Archives Scrapbooks

The image is a newspaper clipping from the Harvard Crimson, dated October 2, 1980. The article is titled "City Reviews Harvard Demolition Plan" and discusses Harvard University's proposal to demolish two historically significant houses on Cambridge Street to make way for an addition to the Fogg Museum.

Key points from the article include:

1. Demolition Plan: Harvard plans to demolish two houses, built in 1746 and 1750, to create a staging area for the construction of a 60,000 square foot addition to the Fogg Museum.

2. Historical Significance: The Cambridge Historical Commission is considering the University's request. Charles Sullivan, the executive director of the Commission, argues that the houses are historically significant and should be preserved.

3. Construction Needs: Harvard representatives, including Richard G. Leahy, argue that demolishing the houses is necessary for efficient construction, as it would provide a staging area and facilitate the movement of construction equipment.

4. Financial Considerations: The Fogg Museum has limited funds and relies on donations, such as a $5 million gift from Dr. Arthur M. Sackler. The University aims to finance most of the construction and operation of the new building but still needs additional funds.

5. Public Pressure: If the Commission delays the demolition, Sullivan plans to use public pressure to encourage Harvard to preserve the buildings.

6. Artifacts: Sullivan notes that Harvard has been cooperative with preserving cultural artifacts from the Fogg Museum but questions the destruction of buildings that are also cultural artifacts.

The article highlights the tension between historical preservation and the practical needs of construction and expansion.

The image shows a newspaper article from the Harvard Crimson, dated October 2, 1980. The headline reads "City Reviews Harvard Demolition Plan." The subheading states, "Fogg Wants to Raze Houses to Build Addition."

The article discusses the Cambridge Historical Commission's consideration of Harvard's request to demolish two historic houses at 1746 and 1750 Cambridge Street to make way for an addition to the Fogg Museum. Charles Sullivan, executive director of the Commission, plans to argue against the demolition, citing the historical significance of the buildings, which are over 50 years old.

Harvard needs the Commission's approval to proceed. If denied, the university will have to wait at least six months before reapplying. The article mentions that Harvard plans to use the site as a staging area for construction of a 60,000 square foot building, with work scheduled to begin the following spring. The university has already secured a $5 million gift from Dr. Arthur M. Sackler for the project.

The article also includes a response from Richard G. Leahy, associate dean of the Faculty for resources and planning, who acknowledges that while the buildings are historically valuable, the university needs the land for construction access.

In a side note, it is mentioned that the Fogg Museum will try to work with the owner to preserve the structure if the demolition is denied. Charles Sullivan criticizes Harvard for not showing a willingness to work with the Commission, highlighting the irony of a repository of cultural artifacts destroying a cultural artifact itself.

If the six-month delay is granted, Sullivan plans to use the time to rally public support to save the buildings. The article concludes by noting that without demolishing the houses, there would be no way to park a crane without moving equipment onto the sidewalk.

The image is a newspaper clipping from the Harvard Crimson dated October 2, 1980. The headline reads "City Reviews Harvard Demolition Plan" and discusses a proposal to demolish two historic houses on 1746 and 1750 Cambridge Street to make way for the Fogg Museum's planned addition.

Here are the key points from the article:

1. Context and Timeline:

   • The Cambridge Historical Commission is considering whether to grant permission for Harvard to demolish the two Cambridge Street houses.
   • The houses are over 50 years old and are significant historically.

2. Arguments Against Demolition:

   • Charles Sullivan, the executive director of the Historical Commission, argues that the board should deny the demolition request due to the buildings' historical value.
   • If the permit is denied, Harvard would have to wait at least six months before proceeding with the demolition.

3. Project Requirements:

   • Harvard needs the site of the houses for construction of a new addition to the Fogg Museum, which is planned to be completed by next spring.
   • The new building will be 60,000 square feet and is expected to cost a significant amount.

4. Funding and Challenges:

   • The Fogg Museum has limited funds and needs additional financial support, specifically mentioning a $5 million gift from Arthur M. Sackler.
   • The construction and operation costs are expected to be very expensive, and raising additional funds is necessary.

