Archives Scrapbooks

The image shows two pages from a magazine or publication, dated June '48. The left page has a continuous text discussing the themes of art, education, and culture, particularly focusing on the degradation of art in America and the influence of museums and universities on its landscape. The right page includes the continuation of a rebuttal, with the title "IN REBUTTAL cont’d" indicating that this is part of a longer discussion. The text on this page is written by P.T. Rathbone, identified as the Director of the City Art Museum of St. Louis, and it criticizes the perspective or actions of someone named Mr. Craven. There is also a black-and-white illustration of a smiling man in the bottom right corner of the right page. The pages are numbered 70 and 71.

The image shows two pages from a magazine or book, likely from the mid-20th century, discussing the degradation of art in America. The text on the left page (page 70) and the right page (page 71) is part of an article titled "Is American Art Degraded?" The article critiques the influence of snobbery and intellectualization on art and discusses the role of museums, universities, and professors in shaping artistic tastes and practices.

The right page features a section titled "IN REBUTTAL cont'd," which appears to be a response to the main article. It includes a photograph of a man, identified as P. T. Rathbone, the Director of the City Art Museum of St. Louis. The text criticizes Mr. Craven for not delivering a constructive criticism of American museums and for engaging in name-calling.

The overall tone of the articles is critical, discussing the negative impact of certain educational and cultural practices on the development of American art. The articles also mention specific figures such as Grant Wood and discuss the role of universities like the University of Iowa and Smith College in art education.

This image displays two facing pages (pages 70 and 71) of a printed magazine article from June 1948, titled “Is American Art Degraded?”, which appears to be part of a larger publication, possibly a cultural or art journal.

The article is a critical essay on the state of American art education and institutional practices in the mid-20th century. The author, P. T. Rathbone, Director of the City Art Museum of St. Louis, is featured in a small inset portrait on page 71.

The article’s tone is sharply critical and polemical. Key themes include:

• The “degradation of art in America,” blamed on the “topsoil of snobbery” that permeates museums and universities.
• The influence of wealthy patrons and museum directors who treat art as a status symbol rather than a cultural necessity.
• The failure of academic art education to teach genuine aesthetics, instead promoting imported European styles (particularly abstract, expressionist, and surrealist works) that are “insanely trivial” and disconnected from American life.
• A specific critique of the University of Iowa, which the author accuses of promoting “exotic haven[s] for esthetes” and showcasing art with “no relation whatever to the Iowa environment.”
• A defense of Grant Wood, whose art the author praises for representing “the conditions of Iowa life and the true culture of his native place,” and for making it “beautiful.”
• An attack on critics and institutions that dismiss regional American art as “provincial,” arguing instead that such art embodies authentic national identity.
• A rebuttal directed at someone named Mr. Craven, who is accused of being an “offensive inclination to suppress anything American” in favor of European imports, and of using “childish name-calling” and “cheap applause” to promote his views.

The writing style is confrontational, using strong language like “toxic propaganda,” “counterfeit,” and “mischief.” The argument hinges on a nationalist defense of American regional art against perceived elitist, internationalist cultural trends.

Visually, the pages are presented against a neutral gray background, as if laid flat for documentation. The typesetting is typical of mid-century magazines, with justified columns, serif typeface, and a clear headline “IN REBUTTAL cont’d” on page 71 indicating this is a continuation of a prior argument.

The article concludes mid-sentence on page 71 with a note: “(Continued on Page 77),” suggesting this is part of a larger, multi-page feature.

In summary, the image captures a moment of cultural debate in postwar America, reflecting tensions between international modernism, regionalism, academic elitism, and democratic cultural values — all framed within a passionate defense of American artistic identity rooted in local experience.

The image appears to be a double-page spread from a magazine or journal article. The text is divided into two columns, with the left column discussing the decline of American art and the right column providing a rebuttal to the claims made in the left column.

The left column argues that American art has become degraded due to factors such as the influence of European art, the lack of a native American art tradition, and the commercialization of art. It suggests that American artists have become imitators and imitators of European styles, and that the art establishment has become snobbish and elitist.

