on the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University.
   • The story discusses the aftermath of a controversial decision by President Bok to cancel plans for a new wing of the Fogg Museum, which had been under severe financial and planning challenges.
   • A group of about 35 supporters, referred to as the Visiting Committee to the Fogg Art Museum, is planning to meet in the coming weeks to assess the museum's future and develop a strategy for the next few years.
   • The article highlights the disappointment among museum supporters, including faculty, donors, and members of the Visiting Committee, due to the cancellation of the expansion plan.
   • Key figures mentioned include:
     • Charles C. Cunningham Jr., the chairman of the Visiting Committee, who expresses concerns about the museum's future.
     • Arthur M. Sackler, a prominent collector and donor who contributed significantly to the museum.
     • Slive, the director of the Fogg, who had pledged $11 million in contributions.
     • George Putnam, treasurer of the College, who criticized the decision as "absolutely fictitious."
     • Oleg Grabar, chairman of the Fine Arts Department, who described the decision as a "blow" to the university and the museum.

3. Contextual Details:

   • The article mentions that the Fogg's expansion plan had been in development for over three years and involved significant planning and fundraising efforts.
   • The cancellation of the project is attributed to severe funding issues and the university's decision to redirect resources.
   • The article also notes that the museum's future is uncertain, with supporters planning to meet to reassess the situation and explore alternative strategies.

4. Visual Layout:

   • The page has a classic newspaper layout with a clear hierarchy of information.
   • The headline is bold and centered, drawing immediate attention to the main story.
   • The article is written in a formal, journalistic style, with quotes from various individuals involved in the issue.
   • The page also includes a small section labeled "The Weather", indicating that weather information is part of the newspaper's content.

Summary:

The image shows the front page of The Harvard Crimson from February 8, 1982, focusing on a significant controversy surrounding the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University. The article details the cancellation of a major expansion plan, the disappointment among supporters, and the upcoming meeting of a visiting committee to assess the museum's future. The page is part of a Fogg Special Report and includes standard newspaper elements such as the date, volume/issue number, and weather information.

The image displays a scanned newspaper clipping from "The Harvard Crimson" dated Monday, February 8, 1982. The headline reads "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future." The article discusses the potential meeting of Fogg supporters to discuss the future of the museum, which is under severe financial strain. The article also mentions that the museum's building is in disrepair and that there are concerns about its future.

• The headline of the article is "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future."
• The article discusses the potential meeting of Fogg supporters to discuss the future of the museum.
• The article mentions that the museum's building is in disrepair and that there are concerns about its future.
• The article also mentions that the museum's financial situation is severe and that there are concerns about its ability to continue operating.

Overall, the article suggests that the future of the Fogg Museum is uncertain and that its supporters are considering ways to address its financial and physical challenges.

The image presents a newspaper clipping from The Harvard Crimson, dated Monday, February 8, 1982. The headline reads "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future." The article discusses the potential meeting of Fogg Art Museum supporters to discuss the museum's future in light of President Bok's decision to cancel plans for a new building. The article also mentions the formation of a visiting committee to oversee the museum's expansion plan and the possibility of fundraising efforts to support the museum.

The clipping is placed on a gray background, with a portion of another newspaper clipping visible in the top-left corner. The overall tone of the image suggests that it is a historical document or artifact related to the Fogg Art Museum's history and development.

The image shows a torn newspaper clipping from "The Harvard Crimson" dated Monday, February 8, 1982.

• The headline reads "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future" in large black font.
  • The article is written by Michael W. Miller and discusses the future of the Fogg Art Museum.
  • The museum's Visiting Committee is set to meet to discuss the museum's future after President Bok's decision to cancel plans for a new Fogg building.
  • The committee is comprised of about 35 supporters and benefactors of the museum.
  • The article quotes various individuals, including Charles C. Cunningham Jr., Seymour Slive, Oleg Grabar, Konrad J. Oberhuber, and J. B. Wyatt.
• The newspaper clipping is torn and appears to be page three of the "Fogg Special Report".
  • The top of the page has a header that reads "Fogg Special Report, Page Three".
  • The date and volume number are listed as "Monday, February 8, 1982" and "VOLUME CLXXV, No. 7", respectively.
  • The weather is reported as "Still Foggy".
• The background of the image is a plain gray color.

