Archives Scrapbooks

The image is of a newspaper clipping from the Akron Beacon-Journal, dated April 1, 1962. The article is titled "Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing" and is written by Mark and Eleanor Worthen from Hudson. The article discusses the case of Alger Hiss, who was convicted of perjury in relation to espionage charges. The authors question whether Hiss is guilty and whether he is still awaiting vindication.

Key points from the article include:

1. Doubts About Hiss's Guilt: The authors mention that doubts about Hiss's guilt persist, despite the Attorney General's investigation and evidence presented during his trials.

2. Recent Developments: The article refers to a recent declaration by Hiss that the prosecution's witness during the trials was unreliable. This statement is supported by affidavits from experts in various fields, including document examination and ballistics.

3. Expert Opinions: The authors cite several experts who have submitted affidavits supporting Hiss's claims. These experts include Dr. Daniel P. Norman, Mrs. Evelyn Ehrlich, and Miss Elizabeth McCarthy, who have expertise in areas such as document examination and ballistics.

4. Call for Congressional Investigation: The authors suggest that Hiss should be given the opportunity to present his new evidence in detail, possibly through a Congressional investigation, to clear his name if he is innocent.

5. Historical Context: The article mentions the historical context of the case, including the role of Whittaker Chambers, who contradicted himself during the trials, and the involvement of Attorney General Kennedy.

Overall, the article advocates for a re-examination of the Alger Hiss case, citing new evidence and expert opinions that cast doubt on his conviction.

The image shows a newspaper clipping from "The Ohio News Bureau Company" in Cleveland, Ohio, dated April 1, 1962. The headline of the article is "Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing." The piece is a letter to the editor signed by Mark and Eleanor Worthen from Hudson.

The authors question the guilt of Alger Hiss, comparing his case to that of Alfred Dreyfus, suggesting that Hiss may also be a victim of a miscarriage of justice. They reference a recent book by Mr. Nixon that casts doubts on Hiss's conviction for perjury, noting that evidence presented by the Attorney General's investigation and subsequent studies challenge the conclusions of Hiss's trials.

The letter highlights conflicting testimony, including that of Whittaker Chambers, and mentions specific experts, such as Dr. Daniel P. Norman and Mrs. Evelyn Ehrlich, who have questioned the authenticity of key documents. The authors express hope that Hiss will be given the opportunity to present new evidence to a Congressional investigation to clear his name, invoking the tradition of American justice.

The image shows a clipping from a newspaper titled "The Ohio News Bureau Company" dated April 1, 1962. The clipping is from the Akron Beacon-Journal and is from the first clipping bureau in Ohio.

The main headline reads, "Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing," with the subtitle "To the Editor." The letter to the editor discusses the case of Alger Hiss, a controversial figure who was accused of espionage during the Cold War.

The article addresses the following points:

1. Alger Hiss's Guilt: The writer questions whether Alger Hiss was guilty or if he was another Dreyfus, still awaiting his Zola (referring to the famous French writer Émile Zola, who defended Dreyfus).
2. New Evidence and Investigations: The text references the Attorney General's investigation into Hiss' claims of innocence, noting that new evidence has cast doubts on the fairness of his treatment.
3. Expert Testimonies: It mentions the Beacon Journal article from April 4, which suggests that new claims of innocence were supported by affidavits from experts in forgery detection, such as Daniel P. Norman, Evelyn Ehrlich, and Miss Elizabeth McCarthy.
4. Contradictory Testimonies: The case is highlighted for its conflicting testimony, particularly Whittaker Chambers' contradictory statements under oath.
5. Opportunity for New Evidence: The letter suggests that Mr. Hiss should be given the chance to present new evidence in a Congressional investigation to potentially vindicate his innocence.

The text ends with a mention of Mark and Eleanor Worthen from Hudson, who are presumably the authors of the letter.

The image is a clipping from a newspaper article titled "Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing," dated April 1, 1962. The article is from the Akron Beacon-Journal and was distributed by The Ohio News Bureau Company.

The article discusses the case of Alger Hiss, who was accused of being a communist and later convicted of perjury. The writer expresses doubts about Hiss's guilt, comparing him to Dreyfus, who was also wrongfully convicted. The article mentions a new book by Mr. Nixon, which raises doubts about the evidence used in Hiss's case, suggesting that new evidence might be brought forward.

The article highlights that the original investigation by the Attorney General's office and the subsequent trials have raised doubts among many about the fairness of Hiss's treatment. It specifically mentions the involvement of Whittaker Chambers, a government's chief witness, who contradicted himself under oath.

