Archives Scrapbooks

The image shows two pages from a magazine or publication, dated June '48. The left page has a continuous text discussing the themes of art, education, and culture, particularly focusing on the degradation of art in America and the influence of museums and universities on its landscape. The right page includes the continuation of a rebuttal, with the title "IN REBUTTAL cont’d" indicating that this is part of a longer discussion. The text on this page is written by P.T. Rathbone, identified as the Director of the City Art Museum of St. Louis, and it criticizes the perspective or actions of someone named Mr. Craven. There is also a black-and-white illustration of a smiling man in the bottom right corner of the right page. The pages are numbered 70 and 71.

The image shows two pages from a magazine or book, likely from the mid-20th century, discussing the degradation of art in America. The text on the left page (page 70) and the right page (page 71) is part of an article titled "Is American Art Degraded?" The article critiques the influence of snobbery and intellectualization on art and discusses the role of museums, universities, and professors in shaping artistic tastes and practices.

The right page features a section titled "IN REBUTTAL cont'd," which appears to be a response to the main article. It includes a photograph of a man, identified as P. T. Rathbone, the Director of the City Art Museum of St. Louis. The text criticizes Mr. Craven for not delivering a constructive criticism of American museums and for engaging in name-calling.

The overall tone of the articles is critical, discussing the negative impact of certain educational and cultural practices on the development of American art. The articles also mention specific figures such as Grant Wood and discuss the role of universities like the University of Iowa and Smith College in art education.

This image displays two facing pages (pages 70 and 71) of a printed magazine article from June 1948, titled “Is American Art Degraded?”, which appears to be part of a larger publication, possibly a cultural or art journal.

The article is a critical essay on the state of American art education and institutional practices in the mid-20th century. The author, P. T. Rathbone, Director of the City Art Museum of St. Louis, is featured in a small inset portrait on page 71.

The article’s tone is sharply critical and polemical. Key themes include:

• The “degradation of art in America,” blamed on the “topsoil of snobbery” that permeates museums and universities.
• The influence of wealthy patrons and museum directors who treat art as a status symbol rather than a cultural necessity.
• The failure of academic art education to teach genuine aesthetics, instead promoting imported European styles (particularly abstract, expressionist, and surrealist works) that are “insanely trivial” and disconnected from American life.
• A specific critique of the University of Iowa, which the author accuses of promoting “exotic haven[s] for esthetes” and showcasing art with “no relation whatever to the Iowa environment.”
• A defense of Grant Wood, whose art the author praises for representing “the conditions of Iowa life and the true culture of his native place,” and for making it “beautiful.”
• An attack on critics and institutions that dismiss regional American art as “provincial,” arguing instead that such art embodies authentic national identity.
• A rebuttal directed at someone named Mr. Craven, who is accused of being an “offensive inclination to suppress anything American” in favor of European imports, and of using “childish name-calling” and “cheap applause” to promote his views.

The writing style is confrontational, using strong language like “toxic propaganda,” “counterfeit,” and “mischief.” The argument hinges on a nationalist defense of American regional art against perceived elitist, internationalist cultural trends.

Visually, the pages are presented against a neutral gray background, as if laid flat for documentation. The typesetting is typical of mid-century magazines, with justified columns, serif typeface, and a clear headline “IN REBUTTAL cont’d” on page 71 indicating this is a continuation of a prior argument.

The article concludes mid-sentence on page 71 with a note: “(Continued on Page 77),” suggesting this is part of a larger, multi-page feature.

In summary, the image captures a moment of cultural debate in postwar America, reflecting tensions between international modernism, regionalism, academic elitism, and democratic cultural values — all framed within a passionate defense of American artistic identity rooted in local experience.

The image appears to be a double-page spread from a magazine or journal article. The text is divided into two columns, with the left column discussing the decline of American art and the right column providing a rebuttal to the claims made in the left column.

The left column argues that American art has become degraded due to factors such as the influence of European art, the lack of a native American art tradition, and the commercialization of art. It suggests that American artists have become imitators and imitators of European styles, and that the art establishment has become snobbish and elitist.

The right column, titled "In Rebuttal," provides a counterargument to the claims made in the left column. It argues that American art is not as degraded as claimed and that there are many examples of original and innovative American art. It also criticizes the left column's focus on the decline of American art as a distraction from the real issues facing the art world, such as the commercialization of art and the lack of support for artists.

The image also includes a photograph of a man, possibly the author of the right column, with a caption that reads "By P. T. Rathbone, Director, City Art Museum of St. Louis." This suggests that the article may have been published in a magazine or journal associated with the City Art Museum of St. Louis.

Overall, the image appears to be a debate or discussion about the state of American art, with two sides presenting their arguments and counterarguments.

The image is a photograph of two pages from a magazine or journal. The pages are placed side by side and appear to be from the same issue.

The left page is numbered "70" at the bottom left corner, and the right page is numbered "71" at the bottom right corner. The pages contain text in two columns, with a header at the top of each page.

The header on the left page reads "IS AMERICAN ART DEGRADED?" and the header on the right page reads "IN REBUTTAL."

The text on both pages is written in a serif font and is divided into paragraphs. The text on the left page discusses the degradation of art in America, while the text on the right page appears to be a rebuttal or response to the claims made on the left page.

There is a small photograph of a man in the bottom right corner of the right page, but it is not clear who the man is or what his connection to the article is.

Overall, the image appears to be a photograph of two pages from a magazine or journal that discuss the state of art in America and the debate surrounding it.

The image depicts two adjacent pages from a printed publication, likely a magazine or journal, featuring an article titled "Is American Art Degraded?" The layout includes text in a serif font, typical of formal or academic writing, and is organized into two columns per page.

