Archives Scrapbooks

The image shows a page from a scrapbook or album containing newspaper clippings. The page has two main articles pasted on it.

1. Left Side Article:

   • Title: "Somebody Should Have 'Edited' Motherwell's Art"
   • Subtitle: "Abstract Impressionist's Work at Smith, Like Poor English Usage, Disciplined, Large & Savory to Some, Trash to Others"
   • Author: Wayne C. Smith
   • Content: The article reviews an exhibition of Robert Motherwell's work at the Smith College Museum of Art. The reviewer critiques the artist's work, comparing it to poor English usage and suggesting that it needs editing. The reviewer describes the art as large, disciplined, and savory to some, while being trash to others. The article also mentions a book signing event by Motherwell and discusses the artist's technique and style.

2. Right Side Article:

   • Title: "Eclectic Furniture"
   • Content: This article discusses a furniture exhibition at the Museum of Contemporary Crafts in New York. It highlights the eclectic nature of the furniture on display, which includes pieces made from various materials such as wood, metal, and plastic. The article mentions that the exhibition aims to showcase the diversity and creativity in contemporary furniture design.

The clippings are neatly arranged on the page, with the left article taking up more space and the right article being smaller and positioned towards the top right corner. The background of the page is a light beige color, and the clippings are attached with what appears to be adhesive.

The image depicts a newspaper article from the "Sunday Republican" dated January 27, 1963. The article, titled "From the Galleries: Somebody Should Have 'Edited' Motherwell's Art," is written by Wayne C. Smith. It critiques an exhibition of Robert Motherwell's work at the Smith College Museum of Art, suggesting that the presentation of the art was disorganized and lacked coherence. The article compares the experience to a "savory collection of trash," indicating that while individual pieces might have merit, the overall presentation was unrefined and haphazard. The author also expresses concern over the influence of such presentations on the public's perception and support of abstract art. The article is accompanied by two smaller sections on the right side of the page, one discussing new art books and the other criticizing the use of abstract art in commercial advertising. The layout and content reflect the cultural and artistic debates of the mid-20th century.

The image displays a page from a newspaper dated January 27, 1963. The newspaper is titled "New England Newsletter," and it features two main articles.

The primary article, titled "From the Galleries: Somebody Should Have 'Edited' Motherwell's Art," is written by Wayne C. Smith. This piece criticizes the abstract impressionist work of artist William George Motherwell, displayed at the Smith College Museum of Art. Smith argues that Motherwell's work lacks discipline and savviness, calling it a "Savory Collection of Trash." He criticizes the current exhibition, which features a lecture by Motherwell, for not adequately editing the artist’s work, leading to poor usage and undiscerning display.

The second article, titled "New Art Books," is a review of recent publications related to art. The reviewer highlights several books, including "Karl Weber's Dutch Painting" by Hans Kroll and "Hanseatic Art and His Contemporary Art of Asia" by Andrea Parry. The reviewer also discusses the work of Motherwell, emphasizing the freedom of painters to experiment and express themselves without strict rules, while criticizing the lack of clarity in Motherwell’s own works.

The newspaper page itself is somewhat aged, with visible yellowing and wear, indicating it has been handled over time. The layout includes a mix of text and small photographs, typical of the format of the time.

The image shows a newspaper clipping from the New England Newspaper, dated January 27, 1963. The main article is titled "From the Galleries" and is written by Wayne C. Smith. The article discusses an exhibition of Abstract Expressionist art by Robert Motherwell at Smith College Museum of Art. The exhibition is criticized for being poorly curated and for featuring what the author describes as "a savory collection of trash."

Key points from the article include:

1. The exhibition contains works by Motherwell that are described as "poor English usage, undisciplined, ergo a savory collection of trash."
2. The author criticizes the presentation of Motherwell’s art, which he feels is not given proper respect and dignity.
3. The article questions the lack of curatorial effort and the museum's handling of the artist's legacy, suggesting that the works should have been edited to reflect their true value and artistic intent.
4. The author also expresses frustration with the art world's tendency to accept mediocre work and the lack of critical scrutiny, comparing the situation to a political climate where "anything goes."

Additionally, the article includes a sidebar titled "Frontier Formulae," which discusses the impact of abstract expressionism on the art world and the public's perception of it, suggesting that the art form is often misunderstood and misrepresented in popular media and public discourse.

