Archives Scrapbooks

The image is a scanned copy of "The Graduate Student's Bulletin" from Harvard and Radcliffe, dated Friday, November 3, 1960. It is Volume II, Number 3. The bulletin primarily discusses issues related to academic freedom.

Academic Freedom Section:

• The Graduate Student Council is debating a declaration on academic freedom proposed by the National Student Association (NSA).
• Frank Parker, the head of the NSA Committee, initiated a discussion on the declaration.
• Norton Hintz proposed applying the declaration to situations at the University of California and the University of Chicago, which involved faculty members who refused to sign loyalty oaths.
• The Council decided to delay voting on the motion to determine majority opinion.
• The bulletin asks for opinions on what course the Council should take and invites postcards to the NSA committee at 18 Appian Way.

NSA Declaration:

1. Hiring, firing, and placing of tenure should be based on professional competence, not political, religious, or social criteria.
2. Standards for judging professional competence should be determined and maintained by the university community.
3. Those providing financial support to the university should not infringe upon academic freedom.
4. Requiring loyalty oaths is opposed.

Editorial Section:

• The editorial argues against banning Communists from teaching based on their beliefs.
• It suggests that banning Communists would infringe on the freedom of inquiry essential to teachers.
• The editorial warns against the danger of using Communist affiliation as a pretext for dismissing teachers.
• It criticizes loyalty oaths as destructive to academic freedom and an ethical breach of a professor's constitutional rights.
• The editorial concludes that isolating the academic community in the fight against subversion is counterproductive and that teachers should have the same freedoms as other citizens.

Overall, the bulletin emphasizes the importance of academic freedom and argues against political interference in academic hiring and tenure decisions.

The image shows a page from "The Graduate Student's Bulletin," published by Harvard and Radcliffe on Friday, November 3, 1950. It is Volume II, Number 3.

The page is divided into two sections: "Academic Freedom" and an "Editorial."

Academic Freedom:

• The section discusses a declaration on academic freedom passed by the National Student Association (NSA) in August.
• Frank Parker, head of the NSA Committee, started a discussion at a Council meeting regarding the affirmation of this declaration.
• Norton Hintz proposed sending a letter to the University of California Regents condemning their dismissal of faculty members who refused to sign a loyalty oath.
• The Council voted to delay the motion for a month to gather majority opinion.
• The text of the NSA declaration is provided, stating:
  1. Hiring, firing, and tenure should be based on professional competence, not political, religious, or social criteria.
  2. Standards for professional competence should be set by the academic community.
  3. Loyalty oaths should not be required for academic freedom.

Editorial:

• The editorial addresses the argument against allowing Communists to teach, based on two main points: their religious beliefs prevent inquiry and they are committed to the overthrow of the government.
• It argues that while these reasons are impressive, they are not strong enough to justify legislation that would reduce academic freedom.
• The editorial warns against using loyalty oaths and other methods to combat Communism, as these can be used to suppress academic freedom and constitutional rights.
• It emphasizes that academic freedom is crucial and that the Congress should not isolate the academic community in the fight against subversion, but rather ensure that teachers have the same freedoms as other citizens.

The image is a page from "The Graduate Student's Bulletin," Volume II, Number 3, published by Harvard and Radcliffe on Friday, November 3, 1950. The page contains two main sections: an article on academic freedom and an editorial.

Academic Freedom Article:

• Title: "Should the Graduate Student Council affirm the declaration on academic freedom which the National Student Association passed last August?"
• Content:
  • The article discusses the Graduate Student Council's deliberation on affirming the National Student Association's declaration on academic freedom.
  • Frank Parker, head of the NSA Committee, initiated a discussion at a Council meeting.
  • Norton Hintz proposed to apply the declaration to the situation at the University of California and suggested sending a letter to the U.C. Regents condemning the dismissal of faculty members who refused to sign a loyalty oath.
  • The Council voted to delay voting on the motion and related proposals for a month to gather more opinions.
  • The text of the NSA declaration is provided, emphasizing that hiring, firing, and tenure should be based on professional competence, not political, religious, or social criteria. It also states that standards for judging professional competence should be determined and maintained by the university community, and that financial supporters should not have the power to infringe on academic freedom. It condemns requiring loyalty oaths as a condition for employment.

Editorial:

• Content:
  • The editorial argues against excluding Communists from teaching positions based on their political beliefs.
  • It acknowledges that Communists may have beliefs that prevent free inquiry and are committed to overthrowing the government, but it argues that these reasons are not strong enough to justify legislation that would reduce academic freedom.
  • The editorial argues that dismissing teachers solely because of their political convictions is unethical and would set a dangerous precedent, equating it with the methods of dictatorship.
  • It also mentions that loyalty oaths do not guarantee loyalty to one's country and are destructive to academic freedom.
  • The editorial further states that the Congress should not isolate the academic community from the broader fight against subversion and believes that teachers should have the same freedoms as other citizens.