5. Historical Significance:

   • The buildings are noted as being constructed in 1887 and 1888 by architect James Fogarty.
   • The house at 1746 Cambridge Street is described as an example of a Queen Anne style home, unique in the area.

6. Sullivan's Concerns:

   • Sullivan believes the buildings are historically valuable and will try to work with the owner to preserve the structures.
   • He indicates that Harvard has shown reluctance to collaborate with the Historical Commission and that public pressure might be necessary to save the buildings.

7. Logistical Considerations:

   • The demolition is necessary for easy access to the construction site, especially for parking cranes and other equipment needed for the project.

The article highlights the tension between the need for architectural space and the preservation of historical buildings in Cambridge.

The image is a newspaper clipping from the "New England Newspaper" dated October 2, 1980. The headline reads "City Reviews Harvard Demolition Plan" with a subtitle "Fogg Wants to Raze Houses to Build Addition."

The article discusses a proposal by Harvard University to demolish two historic houses on Cambridge Street in order to make room for an addition to the Fogg Museum. The Cambridge Historical Commission is considering whether to approve this demolition.

Key points include:

1. Historical Significance: The houses are over 50 years old and are considered historically significant by Charles Sullivan, executive director of the Commission, who argues that the Commission should deny the request.
2. Harvard’s Need for Space: Harvard needs the site as a staging area for construction work on a new 60,000 square foot building planned for next spring.
3. Funding: Harvard has received a $5 million gift from New York millionaire Dr. Arthur M. Sackler to help fund the construction.
4. Design and Approval: The building's architects have completed the design development stage and will submit working drawings by March. Approval from the Corporation is required.
5. Public and Financial Considerations: Lewis A. Armistead, assistant vice-president for government and community affairs, argues that the buildings are more expensive to preserve and that the Fogg has limited funds. Doeringer, assistant to the director of the Fogg, mentions that they still need to raise a few million dollars more.
6. Historic Value and Preservation Efforts: The houses are noted as being architecturally significant, with one being an example of Queen Anne style architecture. Sullivan suggests that if the Commission agrees with his assessment of the buildings' historic value, they will try to work with the owner to preserve the structures.
7. University’s Stance: The University has shown no willingness to work with the Commission, which Sullivan finds ironic given the Fogg Museum's role as a repository of cultural artifacts.

The article also mentions that the University will demolish the Allston Burr Lecture Hall to make room for the new museum wing, requiring the land for easy access to the construction site. Sullivan indicates that if the six-month delay is granted, he will try to bring public pressure to bear on the University to save the buildings.

The image is a newspaper clipping from the Cambridge, MA, edition of the "New England Newspaper," dated October 2, 1980. The headline reads "City Reviews Harvard Demolition Plan" and the subheading is "Fogg Wants to Raze Houses to Build Addition."

The article discusses a proposal by Harvard University to demolish two historic houses on Cambridge Street to make room for an addition to the Fogg Museum. Charles Sullivan, executive director of the Cambridge Historical Commission, argues that the houses should not be demolished due to their historical significance, as they are more than 50 years old.

The houses in question, built in 1746 and 1750, are described as historically valuable and unique. Harvard needs the site for construction work on a 60,000-square-foot building scheduled for the following spring. The university has a $5 million gift from Dr. Arthur M. Sackler to help finance the project, but more funds are needed.

The article mentions that the architects have completed the design stage and will submit working drawings by March. The Fogg Museum's assistant director, Suzannah J. Doeringer, states that the buildings are not structurally sound and that their demolition would not affect the museum's operations.

Sullivan expresses concern that Harvard is not willing to work with the commission to preserve the buildings, calling it ironic that the Fogg Museum, which houses cultural artifacts, would demolish another cultural artifact. He plans to bring public pressure to bear if the commission grants the six-month delay requested by Harvard.

The article concludes with the reasoning that the university needs the space for construction equipment access, and if the houses are not torn down, there would be no way to park a crane on the sidewalk.