Left Page (Page 70):

• Content: The left page contains the beginning of the article, discussing the state of American art and its perceived decline. The text critiques the academic approach to aesthetics, arguing that the discipline has become irrelevant due to its disconnect from the realities of art as a living business. It highlights the influence of foreign art on American artists and the challenges faced by those who attempt to create art rooted in their own cultural heritage.
• Key Points:
  • The author laments the degradation of art in America, attributing it to the influence of snobbery and the spread of art propaganda through schools and universities.
  • The text emphasizes the importance of art being tied to the artist's native culture and heritage, rather than imitating foreign styles.
  • The author references Grant Wood, a prominent American artist, as an example of a native artist whose work was misunderstood or dismissed by academic institutions.

Right Page (Page 71):

• Content: The right page continues the article, further elaborating on the critique of American art institutions and the role of museums. It also includes a rebuttal section titled "IN REBUTTAL," which is a response to criticisms or opposing viewpoints.
• Key Points:
  • The article continues to discuss the challenges faced by American artists, particularly those who attempt to express their native culture through art.
  • The author critiques the Iowa School of Art, suggesting that its exhibitions are filled with abstract, extreme, and surrealist works that lack connection to the local culture.
  • The article references Mr. Craven, a critic who is portrayed as having a controversial stance on American art. The author defends Craven against accusations of promoting a "primitive tribe" view of American art, arguing that his perspective is valid and that American art should not be limited to European influences.
  • The article concludes with a question: "Is American Art Degraded?" and is signed by P. T. Rathbone, Director of the City Art Museum of St. Louis.

Visual Elements:

• Text Layout: The text is neatly formatted into two columns, with justified alignment and consistent spacing. The font is serif, giving the publication a formal and academic tone.
• Illustration: On the right page, there is a small black-and-white photograph of a man, presumably Mr. Craven, who is being discussed in the rebuttal section. The photograph is placed within the text, likely to illustrate the discussion about his views.
• Pagination: The left page is labeled as Page 70, and the right page is labeled as Page 71, indicating that these are consecutive pages from the same issue.

Overall Impression:

The image portrays a thoughtful and critical examination of the state of American art, focusing on the tension between academic institutions and artists who strive to express their native culture. The inclusion of a rebuttal section suggests that the article is part of a larger debate or discussion on the topic, with the author defending a particular viewpoint against criticism. The formal layout and tone indicate that this is a scholarly or intellectual publication, likely aimed at an audience interested in art, culture, and aesthetics.

The image shows two pages from a publication, with printed text in columns discussing topics related to art, museums, exhibitions, and aesthetics. The left page appears to be concluding remarks about the influence of museums on art and the notion that American art is suffering from a sense of degradation, touching on various aspects like the commercialization of art and the education in aesthetics. The right page contains the continuation of an article titled "IN REBUTTAL" by P. T. Rathbone, the director of the City Art Museum of St. Louis. It discusses counter-arguments to a previous article or stance, raising points about the role of museums, critics, and the distinction between fine arts and more provincial art forms. References are made to specific examples and perspectives regarding American art. The continuation note at the bottom suggests that the article carries on to the next page. There's a partial date visible ('48 June), which could indicate the publication date as June 1948.

This is a two-page spread from a printed publication or journal, seemingly discussing art and its relationship with American society and culture.

• Left Page: It critiques the influence of foreign art and aesthetics on American art, noting that it may have led to a loss of originality and a reliance on imported works. It laments the intellectualization and commercialization of art at the expense of native creativity. References to "Grant Wood" highlight the importance of art tied to regional and cultural identity rather than imported styles.

• Right Page: The text continues the critique, emphasizing the disconnect between art promoted by institutions and the practical values or interests of the local people. It admonishes the replacement of meaningful art by abstract, foreign influences. The page challenges notions of elitism, referencing the artist Grant Wood as an example of regional art as an authentic representation of American culture. The section titled "In Rebuttal" addresses a counterpoint to previous claims and critiques the lack of constructive solutions in prior arguments.

The typography is clean, consistent with older publications, and the presence of a blurred image suggests a commentary focusing on an individual or a controversial figure.

A two-page spread from an old magazine or journal laid open on a flat surface. The pages are yellowed with dense, serif-column text.

• Left page (page 70) begins with a long paragraph starting “in itself, the sad chronicle of the degradation of art in America,” and continues across two columns.
• Right page (page 71) has a heading near the top that reads “IN REBUTTAL” and a subheading/byline for “P. T. Rathbone, Director, City Art Museum of St. Louis.” There is a small portrait/photo of a man with his face blurred or obscured by a gray block. The text continues in two columns, with a note at the bottom about continued publication (e.g., “Continued on Page 77”).

Overall, it looks like a mid-20th-century critical article about American art and museums.

The image shows two pages from a printed article or magazine. The text discusses the topic of art in America, focusing on the degradation of art due to snobbery, foreign influences, and the impact of certain educators in universities and museums. It mentions the negative influence of professors who favor foreign imports over native cultural heritage, leading to a decline in art appreciation and creation in America.

The article also criticizes the exhibition practices of some institutions, exemplified by the University of Iowa, accusing them of showcasing art with little relevance to the local culture and reality. It touches on the role of estheticians and the rejection of native tastes and intelligence.

A section titled "IN REBUTTAL" on the right page is authored by P. T. Rathbone, Director of the City Art Museum of St. Louis, responding to the article. Rathbone defends the art community against criticism, praises Mr. Craven's promotion of American art, and disputes accusations of provincialism and lack of knowledge among museum officials. The rebuttal highlights a tension between criticism and defense of American art institutions.

The pages are numbered 70 and 71, and the article appears to be part of a continuing discussion on whether American art is in decline, with the title "Is American Art Degraded?" visible at the bottom of page 71. There is also a small illustration or photo of a person on the right page, but it is partially obscured.