Archives Scrapbooks

The image shows a collection of newspaper clippings from The New York Times, dated January 1982. The articles discuss Harvard University's considerations and decisions regarding the Fogg Art Museum and its potential expansion. Here is a summary of the main points covered in the clippings:

1. Fogg Warned on Selling Art (by Grace Glueck):

   • Harvard's Fogg Art Museum was considering selling art to raise funds for its operations.
   • The Association of Art Museum Directors warned Harvard that selling art for purposes other than acquiring new art could result in sanctions.
   • The article mentions that Harvard had already sold some art and was considering further sales.

2. Harvard May Sell Art to Pay for Wing (by Fox Butterfield):

   • Harvard was contemplating selling artworks to finance the construction of a new wing for the Fogg Art Museum.
   • The university had already initiated a fundraising campaign but was considering selling art if the campaign fell short.
   • The article mentions that the university had received a $7.5 million donation for the new wing.

3. Considering Sale of Art to Help Finance New Building (by Michael W. Miller):

   • University officials confirmed that they were considering selling art to help finance the construction of a new building.
   • The decision was part of a broader fundraising effort that included seeking donations and possibly charging admission fees.
   • The article notes that the university had already received significant donations but was still exploring additional funding sources.

4. Harvard Won't Expand Fogg (by Fox Butterfield):

   • Harvard decided not to expand the Fogg Art Museum due to financial constraints.
   • The decision was influenced by the university's reluctance to sell art from its collection to finance the expansion.
   • The article mentions that the university had received a large donation but still faced a significant funding gap.

Overall, the clippings highlight the financial challenges faced by Harvard University in expanding the Fogg Art Museum and the controversial consideration of selling art to meet these challenges.

The image displays two pages from a newspaper, specifically from the New York Times, dated Thursday, January 21, 1982. The pages contain several articles related to Harvard University's considerations and decisions regarding its art collection and museum.

Page 1:

1. Headline: "Harvard May Sell Art to Pay for Wing"

   • Author: Fox Butterfield
   • Content: The article discusses Harvard's potential plan to sell some of its art to fund the construction of a new wing at the Fogg Art Museum. The university is considering selling less prominent works to raise around $7 million. The decision has sparked debate, with some advocating for the sale to support teaching needs and others expressing concern about losing valuable pieces. The university has an art collection insured at $350 million.

2. Headline: "Harvard Won't Expand Fogg"

   • Content: This shorter article details Harvard's decision to halt the construction of a new $7.4 million wing at the Fogg Museum due to budget concerns. The money saved will be redirected to other university needs, and the current Fogg building will be renovated instead.

Page 2:

1. Headline: "Fogg Warned on Selling Art"

   • Author: Grace Glueck
   • Content: The article warns about the potential pitfalls of Harvard selling its art. The Association of Art Museum Directors (AAMD) has advised museums against selling pieces from their collections to fund operations, unless the proceeds go to acquiring new pieces. The Fogg Museum's director, Seymour Slive, is reported to be against the idea of deaccessioning, as it could set a problematic precedent.

2. Headline: "Considering Sale of Art to Help Finance New Building"

   • Author: Michael W. Miller
   • Content: This article further explores the implications of selling art for financing the new wing. It mentions the AAMD's warning and the potential long-term consequences for the museum's collection. The article also notes that the decision might affect the museum's reputation and future donations.

Additional Notes:

• The articles include various viewpoints, such as those from the AAMD, museum directors, and Harvard officials.
• The discussions reflect a tension between financial needs and the preservation of cultural heritage.

Visual Elements:

• The pages are well-preserved, with some handwritten annotations and a date stamp indicating the article was printed on January 21, 1982.
• The layout includes photographs, though they are not clearly visible in the description.

The image provides a snapshot of a critical moment in the management of cultural institutions, highlighting the ethical and practical challenges of using art collections to support financial needs.

The image shows a collection of newspaper clippings from January 1982 regarding Harvard University's Fogg Art Museum and its potential sale of artworks to finance a new building expansion.

1. Top Left Clipping (Grace Gleuck, "Fogg Warned on Selling Art"):

   • This article discusses Harvard’s concerns about the proposal to sell artworks from the Fogg Art Museum to cover operating expenses.
   • The resolution was debated at a meeting, with the university considering whether to use the proceeds from the sale of art to offset the deficit.

