Archives Scrapbooks

This image displays a vintage newspaper clipping from the St. Louis Globe-Democrat, dated May 7, 1950. The article, titled “Are there two MONA LISAS?”, written by Emily Genauer (author of “Best of Art”), explores a sensational art mystery: the possibility that two authentic versions of Leonardo da Vinci’s Mona Lisa exist.

Key Features of the Article:

• Headline & Sub-headline: The headline poses the central question, while the sub-headline teases the mystery: “The world’s most famous painting has a twin — or at least a cousin. Art experts cannot decide which.”

• Two Images of the Mona Lisa: The article features side-by-side illustrations of two slightly different versions of the Mona Lisa:

  • The one on the left is credited to Wernher Wolff.
  • The one on the right is credited to Camera Club (likely referring to a photographic source).
    Both images show the iconic subject, but the version on the right has a bluer, more vibrant color palette and slightly different background details, hinting at stylistic or compositional variations.

• Caption Above Images: “WHICH IS WHICH? One of the paintings above hangs in the Louvre. The other has been in the United States for 153 years. For their identity, read below.”

• Article Content Summary:

  • The article recounts a claim that another Mona Lisa — not the one in the Louvre — was authenticated as genuine by Thomas MacGoughy Judson, a member of the American Academy in Rome and former Vatican curator.
  • The “second” Mona Lisa is said to have been in the United States for 153 years, tracing its lineage to William Henry Vernon of Newport, R.I., who acquired it in 1788 from an ancestor. Vernon’s great-grandnephew, Dr. Ambrose W. Vernon, was said to be the current owner.
  • The article mentions the painting’s mysterious history, including a link to Benjamin Franklin and a rumored escape from the French Reign of Terror.
  • Despite authentication via X-ray, infra-red, and other scientific tests, the article admits “the mystery remains unsolved,” and the Louvre's Mona Lisa continues to smile “enigmatically as ever.”
  • A small cartoon illustration in the left margin depicts an artist painting a portrait — perhaps symbolizing the act of creation or forgery.

• Visual Details:

  • The aged yellow paper, typewritten text, and serif fonts reflect mid-20th-century newspaper design.
  • A small handwritten "128F" is visible in red ink near the top, likely an archival or cataloging mark.
  • The paper is folded vertically down the center, suggesting it was preserved from a broadsheet.

Historical Context & Significance:

This clipping captures a moment of public fascination with art attribution and the enduring mythos of Leonardo’s masterpiece. The theory of a “second Mona Lisa” has long resurfaced — most notably in the 20th century through the “Isleworth Mona Lisa” and later the “Prado Mona Lisa.” While most experts today recognize only one authentic Mona Lisa by Leonardo (the Louvre version), this article reflects the cultural appetite for art mysteries and the romantic idea that legendary masterpieces might have “hidden twins.”

The article is both journalistic curiosity and historical artifact — a snapshot of 1950s art world intrigue.

In summary: This is a May 7, 1950, newspaper article questioning whether Leonardo da Vinci painted more than one Mona Lisa, featuring images of two versions and recounting the controversial claim of a second authentic painting existing in America. It’s an intriguing glimpse into mid-century art controversies and public fascination with one of history’s most iconic artworks.

This image appears to be a newspaper article from the St. Louis, MO Globe-Democrat dated May 7, 1950. The article discusses the debate over the authenticity of a painting that claims to be a Mona Lisa, suggesting there might be two versions of the famous portrait by Leonardo da Vinci. The article includes two images of the Mona Lisa, one on the left and one on the right, each attributed to a different source: "WERNER WOLFF" and "CAMERA CLIX" respectively. The headline poses the question, "Are there two MONA LISAS?" and credits the article to Emily Genauer, author of "Best of Art." The article delves into the history of the painting, including its ownership and authentication, as well as the skepticism surrounding the new painting's claim. It references experts and historical accounts of the Louvre's Mona Lisa and a private collection. The article also mentions the involvement of Dr. Ambrose W. Vernon and his family in the ownership of the painting. The article concludes that the mystery of the dual existence of the Mona Lisa remains unsolved.

This is an old article from the St. Louis, Missouri Globe Democrat dated May 7, 1950. The headline reads "Are there two MONA LISAS?" and the author is listed as Emily Genauer, who wrote the book "Best of Art." The article discusses the possibility of there being a second Mona Lisa painting in addition to the famous one in the Louvre Museum.

The article mentions that another Mona Lisa painting was recently discovered in New York City, accompanied by documentation and authentication. It also mentions a skeptical official from the Louvre who commented on the possibility of another genuine Mona Lisa.

The article goes on to discuss the history of the Louvre Mona Lisa, including its authentication by Professor Edward W. Forbes in 1933. It also mentions the painting's connection to Marie Antoinette and the mystery surrounding its ownership.

The article concludes by stating that the mystery remains unsolved, and while the Louvre's Mona Lisa smiles as enigmatically as ever, the doors of a New York bank vault have temporarily closed on the smile of the Vernon lady.

