Archives Scrapbooks

The image contains two pages from a printed article titled "Is American Art Degraded?" written by Thomas Craven. The article discusses the state of modern American art, particularly focusing on a controversial exhibition of modern art that was sent abroad by the U.S. State Department.

Page 1:

• The title "Is American Art" is prominently displayed at the top.
• The article begins with a critique of the State Department's administration, specifically an initiative to promote modern American painting abroad.
• Thomas Craven argues that the collection, which cost $89,000, was poorly received and ridiculed in Prague, leading Secretary Marshall to withdraw the exhibition.
• Craven criticizes the selection of artworks, describing them as "neurotic platoons of contemporary painting" and "non-objective smears."
• He suggests that the critics who defended the collection were either ignorant or had financial stakes in the artworks.
• Craven questions whether the artworks reflect American culture and values.

Page 2:

• The title "Degraded?" continues the discussion.
• Craven reflects on the Metropolitan Museum exhibition and the broader question of whether America can produce an art of its own.
• He acknowledges the historical struggles and errors in American art but argues that the current trend of abstract art is not a true reflection of American spirit.
• Craven expresses concern that the focus on abstract art may lead to a loss of traditional artistic values and skills.
• He highlights the irony that while America has produced exceptional artists and has a rich artistic heritage, the current trend seems to disregard this legacy.
• The article concludes with a question about the future of American art and whether it is too young to have a substantial body of work.

Overall, the article is a critical examination of the state of modern American art, questioning its value and authenticity.

The image depicts an open book or magazine. The left page features an article titled "Is American Art Degraded?" by Thomas Craven. The article begins with a drawing of a man and large, bold subheadings that present two opposing views: "Yes! A noted critic attacks extremism" and "No! Six defenders." The text discusses the sale of modern paintings by the War Assets Administration, which were intended to showcase American culture abroad. The author criticizes the quality and representativeness of the selected artworks, questioning whether they reflect true American culture. The article suggests that the selection process was flawed, with the art being described as neurotic, abortive, and lacking in originality.

The right page continues the article, with the title "DEGRADED?" in bold letters. The text elaborates on the author’s critique, expressing concern over the state of modern American art. The author seems to be questioning whether American art has declined, pointing out the influence of various styles and the lack of a distinct, high-quality American art form. The narrative indicates a concern that the country, despite its resources and opportunities, has not produced a notable art movement comparable to those of other nations. The author also reflects on the potential reasons for this perceived failure, hinting at a loss of originality and spirit in contemporary American art. The page ends with a question, suggesting that the current state of American art is one of uncertainty and decline.

The image contains a page from a newspaper article written by Thomas Craven. The article is titled "Is American Art Degraded?" and it addresses the debate surrounding the quality and direction of modern American art.

Left Side:

The left side of the page starts with the headline, "Is American Art Degraded?" followed by a subtitle that reads "Yes! A noted critic attacks extremism • No! Six defenders."

The article begins by discussing the War Assets Administration's efforts to sell a collection of modern paintings. It mentions that these paintings were originally intended to be viewed as representative of American culture but were instead criticized for their abstract and sometimes bizarre nature. Secretary of State Marshall's handling of the collection, which was supposed to be sold to foreign buyers, is highlighted as problematic. The collection's return to the United States and its presentation at the Metropolitan Museum of Art is noted as a source of amusement and disbelief among critics.

Right Side:

The right side of the page includes the same title and starts a continuation of the discussion on the state of modern art.

Craven points out that while styles in painting should be a matter of taste, the current state of modern art is a matter of state due to widespread criticism and the lack of a coherent, original American art tradition. He argues that American art, though historically underappreciated, has produced exceptional artists and a strong national spirit. He mentions that despite the lack of an established art movement, America has been a significant collector of art and has supported artists with pride.

The article emphasizes the need for an authentic and enduring American art form, questioning whether America is too young to have such a tradition fully established.

The image also includes a small biography of Thomas Craven at the bottom left, noting that he has been a critic of art and a chief gadfly at the School of Paris for many years, with notable publications such as "Men of Art," "Modern Art," and "A Treasury of Art Masterpieces."

The image displays a two-page spread from a magazine featuring an article by Thomas Craven. The article is titled "Is American Art Degraded?" and discusses the state of modern American art.

Left Page:

• Headline: "IS AMERICAN ART Degraded?"
• Subheading: "Yes! A noted critic attacks extremism • No! Six defenders"
• Introduction: The article begins by discussing the acquisition and subsequent handling of a collection of modern paintings by the War Assets Administration and the State Department. The collection was intended to showcase American culture abroad but was criticized for its perceived lack of quality and artistic merit.
• Criticism: Craven, a critic of art, mentions that the Secretary of State, George C. Marshall, was aware of the poor quality of the art but still paid for it, leading to a prolonged and laughable situation.
• Background of Craven: He mentions that he has been a critic for many years, with notable books including "Men of Art, Modern Art, and A Treasury of Art Masterpieces."

