Archives Scrapbooks

meta

Meta

The image is a photograph of a newspaper clipping that features an article about Cambridge architecture. The clipping is from the Cambridge Chronicle, dated Friday, October 24, 1980. The main article, titled "Historic home here for now," discusses the architecture of Harvard University and Cambridge, focusing on the historical context and the evolving styles of academic buildings.

The article seems to be an opinion piece or review, with sections like "Meta Architecture" and "Environment." It touches upon specific buildings and architectural theories, citing architects like William James Hall, H.H. Richardson, and Henry Hobson Richardson. There are also references to the influence of Gothic and Romanesque styles, as well as modernist and contemporary approaches.

The clipping also includes a smaller advertisement or announcement in the top right corner, indicating the date and location of the newspaper: "Cambridge Chronicle, Cambridge, MA, W. 13,201, Oct 9 1980." Below this, there's a headline in larger font: "Historic home here for now," suggesting a focus on historical preservation or a particular historical building.

The text is dense and appears to be well-written, likely aimed at an educated audience interested in architecture, history, and urban development. The layout suggests a typical newspaper page with columns of text. The overall impression is one of a detailed and thoughtful exploration of the architectural landscape of Cambridge.

This image is a scanned page from an aged newspaper or periodical, primarily dated October 24, 1980, as indicated at the top center. The paper has a yellowed, vintage appearance with slight creasing and minor imperfections, consistent with its age.

The page is divided into two main sections of content:

1. Left and Central Section (Dominant Article): This takes up approximately two-thirds of the page width. It's a long, multi-column article, likely a feature or analysis piece, given its structure.

   • It is divided into several sub-sections with bolded headings, such as "Environment," "Meta Architecture," "Imperial Harvard," and "Evaluating possible models for future architecture."
   • The text is set in a serif font across multiple narrow columns. The content appears to be a detailed discussion, possibly related to architecture or urban planning, judging by the subheadings.

2. Right Section (Distinct Article): This section is clearly separated from the left, appearing as a reprinted article.

   • It features its own masthead: "CAMBRIDGE CHRONICLE CAMBRIDGE, MA W. 13.201" and is dated OCT 9 1980 with "NEW England Newspapers" below it. This indicates it's an article from a different, earlier publication, likely reprinted here.
   • The prominent headline reads: "Historic home here for now" in a large, bold, serif font.
   • Below the headline, the article discusses a local issue, specifically the Cambridge Historical Commission's decision regarding a six-month moratorium on demolitions, likely concerning historic homes.
   • The article concludes with a byline at the very bottom: "-IRENE SEGE".

In summary, the image displays an aged print media page from late 1980, featuring a detailed architectural or planning analysis on the left and a reprinted local news story about historic preservation from the Cambridge Chronicle on the right.

The image depicts an open book or document that contains a newspaper clipping from the Cambridge Chronicle, dated October 9, 1980. The newspaper article is titled "Historic home here for now" and discusses the Cambridge Historical Commission's decision to move the Hooper-Lee-Nichols House from its original location to accommodate Harvard University's expansion plans. The article mentions that the house, built in 1685, is one of the oldest surviving houses in Cambridge and will be moved to a site near the Charles River. The decision faced opposition from preservationists and neighbors, who argued that the house should remain in its original location. The article also notes that the move is part of a larger plan to create a new science center at Harvard. The text is densely packed and includes quotes from various individuals involved in the debate. The document appears to be part of a larger collection, as indicated by the handwritten notes and markings on the pages.

The image depicts an open book or document, with text and a newspaper clipping. The left page of the book contains text discussing architectural styles, with a focus on the Harvard Hall and its Georgian features. It mentions the contrast between the old and new architecture on the Harvard campus, highlighting the traditional brick and stone of the older buildings compared to the more modern, contemporary designs.

The right page features a newspaper clipping from the Cambridge Chronicle, dated October 9, 1981. The article discusses the historical significance and potential future of Harvard Hall. It mentions the building's construction in 1766, its design by the first American architect, and its current state as a landmark. The article also explores debates about its preservation and possible uses, including a proposal to house the university's art museum. There is a photograph accompanying the article, showing the exterior of Harvard Hall.

The image is a page from a newspaper or magazine, specifically from a historical publication titled "Cambridge Chronicle," dated October 24, 1880. The main focus is on the architectural and historical context of Harward House, a significant building in Cambridge.

The left side of the page contains an article discussing the history and architectural significance of Harward House. It mentions:

• The grand climax of the University buildings, which includes the mention of the building's architectural style and its historical importance.
• The building's design and the role of its architect, Frederick Law Olmsted, who was instrumental in the planning of the Cambridge landscape.
• The building's name, Harward, and its connection to the historical figure Harvard.
• The university's reaction to the design and the debate surrounding the construction and architectural style.
• The mention of the "Harvard" style and its influence in the landscape, contrasting with the "modern" or contemporary styles.
• The juxtaposition of the building's age and the current architectural environment.

On the right side, there is an article from October 9, 1880, titled "Historic Home for Now." It discusses the Cambridge Historical Commission's plans to preserve and possibly renovate Harward House. The article explains the historical significance of the building, noting that it is a rare example of early 19th-century architecture that needs to be protected from modern development pressures.

The articles collectively highlight the efforts to preserve the historical and architectural heritage of Harward House amidst the growing urbanization and modern architectural trends.

The image shows two pages from an old newspaper and a book, likely a history or architectural book, with a focus on Harvard University's campus and its architectural evolution.

Left Page:

This page contains an excerpt from a newspaper article discussing the architectural history and development of Harvard University's campus, specifically focusing on the design and construction of buildings like Harvard Yard and the expansion towards the Charles River.

