Archives Scrapbooks

This image displays an open, aged newspaper clipping from The New York Times, dated Thursday, January 21, 1982, placed inside a black, hardcover binder.

The clipping, likely from the "Arts & Leisure" section, focuses on Harvard University's Fogg Museum and its financial struggles related to a planned expansion.

Main Article Headline:

Harvard May Sell Art to Pay for Wing

This article, by Fox Butterfield, details Harvard’s consideration of deaccessioning (selling) parts of its art collection to fund the construction of a new museum wing designed by architect James Stirling.

Key points from the article:

• The university was exploring a plan to create a special $3 million contingency fund to help pay for the new wing.
• This fund would be created by selling off some of the museum's art, including works of "lesser value."
• The Harvard Corporation (the university’s governing body) had stressed that only works not of “artistic merit or historic importance” would be considered for sale, though no final decision had been made.
• There was a contingency fund already established, but it was deemed insufficient.
• Selling art was seen as a last resort since museum collections are typically considered permanent assets.
• The Fogg Museum, which opened in 1895, holds collections of European and American watercolors, Chinese jade, and master drawings, and was considered one of the finest university museums in the U.S.
• The architect, James Stirling, had won the 1981 Pritzker Prize and designed several other major buildings, including the new chemistry building at Columbia University.

Additional Articles on the Page:

1. “Fogg Warned on Selling Art” by Grace Glueck

• Reports that the Association of Art Museum Directors issued a formal warning to Harvard against selling art to finance construction.
• The association, representing 150 institutions in the U.S. and Canada, passed a resolution urging Harvard to explore other options.
• It emphasized that selling art to cover operating costs or construction violates the ethical code of the museum world.

2. “Fogg Considering Sale of Art To Help Finance New Building” by Michael W. Miller

• Confirms the university is looking at “limited sale of certain redundant pieces” to raise money.
• Mentions Harvard’s consideration of charging admission fees to boost revenue.

3. “Harvard Won’t Expand Fogg”

• Reports on a reversal of plans: Harvard officials, led by President Derek C. Bok, have decided to cancel the museum expansion project.
• The decision was made due to “deep-seated reservations” and concerns about the projected $7.8 million cost and operational deficits.
• The university confirmed that $3 million had already been raised for the building, and $11 million more would have been needed — money that was not available.
• The article ends with a quote from Seymour Slive, the museum’s director: “This was not a luxury item.”

Handwritten Notes & Markings:

• At the top left, written in blue ink:
  “30 Jan 1982 N.Y. Times”
• Attached by a paperclip near the center-left is a typed note from Harvard Crimson:
  “HARVARD CRIMSON
  CAMBRIDGE, MA.
  D. 15.00”
  Below it, hand-written: “JAN 15 1982” — suggesting the clipping may have been compiled after reviewing multiple sources.
• At the bottom right, in pencil:
  “Fri 5 Feb 1982” and “NNT” — likely a personal filing notation.

Visual Context:

• The newspaper pages are yellowed with age, with some creases and a small tear along the center fold.
• The clipping is set against a black, textured binder or file cover, giving the sense it’s part of an archive or research collection.
• The layout is typical of 1980s newspapers: dense columns, serif fonts, and minimal imagery.

Significance:

This clipping captures a pivotal moment in U.S. museum history — the debate over whether prestigious institutions should sell artworks to cover financial shortfalls, a practice often condemned by the professional museum community.

Harvard’s eventual decision to cancel the expansion rather than sell art reflected its adherence to ethical museum standards — a stance that influenced future deaccessioning policies in the U.S.

In short, this image documents a moment of financial crisis, ethical decision-making, and institutional restraint at a top American university museum — all preserved in a carefully filed newspaper clipping from 1982.

The image is a photograph of a collection of newspaper clippings, which appear to be part of a scrapbook or a collection of articles related to the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University. The clippings are from The New York Times, dated between January 1982 and February 1982.

The articles discuss a proposal by Harvard's Fogg Art Museum to sell some of its art collections to help finance the construction and operation of a new wing of the museum. The articles are written by different authors, including Grace Glueck, Fox Butterfield, and Michael W. Miller, and they provide details on the university's decision to consider deaccessioning some of its less valuable works to pay for the new wing.

The clippings are arranged on a yellowed page, with some headlines and articles partially visible, and the dates and headlines include "Harvard May Sell Art to Pay for Wing," "Fogg Warned on Selling Art," "Harvard Won't Expand Fogg," and "Fogg Considering Sale of Art To Help Finance New Building." There are also handwritten notes on the page, indicating that the clippings were dated and filed.

