Archives Scrapbooks

This image displays a yellowed, aged newspaper clipping mounted on a slightly larger piece of paper, along with a corresponding news bureau slip. The clipping is from The Beacon Journal of Akron, Ohio, dated April 11, 1962.

The headline of the article is: “Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing”.

Below the headline, the article is presented as a “Voice Of The People” letter to the editor, signed by Mark and Eleanor Worthen, Hudson.

The letter addresses the controversy surrounding Alger Hiss, a former U.S. State Department official convicted of perjury in the 1950s related to allegations of espionage. It questions whether Hiss was truly guilty or a victim of false accusations (comparing him to Dreyfus or Zola).

Key points from the letter include:

• The authors believe recent news releases (prompted by President Nixon’s book) and a Beacon Journal story (“Facts Don’t Support Hiss Claims — Bobby”) have revived doubts about the fairness of Hiss’s trials and conviction.
• They contend that evidence gathered since the trials casts “grave doubts” on the justice of his treatment and should not be dismissed by the Attorney General.
• The letter highlights how the prosecution’s “immutable witness”—Mr. Hiss’s former typewriter—has been “discovered to be a fake” (in reference to claims it was altered to match the typewriter used on the disputed documents).
• It asserts that Hiss’s claims of innocence are supported by “pages and pages of affidavits” from “the highest experts” in forgery detection.
• It names several experts supporting Hiss, including:
  • Dr. Daniel P. Norman, president of Skinner & Sherman, a firm testing metals for the U.S. military and government.
  • Mrs. Evelyn Ehrlich, an expert in photomicrography for detecting printing forgeries.
  • Miss Elizabeth McCarthy, a document expert for the Massachusetts State Police and Boston Police Department, and on the staff of the Fogg Museum.

The authors urge a renewed, detailed investigation—possibly Congressional—to allow Hiss to present his evidence and, if innocent, “vindicate his name.”

Accompanying News Bureau Slip:

Above the clipping is a small, torn slip from “THE OHIO NEWS BUREAU COMPANY, Cleveland 14, Ohio”, which identifies itself as the “First Clipping Bureau In Ohio.” This slip contains:

• “Akron Beacon-Jnl.” (Akron Beacon Journal)
• Location: Akron, O.
• Circulation figures: P.M.-circ.166,796; Sun.-circ.178,794
• Date: APR 11 1962 (written in purple ink)
• A handwritten note “F 5” is visible in the top left corner of the slip.

The entire piece has marks of age—yellowing paper, slight tears, and red and black pen markings on the clipping (such as “N X” near “To The Editor”).

In summary, this image is a preserved 1962 newspaper clipping from Ohio, featuring a public letter advocating for a new hearing for Alger Hiss based on expert forensic opinions questioning the evidence used against him. It captures a moment of enduring public interest and controversy over a high-profile Cold War-era case.

The image appears to be a scanned copy of a newspaper clipping from "Voice of the People" dated April 11, 1962. The headline of the article reads, "Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing." The article discusses the case of Alger Hiss, a prominent figure in American politics and journalism, and questions his conviction of perjury. The text includes a letter to the editor expressing skepticism about Hiss's guilt, citing new evidence and expert testimonies in support of his innocence. There is also a note at the bottom of the clipping that indicates the article was from the "Akron Beacon-Journal" and mentions the circulation figures for Sunday and the previous week. The clipping is labeled with a stamp that includes "The Ohio News Bureau Company" and "First Clipping Bureau in Ohio." Additionally, there are handwritten markings and annotations on the clipping, including a red "X" and some highlighted text.

This image shows a clipping from the Akron Beacon Journal, dated April 11, 1962, with a headline "Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing." The clipping is part of a column titled "Voice Of The People," which contains a letter to the editor discussing the case of Alger Hiss. The letter questions Hiss's guilt and calls for a new hearing based on new evidence and expert testimony. The clipping is from The Ohio News Bureau Company in Cleveland, Ohio, and includes details about the newspaper's circulation and the date of the clipping. The letter is signed by Mark and Eleanor Worthen from Hudson.