The right column, titled "In Rebuttal," provides a counterargument to the claims made in the left column. It argues that American art is not as degraded as claimed and that there are many examples of original and innovative American art. It also criticizes the left column's focus on the decline of American art as a distraction from the real issues facing the art world, such as the commercialization of art and the lack of support for artists.

The image also includes a photograph of a man, possibly the author of the right column, with a caption that reads "By P. T. Rathbone, Director, City Art Museum of St. Louis." This suggests that the article may have been published in a magazine or journal associated with the City Art Museum of St. Louis.

Overall, the image appears to be a debate or discussion about the state of American art, with two sides presenting their arguments and counterarguments.

The image is a photograph of two pages from a magazine or journal. The pages are placed side by side and appear to be from the same issue.

The left page is numbered "70" at the bottom left corner, and the right page is numbered "71" at the bottom right corner. The pages contain text in two columns, with a header at the top of each page.

The header on the left page reads "IS AMERICAN ART DEGRADED?" and the header on the right page reads "IN REBUTTAL."

The text on both pages is written in a serif font and is divided into paragraphs. The text on the left page discusses the degradation of art in America, while the text on the right page appears to be a rebuttal or response to the claims made on the left page.

There is a small photograph of a man in the bottom right corner of the right page, but it is not clear who the man is or what his connection to the article is.

Overall, the image appears to be a photograph of two pages from a magazine or journal that discuss the state of art in America and the debate surrounding it.

The image depicts two adjacent pages from a printed publication, likely a magazine or journal, featuring an article titled "Is American Art Degraded?" The layout includes text in a serif font, typical of formal or academic writing, and is organized into two columns per page.

Left Page (Page 70):

• Content: The left page contains the beginning of the article, discussing the state of American art and its perceived decline. The text critiques the academic approach to aesthetics, arguing that the discipline has become irrelevant due to its disconnect from the realities of art as a living business. It highlights the influence of foreign art on American artists and the challenges faced by those who attempt to create art rooted in their own cultural heritage.
• Key Points:
  • The author laments the degradation of art in America, attributing it to the influence of snobbery and the spread of art propaganda through schools and universities.
  • The text emphasizes the importance of art being tied to the artist's native culture and heritage, rather than imitating foreign styles.
  • The author references Grant Wood, a prominent American artist, as an example of a native artist whose work was misunderstood or dismissed by academic institutions.

Right Page (Page 71):

• Content: The right page continues the article, further elaborating on the critique of American art institutions and the role of museums. It also includes a rebuttal section titled "IN REBUTTAL," which is a response to criticisms or opposing viewpoints.
• Key Points:
  • The article continues to discuss the challenges faced by American artists, particularly those who attempt to express their native culture through art.
  • The author critiques the Iowa School of Art, suggesting that its exhibitions are filled with abstract, extreme, and surrealist works that lack connection to the local culture.
  • The article references Mr. Craven, a critic who is portrayed as having a controversial stance on American art. The author defends Craven against accusations of promoting a "primitive tribe" view of American art, arguing that his perspective is valid and that American art should not be limited to European influences.
  • The article concludes with a question: "Is American Art Degraded?" and is signed by P. T. Rathbone, Director of the City Art Museum of St. Louis.

Visual Elements:

• Text Layout: The text is neatly formatted into two columns, with justified alignment and consistent spacing. The font is serif, giving the publication a formal and academic tone.
• Illustration: On the right page, there is a small black-and-white photograph of a man, presumably Mr. Craven, who is being discussed in the rebuttal section. The photograph is placed within the text, likely to illustrate the discussion about his views.
• Pagination: The left page is labeled as Page 70, and the right page is labeled as Page 71, indicating that these are consecutive pages from the same issue.

Overall Impression:

The image portrays a thoughtful and critical examination of the state of American art, focusing on the tension between academic institutions and artists who strive to express their native culture. The inclusion of a rebuttal section suggests that the article is part of a larger debate or discussion on the topic, with the author defending a particular viewpoint against criticism. The formal layout and tone indicate that this is a scholarly or intellectual publication, likely aimed at an audience interested in art, culture, and aesthetics.

