Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V. Rinse, repeat.
ARCH.2003.29, Rendition: 803716
The image shows a piece of paper with a clipping from a newspaper article. The headline of the article reads, "Officials at Harvard Silent On $100,000 Painting Suit." The article discusses a lawsuit filed by Mrs. Jean Bullitt Darlington against Harvard University for damages caused by the disappearance of a painting by Rubens, titled "Descent from the Cross." The article mentions that the painting was allegedly given by Harvard to another person without Mrs. Darlington's knowledge, leading to her lawsuit. It also includes comments from Harvard officials and details about the legal proceedings.
The paper also has some handwritten notes at the bottom right corner, which read "Christian Science Monitor" and the date "June 19, 1946," indicating the source and date of the newspaper. The paper appears to be slightly aged, with some discoloration and wear, suggesting it is an older document.
This image shows a newspaper clipping pasted onto a sheet of paper. The clipping is titled "Officials at Harvard Silent On $100,000 Painting Suit." The article discusses a lawsuit filed by Mrs. Jean Bullitt Darlington of West Chester, Pennsylvania, against Harvard University for $100,000 in damages related to a missing painting. The painting in question is "Descent From the Cross" by Rubens. The article mentions that Harvard officials have been tight-lipped about the matter, and private detectives have conducted a thorough search of the former gallery but found no clues.
The text also mentions that if the case is brought before the Suffolk Superior Court, the court will have to decide whether Harvard, as an educational institution, is liable in such a case. It also notes that several art authorities in Philadelphia believe the painting to be a genuine original of the famous scene. However, it is explained that it was a custom of great artists to paint several pictures on the same theme or to have outstanding students make copies of their great works.
The bottom part of the clipping is partially torn off and includes the headline "Demand for Peace" and the beginning of an article about a contract for use of Fort Devens buildings and extension college.
The sheet of paper on which the clipping is pasted has handwritten text that reads "Christian Science Monitor" and "June 19, 1946," indicating the source of the clipping and the date.
The image shows a newspaper clipping with a headline that reads, "Officials at Harvard Silent on $100,000 Painting Suit." It appears to be an article discussing a legal case involving Harvard University and a missing painting. The clipping is placed on a piece of paper with a handwritten note that reads, "Christian Science Monitor, June 19, 1946." The clipping is attached to the paper with a piece of tape.
The image shows a page from a newspaper with a headline "Officials at Harvard Silent On $100,000 Painting Suit." The article is about a missing painting that was stolen from Harvard University. The painting, which was valued at $100,000, was missing for a long time, and the university officials were tight-lipped about the case. The article also mentions that private detectives were hired to search for the painting, and the case was expected to be heard in the Suffolk Superior Court. The article also mentions that the painting was a copy of a famous Rubens masterpiece, and it was a custom of great artists to paint several pictures on the same theme.
The image shows a scanned newspaper clipping from the Christian Science Monitor, dated June 19, 1946. The article is titled "Officials at Harvard Silent On $100,000 Painting Suit" and discusses a legal dispute involving a missing painting valued at $100,000.
Context: Harvard University officials and private detectives were tight-lipped about a lawsuit filed in Suffolk Superior Court by Mrs. Darlington of West Chester, Pennsylvania. The lawsuit concerns a missing painting that was part of a gallery but could not be found during a thorough search.
Painting in Question: The painting in question is described as a Rubens masterpiece, specifically "Descent From the Cross." The article notes that the painting had been the subject of a long-standing legal dispute over its authenticity and ownership.
Harvard's Role: Harvard University was involved because the painting was part of its collection. The university turned the painting over to another person for inspection without Mrs. Darlington's authority or knowledge.
Plaintiff's Claim: Mrs. Darlington, a first cousin of former Ambassador William Bullitt and daughter of a Harvard student, is seeking to recover damages for the mysterious disappearance of the painting. She is represented by attorney George A. McLaughlin of Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Legal Action: Mrs. Darlington has charged the President and Fellows of Harvard College with breach of contract and conversion. The case is expected to come before the court for argument unless it is settled out of court.
Authenticity Concerns: The article mentions that several art authorities in Philadelphia examined the painting and stated that it was believed to be the genuine original of the famous Rubens masterpiece. However, it also notes that it was a custom for outstanding students to make copies of great works, which complicates the authenticity issue.