The image is a newspaper clipping from the Harvard Crimson, dated October 2, 1990. The headline reads "City Reviews Harvard Demolition Plan: Fogg Wants to Raze Houses to Build Addition."

Here are the key points from the article:

1. Proposal by Harvard:

   • Harvard University plans to demolish two houses on Cambridge Street to make room for an addition to the Fogg Museum.

2. Historical Commission Review:

   • The Cambridge Historical Commission is considering whether to allow Harvard to demolish the two buildings.
   • Charles Sullivan, the executive director of the Commission, indicated that the board might deny the University’s request due to the historical significance of the buildings, which are over 50 years old.

3. University’s Argument:

   • Harvard needs the site of the two houses as a "staging area" for the construction of a 60,000 square-foot building scheduled to start next spring.
   • Richard G. Leahy, associate dean of the Faculty for resources and planning, mentioned that the University would proceed with construction regardless but having the buildings in place would make construction "very more expensive."

4. Building Details and Funding:

   • The Fogg Museum's planned addition is designed by architects from the firm March, Suzanneh J. Doerger.
   • The construction and operation of the new building will largely be financed by a $35 million gift from New York philanthropist Dr. Arthur M. Sackler.

5. Historical Significance of the Houses:

   • The two homes in question, built in 1874 and 1750, are located at 1746 and 1750 Cambridge Street.
   • The 1746 house, designed by architect James Fogerty, is considered an example of the Queen Anne style, unique in the area.

6. Potential Actions and Public Involvement:

   • If the Commission agrees the buildings are historically valuable, Harvard has six months to try to work with the owner to preserve the structures.
   • Sullivan mentioned the importance of public pressure in saving the buildings.
   • Harvard also needs to demolish the Allston Burr Lecture Hall to create an access point for construction equipment.

7. Perspectives on Demolition:

   • Sullivan criticized Harvard, stating that it's ironic for the Fogg Museum, a repository of cultural artifacts, to destroy a building that is itself a cultural artifact.

The article highlights the tension between preserving historical architecture and the university’s expansion plans.

This image shows a newspaper clipping from "The Harvard Crimson," dated October 2, 1980. The main headline reads "City Reviews Harvard Demolition Plan" and the subheadline states "Fogg Wants to Raze Houses to Build Addition". The article discusses the Cambridge Historical Commission considering Harvard's request to demolish two Cambridge St. houses to "make room for the Fogg Museum's planned addition."

The article mentions that Charles Sullivan, the executive director of the Commission, suggests that the buildings should be preserved because they are "historically significant," being more than 50 years old. There is also mention of a $5 million gift from New York millionaire Dr. Arthur M. Sackler toward the construction of the new building.

The text is partially obscured by the fold of the paper, but the discernible parts talk about issues related to architectural heritage, university expansion, and potential delays to construction plans due to the dispute over historical preservation.

The clipping includes some additional text and appears to continue on a different page with the text "Fogg continued from page 1". The page header includes the newspaper name, location in Cambridge, MA, and a price of 15,000, which likely refers to its circulation number rather than the price of the paper.

The image is of a newspaper clipping from the Harvard Crimson dated October 2, 1980. The article is titled "City Reviews Harvard Demolition Plan," with a subheading "Fogg Wants to Raze Houses to Build Addition."

The article discusses the Cambridge Historical Commission's consideration of allowing Harvard to demolish two Cambridge street houses to make room for an addition to the Fogg Museum. Charles Sullivan, executive director of the Commission, testified that the board should deny Harvard's request because the buildings are historically significant. The houses are over 50 years old, and Harvard must get demolition permits for such buildings, which usually involve a wait of six months.

Harvard plans to use the site as a staging area for construction work on a new 60,000 square foot building scheduled for the next spring. Richard G. Leahy, an associate dean of the Faculty for resources and planning, stated Harvard needs the site for construction and that moving the two buildings is too expensive.

Lewis A. Amistead, assistant vice-president for government and community affairs, described the project and mentioned a $5 million gift from New York millionaire Dr. Arthur M. Sackler to help finance most of the construction and operation costs of the new building. However, the Fogg still needs to raise a few million more.