Right Page:

• Headline: "DEGRADED? of modern art strike back."
• Exhibition Context: The article discusses an exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum before the collection was sent abroad. Craven reflects on the wastefulness and the fundamental question of whether American art can produce anything comparable to the originality and expressive force of European art.
• Critique: Craven argues that the art produced in America is often derivative and lacks the depth and innovation seen in European art. He questions the ability of American art to reflect the national spirit and endure over time.
• Comparative Analysis: He asserts that America has produced artists of exceptional ability and sensibilities but questions the consistency and originality of their work. Craven argues that American art often lacks the depth of appreciation and commitment seen in other nations.
• Concluding Thoughts: Craven suggests that American art may be too young and not yet developed enough to have a substantial body of work that stands on its own, implying a need for more maturity and innovation in American artistic endeavors.

The article overall critiques the state of modern American art, questioning its quality, originality, and cultural significance compared to European art.

The image contains two pages from a magazine or newspaper discussing the state of American art. The articles are titled "Is American Art Degraded?" by Thomas Craven.

Left Page:

• Title: "Is American Art Degraded?"
• Subtitle: "Yes! A noted critic attacks extremism • No! Six defenders"
• Author: Thomas Craven

Summary:

• The War Assets Administration was tasked with selling a collection of modern paintings to promote a view of American culture.
• Secretary of the Interior, Harold Ickes, purchased these paintings with $49,000 from the State Department's funds, despite mixed reactions from critics.
• Thomas Craven criticizes the idea that these paintings reflect American culture, calling them surrealistic and devoid of genuine American spirit.
• He mentions that these paintings were either a revival of cubist patterns or abstract and boneless distortions.
• Craven argues that these artworks do not represent American culture but rather a reflection of European influences and surrealism.

Right Page:

• Title: "Degraded? of modern art strike back"
• Subtitle: "Styles in painting should be a matter of taste. But today this perennial controversy is a matter of state."

Summary:

• The author argues that styles in painting should be a matter of taste but acknowledges that the current debate is more significant.
• He mentions visiting the Metropolitan Museum before the collection went abroad and was concerned about the wastefulness of spending public funds on these paintings.
• The author defends American art, stating that America has produced artists of exceptional ability and sensitivity.
• He highlights that the government's support of these artists is a matter of national pride and that the American people have historically appreciated and supported art.
• The author concludes that the art in question is not truly representative of American culture and questions why there is no substantial body of American art today.

Overall, the articles present a debate on whether modern American art, particularly the abstract and surrealistic pieces, truly represents American culture or if it is a misguided reflection of European influences.

The image contains a two-page spread from a publication discussing the state of American art, specifically addressing controversies around modern art.

Left Page:

Title: "IS AMERICAN ART DEGRADED?"
Subtitle: "Yes! A noted critic attacks extremism • No! Six defenders"

Article by Thomas Craven:
Thomas Craven criticizes the collection of modern paintings assembled by the War Assets Administration, which was later transferred to the State Department. He describes how this collection, initially intended to showcase American culture, has ended up promoting what he considers extreme and unrepresentative examples of modern art.

Craven notes that:

• The collection was amassed for around $49,000.
• The Secretary of State, at that time, decided to exhibit these paintings globally, reflecting negatively on American art.
• He believes that the selection of works was poor and not reflective of the true spirit of American culture.

Craven is known for his strong opinions and critiques of modern art, as evidenced by his books such as "Men of Art" and "Modern Art."

Right Page:

Title: Continuation of the article "IS AMERICAN ART DEGRADED?"

The article continues with a response to Craven's critique:

• It discusses the Metropolitan Museum's exhibition and the subsequent controversy.
• The writer admits to initially being confused but ultimately seeing the importance of mature confidence and independence in creating original art.
• The piece argues that America, despite its youth, has produced artists of exceptional ability and sensitivity.

The debate touches on:

• The nature of American art and its comparison to European art.
• The role of art education and the support of native artists.
• The idea that American art should not simply mimic European traditions but should instead reflect its unique culture.

The article concludes by questioning whether the current trends in American art are a result of a lack of substantial body of work or simply a reflection of the nation's youth and inexperience.

Visual Elements:

• There is a portrait of Thomas Craven on the left page.
• The text is formatted in columns, typical of magazine or newspaper layouts.