The clipping also includes a reference to the "New Art Books" section, which lists titles and authors, including works by Karl Kasten and Albert C. Trumble.

The image shows a newspaper clipping from the New England Newspapers, Inc., specifically from the Springfield Union, dated January 27, 1963. The article is titled "From the Galleries: Somebody Should Have 'Edited' Motherwell's Art" and is written by Wayne C. Smith.

Summary of the Article:

1. Context and Visit:

   • The author visited the Smith College Museum of Art, which was displaying works by the artist Robert Motherwell, including lithographs, collages, and prints.

2. Critique of Motherwell’s Art:

   • The article criticizes Motherwell’s work, particularly his use of abstract expressionism.
   • The author argues that Motherwell’s art lacks discipline and is reminiscent of poor English usage, comparing it to a "savory collection of trash."

3. Comparison to Other Artists:

   • The author mentions that Motherwell’s work is not as refined as that of other artists like Andrew Wyeth and Karl Schrag.
   • He points out that Motherwell's paintings lack the meticulousness and precision seen in the works of artists like Picasso and Matisse.

4. Criticism of Art Critics:

   • The author expresses frustration with art critics who support Motherwell’s work, stating they are merely repeating what they have heard without true understanding or appreciation of the art.
   • He believes that Motherwell's art is overpraised and that critics are not doing their job by not recognizing the mediocrity of his work.

5. General Critique of Modern Art:

   • The author extends his critique to the broader field of modern art, suggesting that many artists are not adequately trained and that their works lack the necessary skills and discipline.
   • He criticizes the art world for embracing and promoting mediocrity, comparing it to poor writing skills in journalism.

6. Specific Criticisms:

   • The author highlights that Motherwell’s work is often filled with "typographical errors" and that his art lacks the aesthetic coherence and technical proficiency of other artists.
   • He argues that Motherwell's paintings are not worth the attention they receive and that they are more akin to "scribbles" than genuine art.

7. Conclusion:

   • The author concludes by expressing his hope that someone would have edited Motherwell’s work to improve its quality, implying that the art is not as it should be without such intervention.

The clipping also includes a small advertisement for art books, promoting a few titles and mentioning that the books are available at the Art Institute of Chicago.

The image is a scanned page from the "New England Newspaper" dated January 27, 1983. The article is titled "Somebody Should Have 'Edited' Motherwell's Art," written by Wayne C. Smith.

Summary of the Article:

Main Review:

The article critiques an exhibition at the Smith College Museum of Art featuring works by Robert Motherwell. The author argues that the exhibition, which includes paintings, collages, and prints, lacks curation and seems thrown together without a clear focus or theme.

Detailed Points:

1. Lack of Curation:

   • The exhibition is described as unedited, giving the impression that it was assembled without a guiding vision.
   • The author feels that the works do not cohesively represent Motherwell’s contributions to Abstract Expressionism.

2. Observations on Artworks:

   • The author mentions that many of the pieces appear to be preliminary sketches or experiments rather than finished works.
   • There is a notable absence of some of Motherwell’s major works, which could have provided a more comprehensive view of his artistic development.

3. Critique of Specific Works:

   • The author finds that some of the displayed works, such as the "Beside the Sea" series, are less impressive in reality compared to their reproductions in books.
   • Other pieces, like those from the "Opens" series, are noted for their boldness but still seem to fall short in the overall context of the exhibition.

4. Philosophy and Presentation:

   • The author discusses the philosophical aspects of Motherwell's art, particularly the idea of "editing" and refining ideas, which the author feels is not evident in this exhibition.
   • The article suggests that Motherwell’s work is often about the process and exploration of ideas, and this exhibition fails to capture that essence adequately.

5. Recommendations:

   • The author posits that a more selective and curated approach could have significantly improved the exhibition.
   • They suggest that including more iconic works and a clearer narrative would have provided a better understanding of Motherwell’s artistic journey.

6. Comparison to Other Exhibitions:

   • The article compares this exhibition unfavorably to others, like those at the Guggenheim and Whitney Museum, which provided a more thorough and engaging exploration of Motherwell’s oeuvre.

Additional Content:

The page also features a section titled "New Art Books," listing and briefly reviewing several new art-related publications by different authors and publishers.