• Harvard's Architectural Evolution:

  • The article discusses the evolution of Harvard's architectural style, contrasting it with other universities.
  • It mentions the "double reaction" of Harvard's monumental classical architecture, noting it was "a reaction towards monumental classic architecture."
  • The university's initial design by Charles Bulfinch in 1819 is highlighted, which was influenced by the Georgian style.
  • The article notes the transition from the Georgian style to more contemporary designs, including the use of the Beaux-Arts style in the early 20th century, which was seen as a reaction against the overly ornate Victorian styles.

• Controversial Decisions:

  • The article mentions the controversy surrounding the decision to demolish and rebuild certain buildings, such as the decision to replace the Old Harvard Yard with modern structures.
  • It also discusses the architectural choices made by the university, such as the use of brick and stone, and the impact of these decisions on the landscape and aesthetic of the campus.

Right Page:

This page is from a newspaper article titled "Historic home here for now," dated October 9, 1880, from the Cambridge Chronicle.

• Cambridge Historical Commission:

  • The article discusses the Cambridge Historical Commission's efforts to preserve historical buildings in Cambridge.
  • It mentions the preservation of Harvard Yard's architecture and the concern over the demolition of historic structures.
  • The commission's recommendation to preserve the historical character of the area is highlighted, including the preservation of structures like the Old Harvard Yard.

• University Plans:

  • The article discusses plans for the expansion and modernization of Harvard University, focusing on the potential demolition of historic buildings.
  • It mentions the debate over whether to preserve or replace these buildings, indicating a push for modernization and the need to accommodate growing student numbers.

Summary:

The combined pages provide a historical perspective on Harvard University's architectural development and the debates surrounding preservation versus modernization. The articles highlight the university's transition through various architectural styles and the ongoing discussion about maintaining historical integrity while adapting to modern needs.

The image is a page from a newspaper, specifically the Cambridge Chronicle from October 9, 1980. The article is titled "Historic home here for now," and it discusses the preservation of a historic building on Harvard Square in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Key points of the article include:

1. Background on Harvard Square:

   • Harvard Square is known for its Georgian-style homes and was established in the early 19th century. It has been a focal point of architectural interest and preservation efforts.

2. Architectural Significance:

   • The article mentions the importance of preserving the architectural heritage of Harvard Square, which includes buildings like the Harvard Cooperative Society and the Harvard Square Library.

3. Preservation Efforts:

   • The Cambridge Historical Commission (CHC) is highlighted for its role in overseeing and approving significant architectural projects. The commission has been involved in ensuring that new constructions respect the historical character of the area.

4. Current Situation:

   • The article discusses a specific building, identified as a historic house, which is under consideration for preservation. The Cambridge Historical Commission is reviewing a proposal to build a new structure on the site, with the aim of maintaining the historical integrity of the area.

5. Community Involvement:

   • There is mention of community sentiment and the involvement of the Cambridge Historical Commission in making decisions about the future of the site. The article indicates that the commission has been proactive in preserving the historic character of Harvard Square.

6. Architectural Styles:

   • The article notes the variety of architectural styles in Harvard Square, including Georgian, Victorian, and others, and the importance of preserving these styles for their historical value.

7. Challenges:

   • Challenges in preservation include balancing the need for new development with the desire to maintain historical authenticity.

8. Conclusion:

   • The article concludes that, despite the challenges, the historical character of Harvard Square is being preserved, ensuring that the area remains a significant and attractive part of Cambridge.

The article is accompanied by a photo of a historic building, likely one of those under discussion for preservation, which is described as having a "historic home" for now. The text emphasizes the importance of maintaining the historical and architectural heritage of the area.

The image displays two newspaper articles from different publications dated around October 1969.

Left Side Article:

Newspaper: Life Shell, Friday, October 24, 1969
Title: Not explicitly given, but it discusses the historical and architectural significance of buildings on a university campus.

Summary:

The article discusses a debate over the potential demolition of several historic buildings on a university campus. The university had proposed replacing these buildings with new structures, citing modern needs and the condition of the existing buildings.

• George Washington's Historic Residence:

  • The house where George Washington planned the siege of Yorktown is slated for demolition. This building, known as the President's House, has significant historical value.
  • The university argues that the building is not structurally sound and requires costly renovations.

• College Buildings and Historical Significance:

  • The article mentions other historic buildings, including the Brafferton, constructed in the early 18th century, and the Wren Building, which has been used continuously since its construction.
  • There is a debate about the preservation of these buildings, with some arguing that they hold immense historical and architectural value.
  • The university administration and the Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission are involved in the discussions, with the latter advocating for the preservation of these historic structures.

Right Side Article:

Newspaper: Commerce Chronicle, Cambridge, Mass., dated Oct 9, 1969
Title: "Historic Home Here For Now"

Summary:

The article discusses the temporary reprieve of a historic home in Cambridge, Massachusetts, from demolition.

• Historical Significance:

  • The house, located at 159 Brattle Street, was originally the home of Longfellow and is a significant historical landmark.
  • The building was planned for demolition to make way for a new university building.

• Temporary Reprieve:

  • The Cambridge Historical Commission (CHC) has temporarily halted the demolition.
  • The CHC is considering a six-month delay to explore options for saving the building, such as moving it to another site.

• Community Involvement:

  • The article mentions community efforts and the involvement of the Cambridge Plant and Zoning Committee.
  • Several residents and historical preservation advocates, such as Virginia Lee Pratt and Irene Sege, have been active in the campaign to save the building.

Overall, both articles highlight the tension between modern development and the preservation of historical landmarks. They detail the arguments for and against demolition and the efforts to save these buildings for their historical and cultural value.