The image shows an open magazine or newspaper article spread over two pages. On the left page is a larger heading that says "IS AMERICAN ART", followed by a subheading "By THOMAS CRAVEN". Below these, there is an enlarged beginning of the article that provides a bold statement, "Yes! A noted critic attacks extremism • No! Six defenders". The text of the article begins below this, starting with "OF ALL THE STRANGE commodities which the War Assets Administration has been called upon to sell, the 'strangest certainly is the collection of modern paintings originally intended to give people a broad view of American life...". The page number at the bottom is "66".

The right page features a heading saying "DEGRADED ?" followed by a subheading "Styles in painting should be a matter of taste. But today this perennial controversy is a matter of state." The article continues on this page, discussing various opinions on modern art. There is another text box that starts with "After observing the trials and errors of art in the United States for more than thirty-five years...". The page number here is "67".

The newspaper or magazine piece seems to be exploring the topic of American art and its perception, value, and controversies surrounding its extremisms and modern styles. There is a sense of a debate or argument, as indicated by the words "attacks extremism", "defenders", "DEGRADED?", and the inclusion of controversy over modern art's validity and appreciation.

This image is a double-page spread from a magazine featuring two articles. The left page has a bold title "IS AMERICAN ART DEGRADED?" with a portrait of a man, likely Thomas Craven, the author of the article. The article discusses the state of American art, questioning its quality and originality. The right page has a title "DEGRADED?" and features a continuation of the discussion on American art, focusing on the impact of modern art and the role of the government in promoting or hindering artistic expression. Both pages contain text in a cursive font, with the right page having a more serious tone.

The image shows two adjacent pages from a publication, likely a magazine or journal, discussing the topic of American art and its contemporary state. Here is a detailed description:

Page 66: "IS AMERICAN ART"

• Title: "IS AMERICAN ART" is prominently displayed at the top, with a subheading: "Yes! A noted critic attacks extremism • No! Six defenders."
• Illustration: On the left side of the page, there is a black-and-white illustration of a man in formal attire, standing with his hands in his pockets. The illustration is labeled "By THOMAS CRAVEN."
• Content: The text begins with a discussion of modern art collections, referencing the War Assets Administration and its sale of "strange commodities" to the public. It mentions a collection of modern paintings that was sold for $9,000, which was deemed a "lofty mission" by some, but the Secretary of State halted its progress due to concerns over its artistic merit.
• Key Points:
  • The article critiques modern art as "neurotic platons of contemporary painting" and "abortion creations."
  • It highlights the controversy surrounding modern art, with Secretary Marshall being described as a "commissar of painting" who wisely halted the sale.
  • Thomas Craven is introduced as a critic of modern art, known for his books such as Men of Art, His Best-Known Books for Many Years, Modern Art, and A Treasury of Art Masterpieces.

Page 67: "DEGRADED?"

• Title: The page is titled "DEGRADED?" with a subtitle: "of modern art strike back."
• Content: This page continues the discussion on modern art, presenting a counterargument to the critique from the previous page.
• Key Points:
  • The author reflects on an exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum, expressing disappointment with the collection and the State Department's handling of it.
  • The author argues that modern art, despite its perceived flaws, is a reflection of American culture and experiences, and that it is comparable to literature in its originality and expressive force.
  • The text emphasizes the maturity of American artists and the public's support for modern art, stating that America has produced exceptional artists and that the nation has more students attending art schools than any other country.
  • The author challenges the notion that American art is "too young" or "provincial," asserting that the nation has a substantial body of American art and that its future is promising.

Overall Context:

• The two pages represent a debate on the state of American art, with Page 66 presenting a critical perspective by Thomas Craven, who argues against modern art as "degraded" and lacking in cultural significance.
• Page 67 offers a rebuttal, defending modern art as a legitimate and evolving expression of American culture, emphasizing its originality, public support, and potential for growth.

The layout is typical of mid-20th-century publications, with clear headings, illustrations, and structured text. The debate reflects the broader cultural and artistic discussions of the time, particularly around the legitimacy and value of modern art movements.

The image depicts two pages from a magazine or newspaper, featuring an article about American art. The article is titled "Is American Art Degraded?" and is written by Thomas Craven.

The left page contains a portrait of a man, presumably Thomas Craven, and the title of the article. The text below the title reads, "Yes! A noted critic attacks extremism • No! Six defenders of modern art strike back." The article discusses the controversy surrounding modern art and whether it can be considered American art.

The right page continues the article, with the text discussing the impact of modern art on American culture and the debate over its value and significance. The article also touches on the role of government and institutions in supporting and promoting modern art.

Overall, the image presents a thought-provoking discussion about the state of American art and the ongoing debate over its definition and significance.