The articles also mention a contingency fund of $3 million that the university had set up to avoid deficits and the possibility of charging admission fees to the museum, among other financial measures being considered by the university.

The image displays an open scrapbook or journal with several newspaper clippings pasted inside. The clippings are from "The New York Times" and "The Harvard Crimson," dated between January 15, 1982, and February 5, 1982. The articles discuss the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University and its potential plans to sell art to pay for a new wing.

1. Top Left Clipping (The New York Times, January 21, 1982):

   • Headline: "Harvard May Sell Art to Pay for Wing"
   • The article mentions that Harvard University is considering selling some of its less valuable art works to help pay for the operation of a new wing at the Fogg Art Museum.

2. Top Right Clipping (The New York Times, January 20, 1982):

   • Headline: "Fogg Warned on Selling Art"
   • This article discusses a proposal by Harvard’s Fogg Art Museum to sell art to help pay operating expenses, which has been condemned by the Association of Art Museum Directors.

3. Middle Clipping (The Harvard Crimson, January 15, 1982):

   • Headline: "Fogg Considering Sale of Art To Help Finance New Building"
   • The article reports that the Fogg Art Museum is considering selling art works to raise money for the construction and operation of its new building.

4. Bottom Clipping (The New York Times, February 4, 1982):

   • Headline: "Harvard Won’t Expand Fogg"
   • This article states that Harvard University has canceled plans to expand the Fogg Museum due to the high costs and concerns about the museum's operating deficits.

The clippings are neatly arranged and taped to the scrapbook page, with some handwritten notes visible, indicating the dates and sources of the articles. The scrapbook appears to be a collection of news articles related to the financial and operational challenges faced by the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University during that period.

The image shows a newspaper clipping from "The New York Times" dated Thursday, January 21, 1982. The clipping features an article titled "Harvard May Sell Art to Pay for Wing" by Fox Butterfield. The article discusses Harvard University's consideration of selling art from its Fogg Art Museum to fund the construction of a new wing. The university has been facing rising costs and has delayed the project due to financial constraints. The article mentions that the university has already raised $7.4 million for construction but needs an additional $11 million. The sale of artworks is being considered as a last resort, with the university exploring other funding options first. The article also notes that the university's governing body, the Harvard Corporation, has not yet made a final decision on the matter.

The image is a spread from a newspaper, specifically The New York Times, dated January 21, 1982. The spread features several articles about the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University and its financial challenges. The headlines include "Harvard May Sell Art to Pay for Wing," "Fogg Won't Expand Fogg," and "Fogg Considering Sale of Art to Help Finance New Building." The articles discuss the museum's plan to sell some of its less valuable art to cover operating costs and to finance a new wing. They also mention the museum's financial difficulties, including a $3 million contingency fund, and the potential sale of art works to raise funds. The articles are accompanied by various images, including photographs and illustrations related to the museum and its art collection.

The image shows an open newspaper, specifically The New York Times, dated Thursday, January 21, 1982. The newspaper is open to a page featuring several articles related to Harvard University's Fogg Art Museum. Here is a detailed description:

Layout and Content:

1. Header:

   • The top of the page displays the newspaper's name, The New York Times, along with the date and day of the week.

2. Articles:

   • The page contains multiple articles, each with its own headline and byline. The articles are centered around the Fogg Art Museum and its financial and operational challenges.

3. Headlines:

   • Top Article (Left Column):

     • Headline: "Fogg Warned on Selling Art"
     • Byline: By GRACE GLUECK
     • This article discusses concerns about the Fogg Art Museum potentially selling art to fund the construction of a new wing. It mentions a proposal by the Association of Art Museum Curators, which warns against the sale of artworks, emphasizing that such actions could undermine the museum's mission and ethical standards.

   • Middle Article (Center Column):

     • Headline: "Harvard May Sell Art to Pay for Wing"
     • Byline: By FOX BUTTERFIELD
     • This article reports on Harvard University's consideration of selling art from the Fogg Art Museum to finance the construction of a new wing. It details the financial implications, the potential sale of artworks, and the controversy surrounding the idea. The article also mentions that the university has formed a contingency fund and discusses the role of the Fogg's director, Seymour Slive.

   • Bottom Article (Right Column):

     • Headline: "Harvard Won't Expand Fogg"
     • Byline: By MICHAEL W. MILLER
     • This article states that Harvard University has decided not to expand the Fogg Art Museum. It explains that the decision was made after months of construction delays and financial concerns. The article notes that the museum's director, Seymour Slive, confirmed the decision and highlights the financial challenges faced by the university.