2. Top Right Clipping (Fox Butterfield, "Harvard May Sell Art to Pay for Wing"):

   • This article highlights Harvard's plans to sell artworks to help fund the construction of a new wing for the Fogg Art Museum.
   • It mentions the museum's financial difficulties and the potential benefits of raising funds through the sale of art, including the ability to fund the museum’s operations.

3. Bottom Left Clipping (Michael W. Miller, "Fogg Considering Sale of Art to Help Finance New Building"):

   • This article reports that Harvard University officials are considering selling some artworks from the Fogg Art Museum collection to finance the construction of a new building.
   • The proposal involves raising funds by selling certain artworks, with a particular focus on the potential costs of the new wing and the existing financial challenges.

4. Bottom Right Clipping (Special to The New York Times, "Harvard Won't Expand Fogg"):

   • This article notes that Harvard decided not to proceed with expanding the Fogg Art Museum due to the financial implications of the project.
   • It explains that the university had to consider the costs and alternatives, including the sale of artworks and the potential endowment funds, to avoid excessive debt.

The clippings collectively cover discussions and decisions made by Harvard University regarding the financial and operational strategies for the Fogg Art Museum, particularly focusing on the sale of art to fund new projects.

The image is a collage of newspaper clippings from The New York Times, dated January 21, 1982, discussing Harvard University's consideration of selling artworks to fund a new building project. Here's a detailed summary of each clipping:

1. Top Left Clipping - "Fogg Warned on Selling Art" by Grace Glueck:

   • The article warns Harvard's Fogg Art Museum about selling artworks to cover operating expenses.
   • It mentions a proposal by the Association of Art Museum Directors to investigate the use of deaccessioned artworks for operating expenses.
   • Harvard's decision to sell art to pay for a new building has raised concerns, particularly from the Association of Art Museum Directors, who see it as a risky move.

2. Top Right Clipping - "Harvard May Sell Art to Pay for Wing" by Fox Butterfield:

   • Harvard University is considering selling some artworks to fund the construction of a new wing for the Fogg Art Museum.
   • The decision to sell art is seen as a contingency measure to ensure the wing's completion.
   • Harvard has raised $10 million from private sources and is seeking an additional $1.5 million to complete the project.
   • The article mentions that the university has a contingency fund but is exploring the sale of art as an additional measure.

3. Middle Clipping - "Fogg Considering Sale of Art to Help Finance New Building" by Michael W. Miller:

   • Harvard's Fogg Museum is considering selling artworks to fund the construction and operation of a new wing.
   • The university is looking for ways to raise funds, including the sale of certain pieces.
   • David M. Rosen, the university's director of public affairs, states that the decision to sell art is not final and is being considered as a last resort.

4. Bottom Clipping - "Harvard Won't Expand Fogg" (specific date and author not clearly visible):

   • Harvard has decided not to expand the Fogg Art Museum, canceling plans for a new wing.
   • The cancellation is attributed to the university's need to avoid raising admission fees and to address budget constraints.
   • The decision was made after the university confirmed that the $7.4 million required for the extension would be too costly and would require raising fees.

The articles collectively highlight the financial considerations and controversies surrounding Harvard's plans to sell art to fund a new wing for the Fogg Art Museum, ultimately leading to the cancellation of the project due to budgetary concerns and opposition.

The image shows several newspaper clippings from The New York Times, dated January 21, 1982, and January 30, 1982, discussing Harvard University's consideration of selling art from its collections to fund the construction of a new building for the Fogg Art Museum.

1. Headline: "Fogg Warned on Selling Art"

   • The article by Grace Glueck discusses a proposal to sell art from Harvard's Fogg Art Museum to pay for the museum's operating expenses. The proposal was met with strong opposition from the Association of Art Museum Directors, who argued that selling art should be a last resort. Harvard's president, Derek Bok, supported the idea, but the university's Corporation, which oversees the museum, was reluctant to approve it.

2. Headline: "Harvard May Sell Art to Pay for Wing"

   • By Fox Butterfield, this article details Harvard's plan to sell artworks to finance the construction of a new wing for the Fogg Museum. The university is considering selling some art pieces to raise funds. The decision was influenced by the museum's financial constraints and the need for additional space.