The general tone of the article is critical, suggesting that the exhibition at Smith College fails to do justice to Motherwell's legacy due to poor curation and lack of a coherent narrative.

The image shows an old scrapbook or album page with newspaper clippings glued onto it. The overall color of the page is a brownish tan, typical of aged paper. The clippings contain text and are from a section titled "From the Galleries." The main headline of the larger clipping reads "Somebody Should Have 'Edited' Motherwell’s Art." This suggests that the article is a critique or an opinion piece about the work of the artist Robert Motherwell.

The date "JAN 27 1963" can be seen at the bottom of the first column on the left, indicating when this piece was published. The newspaper is from "The Sunday Republican - Springfield, Mass.," as indicated in the fine print at the top of the page which is only partially visible.

Other visible text suggests discussion about abstract impressionism and criticism of Motherwell's work, citing poor English usage and describing the collection on display as "undisciplined, ergo a savory collection of trash."

Besides the large clipping, there's a smaller piece titled "New Art Books" which seems to discuss recent publications in the art world, though only a section of this article is shown.

The clippings are neatly trimmed and pasted in an organized manner, and there's a noticeable empty space on the right-hand side of the page where additional clippings or items might once have been intended to be placed or have been removed. The edges of the paper appear slightly worn, emphasizing the scrapbook's age.

The image shows a page from a scrapbook or an album with three newspaper clippings attached to it. The largest clipping, positioned on the left side, is an article titled "Somebody Should Have 'Edited' Motherwell's Art" written by Wayne C. Smith. The article critiques an exhibition of paintings, collages, and prints by Robert Motherwell at the Smith College Museum of Art. The text discusses abstract expressionism, the quality of the exhibition, and opinions about art and criticism.

Above this article is a small clipped section titled "New Art Books," which mentions some recently acquired art books by the City Library, including titles by Karl Zerbe, Hans Konigsberger, and others.

On the right side of the page, there is a smaller clipping titled "Esoteric Formulae," which comments on the newspaper's misunderstanding of a specific art prize awarded at the Art Institute of Chicago. It discusses the appreciation (or lack thereof) of the deeper meaning in modern art strokes and criticisms from people less knowledgeable about art.

At the top left corner of the page is a small label from the New England Newsclip Agency, Inc., with details indicating the source of the clipping as the "Sunday Republican, Springfield, Mass." and the date "Jan 27 1963."

The image shows a page from a newspaper or magazine, featuring an article titled "Somebody Should Have Edited Motherwell's Art." The article criticizes the work of Robert Motherwell, an Abstract Impressionist artist, for its poor English usage, undisciplined style, and inclusion of what the author considers a "savory collection of trash." The article suggests that someone should have edited Motherwell's art to improve its quality. The page also includes other articles and advertisements, with a black border on the left side and a black and white border on the right side.

The image shows an open book, likely a newspaper or magazine, with visible text on two facing pages. The left page is titled "Somebody Should Have 'Edited' Motherwell's Art" and is subtitled "Abstract Impressionist's Work at Smith, Like Poor English Usage, Undisciplined, Ergo a Savory Collection of Trash" by Wayne C. Smith. The article discusses an exhibition of Robert Motherwell's artwork at Smith College, critiquing his style as undisciplined and comparing it to poor English usage. The text is dense and appears to be an opinion piece or review, with a critical tone.

The right page features two columns of text. The left column is titled "Ezoterie Formulan" and discusses a newspaper or publication that presents itself as an artistic form, referencing themes of art, commerce, and the role of artists in society. The right column is titled "New Art Books" and appears to be a review or commentary on new art-related publications, mentioning artists such as Karl Knaths, Hans Hofmann, Piet Mondrian, and Alberto Giacometti, among others. The text is formatted in a typical newspaper style, with dense paragraphs and a mix of critical and descriptive commentary.

The book itself has aged pages with a yellowish tint, indicating it is an older publication. The spine is visible on the left side, showing the book's binding. The overall layout and typography suggest it is from the mid-20th century, consistent with the date mentioned at the top of the left page: Sunday Republican, Springfield, Mass., Jan. 27, 1969. The content reflects a period of active art criticism and discussion, particularly focusing on abstract expressionism and contemporary art movements.