Archives Scrapbooks

This image appears to be a clipping from a newspaper, specifically the "Christian Science Monitor," dated June 19, 1946. The article is titled "Officials at Harvard Silent On $100,000 Painting Suit" and discusses a lawsuit filed by Mrs. Jean Bullitt Darlington against Harvard University for the loss of a painting she believed was a Rubens masterpiece. The article details the circumstances of the lawsuit, including the painting's history, its alleged theft or misplacement by Harvard officials, and the ongoing investigations into its disappearance. The clip is pasted onto a piece of paper with handwritten notes at the bottom right corner.

This image is of a newspaper clipping titled "Officials at Harvard Silent On $100,000 Painting Suit," published by the Christian Science Monitor on June 19, 1946. The article discusses a legal dispute involving Harvard University and a painting.

The article begins by stating that Harvard University officials were tight-lipped regarding a $100,000 lawsuit for damage to a mysteriously missing painting. The lawsuit was filed by Mrs. Jean Bullitt Darlington of West Chester, Pennsylvania. The painting in question is a Rubens masterpiece titled "Descent From the Cross." Mrs. Darlington charges that Harvard University turned over the painting to another person without her authorization.

The article then goes into detail about the history of the painting. It was originally purchased from the Tesaro family of Antwerp and brought to the United States in 1921. It was later sent to the Fogg Art Museum at Harvard University for inspection in 1940. Five days later, the painting was given by the university to a Newbury Street art dealer.

Mrs. Darlington claims that the art dealer represented himself as her agent but had no prior approval to act in such a capacity. In 1942, she asked for the painting to be returned from Harvard and learned that it had been given to the Boston art dealer. A world-wide search for the art agent and the painting was then initiated.

The article concludes by questioning whether Harvard is liable for the missing painting. It states that investigators found former officials of the art gallery who explained that they knew nothing of the painting's mysterious disappearance.

The image shows a newspaper clipping with a headline that reads "Officials at Harvard Silent On $100,000 Painting Suit." The clipping is placed on a piece of paper with a handwritten note at the bottom that reads "Christian Science Monitor June 19, 1946." The clipping appears to be an article about a lawsuit filed by Mrs. Jean Bullitt Darlington of West Chester, Pennsylvania, against Harvard University for the loss of a painting worth $100,000. The article mentions that Mrs. Darlington had lent the painting to Harvard for an exhibition in 1940 and that it was later discovered to be missing. The article also mentions that Harvard officials have been silent on the matter and that the case is expected to come before the court unless it is settled out of court. The clipping is placed on a piece of paper with a handwritten note at the bottom that reads "Christian Science Monitor June 19, 1946."

The image shows a newspaper clipping from the Christian Science Monitor, dated June 19, 1946. The headline reads "Officials at Harvard Silent On $100,000 Painting Suit." The article discusses a lawsuit filed by Mrs. Jean Bullitt Darlington against Harvard University for damages to a missing painting by the artist Reubens. Mrs. Darlington claims that the painting, which she believed to be an original masterpiece, was damaged during its exhibition at Harvard. The article also mentions that Harvard officials have been silent on the case, and that private detectives have been unable to find any clues regarding the painting's disappearance.

The image is a scanned page from the Christian Science Monitor dated June 19, 1946. The page features a news article titled "Officials at Harvard Silent On $100,000 Painting Suit". The article discusses a legal dispute involving a valuable painting valued at $100,000, which is missing and the subject of a lawsuit.

Key Details from the Article:

1. Headline and Context:

   • The headline indicates that Harvard University officials and private detectives are tight-lipped regarding the case, which involves a missing painting worth $100,000.
   • The painting in question is a Rubens masterpiece that was originally purchased by Mrs. Tessaro in 1921 and later brought to Harvard University for an exhibition.

2. The Painting's History:

   • The painting was originally purchased by Mrs. Tessaro and then brought to Harvard University in 1921.
   • It was exhibited in many European art galleries, where it was identified as an original Rubens masterpiece.
   • The painting was loaned to Harvard University by Mrs. Darlington, a former Harvard student, in 1942. It was given to the University to a Newbury Street art dealer, Alan Burroughs, who kept the painting in his gallery.

3. The Disappearance:

   • The painting disappeared after being exhibited at Harvard. Mrs. Darlington claims she had no prior approval to act as an agent for the painting and that it was taken without her knowledge.
   • Investigators have found no clues, and the case remains unsolved.

4. Legal Action:

   • Mrs. Darlington, through her cousin George A. McLaughlin, has filed a lawsuit against Harvard College, alleging breach of contract and conversion.
   • The case is expected to come before the Suffolk Superior Court in the fall, unless settled out of court.

5. Harvard's Position:

   • Harvard officials have remained silent on the matter, and the University is expected to argue that it is not liable for the painting.
   • The article notes that Harvard, as an educational institution, may not be held liable for the painting, which was loaned rather than purchased.