The article continues, mentioning the historical value of the buildings. The houses are from the 1700s and 1800s, including architectural styles such as Queen Anne. Sullivan suggested the buildings are historically valuable and said he would try to work with the owner to preserve the structure.

Sullivan also commented on Harvard's lack of willingness to work with preservation efforts and plans to bring public pressure on the University to save the buildings if a six-month demolition delay is granted. Publicity is seen as the only tool available.

Finally, the University plans to demolish the Allston Burr Lecture Hall to make room for the new museum wing and needs the land for safe construction access, as noted by Leahy.

The image is a newspaper clipping from the Harvard Crimson dated October 2, 1980. The headline reads "City Reviews Harvard Demolition Plan." The article discusses Harvard University's proposal to demolish two historic houses on Cambridge Street to make room for an addition to the Fogg Museum. The Cambridge Historical Commission is considering allowing Harvard to demolish the houses, which were built in 1746 and 1750. The article mentions that Harvard needs the site for a "staging area" for construction work on a 60,000 square foot building scheduled to begin next spring. The article also notes that Harvard has received a $5 million gift from New York millionaire Dr. Arthur M. Sackler to finance most of the construction and operation of the new building. The article quotes Charles Sullivan, executive director of the Cambridge Historical Commission, who argues that the board should deny the University's requests because the buildings are historically significant.

Description of the Image:

The image is a scanned page from the Harvard Crimson, a student newspaper, dated October 2, 1980, from Cambridge, MA. The page features an article titled "City Reviews Harvard Demolition Plan", with a subheading: "Fogg Wants to Raze Houses to Build Addition." The article discusses a controversial plan by Harvard University to demolish two historic houses on Cambridge Street to make way for an addition to the Fogg Art Museum.

Key Details from the Article:

1. Context and Main Issue:

   • The Cambridge Historical Commission is set to consider Harvard's request to demolish two historic houses on Cambridge Street.
   • These houses, built in 1746 and 1750, are over 50 years old and are considered historically significant.
   • Harvard seeks to remove them to create space for a new addition to the Fogg Art Museum, which requires a 60,000-square-foot building.

2. Harvard's Position:

   • Harvard argues that the demolition is necessary to proceed with construction, which is scheduled for next spring.
   • The university has received a $5 million gift from New York millionaire Dr. Arthur M. Sackler to finance the project.
   • Harvard believes the new addition is essential for the museum's operations and expansion.

3. Historical Commission's Stance:

   • Charles Sullivan, executive director of the Cambridge Historical Commission, plans to argue against the demolition, stating that the houses are historically valuable.
   • If the commission denies the demolition permit, Harvard would have to wait at least six months before proceeding, potentially delaying the project significantly.

4. Architectural and Financial Details:

   • The architects have completed the design development stage and will submit working drawings to the Corporation for the Fogg by March.
   • The Fogg still needs to raise additional funds to cover the construction and operation costs of the new building.

5. Public and Cultural Concerns:

   • Sullivan highlights the irony of Harvard, a repository of cultural artifacts, planning to destroy a historic building that is itself a cultural artifact.
   • He expresses hope to work with the building’s owner to preserve the structure and suggests using publicity to generate public pressure to save the buildings.

6. Additional Demolition Plans:

   • The article also mentions Harvard's plan to demolish the Alston Burr Lecture Hall to make room for a new museum wing. This demolition is necessary to allow easy access to the construction site.
   • If the historic houses are not torn down, Harvard claims there would be no way to park a crane without moving equipment onto a sidewalk.

Visual Layout:

• The article is formatted in a typical newspaper style, with a clear headline, subheading, and body text divided into paragraphs.
• The page includes a small illustration or photograph of the Fogg Art Museum (labeled "Fogg") in the lower right corner, which appears to be a continuation from a previous page.
• The article is signed at the bottom by R.O.B. and W.E.M., likely the authors or reporters.

Overall Tone:

The article presents a balanced view of the conflict, highlighting both Harvard's need for expansion and the historical significance of the buildings. It underscores the tension between development and preservation, reflecting broader debates about urban planning and heritage conservation.