Archives Scrapbooks

The image shows two pages from a publication discussing the topic of American art. The left page is titled "Is American Art" and is written by Thomas Craven. The article critiques the War Assets Administration's efforts to sell a collection of modern paintings intended to showcase American culture. Craven describes the paintings as "neurotic platoons of contemporary painting" and "imitative abstractions and boneless distortions," suggesting they were not representative of American culture. The text mentions the collection's journey to Prague and its return due to Secretary Marshall's decision.

The right page is titled "Degraded?" and continues the discussion on the state of American art, questioning whether it is in decline. It emphasizes the importance of art reflecting the spirit of America and the challenges faced by American artists in producing original, expressive, and reflective art. The text also touches on the lack of a substantial body of American art and questions if it is due to provincialism and the tendency towards abstract art. Both pages are from the year 1948, as indicated by the date "48 JUNE" at the bottom of the left page. The style is typical of mid-20th-century magazine or newspaper articles, with a focus on critical commentary.

The image shows two pages from a printed article titled "Is American Art Degraded?" by Thomas Craven. The article appears to be from a publication dated June 1948.

Left Page:

• Title and Subtitle: The title "IS AMERICAN ART" is prominently displayed in bold, large font. Below it, a subtitle reads, "Yes! A noted critic attacks extremism • No! Six defenders."
• Author Information: At the top left, there is a small illustration of a man in a suit and tie, presumably Thomas Craven, with the text "By THOMAS CRAVEN" next to it.
• Article Content: The article discusses the War Assets Administration's collection of modern paintings and the controversy surrounding them. It mentions Secretary Marshall's decision to halt the progress of the collection and return the canvases.
• Biographical Note: At the bottom left, there is a biographical note about Thomas Craven, stating that he has been a critic of art and chief gadfly of followers of the School of Paris for many years. It mentions his books: "Men of Art," "Modern Art," and "A Treasury of Art Masterpieces."
• Page Number: The page number "66" is at the bottom left.

Right Page:

• Title and Subtitle: The title "DEGRADED?" is prominently displayed in bold, large font. Below it, a subtitle reads, "of modern art strike back."
• Article Content: The article continues, discussing the question of whether American art can produce an art of its own that reflects the native spirit of America and is comparable to its literature in originality and expressive force.
• Sidebar Text: On the right side, there is a sidebar with additional text. It discusses the idea that styles in painting should be a matter of taste but is now a matter of state. It also mentions the need for mature confidence and independence of spirit essential to the creation of original art.
• Page Number: The page number "67" is at the bottom right.

The article appears to be a critical discussion of contemporary American art, questioning its originality and cultural significance.

This image is a double-page spread from a magazine featuring two articles. The left page has a bold title "IS AMERICAN ART DEGRADED?" with a portrait of a man, likely Thomas Craven, the author of the article. The article discusses the state of American art, questioning its quality and originality. The right page has a title "DEGRADED?" and features a continuation of the discussion on American art, focusing on the impact of modern art and the role of the government in promoting or hindering artistic expression. Both pages contain text in a cursive font, with the right page having a more serious tone.

The image depicts two pages from a magazine or newspaper, featuring an article about American art. The article is titled "Is American Art Degraded?" and is written by Thomas Craven.

The left page contains a portrait of a man, presumably Thomas Craven, and the title of the article. The text below the title reads, "Yes! A noted critic attacks extremism • No! Six defenders of modern art strike back." The article discusses the controversy surrounding modern art and whether it can be considered American art.

The right page continues the article, with the text discussing the impact of modern art on American culture and the debate over its value and significance. The article also touches on the role of government and institutions in supporting and promoting modern art.

Overall, the image presents a thought-provoking discussion about the state of American art and the ongoing debate over its definition and significance.

The image shows two adjacent pages from a publication, likely a magazine or journal, discussing the topic of American art and its contemporary state. Here is a detailed description:

Page 66: "IS AMERICAN ART"

• Title: "IS AMERICAN ART" is prominently displayed at the top, with a subheading: "Yes! A noted critic attacks extremism • No! Six defenders."
• Illustration: On the left side of the page, there is a black-and-white illustration of a man in formal attire, standing with his hands in his pockets. The illustration is labeled "By THOMAS CRAVEN."
• Content: The text begins with a discussion of modern art collections, referencing the War Assets Administration and its sale of "strange commodities" to the public. It mentions a collection of modern paintings that was sold for $9,000, which was deemed a "lofty mission" by some, but the Secretary of State halted its progress due to concerns over its artistic merit.
• Key Points:
  • The article critiques modern art as "neurotic platons of contemporary painting" and "abortion creations."
  • It highlights the controversy surrounding modern art, with Secretary Marshall being described as a "commissar of painting" who wisely halted the sale.
  • Thomas Craven is introduced as a critic of modern art, known for his books such as Men of Art, His Best-Known Books for Many Years, Modern Art, and A Treasury of Art Masterpieces.

Page 67: "DEGRADED?"

• Title: The page is titled "DEGRADED?" with a subtitle: "of modern art strike back."
• Content: This page continues the discussion on modern art, presenting a counterargument to the critique from the previous page.
• Key Points:
  • The author reflects on an exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum, expressing disappointment with the collection and the State Department's handling of it.
  • The author argues that modern art, despite its perceived flaws, is a reflection of American culture and experiences, and that it is comparable to literature in its originality and expressive force.
  • The text emphasizes the maturity of American artists and the public's support for modern art, stating that America has produced exceptional artists and that the nation has more students attending art schools than any other country.
  • The author challenges the notion that American art is "too young" or "provincial," asserting that the nation has a substantial body of American art and that its future is promising.