The image is a page from an old newspaper, dated May 7, 1950, from St. Louis, Missouri. The headline reads, "Are there two MONA LISAS?" by Emily Genauer, author of "Best of Art." The article discusses the possibility of there being two versions of Leonardo da Vinci's famous painting, the Mona Lisa.

The page features two images of the Mona Lisa, one on the left and one on the right, both showing a woman with a serene expression, long hair, and hands folded in front of her. The images are nearly identical, with subtle differences that are the subject of the article.

The text provides a detailed account of the history and controversy surrounding the Mona Lisa. It mentions Professor Edward W. Forbes, who suggested the possibility of a second Mona Lisa. The article also recounts the story of William Henry Vernon, who claimed to have inherited a Mona Lisa painting from his ancestor, Benjamin Franklin. Vernon believed that his painting was the original, while the one in the Louvre Museum in Paris was a copy.

The article further explores the debate among art experts and critics about the authenticity of the two paintings. It highlights the skepticism of some experts, who believe that the Mona Lisa in the Louvre is the only authentic version. The article also mentions the use of X-ray and other laboratory tests to authenticate the paintings.

The page includes a small illustration of a painter at work, possibly representing Leonardo da Vinci, and a brief note at the bottom indicating the page number and section of the newspaper. The overall tone of the article is investigative and informative, aiming to shed light on the mystery of the two Mona Lisas.

A newspaper clipping shows two images of the Mona Lisa, one from the Louvre and the other in the United States for 153 years. The headline reads "Are there two Mona Lisas?" The article discusses the mystery of whether the painting in the Louvre is the original or if there is another genuine version. It mentions that the painting in the Louvre is generally regarded as the world's most famous painting, while the one in the United States has been met with skepticism. The article also mentions that the painting in the Louvre is believed to have been painted by Leonardo da Vinci, while the one in the United States has not been authenticated.

Description of the Image

The image shows a newspaper clipping from the St. Louis, Mo., Globe-Democrat, dated May 7, 1950. It features a two-page spread discussing the famous Mona Lisa painting, with a focus on the question of whether there are two versions of the iconic artwork. The headline prominently asks, "Are there two MONA LISAs?" and is attributed to Emily Genauer, described as the author of "Best of Art."

Visual Elements:

1. Headlines and Title:

   • The main headline, "Are there two MONA LISAs?", is large and bold, drawing immediate attention.
   • A subheading states, "BY EMILY GENAUER", identifying the author.
   • The article is titled "The world's most famous painting has a twin—or at least a cousin."

2. Images:

   • Two nearly identical portraits of the Mona Lisa are displayed side by side.
     • The left image is labeled "WENNER WOLFF" and is identified as the version hanging in the Louvre Museum in Paris.
     • The right image is labeled "CARERA CLARK" and is noted as having been in the United States for 153 years.
   • Both portraits depict the same woman with the characteristic enigmatic smile, wearing a dark, flowing garment.

3. Text Content:

   • The article discusses the historical and art-historical debate surrounding the authenticity of the two versions of the Mona Lisa.
   • It references statements made by Professor Edward W. Forbes, then director of Harvard University’s Fogg Museum, who in 1923 declared it "impossible" that Leonardo himself painted more than one version of the Mona Lisa.
   • The article also mentions Dr. Ambrose W. Vernon, a New York City congregational minister and professor of theology, who claimed ownership of one of the versions, believed to be painted by Leonardo da Vinci.
   • The text highlights the mystery surrounding the origins of the two versions, noting that one version (the Louvre’s) is widely accepted as the authentic work, while the other has been in private ownership for centuries.

4. Additional Details:

   • The article includes a small illustration at the bottom left, depicting a cartoonish figure holding a magnifying glass, possibly symbolizing the scrutiny and investigation into the authenticity of the paintings.
   • The article references laboratory tests, including X-ray and infrared analysis, conducted by the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in Rome, which were unable to definitively resolve the mystery.
   • The article concludes by stating that the mystery remains unsolved, with the Louvre’s version being the most famous and the other version temporarily stored in a New York bank vault.

Contextual Notes:

• The article reflects the mid-20th-century fascination with art authentication and the enduring mystery surrounding one of the world’s most celebrated artworks.
• It highlights the challenges faced by art historians and experts in distinguishing between authentic works and forgeries or copies, particularly in the absence of definitive scientific evidence.

This clipping provides a historical snapshot of the ongoing debate about the Mona Lisa, illustrating how even in 1950, the question of whether there were two versions of the painting remained a topic of intrigue and controversy.

The image is a newspaper clipping from the St. Louis, Mo. Globe-Democrat, dated May 7, 1950, featuring an article about the Mona Lisa.