The image appears to be a historical document related to the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University, and the article discusses the controversy surrounding the cancellation of plans for a new building.

The image presents a scanned copy of a newspaper clipping from "The Harvard Crimson," dated Monday, February 8, 1982. The article is titled "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future" and discusses the potential future of the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University.

• Newspaper Clipping
  • Title: The Harvard Crimson
  • Date: Monday, February 8, 1982
  • Volume: CLXXV, No. 7
  • Location: Cambridge, Mass.
• Article Title and Summary
  • Title: Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future
  • Summary: The article discusses the potential future of the Fogg Art Museum after President Bok's decision to cancel plans for a new building on the site of the Alison Burr Lecture Hall.
• Article Content
  • The article mentions that the Fogg Art Museum's Visiting Committee will meet to discuss the museum's future.
  • The committee will assess the museum's strategy in light of President Bok's decision to cancel plans for a new building.
  • The article quotes Charles C. Cunningham Jr. '56, chairman of the Visiting Committee, as saying that there are too many pieces to pick up at the moment.
  • The article also mentions that the museum operates under severely cramped conditions in its Quincy St. building.
  • A $1.6 million project to build a new wing on the site of the Alison Burr Lecture Hall was canceled.
  • The article notes that the Visiting Committee was a major source of funds and advice throughout the Fogg's expansion plan.
  • The article quotes George Putnam '49, treasurer of the College, as saying that the total loss is around $1.1 million.
  • The article mentions that the chairman of the Fine Arts Department and a junior member described separate letters they have written to Bok to express their disappointment.
  • The article quotes Oleg Grabar, chairman, as saying that suddenly all the rules of the game have been changed.
  • The article notes that Konrad J. Oberhuber, the Fogg's curator of drawings and professor of Fine Arts, said he plans to mail Bok a letter expressing his disappointment about the cancellation.
  • The article mentions that other Fine Arts faculty members have written similar letters to Bok.
  • The article quotes Joe B. Wyatt, vice president for administration, as saying that the University has not yet made specific plans for the $1.1 million, which was to be raised to make room for the Fogg addition.

In summary, the article discusses the potential future of the Fogg Art Museum after President Bok's decision to cancel plans for a new building on the site of the Alison Burr Lecture Hall. The Fogg Art Museum's Visiting Committee will meet to discuss the museum's strategy, and the article quotes various individuals involved in the situation, including Charles C. Cunningham Jr. '56, George Putnam '49, Oleg Grabar, Konrad J. Oberhuber, and Joe B. Wyatt.

The image shows a newspaper clipping from "The Harvard Crimson," dated Monday, February 8, 1982. The headline reads "Fogg Supporters May Meet To Assess Museum's Future." The article is written by Michael W. Miller and discusses the reaction to the cancellation of plans for a new Fogg Museum building, following a controversial decision by Seymour Slive, the director of the Fogg Art Museum.

Key points from the article include:

1. Decision and Reaction: The Visiting Committee of the Overseers and the Fine Arts Department are planning to meet to discuss the future of the museum after Slive's decision to cancel the construction project.

2. Financial Context: The project was canceled due to a $16.5 million funding shortfall. The museum has been operating in cramped conditions, and there is disappointment and dismay among supporters.

3. Funding and Contributions: The Visiting Committee, foundations, and the Harvard Corporation had pledged significant funds. Slive's decision was influenced by a $7.9 million pledge from a donor that required immediate construction, which was not feasible.

4. University Benefactors: George Putnam, a major donor, expressed disappointment but placed the total funds raised at about $11 million.

5. Internal Reactions: The Fine Arts Department and the Fogg's curator, Konrad Oberhuber, have written letters expressing their disappointment. Oberhuber mentioned that the cancellation might lead to another building like Busch Hall.

6. Future Plans: Joe B. Wyatt, vice president for administration, indicated that specific plans for Busch Hall would be made to accommodate the art collection.

The article reflects the frustration and uncertainty within the Harvard community following the cancellation of the new museum building project.