Overall, the image captures a historical news report detailing a high-profile legal battle involving a valuable artwork and an esteemed academic institution.
The image depicts a newspaper clipping about a $100,000 painting suit at Harvard University, dated June 19, 1946. The clipping is pasted onto a piece of paper with handwritten notes and a date.
Overall, the image appears to be a historical document or artifact that provides insight into a specific event or issue from the past. The inclusion of the handwritten notes adds a personal touch and suggests that the document may have been used for research or reference purposes.
The image is a scanned newspaper clipping from the Christian Science Monitor, dated June 19, 1946. The article discusses a $100,000 painting suit involving Harvard University officials and private detectives searching for a missing painting in Suffolk Court. The clipping is yellowed with age and features a handwritten note on the right side that reads "Christian Science Monitor" and "June 19, 1946." The background of the image is a light gray color, suggesting it may be a digital scan or photograph of the original clipping. Overall, the image appears to be a historical document related to art and law, specifically a court case involving a valuable painting.
The image shows a piece of paper with three newspaper clippings attached to it. The clippings are arranged vertically down the center of the page.
The top clipping is the largest and has the headline "Officials at Harvard Silent On $100,000 Painting Suit." The article discusses a lawsuit filed by Mrs. Jean Bullitt Darlington against Harvard University over a missing painting valued at $100,000. The article mentions that the painting, "Descent from the Cross" by Rubens, was lent to Mrs. Darlington for inspection but was not returned.
The middle clipping is smaller and has the headline "Paintiff's Case." The article appears to be a continuation of the story from the top clipping, but the text is upside down and difficult to read.
The bottom clipping is the smallest and has the headline "Dawn For Fort." The article discusses a different topic, possibly related to a military or historical event, but the text is also upside down and difficult to read.
To the right of the clippings, there is handwritten text that reads "Christian Science Monitor" and "June 19, 1946." This suggests that the clippings were cut from the Christian Science Monitor newspaper on June 19, 1946.
The background of the image is a plain gray color, which helps to highlight the yellowed paper and the newspaper clippings. Overall, the image appears to be a historical archive or a collection of newspaper articles related to a specific event or topic.
The image presents a vintage newspaper clipping, yellowed with age, featuring a prominent article titled "Officials at Harvard Silent On $100,000 Painting Suit." The clipping is affixed to a piece of paper, which appears to be a page from a scrapbook or a similar archival material.
Newspaper Clipping:
Paper and Handwritten Note:
Background:
Overall, the image appears to be a historical document or archival material, likely from the mid-20th century. The newspaper clipping and handwritten note suggest that the image is related to a specific event or issue from that time period.
The image shows a newspaper clipping from the Christian Science Monitor, dated June 19, 1946. The headline reads "Officials at Harvard Silent On $100,000 Painting Suit." The article discusses a lawsuit filed in Suffolk Court by Mrs. Jean Bullitt Darlington of Weston against Harvard University. The suit concerns a $100,000 painting by Peter Paul Rubens, which Mrs. Darlington alleges was damaged while in Harvard's custody.
Key points from the article include:
Harvard's Silence: Harvard officials have been tight-lipped about the issue, with only a brief statement from William H. Claflin, Jr., the University Treasurer, acknowledging that the painting was in Harvard's possession.
Mrs. Darlington's Claims: Mrs. Darlington charges that Harvard breached its contract by failing to return the painting in its original condition. She seeks damages for the alleged mishandling of the artwork.
Legal Proceedings: The case was filed by Mrs. Darlington's attorney, who claims that Harvard has not responded to their attempts to settle out of court. The suit specifies charges of fraud and seeks to recover damages.
Painting's Authenticity: The article mentions that the painting, a copy of Rubens' masterpiece "The Cross," is not a genuine original but a custom-made replica. This detail is expected to be a significant factor in the court proceedings.
Harvard's Stance: The university has not publicly addressed the specifics of the case, maintaining a silent stance on the matter.
The article suggests that the outcome of the suit will depend on the court's assessment of the painting's value and the circumstances surrounding its handling by Harvard.