Archives Scrapbooks

The image shows the front page of "The Graduate Student's Bulletin," Vol. II, No. 3, dated Friday, November 3, 1950. The bulletin is published by Harvard and Radcliffe. The main article discusses the topic of "Academic Freedom," focusing on the Graduate Student council's consideration of the National Student Association's declaration on academic freedom. The editorial accompanying the article addresses the issue from a different perspective, arguing against the exclusion of Communists from teaching due to their political beliefs and advocating for maintaining academic freedom.

The bulletin includes text in a serif font, with the title and header clearly printed. The editorial section is to the right side of the page, discussing the dangers of government overreach in the name of combating communism and the importance of academic freedom. The layout is simple and typical of student publications from that era, with a focus on text and minimal graphical elements.

This image is a page from "The Graduate Student's Bulletin." It appears to be a publication from Harvard/Radcliffe, dated Friday, November 3, 1950. It is Volume II, Number 3.

The page is divided into two main sections:

1. Academic Freedom: This section discusses whether the Graduate Student Council should affirm a declaration on academic freedom passed by the National Student Association in August. It mentions a discussion initiated by Frank Parker, head of the NSA Committee of the Council, and a proposal by Norton Hintz to apply the declaration to the situation at the University of California, where faculty members were dismissed for refusing to sign a loyalty oath. The Council decided to delay voting on the motion and related proposals for a month to determine the majority opinion. The section also includes the text of the NSA declaration on academic freedom, which has three main points:

   • Hiring, firing, and placing on tenure of academic personnel should be based on professional competence, not on political, religious, or social criteria.
   • Standards for judging professional competence should be determined and maintained solely by the university community.
   • Requiring loyalty oaths as a prerequisite for academic employment is considered destructive to academic freedom and an ethical breach of a professor's constitutional rights.

2. Editorial: This section discusses the arguments against allowing Communists to teach, focusing on their belief in a system that prevents the freedom of inquiry essential to a teacher and their commitment to overthrowing the government. The editorial argues that these reasons are not strong enough to justify legislation that would reduce academic freedom in all areas. It suggests that if Communists make bad teachers, they should be dismissed on that basis, not because of their political convictions. The editorial concludes by stating that no one ever overcame a danger by deliberately cultivating ignorance about it and that combating dictatorship should not involve using dictatorial methods.

The image shows a page from "The Graduate Student's Bulletin" from Harvard and Radcliffe, published on Friday, November 3, 1960. The page is titled "ACADEMIC FREEDOM" and features an editorial discussing the importance of academic freedom and the potential dangers of communism. The editorial argues that communists should not be allowed to teach based on their beliefs and commitment to overthrowing the government. It also highlights the need to combat authoritarianism and protect academic freedom. The page includes a declaration on academic freedom passed by the National Student Association and a call for graduate students to share their views on the matter. The image has a vintage look, with black text on a white background, and is slightly faded, indicating its age.

The image is a page from a student publication titled "The Graduate Student's Bulletin" from Harvard and Radcliffe, dated November 3, 1960. The page features an editorial discussing academic freedom, specifically focusing on the implications of requiring loyalty oaths from faculty members. The editorial argues against the affirmation of a declaration on academic freedom by the National Student Association (NSA), suggesting that such oaths could infringe upon academic freedom and are not justified. It emphasizes the importance of academic freedom for faculty members, likening it to the constitutional rights of other citizens. The page also includes a call to action for readers to express their opinions on the matter.

The image depicts the cover of a publication titled "The Graduate Student's Bulletin", specifically Volume II, Number 3, dated Friday, November 3, 1950. The publication is associated with Harvard & Radcliffe, indicating its academic and institutional context.

The content of the bulletin focuses on the topic of Academic Freedom, as indicated by the bold heading at the top. The article discusses a debate surrounding the National Student Association (NSA) declaration on academic freedom, which was passed in August 1950. It highlights a controversy involving Frank Parker, the head of the NSA Committee, who proposed applying the NSA declaration to the situation at the University of California, where graduate students condemned faculty members who refused to sign a loyalty oath. The Harvard-Radcliffe Graduate Council considered a motion to affirm the declaration but ultimately voted to delay a vote on the matter to gauge majority opinion.

The bulletin also includes an Editorial section, which critiques the argument that Communists should be barred from teaching. The editorial argues against using political beliefs as a basis for dismissing faculty members, emphasizing that academic freedom must be protected and that loyalty oaths are an infringement on constitutional rights. The text underscores the importance of maintaining academic freedom and rejecting attempts to restrict it based on political affiliations.

Overall, the image portrays a historical moment in academic discourse, reflecting tensions between academic freedom, political ideologies, and institutional policies during the early Cold War era.

The image depicts a scanned copy of the front page of the Harvard Radcliffe Graduate Student's Bulletin, dated Friday, November 3, 1960.

The page features the title "THE GRADUATE STUDENT'S BULLETIN" at the top, with the volume and issue number displayed below it. The main content of the page is divided into two columns, with the left column titled "ACADEMIC FREEDOM" and the right column titled "EDITORIAL". The text is typed in black ink on a beige background, with the title and column headings in bold font. The page appears to be a scanned copy of the original, with a slight shadow effect around the edges.