Overall Context:

• The two pages represent a debate on the state of American art, with Page 66 presenting a critical perspective by Thomas Craven, who argues against modern art as "degraded" and lacking in cultural significance.
• Page 67 offers a rebuttal, defending modern art as a legitimate and evolving expression of American culture, emphasizing its originality, public support, and potential for growth.

The layout is typical of mid-20th-century publications, with clear headings, illustrations, and structured text. The debate reflects the broader cultural and artistic discussions of the time, particularly around the legitimacy and value of modern art movements.

The image presents two pages of an article from a magazine, featuring the title "IS AMERICAN ART" and the author's name, Thomas Craven. The left page is numbered 66, while the right page is numbered 67.

Left Page:

• The title "IS AMERICAN ART" is prominently displayed at the top, with the subtitle "Yes!" and "A noted critic attacks extremism • No!" written below it.
• A small illustration of a man's head is situated above the title, accompanied by a newspaper clipping.
• The text on this page discusses the criticism of American art, with the author expressing his opinions on the subject.

Right Page:

• The title "DEGRADED?" is written at the top, with the subtitle "of modern art strike back." below it.
• The text on this page continues the discussion of American art, with the author addressing the criticism and defending the value of modern art.

Background:

• The background of the image is a light gray color, providing a neutral backdrop for the two pages of the article.

Overall, the image presents a thought-provoking discussion on the state of American art, with the author offering his insights and opinions on the subject.

The image depicts a page from a magazine or newspaper, featuring an article titled "IS AMERICAN ART" by Thomas Craven. The article is divided into two columns, with the left column containing the title and a portrait of the author, accompanied by a brief introduction to the article.

The right column presents the main body of the article, which appears to be a critique of modern art. The text is written in black ink on a beige background, with some words and phrases underlined for emphasis. The overall design of the page suggests that it is from an older publication, possibly from the early 20th century.

The article's content is critical of modern art, with the author arguing that it has become too focused on abstract expressionism and has lost touch with traditional techniques and values. The author also expresses concern that modern art is becoming too commercialized and is being driven by market forces rather than artistic merit.

Overall, the image provides a glimpse into the artistic debates of the past and highlights the ongoing tension between traditional and modern approaches to art.

The image shows two yellowed pages from an article titled "IS AMERICAN ART DEGRADED?" by Thomas Craven.

The left page features a black-and-white illustration of the author, Thomas Craven, in the top-left corner, accompanied by his name below it. The title is prominently displayed in large font, with the subtitle "Yes, a noted critic attacks extremism. No, six defenders" written in smaller text underneath. The article begins on this page and continues onto the right page.

The right page is a continuation of the article, with the title "DEGRADED?" visible at the top. The text on both pages is written in a formal, serif font and appears to be discussing the state of American art, with the author arguing that it has been degraded by modern art movements. The pages are numbered 66 and 67, indicating that they are part of a larger publication.

The background of the image is a plain gray color, which helps to highlight the yellowed pages and their contents. Overall, the image presents a nostalgic and informative glimpse into a historical article about American art.

The image presents a vintage magazine article, split across two pages, with the title "IS AMERICAN ART DEGRADED?" prominently displayed on the left page. The article is written by Thomas Craven and features a black-and-white illustration of the author in the top-left corner.

Left Page:

• Title: "IS AMERICAN ART DEGRADED?"
• Author: Thomas Craven
• Illustration: A black-and-white portrait of the author
• Text: The article discusses the state of American art, with a focus on the role of the War Assets Administration in selling modern paintings abroad
• Subheadings:
  • "Yes, a noted critic attacks extremism"
  • "No, six defenders"

Right Page:

• Title: "DEGRADED?"
• Subtitle: "of modern art strike back"
• Text: The article continues from the left page, exploring the controversy surrounding modern art in America
• Discussion: The author argues that American art is not degraded, but rather, it is a reflection of the country's culture and values

Background:

• The pages are set against a plain gray background, which helps to highlight the vintage nature of the magazine article

Overall, the image provides a thought-provoking glimpse into the debate surrounding modern art in America during the mid-20th century.

The image contains two pages from a printed article titled "Is American Art Degraded?" written by Thomas Craven. The article discusses the state of modern American art, particularly focusing on a controversial exhibition of modern art that was sent abroad by the U.S. State Department.

Page 1:

• The title "Is American Art" is prominently displayed at the top.
• The article begins with a critique of the State Department's administration, specifically an initiative to promote modern American painting abroad.
• Thomas Craven argues that the collection, which cost $89,000, was poorly received and ridiculed in Prague, leading Secretary Marshall to withdraw the exhibition.
• Craven criticizes the selection of artworks, describing them as "neurotic platoons of contemporary painting" and "non-objective smears."
• He suggests that the critics who defended the collection were either ignorant or had financial stakes in the artworks.
• Craven questions whether the artworks reflect American culture and values.

Page 2:

• The title "Degraded?" continues the discussion.
• Craven reflects on the Metropolitan Museum exhibition and the broader question of whether America can produce an art of its own.
• He acknowledges the historical struggles and errors in American art but argues that the current trend of abstract art is not a true reflection of American spirit.
• Craven expresses concern that the focus on abstract art may lead to a loss of traditional artistic values and skills.
• He highlights the irony that while America has produced exceptional artists and has a rich artistic heritage, the current trend seems to disregard this legacy.
• The article concludes with a question about the future of American art and whether it is too young to have a substantial body of work.

Overall, the article is a critical examination of the state of modern American art, questioning its value and authenticity.