The image shows a newspaper clipping with a small piece of paper attached to the top left corner. The clipping is from the Ohio News Bureau Company, Cleveland, Ohio. The clipping is titled "Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing" and is dated April 1, 1962. The clipping is about Alger Hiss, who was accused of being a communist spy. The clipping discusses the possibility of Hiss receiving a new hearing and the evidence that has been gathered in his favor. The clipping also mentions the involvement of experts in the field of testing and analysis of metals and other materials.

The image appears to be a clipping from an old newspaper article. The clipping contains two pieces of paper, one with a headline and the other with a caption. The headline reads "Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing" and the caption reads "Voice Of The People". The clipping is dated April 1, 1962. The article discusses the case of Alger Hiss, who was accused of being a Communist spy during the Cold War. The article suggests that Hiss may be innocent and that he should be given a new opportunity to present evidence in his defense. The clipping also mentions the use of photomicrography to detect printing forgeries.

The image shows a newspaper clipping from The Ohio News Bureau Company, dated April 1, 1962, and published in Cleveland, Ohio. The clipping is titled "Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing" and is part of a section labeled "Voice Of The People."

Details of the Clipping:

Header Information:

• Source: The Ohio News Bureau Company, Cleveland, Ohio.
• Date: April 1, 1962.
• Headline: "Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing."
• Section: "Voice Of The People."

Content Overview:

The article discusses the Alger Hiss case, a prominent political scandal from the late 1940s and early 1950s. The piece addresses ongoing debates about Hiss's guilt or innocence, referencing recent developments and public opinion.

Key Points in the Article:

1. Reader Inquiry:

   • The article begins with a letter to the editor asking whether Alger Hiss was truly guilty or if he was another victim like Dreyfus, referencing the famous Dreyfus Affair.
   • It notes that the news releases from the past week, prompted by Mr. Nixon's new book, have reignited doubts about Hiss's guilt.

2. Recent Developments:

   • The article references a Beacon Journal story (April 4) titled "Facts Don’t Support Hiss Claims — Bobby."
   • It highlights a claim made by Attorney General Bobby Kennedy that new evidence of Hiss's innocence has emerged since his trials and conviction.

3. Critique of the Claim:

   • The article expresses skepticism about the claim, stating that it casts doubt on the fairness of Hiss's treatment but should not be dismissed lightly by Attorney General Kennedy.
   • It emphasizes the complexity of the case, noting conflicting testimony and the involvement of high-profile figures, including the Government's chief witness, ex-Communist Whitaker Chambers, who contradicted himself during testimony.

4. Hiss’s Recent Statement:

   • Hiss recently declared that the prosecution’s “immutable witness” during the trials has been discovered to be a fake and incredible irresponsibility, based on pages and pages of affidavits submitted by experts in forgery detection.
   • The article mentions three experts:
     • Dr. Daniel P. Norman, president of Skinner & Sherman, New England’s oldest and largest firm in testing and analysis of metals and other materials for the U.S. Armed Forces, government departments, and major industrial firms.
     • Mrs. Evelyn Ehrlich, an expert in the use of photomicrography to detect printing forgeries, who worked for 15 years on the staff of the Fogg Museum of Art at Harvard University.
     • Miss Elizabeth McCarthy, a document expert for the Massachusetts State Police and the Boston Police Department.

5. Call for a New Hearing:

   • The article suggests that Mr. Hiss may be given a new opportunity to present his evidence in a Congressional investigation in his name, if he is innocent, in the best tradition of American justice.

6. Signatures:

   • The letter is signed by Mark and Eleanor Worthen from Hudson.

Visual Elements:

• The clipping appears to be a physical newspaper page with visible wear, including a torn edge and some discoloration.
• The text is typed in a classic newspaper font, typical of mid-20th-century print media.
• The article is part of a larger collection, as indicated by the label “First Clipping Bureau In Ohio” at the top of the page.