The writer also references a Beacon Journal story (April 4) titled "Facts Don't Support Hiss Claims — Bobby," which questions the reliability of the evidence against Hiss. The article notes that the evidence gathered since Hiss's trials and conviction casts doubts on the fairness of his treatment.

The article further mentions a declaration by Mr. Hiss's typewriter, which was said to be an "immutable witness," and the expertise of three notable experts in forgery detection: Dr. Daniel P. Norman, Mrs. Evelyn Ehrlich, and Miss Elizabeth McCarthy. These experts are cited to support the authenticity or inauthenticity of the documents.

The article concludes by hoping that Mr. Hiss will be given the opportunity to present new evidence in a Congressional investigation, aiming to vindicate his innocence in the spirit of American justice. The article is signed by Mark and Eleanor Worthen from Hudson.

The image is a newspaper clipping from the Akron Beacon-Journal, dated April 1, 1962. The headline reads "Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing," and it discusses the case of Alger Hiss, who was convicted of perjury in 1950.

Key points from the article include:

1. Questioning Hiss's Guilt: The article raises doubts about Alger Hiss's guilt, suggesting that he might be another victim like "Bobby" Nixon, referencing a recent book by Mr. Nixon that casts doubt on Hiss's conviction.

2. New Evidence: The Beacon Journal story mentions new claims of evidence that could potentially exonerate Hiss. This includes affidavits and statements from experts in the field of forgery detection, who attest to the possibility that the "immutable witness" typewriter used in the trials might have been a fake.

3. Experts' Opinions: The article lists three experts who believe the typewriter evidence was potentially faked:

   • Dr. Daniel P. Norman, president of Skinner & Sherman, an expert in testing and analysis of metals.
   • Mrs. Evelyn Ehrlich, an expert in photomicroscopy for detecting printing forgeries.
   • Miss Elizabeth McCarthy, a document expert for Massachusetts State Police and the Boston Police Department.

4. Call for Re-examination: The article expresses hope that Hiss may be given a new hearing to present his new evidence in a Congressional investigation, to either vindicate his name if he is innocent or uphold justice if he is not.

5. Authors' Names: The letter is signed by Mark and Eleanor Worthen from Hudson.

The clipping also includes a note indicating it was from the Ohio News Bureau Company in Cleveland, Ohio, and it was the first clipping bureau in Ohio.

The image is a newspaper clipping from the Akron Beacon Journal, dated April 11, 1962. It features an article titled "Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing" under the section "Voice Of The People."

The article discusses renewed discussions about the case of Alger Hiss, prompted by Mr. Nixon's recent book which casts doubt on Hiss's guilt. The author questions whether Hiss was truly guilty or another victim like Dreyfus, still awaiting exoneration.

Key points include:

• The article mentions the controversy and conflicting testimonies surrounding Hiss’s trials, particularly noting Whittaker Chambers' contradictory statements.
• It highlights doubts raised by evidence gathered after Hiss’s trials, suggesting grave injustices.
• The article references an earlier Beacon Journal story that pointed out flaws in the case against Hiss.
• It notes that Attorney General Robert Kennedy did not lightly dismiss the new claims of Hiss’s innocence.
• The text also details the impressive evidence and expert testimonies that Hiss might present in a new hearing, including experts in typewriter analysis, handwriting, and forensic photography from notable institutions like Harvard University, Massachusetts State Police, and the Boston Police Department.
• The article emphasizes the hope that a new, detailed investigation, possibly by a Congressional body, could vindicate Hiss if he is innocent.

The clipping also shows the masthead of "The Ohio News Bureau Company" based in Cleveland, Ohio, and the date stamp on the article. The names Mark and Eleanor Worthen from Hudson are handwritten at the bottom of the clipping.

The image depicts a newspaper clipping pinned against a light background. It's a section from a page titled "Voice Of The People," dated APR 11 1962, likely a letters to the editor section. The headline reads "Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing" in bold, uppercase letters.

There are two columns of text underneath, with a pointed critique directed at Attorney General Kennedy's handling of the Alger Hiss case and a demand for a proper hearing that fairly considers new evidence. The letter also references the involvement of Dr. Daniel P. Normann, the use of photomicrography in forgery detection, and the expertise of individuals from institutions such as the Fog Museum of Art, Harvard University.

On the top of the clipping are labels indicating it is from The Ohio News Bureau Company, Cleveland, Ohio, and shows it's from the Akron Beacon Journal, dated April 1962. The clipping has ripped edges, and annotations in red pen, including a check mark, underlining, and an "X" mark over the word "To." There is also a handwritten arrow in black ink on the right-hand side. The physical clipping has signs of wear indicating age, such as yellowing of the paper and slight tearing at the top.