The overall theme of the bulletin page is the defense of academic freedom and the debate surrounding the exclusion of Communists from teaching positions.

The image is of a page from the "Graduate Student’s Bulletin," specifically Volume II, Number 3, published on Friday, November 3, 1950. The publication is associated with Harvard and Radcliffe.

The page contains two main sections:

1. Academic Freedom:

   • The lead article discusses the question of whether the Graduate Student Council should affirm a declaration on academic freedom, which was passed by the National Student Association (NSA) in August. Frank Parker, head of the NSA Committee of the Council, initiated a debate.

   • Norton Hintz proposed applying the declaration to the situation at the University of California and suggested sending a letter to the U. of California Regents condemning the dismissal of faculty members who refused to sign a loyalty oath. The Council voted to delay the motion and related proposals for a month to determine majority opinion.

   • The text of the NSA declaration is provided:

     1. Hiring, firing, and tenure decisions should be based on professional competence, not political, religious, or social criteria.
     2. Standards for judging professional competence should be determined and maintained by the university community.
     3. Requiring loyalty oaths is not necessary for academic freedom.

   • The article encourages readers to express their views to the NSA committee at 18 Appian Way.

2. Editorial:

   • The editorial argues against the notion that Communists should not be allowed to teach based on their political beliefs. It highlights two primary reasons:
     1. Communists believe in a system of thought that prevents inquiry, which is essential to academic freedom.
     2. They are committed to overthrowing the government, making them potentially dangerous to have in positions of teaching.
   • The editorial points out that these arguments are not strong enough to justify legislation that would reduce academic freedom. It warns against the danger of dismissing Communists for their political convictions rather than their actual actions.
   • The editorial also asserts that requiring loyalty oaths is an ethical breach of a professor’s constitutional rights and that the Congress should not isolate the academic community in the fight against subversion. It emphasizes that faculty should have the same freedom accorded to other citizens.

Overall, the bulletin discusses the implications and importance of academic freedom and the potential risks of political influence on university settings.

The image displays a newspaper called "The Graduate Student's Bulletin" from Harvard and Radcliffe, dated Friday, November 3, 1950, Volume II, Number 3. The main headline focuses on the topic of academic freedom, discussing whether the Graduate Student Council should affirm a declaration on academic freedom passed by the National Student Association (NSA) the previous August. The article mentions a debate initiated by Frank Parker, head of the NSA Committee, during the Council meeting, with Norton Hintz proposing to apply the declaration to the University of California, which was experiencing controversy over faculty loyalty oaths. The Council delayed voting for a month to gauge student opinion. The NSA's declaration emphasizes hiring based on professional competence, not political, religious, or social criteria, and the autonomy of universities to set standards without external interference. Another section argues against barring Communists from teaching, stating that such actions could reduce academic freedom and that dismissal should be based on teaching ability, not personal convictions. It also argues that loyalty oaths do not ensure loyalty and are a breach of constitutional rights, with Congress opposing special treatment for academics in anti-subversion fights.

The image displays a page from "The Graduate Student's Bulletin" of Harvard and Radcliffe, dated Friday, November 3, 1950. The main article is titled "Academic Freedom" and discusses a declaration on academic freedom passed by the National Student Association (NSA) in August 1950.

Key points from the article:

1. Frank Parker's Initiative:

   • Frank Parker, a member of the Graduate Student Council, initiated a discussion on the NSA’s declaration on academic freedom.
   • Norton Hintz proposed applying the declaration to the University of California, leading to a letter being sent to the University of California (U. of C.) graduate students.

2. Council Decision:

   • The Council initially voted to delay a vote on the motion.
   • The article asks readers their opinions on the matter and where they stand regarding the Council's course of action.

3. NSA Declaration Content:

   • Hiring and Firing: Academic personnel decisions should be based on professional competence, not political, religious, or social criteria.
   • Professional Standards: Professional competence should be judged by the university community.
   • Loyalty Oaths: The declaration opposes requiring loyalty oaths.

4. Editorial on Communist Teachers:

   • The editorial discusses arguments against allowing Communists to teach, including:
     • Communists' belief in a restrictive ideology.
     • Their perceived allegiance to a foreign government.
   • However, the editorial argues that these reasons are not sufficient to deny academic freedom:
     • Legislating against these beliefs could reduce academic freedom.
     • Political views should not be grounds for dismissal.
     • Combatting ignorance and disloyalty through education and addressing subversion in the country is more effective.
   • The editorial asserts that loyalty should be to ethical and constitutional principles, not just national allegiance.
   • It argues that academic freedom should be protected, and teachers should have the same freedom of belief as other citizens.