6. Additional Context:

   • The painting was examined by art authorities, who stated that several paintings attributed to Rubens were believed to be genuine originals of the famous scene.
   • It was customary for great artists to paint several pictures on the same theme, and the missing painting was one of these copies.

Visual Elements:

• The page has a clean, typed layout typical of newspaper articles from the mid-20th century.
• The headline is prominently displayed at the top in bold, serif font.
• The article is structured with subheadings and paragraphs, providing a clear narrative.
• The source ("Christian Science Monitor") and date ("June 19, 1946") are visible at the bottom right of the page.

Summary:

The image depicts a news article from the Christian Science Monitor detailing a high-profile legal dispute involving a missing Rubens painting valued at $100,000. The painting, originally purchased by Mrs. Tessaro and later loaned to Harvard University, disappeared under mysterious circumstances. Mrs. Darlington has filed a lawsuit against Harvard, alleging breach of contract and conversion, while Harvard officials remain silent on the matter. The case is expected to proceed to court unless settled out of court.

The image depicts a newspaper clipping about a painting lawsuit, with the headline "Officials at Harvard Silent On $100,000 Painting Suit" and a date of June 19, 1946, written in pencil on the right side. The clipping is placed on a white background, with a shadow visible behind it.

The article discusses a lawsuit filed by Mrs. Darlington against Harvard University, alleging that the university had purchased a painting from her family without her knowledge or consent. The painting, which was valued at $100,000, was allegedly sold to the university by a former ambassador to Italy, William Bullitt. The article states that the university has been silent on the matter, and that Mrs. Darlington is seeking to recover damages for the mysterious disappearance of the painting.

Overall, the image appears to be a historical document related to a legal dispute involving a valuable painting and Harvard University.

The image presents a newspaper clipping from the Christian Science Monitor, dated June 19, 1946. The article discusses a $100,000 painting suit involving Harvard University officials and private detectives searching for a missing painting. The clipping is placed on a gray background, with a subtle shadow effect around its edges.

Key Points:

• Newspaper Clipping: The article is from the Christian Science Monitor, dated June 19, 1946.
• Painting Suit: The article discusses a $100,000 painting suit involving Harvard University officials and private detectives.
• Missing Painting: The painting in question is a mystery, with no information provided about its title, artist, or description.
• Background: The clipping is placed on a gray background, with a subtle shadow effect around its edges.
• Overall: The image provides a glimpse into a historical news article, highlighting the efforts of Harvard University officials and private detectives to locate a missing painting.

The image depicts a newspaper clipping from the Christian Science Monitor, dated June 19, 1946, with the headline "Officials at Harvard Silent On $100,000 Painting Suit." The article discusses a lawsuit involving a painting attributed to Peter Paul Rubens, "Descent from the Cross," which was allegedly damaged while in the care of Harvard University. The clipping is pasted onto a larger piece of paper, suggesting that it may have been preserved or archived for future reference. The overall appearance of the image is one of aged newsprint, with the clipping showing signs of wear and tear.

The image presents a vintage newspaper clipping, yellowed with age, featuring a prominent headline that reads "Officials at Harvard Silent On $100,000 Painting Suit." The article discusses a lawsuit filed by Mrs. Jean Bullitt Darlington of West Chester, Pennsylvania, against Harvard University.

The clipping is affixed to a piece of paper, which bears handwritten text that reads "Christian Science Monitor" and "June 19, 1946." The background of the image is a light gray color.

Key Points:

• Newspaper Clipping:
  • Headline: "Officials at Harvard Silent On $100,000 Painting Suit"
  • Content: Lawsuit filed by Mrs. Jean Bullitt Darlington against Harvard University
• Handwritten Text:
  • "Christian Science Monitor"
  • "June 19, 1946"
• Background:
  • Light gray color

The image is of a newspaper clipping from the "Christian Science Monitor," dated June 19, 1946. The article is titled "Officials at Harvard Silent On $100,000 Painting Suit."

Here is a summary of the article:

• Harvard University officials and private detectives are investigating the mysterious disappearance of a $100,000 suit of clothing from a gallery, which was found to have no clue to the missing painting.
• The painting, "The Blue Boy" by Jean Bullitt Darlington of Westchester, Pa., was stolen from a gallery in Philadelphia.
• Harvard officials have commented that they have no information about the painting's whereabouts.
• The painting was originally owned by Mrs. Darlington's father, who had it insured for $100,000.
• The article mentions that the painting was part of a collection that included works by famous artists such as Rubens and Ribera.
• The painting was stolen from the Darlington home in 1942, and the theft was reported to the police.
• The article also mentions that the painting was found in a gallery in Boston, but the gallery owner claimed that it was a copy and not the original.
• The article concludes by stating that the search for the painting continues, and that Harvard officials are remaining silent on the matter.

Overall, the article discusses the theft and subsequent investigation of a valuable painting, highlighting the mystery surrounding its disappearance and the efforts to recover it.