The image shows a newspaper clipping from The Ohio News Bureau Company, dated April 1, 1962, and published in Cleveland, Ohio. The clipping is titled "Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing" and is part of a section labeled "Voice Of The People."

Details of the Clipping:

Header Information:

• Source: The Ohio News Bureau Company, Cleveland, Ohio.
• Date: April 1, 1962.
• Headline: "Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing."
• Section: "Voice Of The People."

Content Overview:

The article discusses the Alger Hiss case, a prominent political scandal from the late 1940s and early 1950s. The piece addresses ongoing debates about Hiss's guilt or innocence, referencing recent developments and public opinion.

Key Points in the Article:

1. Reader Inquiry:

   • The article begins with a letter to the editor asking whether Alger Hiss was truly guilty or if he was another victim like Dreyfus, referencing the famous Dreyfus Affair.
   • It notes that the news releases from the past week, prompted by Mr. Nixon's new book, have reignited doubts about Hiss's guilt.

2. Recent Developments:

   • The article references a Beacon Journal story (April 4) titled "Facts Don’t Support Hiss Claims — Bobby."
   • It highlights a claim made by Attorney General Bobby Kennedy that new evidence of Hiss's innocence has emerged since his trials and conviction.

3. Critique of the Claim:

   • The article expresses skepticism about the claim, stating that it casts doubt on the fairness of Hiss's treatment but should not be dismissed lightly by Attorney General Kennedy.
   • It emphasizes the complexity of the case, noting conflicting testimony and the involvement of high-profile figures, including the Government's chief witness, ex-Communist Whitaker Chambers, who contradicted himself during testimony.

4. Hiss’s Recent Statement:

   • Hiss recently declared that the prosecution’s “immutable witness” during the trials has been discovered to be a fake and incredible irresponsibility, based on pages and pages of affidavits submitted by experts in forgery detection.
   • The article mentions three experts:
     • Dr. Daniel P. Norman, president of Skinner & Sherman, New England’s oldest and largest firm in testing and analysis of metals and other materials for the U.S. Armed Forces, government departments, and major industrial firms.
     • Mrs. Evelyn Ehrlich, an expert in the use of photomicrography to detect printing forgeries, who worked for 15 years on the staff of the Fogg Museum of Art at Harvard University.
     • Miss Elizabeth McCarthy, a document expert for the Massachusetts State Police and the Boston Police Department.

5. Call for a New Hearing:

   • The article suggests that Mr. Hiss may be given a new opportunity to present his evidence in a Congressional investigation in his name, if he is innocent, in the best tradition of American justice.

6. Signatures:

   • The letter is signed by Mark and Eleanor Worthen from Hudson.

Visual Elements:

• The clipping appears to be a physical newspaper page with visible wear, including a torn edge and some discoloration.
• The text is typed in a classic newspaper font, typical of mid-20th-century print media.
• The article is part of a larger collection, as indicated by the label “First Clipping Bureau In Ohio” at the top of the page.

Contextual Notes:

• Alger Hiss was a former State Department official convicted in 1950 of perjury for denying that he had passed secret documents to the Soviet Union. His case became a symbol of political persecution during the Red Scare era.
• Richard Nixon, then a U.S. Senator, played a significant role in Hiss’s prosecution and later referenced the case in his writings.
• The article reflects the enduring public interest and controversy surrounding Hiss’s conviction, with ongoing debates about the fairness of the trials and the possibility of new evidence.

This clipping provides a snapshot of the public discourse surrounding the Hiss case in 1962, highlighting the complexity of the legal and political issues involved.

The image appears to be a clipping from an old newspaper article. The clipping contains two pieces of paper, one with a headline and the other with a caption. The headline reads "Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing" and the caption reads "Voice Of The People". The clipping is dated April 1, 1962. The article discusses the case of Alger Hiss, who was accused of being a Communist spy during the Cold War. The article suggests that Hiss may be innocent and that he should be given a new opportunity to present evidence in his defense. The clipping also mentions the use of photomicrography to detect printing forgeries.

The image shows a newspaper clipping with a small piece of paper attached to the top left corner. The clipping is from the Ohio News Bureau Company, Cleveland, Ohio. The clipping is titled "Hopes Hiss May Get New Hearing" and is dated April 1, 1962. The clipping is about Alger Hiss, who was accused of being a communist spy. The clipping discusses the possibility of Hiss receiving a new hearing and the evidence that has been gathered in his favor. The clipping also mentions the involvement of experts in the field of testing and analysis of metals and other materials.