The image presents a scanned page from a magazine, featuring two columns of text on the left and a single column on the right. The left page contains a lengthy article discussing the degradation of art in America, while the right page includes a rebuttal to an article about Grant Wood, an American artist.

Left Page:

• The article begins with a statement about the sad chronicle of the degradation of art in America.
• It highlights the importance of esthetics and the need for it to be recognized as a science.
• The article discusses the impact of the mental discipline exacted by students in law or medicine or physics courses on esthetics.
• It also touches on the development of esthetics as a special discipline in taste and the closed minds of students to the reality of art.
• The article concludes by stating that the first step in the making of art was to repudiate their cultural background and that they also surrendered the chance of making any art at all.

Right Page:

• The article is titled "Is American Art Degraded?" and features a portrait of Grant Wood.
• The article discusses the controversy surrounding Grant Wood's work and the criticism he received from American museums.
• It also mentions the praise he received from European artists and the irony of his work being considered "provincial" in America.
• The article concludes by stating that the museum men of this country are responsible for the degradation of our art.

Summary:

The image presents a scanned page from a magazine, featuring two columns of text on the left and a single column on the right. The left page contains a lengthy article discussing the degradation of art in America, while the right page includes a rebuttal to an article about Grant Wood, an American artist. The articles highlight the importance of esthetics and the need for it to be recognized as a science, as well as the controversy surrounding Grant Wood's work and the criticism he received from American museums.

The image depicts two pages from a magazine, featuring an article about art and its relationship to American culture. The left page contains the beginning of the article, while the right page includes the continuation of the article, accompanied by a small portrait of the author, P.T. Rathbone, and a section titled "In Rebuttal." The article discusses the degradation of art in America, citing the influence of wealthy patrons and the spread of propaganda through schools and universities. It also touches on the topic of American art being degraded.

The background of the image is a plain gray color, which helps to focus attention on the text and the portrait of the author. Overall, the image presents a thought-provoking discussion on the state of art in America, highlighting the challenges faced by artists and the need for a more nuanced understanding of artistic expression.

The image presents an open book with two pages facing outward, set against a gray background. The left page is numbered 70 and features a continuation of an article from the previous page, while the right page is numbered 71 and contains the remainder of the article, along with the beginning of another article titled "In Rebuttal."

Left Page (Page 70):

• The text on this page continues from the previous page.
• It discusses the degradation of art in America, citing the influence of snobbery and the emphasis on academic science over aesthetics.
• The author argues that this has led to a lack of original expression in American art.

Right Page (Page 71):

• The main article concludes on this page, posing the question "Is American Art Degraded?"
• A new article, "In Rebuttal," begins on this page, written by P.T. Rathbone, Director of the City Art Museum of St. Louis.
• The article responds to Mr. Craven's views on American art, criticizing his approach as lacking constructive criticism and instead relying on cheap applause.
• Rathbone questions Craven's statement about the "provincial tribe" described by the Fogg, suggesting that it may be a misrepresentation of the facts.
• The article concludes by noting that Craven's charge that museum men are responsible for the degradation of American art is unfounded.

Overall, the image provides a glimpse into a critical discussion about the state of American art during a particular period, highlighting the tensions between different perspectives on the subject.

The image presents a scanned or photographed page from an old magazine or journal, featuring two columns of text on each side. The left page is numbered 70 and dated June 1948, while the right page is numbered 71.

Left Page:

• The text discusses the degradation of art in America.
• It highlights the influence of academic disciplines on art, comparing it to mental disciplines expected of students in law or medicine.
• The author argues that the development of esthetics as a special discipline has led to a mischievous ignorance of the nature and function of art in society.

Right Page:

• The section titled "IN REBUTTAL" features a response to an article by Mr. Craven.
• The author, P.T. Rathbone, Director of the City Art Museum of St. Louis, defends American art and artists.
• He criticizes Mr. Craven's views on the quality of American art and his method of promoting it.

Visual Elements:

• A black-and-white portrait of P.T. Rathbone is situated at the bottom right corner of the right page.
• The background of the image is a plain gray color.

Overall, the image appears to be a scanned or photographed page from an old magazine or journal, featuring a discussion on the state of art in America and a rebuttal to an article by Mr. Craven.