The page provides insight into the debates on academic freedom and the employment of individuals with controversial political beliefs during that period.

The image shows a scanned document, which is a newsletter or bulletin titled "THE GRADUATE STUDENT'S BULLETIN" from Harvard & Radcliffe. It's dated Friday, November 3, 1950, and is marked as Vol. II, No. 3. The document contains two sections with headers: "ACADEMIC FREEDOM" and "EDITORIAL."

In the "ACADEMIC FREEDOM" section, the text discusses whether the Graduate Student Council should affirm a declaration on academic freedom which the National Student Association's president, Frank Porter, supported. It mentions the University of California and the University of Chicago's stance on the issue of academic freedom, specifically relating to requiring faculty members to sign a loyalty oath.

The "EDITORIAL" section addresses the concerns regarding Communism and teaching, suggesting that Communism alone shouldn't disqualify individuals from teaching positions. It argues against loyalty oaths as a condition for employment and maintains that subversion should not be an exception to academic freedom, asserting that teachers should have the same freedoms as other citizens.

The text of the document is presented in a columnar format typical of newsletters and bulletins of that era, and it is printed in a monospaced typeface that resembles typewriter output or standard print from that period. Overall, the image gives an impression of an academic discussion about freedom and loyalty during the early stages of the Cold War in the United States.

This image shows a vintage newsletter titled "THE GRADUATE STUDENT'S BULLETIN" from Harvard and Radcliffe, dated Friday, November 3, 1950, Volume II, Number 3. The main focus is on two sections titled "ACADEMIC FREEDOM" and "EDITORIAL."

The "ACADEMIC FREEDOM" section discusses whether the Graduate Student Council should affirm a declaration on academic freedom passed by the National Student Association. It mentions Frank Parker, head of the NSA Committee of the Council, who started discussion on affirming the declaration, and Norton Hintz, who proposed to apply the declaration to a specific situation at the University of California and to send a letter about the dismissal of faculty members who refused to sign a loyalty oath. The Council decided to delay the vote to determine majority opinion. The NSA declaration text is included, emphasizing hiring and firing based on professional competence, standards to be maintained by the university community, and rejecting loyalty oaths as a prerequisite for employment.

The "EDITORIAL" section addresses arguments about whether Communists should be allowed to teach, presenting reasons against their exclusion while cautioning against reducing academic freedom or using methods of dictatorship in the U.S. It discusses the importance of intellectual freedom and opposition to loyalty oaths, highlighting ethical and constitutional concerns about academic employment and freedom.

The newsletter is in typewritten font on plain paper.

The image is a page from a student publication titled "The Graduate Student's Bulletin" from Harvard and Radcliffe, dated November 3, 1960. The page features an editorial discussing academic freedom, specifically focusing on the implications of requiring loyalty oaths from faculty members. The editorial argues against the affirmation of a declaration on academic freedom by the National Student Association (NSA), suggesting that such oaths could infringe upon academic freedom and are not justified. It emphasizes the importance of academic freedom for faculty members, likening it to the constitutional rights of other citizens. The page also includes a call to action for readers to express their opinions on the matter.

The image depicts the cover of a publication titled "The Graduate Student's Bulletin", specifically Volume II, Number 3, dated Friday, November 3, 1950. The publication is associated with Harvard & Radcliffe, indicating its academic and institutional context.

The content of the bulletin focuses on the topic of Academic Freedom, as indicated by the bold heading at the top. The article discusses a debate surrounding the National Student Association (NSA) declaration on academic freedom, which was passed in August 1950. It highlights a controversy involving Frank Parker, the head of the NSA Committee, who proposed applying the NSA declaration to the situation at the University of California, where graduate students condemned faculty members who refused to sign a loyalty oath. The Harvard-Radcliffe Graduate Council considered a motion to affirm the declaration but ultimately voted to delay a vote on the matter to gauge majority opinion.

The bulletin also includes an Editorial section, which critiques the argument that Communists should be barred from teaching. The editorial argues against using political beliefs as a basis for dismissing faculty members, emphasizing that academic freedom must be protected and that loyalty oaths are an infringement on constitutional rights. The text underscores the importance of maintaining academic freedom and rejecting attempts to restrict it based on political affiliations.

Overall, the image portrays a historical moment in academic discourse, reflecting tensions between academic freedom, political ideologies, and institutional policies during the early Cold War era.