3. Headline: "Fogg Considering Sale of Art to Help Finance New Building"

   • By Michael W. Miller, this article reports on Harvard’s plans to raise money for the construction and operation of the Fogg Art Museum's new building by selling some artworks. The university is exploring options, including selling pieces and charging admission fees for certain events.

4. Headline: "Harvard Won't Expand Fogg"

   • This article, also by Michael W. Miller, details the decision to cancel the construction of the new wing for the Fogg Museum. The university had initially planned to raise funds through selling artworks, but this plan was abandoned due to the significant opposition and the availability of alternative funding sources.

Overall, the clippings reflect the controversy and eventual decision-making process regarding Harvard's plan to sell art to fund the expansion of the Fogg Art Museum. The university ultimately decided against the expansion, citing opposition and other financial considerations.

The image shows two newspaper articles from The New York Times, both dated January 31, 1982, discussing financial and operational challenges faced by Harvard University's Fogg Art Museum.

Left Article: "Fogg Warned on Selling Art"

By Grace Glueck

• Summary:
  A proposal by Harvard’s Fogg Art Museum to sell artworks to cover operating expenses has raised concerns.
  The museum’s association, made up of 100 distinguished figures including museum directors from the U.S. and Canada, warned that such a move could set a dangerous precedent.
  The association recommended seeking other funding sources before considering deaccessioning (selling off) art.
  The Fogg Museum had previously deaccessioned art in 1956 to raise funds for acquisitions, but the practice was criticized by experts.
  Recently, Harvard’s President Derek Bok and the Harvard Corporation discussed the possibility of selling art to fund a new museum wing, which would violate the museum association's principles if not used for new acquisitions.

Right Article: "Harvard May Sell Art to Pay For Wing"

By Fox Butterfield

• Summary:
  Harvard University is considering selling part of its Fogg Art Museum's collection to finance a new wing.
  The university is facing a $50 million budget deficit and has been exploring various options, including selling artworks.
  The artworks under consideration include pieces by American watercolorists, Chinese and Japanese masters, and old master drawings.
  The decision to sell art has not been finalized, but the university's governing boards have been informed.
  The proposed new wing would house modern art and provide more space for the museum’s collections.
  This plan has sparked debate among museum professionals about the ethical implications of selling art to fund operations.

Bottom Article: "Fogg Considering Sale of Art to Help Finance New Building"

By Michael W. Miller

• Summary:
  Harvard officials confirmed they are considering selling some artworks to fund the construction and operation of a new wing for the Fogg Museum.
  The decision stems from the need to raise funds due to budget constraints and rising construction costs.
  The potential sale could include works by notable artists like Picasso, Renoir, and Monet, valued at up to $20 million.
  Harvard’s Corporation moved to delay the construction of the Fogg’s extension, initially estimated at $35.9 million.
  The university is also facing cuts in public funds and a decline in donations, prompting the consideration of art sales.
  The museum's director, Seymour Slive, and other officials have previously discussed selling artworks to meet financial needs.

Additional Notes:

• The articles highlight the tension between financial pressures and ethical standards in museum management.
• There is a strong emphasis on the need for funds to maintain and expand the museum's facilities while adhering to professional guidelines on deaccessioning art.

The image shows a scrapbook page with several newspaper clippings pasted on it. These clippings are related to Harvard University's financial considerations regarding the Fogg Museum of Art.

The largest clipping, dated Thursday, January 21, 1982, from The New York Times, has the headline "Harvard May Sell Art to Pay for Wing" and is written by Fox Butterfield. It discusses Harvard University, specifically the Fogg Art Museum, seeking funds by possibly selling some of its art collection to help finance a new wing for the museum. It details the considerations, financial pressures, and the value assigned to the art.

Another clipping warns about selling art and is dated January 30, 1982, sourced from the New York Times, written by Grace Glueck. It addresses concerns and warnings related to institutions selling art.

There are two other smaller clippings: one titled "Harvard Won't Expand Fogg," dated Friday, February 5, 1982, also from The New York Times, which reports on Harvard's decision not to expand the Fogg Museum, countering earlier ideas about selling art for funding. The fourth clipping, partially obscured and with a curled corner, touches on financial strategies related to the museum like charging admission and other fundraising efforts.