• Title: "Are there two MONA LISAS?"
  • The title is prominently displayed in large black font at the top of the page.
• Author: Emily Genauer
  • The author's name is listed below the title in smaller black font.
• Article Content:
  • The article discusses the possibility of there being two versions of the Mona Lisa painting.
  • It mentions that one version hangs in the Louvre, while the other has been in the United States for 153 years.
  • The article also mentions that art experts cannot decide which version is the original.
• Image of the Mona Lisa:
  • There are two images of the Mona Lisa side by side on the page.
  • The image on the left shows the Mona Lisa with a more serious expression, while the image on the right shows her with a slight smile.
  • The images are labeled "WINSTON WOLFF" and "GARDNER CLARK," respectively.
• Background:
  • The background of the image is a light gray color.
  • There is a small logo in the bottom-left corner of the page that appears to be a cartoon figure holding a paintbrush.

In summary, the image is a newspaper clipping from the St. Louis, Mo. Globe-Democrat, dated May 7, 1950, featuring an article about the possibility of there being two versions of the Mona Lisa painting. The article discusses the differences between the two versions and mentions that art experts cannot decide which one is the original. The image also includes two pictures of the Mona Lisa, one with a serious expression and the other with a slight smile.

The image presents a newspaper clipping from the St. Louis, MO, Globe-Democrat, dated May 7, 1950. The article is titled "Are there two MONA LISAS?" and features two images of the Mona Lisa, one on the left and one on the right. The article discusses the possibility of there being two versions of the famous painting, with the author, Emily Genauer, exploring the history and authenticity of the two paintings.

Key Points:

• The article is from the St. Louis, MO, Globe-Democrat, dated May 7, 1950.
• The title of the article is "Are there two MONA LISAS?"
• The article features two images of the Mona Lisa, one on the left and one on the right.
• The author, Emily Genauer, discusses the possibility of there being two versions of the famous painting.
• The article explores the history and authenticity of the two paintings.

Visual Description:

• The newspaper clipping has a yellowed appearance, indicating its age.
• The title of the article is prominently displayed in large font.
• The two images of the Mona Lisa are placed side by side, allowing for easy comparison.
• The text of the article is written in a clear and readable font.

Conclusion:

The image presents a fascinating article that explores the possibility of there being two versions of the famous Mona Lisa painting. The article provides a detailed analysis of the history and authenticity of the two paintings, making it an interesting read for art enthusiasts and historians alike.

The image is a vintage newspaper clipping featuring an article titled "Are there two MONA LISAS?" by Emily Genauer. The article is accompanied by two side-by-side images of the Mona Lisa, with the left image appearing to be a different version than the right.

Key Features:

• Title and Author: The title "Are there two MONA LISAS?" is prominently displayed in large font, with the author's name, Emily Genauer, written below it.
• Images of the Mona Lisa: Two images of the Mona Lisa are presented side by side, with the left image showing a different version of the painting compared to the right image.
• Article Text: The article discusses the possibility of there being two versions of the Mona Lisa, with the author presenting evidence and expert opinions on the matter.
• Newspaper Clipping: The article is a clipping from a newspaper, with a date stamp indicating that it was published on May 7, 1960.
• Background: The background of the image is a light gray color, which helps to highlight the details of the newspaper clipping.

Overall Impression:

The image presents a fascinating historical artifact that showcases a debate about the authenticity of the Mona Lisa. The article provides insight into the art world and the ongoing discussions surrounding the famous painting. The inclusion of the two images side by side allows the viewer to compare and contrast the different versions of the Mona Lisa, adding to the intrigue and mystery surrounding the artwork.

The image presents a vintage newspaper clipping featuring two side-by-side images of the Mona Lisa, accompanied by an article discussing the authenticity of these paintings.

• The top section of the clipping displays two images of the Mona Lisa:
  • The left image shows the Mona Lisa with a more vibrant color palette and a subtle smile.
  • The right image depicts the Mona Lisa with a more muted color scheme and a slightly wider smile.
• Below the images, a headline reads:
  • "Are there two MONA LISAS?" in large black text.
• The article is written by Emily Genauer and titled:
  • "BY EMILY GENAUER"
  • "Author of 'Best of Art'"
• The article discusses the mystery surrounding the Mona Lisa's famous smile and the possibility of a second, authentic version of the painting:
  • The article mentions that one of the paintings hangs in the Louvre Museum in Paris, while the other has been in the United States for 153 years.
  • It notes that art experts cannot decide which one is the original.
• The article also includes information about the history of the paintings:
  • The painting on the left was created by Leonardo da Vinci in 1503-1506.
  • The painting on the right was owned by William Henry Vernon, who purchased it in 1785.
• The article concludes by stating that the mystery of the Mona Lisa's twin remains unsolved:
  • Despite extensive testing, including X-ray and infrared analysis, the authenticity of the paintings remains uncertain.

In summary, the image presents a thought-provoking article that challenges the reader to consider the possibility of two authentic Mona Lisa paintings. The inclusion of the two images allows the reader to compare and contrast the two works of art, adding to the intrigue and mystery surrounding this famous painting.