The content of the page discusses the National Student Association's declaration on academic freedom, which was passed in August. The article highlights the importance of academic freedom and the need for students to be able to express their opinions without fear of reprisal. The editorial section of the page also touches on the topic of academic freedom, emphasizing the importance of protecting it from those who would seek to undermine it.

Overall, the image provides a glimpse into the academic and political climate of Harvard University in the early 1960s, highlighting the importance of academic freedom and the role of students in advocating for it.

The image presents a scanned copy of "THE GRADUATE STUDENT'S BULLETIN," a publication associated with Harvard and Radcliffe, dated Friday, November 3, 1950. The bulletin is displayed on a gray background, with the title prominently featured at the top in large, bold font.

Key Features:

• Title and Date: The title "THE GRADUATE STUDENT'S BULLETIN" is accompanied by the date "Friday, November 3, 1950," and the volume and issue numbers "Vol. II, No. 3."
• Content: The bulletin contains two articles:
  • The left article discusses academic freedom, referencing a declaration passed by the National Student Association in August and a proposal to apply this declaration to the University of California situation.
  • The right article is an editorial addressing the issue of Communist teachers, arguing that while Communism is a danger, it is not a valid reason to dismiss teachers based on their political convictions.
• Layout: The text is presented in a clear and readable format, with headings and paragraphs that facilitate easy comprehension.

Overall Impression:

The image provides a glimpse into the academic and political discourse of the time, highlighting the concerns and debates surrounding academic freedom and the role of Communism in education. The bulletin's content and layout suggest a thoughtful and informative publication that engages with the issues of its era.

The image presents a vintage newspaper or bulletin, specifically "THE GRADUATE STUDENT'S BULLETIN" from Harvard and Radcliffe, dated Friday, November 3, 1950. The bulletin is divided into two main sections: "ACADEMIC FREEDOM" and "EDITORIAL."

Header Section:

• Title: THE GRADUATE STUDENT'S BULLETIN
• Volume and Issue: Vol. II, No. 3
• Date and Location: Friday, November 3, 1950, Harvard * Radcliffe

ACADEMIC FREEDOM Section:

• Discusses a declaration on academic freedom passed by the National Student Association (NSA) the previous August
• Focuses on a proposal to affirm this declaration, specifically in relation to:
  • The University of California's situation
  • A motion to condemn Harvard graduate students who refused to sign a loyalty oath
• The Council voted to delay a vote on the motion and related proposals to determine majority opinion

EDITORIAL Section:

• Argues against the notion that Communists should not be allowed to teach based on their political beliefs
• Presents two main counterarguments:
  1. Communists believe in a system of thought that prevents the freedom of inquiry essential to a teacher
  2. Communists are committed to overthrowing the government and are therefore dangerous as teachers
• Asserts that while communism is a danger, it is not a reason to combat it through dictatorship methods in the US
• Emphasizes the importance of academic freedom and the rights of teachers

Call to Action:

• Invites readers to share their views with the NSA committee at 18 Appleton Way via postcard

The bulletin appears to be a call to action and a discussion forum for Harvard and Radcliffe graduate students regarding academic freedom, political beliefs, and the role of communists in education.

The image depicts a page from "The Graduate Student's Bulletin" dated November 3, 1960. The page is divided into two sections: "Academic Freedom" and "Editorial."

The "Academic Freedom" section presents a letter to the University of California, condemning the dismissal of faculty members who refused to sign a loyalty oath. It also includes a postcard for the NSA committee at 15 Appian Way, inviting readers to share their views on the Council.

The "Editorial" section discusses the importance of maintaining academic freedom, citing the dangers of communism and the need for professors to be committed to the overthrow of the government. It also mentions that the Congress opposes any attempt to isolate the academic community as a special case in the fight against subversion.

Overall, the page appears to be a call to action for graduate students to defend academic freedom and resist the influence of communism on campus.

The image is a scanned copy of "The Graduate Student's Bulletin" from Harvard and Radcliffe, dated Friday, November 3, 1960. It is Volume II, Number 3. The bulletin primarily discusses issues related to academic freedom.

Academic Freedom Section:

• The Graduate Student Council is debating a declaration on academic freedom proposed by the National Student Association (NSA).
• Frank Parker, the head of the NSA Committee, initiated a discussion on the declaration.
• Norton Hintz proposed applying the declaration to situations at the University of California and the University of Chicago, which involved faculty members who refused to sign loyalty oaths.
• The Council decided to delay voting on the motion to determine majority opinion.
• The bulletin asks for opinions on what course the Council should take and invites postcards to the NSA committee at 18 Appian Way.

NSA Declaration:

1. Hiring, firing, and placing of tenure should be based on professional competence, not political, religious, or social criteria.
2. Standards for judging professional competence should be determined and maintained by the university community.
3. Those providing financial support to the university should not infringe upon academic freedom.
4. Requiring loyalty oaths is opposed.

Editorial Section:

• The editorial argues against banning Communists from teaching based on their beliefs.
• It suggests that banning Communists would infringe on the freedom of inquiry essential to teachers.
• The editorial warns against the danger of using Communist affiliation as a pretext for dismissing teachers.
• It criticizes loyalty oaths as destructive to academic freedom and an ethical breach of a professor's constitutional rights.
• The editorial concludes that isolating the academic community in the fight against subversion is counterproductive and that teachers should have the same freedoms as other citizens.

Overall, the bulletin emphasizes the importance of academic freedom and argues against political interference in academic hiring and tenure decisions.