The clippings collectively give a snapshot of the internal debate and decision-making process at Harvard about financing the Fogg Art Museum in early 1982.

This is an image of an open newspaper, specifically The New York Times, dated Thursday, January 21, 1982. There are three articles visible in the image:

1. The headline at the top reads "Harvard May Sell Art to Pay for Wing" by Fox Butterfield.
2. Below and to the left, there's another headline "Considering Sale of Art To Help Finance New Building" by Michael M. Miller.
3. Lastly, on the right, there's an article continuation with the heading "Harvard Won’t Expand Fogg."

The articles discuss a controversial and then-topical issue concerning Harvard University's potential sale of artworks to finance a new building, and decisions related to the expansion of the Fogg Museum.

The images of the text are partially obstructed by what appears to be a yellowed transparent tape securing the newspaper clipping, and by the fold of the page.

Handwritten notes indicate the date "30 Jan 1982" and initials "NYT," possibly denoting a personal archive or reference system. There are also additional handwritten notes, including one that appears to say "FRI 15 Jan ‘82 NYT" near the bottom right corner, indicating the date when the articles were possibly retrieved or of significance to the reader.

The image shows an open newspaper spread from The New York Times, dated Thursday, January 21, 1982. The spread features several articles, with a focus on Harvard University's plans regarding its art collection and financial strategies. Here’s a detailed description:

Layout and Content:

1. Headline and Main Articles:

   • The central headline reads: "Harvard May Sell Art to Pay for Wing." This article, authored by Fox Butterfield, discusses Harvard University's consideration of selling art from its Fogg Art Museum collection to fund the construction of a new wing. The article details the financial challenges faced by the university, including the need to raise funds for the new wing and the potential sale of artworks to cover costs.

2. Secondary Headlines:

   • Left Column:
     • The headline reads: "Fogg Warned on Selling Art," written by Grace Glueck. This article critiques the idea of selling art from the Fogg Art Museum, emphasizing concerns about the ethical and financial implications of such a move. It highlights debates within the museum community about the appropriateness of selling artworks to fund construction.
   • Right Column:
     • The headline reads: "Harvard Won't Expand Fogg," also by Michael W. Miller. This article reports that Harvard has decided not to proceed with expanding the Fogg Art Museum, citing financial constraints and the high costs associated with the project. It mentions that the university had previously considered selling art to fund the expansion but has now abandoned the plan.

3. Visual Elements:

   • The pages are marked with handwritten annotations, including the date "30 Jan 1982" and the initials "NYT" (indicating The New York Times). There is also a handwritten note at the bottom of the right page: "Fri. 5 Feb. 1982", possibly indicating a follow-up or reference date.
   • The text is typeset in the classic newspaper style of the time, with clear column divisions and subheadings.

Key Themes:

• Financial Challenges: The articles highlight Harvard’s financial struggles, particularly the high cost of constructing a new wing for the Fogg Art Museum and the university’s decision to abandon the expansion project.
• Ethical Concerns: The debate over selling art from the museum’s collection raises questions about the ethical implications of using cultural assets to fund institutional projects.
• Institutional Decision-Making: The articles provide insight into the decision-making processes at Harvard, including internal discussions and external critiques from museum professionals and the public.

Context:

• The articles reflect a period of financial scrutiny for cultural institutions in the early 1980s, where universities and museums faced pressure to balance educational and artistic missions with budgetary constraints.
• The Fogg Art Museum, part of Harvard University, was a significant cultural institution, and the idea of selling its collection sparked considerable debate within the art world.

Overall Impression:

The image captures a moment of tension and decision-making at Harvard University, illustrating the complex interplay between financial needs, cultural preservation, and institutional priorities. The handwritten notes suggest that the pages were part of a collection or archive, possibly for research or historical documentation.

The image is of a newspaper clipping from the New York Times, dated January 21, 1982. The clipping is about Harvard University's plan to sell some of its art collection to pay for the construction of a new wing of the Fogg Art Museum. The article mentions that the university had already raised $7.3 million from the sale of deaccessioned art and was considering selling more art to meet the $11 million shortfall in funds for the new wing. The article also discusses the controversy surrounding the sale of art and the concerns of art historians and museum directors.