4. Visual Elements:

   • Handwritten Notes:
     • There are handwritten notes and markings on the page, including:
       • "30 Jan 1982" and "NYT" written in the top-left corner.
       • "Fogg Considering Sale of Art To Help Finance New Building" written vertically along the left margin.
       • "Fri. 5 Feb. 1982" and "NYT" written at the bottom-right corner.
     • These annotations suggest the page was used for reference or study, possibly by a researcher or journalist.

5. Textual Details:

   • The articles contain detailed discussions about:
     • The financial situation of the Fogg Art Museum.
     • The ethical and professional concerns surrounding the potential sale of artworks.
     • The decision-making process within Harvard University regarding the expansion of the museum.
     • Quotes from key individuals, such as Seymour Slive, the museum's director, and other stakeholders.

Overall Impression:

The image captures a historical moment in the operation of the Fogg Art Museum, highlighting the financial and ethical debates surrounding the potential sale of artworks to fund a new wing. The handwritten notes indicate that this page was likely used for research or analysis, providing context for the events discussed in the articles. The layout and content reflect the journalistic style of The New York Times from the early 1980s.

This is a scrapbook page featuring multiple newspaper clippings related to Harvard University's Fogg Museum and its consideration of selling artwork to fund a new building or expansion projects. The clippings come from various news sources and are dated in early 1982. Headlines such as "Harvard May Sell Art to Pay for Wing," "Fogg Considering Sale of Art to Help Finance New Building," "Fogg Warned on Selling Art," and "Harvard Won’t Expand Fogg" dominate the page. The articles discuss debates about the financial and ethical implications of selling valuable artworks for construction or expansion purposes. Handwritten annotations, including dates and sources (like “NYT”), are also visible on the page. The clippings appear to be carefully pasted into a scrapbook for archival purposes.

This image shows a scanned newspaper page with articles from 'The New York Times', dated Thursday, January 28, 1982. There are handwritten notes on the magazine indicating a date ("30 Jan 1982") and initials ("NYT") which likely suggest when and from which source the clippings were taken or read.

The article at the top of the page, titled "Harvard May Sell Art to Pay for Wing," by Fox Butterfield, discusses the potential sale of artwork by Harvard University as a means to raise money for a new wing of the Fogg Art Museum. This article appears to be the main focus of this particular page.

Below the main article, there is another smaller article titled "Fogg Considering Sale of Art To Help Finance New Building," by Michael W. Miller. This article also deals with the financial aspects of the Fogg Art Museum considering the sale of art as a funding strategy for new construction or expansions.

The articles discuss topics including art sale ethics, finance, and museum expansion plans, reflecting the challenges and considerations educational institutions may face regarding the management of their art collections.

The page itself shows signs of age with some discoloration, and there's also a clipped and pasted newspaper article at the center, overlapping the main articles. This suggests the person who maintained these clippings curated them for specific content and organization purposes, possibly for research or archival reasons.

The image shows a scrapbook page containing five newspaper clippings related to Harvard University's Fogg Museum and its financial challenges in the early 1980s. The clippings are from The New York Times and discuss topics such as Harvard considering selling art to finance a new building, warnings against selling art, and the possibility of building expansions at the Fogg Museum.

Key points from the clippings include:

1. Harvard may sell art to pay for a new wing at the Fogg Museum.
2. The university faced financial challenges in funding construction.
3. Officials warn that selling art might not be the best solution.
4. Discussions around financing methods such as using a contingency fund or donations.
5. The complexity and controversy of using valuable artwork as financial resources.

Dates noted on the clippings and the page indicate these discussions took place around January and February of 1982. The page is labeled as from "The New York Times," with a handwritten date "30 Jan 1982."

• A scrapbook page opened to a collage of newspaper clippings from January 1982.
• The clippings discuss Harvard’s Fogg Art Museum and possible options to fund a new building or wing, including the idea of selling art.
• Headlines visible include “Harvard May Sell Art to Pay for Wing,” “Fogg Warned on Selling Art,” “Fogg Considering Sale of Art To Help Finance New Building,” and “Harvard Won’t Expand Fogg.”
• There are handwritten notes with dates such as “JAN 15 1982” and “30 Jan 1982 NYT.”
• The page has yellowed paper, clipped articles arranged in a grid, and is part of an archival notebook.