Contextual Notes:

• Alger Hiss was a former State Department official convicted in 1950 of perjury for denying that he had passed secret documents to the Soviet Union. His case became a symbol of political persecution during the Red Scare era.
• Richard Nixon, then a U.S. Senator, played a significant role in Hiss’s prosecution and later referenced the case in his writings.
• The article reflects the enduring public interest and controversy surrounding Hiss’s conviction, with ongoing debates about the fairness of the trials and the possibility of new evidence.

This clipping provides a snapshot of the public discourse surrounding the Hiss case in 1962, highlighting the complexity of the legal and political issues involved.

This image includes a clipping from the Akron Beacon Journal, dated April 1, 1962, as noted by the tag from "The Ohio News Bureau Company." The article, titled "Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing," appears to be an opinion piece or letter to the editor from the "Voice of the People" section. The article discusses the doubts regarding the guilt of Alger Hiss in his conviction, referring to him as a potentially modern-day "Dreyfus."

The text mentions various evidence and testimonies challenging the fairness of Hiss's trial and conviction. It highlights issues with key witness Whittaker Chambers and the use of allegedly forged documents and “fake typewriter” evidence. The authors, Mark and Eleanor Worthen, point to several experts who examined related evidence and express hope that Hiss will be able to present new findings, possibly through a Congressional investigation, to clear his name or seek vindication.

The tone of the piece suggests skepticism about Hiss's conviction and calls for justice to prevail through further investigation.

This image shows a clipped newspaper letter to the editor titled "Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing." It is from The Ohio News Bureau Company, Cleveland 14, Ohio, labeled as a clipping bureau. The letter refers to the legal case of Alger Hiss and debates whether he is guilty or another person named Dreylus.

The letter discusses recent news releases and investigations regarding the case, mentioning Nixon's book and doubts about the fairness of Hiss's treatment. It refers to evidence and testimony, including a declaration by Hiss about a typewriter, and the involvement of experts in forgery detection. The letter expresses hope that Mr. Hiss may be given an opportunity to present new evidence in a Congressional investigation.

The letter is signed by Mark and Eleanor Worthen from Hudson. Some text has been marked or corrected with red pen, and the clipping shows signs of aging with browned edges and a small tear at the top.

The image shows a small collage of vintage newspaper clippings laid on a gray background.

• At the top left is a tiny clipping from The Ohio News Bureau Company (Cleveland, Ohio) with torn edges and a stamp-like mark showing a date (April 11, 1962) and some postal details.
• Below it is a larger tan-colored clipping with the header “Voice Of The People” and the bold headline “Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing.” It appears to be a letter to the editor or opinion piece about Alger Hiss, mentioning Nixon and other details, to appear in a newspaper (the text includes phrases like “To The Editor” and “EVIDENCE in other aspects of this mysterious case…”).
• The overall look is of old newspaper print, with two separate pieces arranged together, showing signs of age and handling.

The image depicts a newspaper clipping pinned against a light background. It's a section from a page titled "Voice Of The People," dated APR 11 1962, likely a letters to the editor section. The headline reads "Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing" in bold, uppercase letters.

There are two columns of text underneath, with a pointed critique directed at Attorney General Kennedy's handling of the Alger Hiss case and a demand for a proper hearing that fairly considers new evidence. The letter also references the involvement of Dr. Daniel P. Normann, the use of photomicrography in forgery detection, and the expertise of individuals from institutions such as the Fog Museum of Art, Harvard University.

On the top of the clipping are labels indicating it is from The Ohio News Bureau Company, Cleveland, Ohio, and shows it's from the Akron Beacon Journal, dated April 1962. The clipping has ripped edges, and annotations in red pen, including a check mark, underlining, and an "X" mark over the word "To." There is also a handwritten arrow in black ink on the right-hand side. The physical clipping has signs of wear indicating age, such as yellowing of the paper and slight tearing at the top.