Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V. Rinse, repeat.
ARCH.2003.29, Rendition: 803712
This image is a scanned newspaper clipping from the Boston Herald, dated Thursday, July 18, 1946. The headline on the clipping reads "Masterpiece Owner to Press $100,000 Suit Against Harvard." The article discusses a legal dispute involving a painting and Harvard University.
The clipping includes a photograph showing several individuals, likely the owner of the painting and her legal advisors or associates. The text below the photograph reads: "OWNER OF PAINTING involved in $100,000 suit against Harvard University, Mrs. Jean Bullitt Darlington of West Chester, Pa., on the steps of Fogg Art Museum with her attorneys yesterday. Left to right are George G. Clauter of Philadelphia, Mrs. Darlington and attorney, and Charles S. McLaughlin of Boston."
The article continues to detail the circumstances of the dispute, mentioning Mrs. Darlington's efforts to locate her painting, which she believes was stolen or misplaced by Harvard University. The article also mentions that the painting is the subject of a legal action worth $100,000, and it describes the efforts to determine the painting's value and condition.
The text is arranged in a typical newspaper format with columns and headings, and it provides various details about the painting and the legal proceedings surrounding it.
This image is a collection of newspaper clippings from the Boston Herald dated Thursday, July 18, 1946. The clippings are related to a legal dispute involving a painting and Harvard University. The main headline reads "Masterpiece Owner to Press $100,000 Suit Against Harvard." The article, written by Arthur Stratton, discusses a lawsuit filed by Mrs. Jean Bullitt Darlington against Harvard University regarding a Rembrandt masterpiece, "Descent from the Cross," which she claims was damaged while in Harvard's custody. The article mentions that the painting was found in a cellar in the Back Bay area and that Mrs. Darlington is seeking $100,000 in damages.
The clippings include a photograph of Mrs. Darlington with her attorney, George G. Clauter, and another attorney, Charles S. McLaughlin, standing in front of the Fogg Art Museum. The caption under the photograph identifies the individuals and provides context for the image.
The clippings also include a continuation of the article from the first page, providing more details about the lawsuit and the actions being taken by Mrs. Darlington and her attorneys. The article mentions the involvement of experts and the potential for the situation to be clarified within the next few days. The overall tone of the clippings suggests a significant legal and cultural event involving a valuable piece of art and a prestigious institution.
This image displays a yellowed, aged newspaper clipping from the Boston Herald, dated Thursday, July 18, 1946.
The clipping is composed of several sections glued or taped together, showing the main headline, the newspaper's masthead and date, a photograph, and the continuation of the article.
“Masterpiece Owner to Press $100,000 Suit Against Harvard”
By Andrew Berton
“WHEEL OF PAINTING involved in $100,000 suit against Harvard University, Mrs. Joe H. Darlington of West Chester, Pa., on the steps of Fogg Art Museum with her allies in court case. Left to right are George G. Chaider of Philadelphia, Mrs. Darlington on steps, and Charles S. McLaughlin, of Boston.”
The photo shows three people standing outdoors in front of a classical building with steps (presumably the Fogg Art Museum). From left to right:
The article details Mrs. Darlington’s legal action against Harvard, following the disappearance and subsequent “rediscovery” of a valuable painting that had been given to Harvard University. The painting is described as “a masterpiece,” possibly by a French artist, and had been left to Harvard in the 1930s. She claims it was lost, then later found hanging in a Harvard building, and now she is suing for its return or $100,000 in damages.
Key points from the text:
The article is presented in classic mid-20th-century newspaper format, with columns, small font, and a “Continued from First Page” indicator.
In summary, the image is a historical newspaper clipping reporting on a high-profile art restitution lawsuit brought against Harvard in 1946, involving a wealthy woman, a lost painting, and prominent legal figures — all captured in a photograph taken on the steps of the Fogg Art Museum.
The image shows a collage of newspaper clippings on a gray background. The clippings are arranged in a cross shape, with the largest clipping in the center and smaller clippings on the sides. The clippings are from different newspapers and feature various headlines and articles. The largest clipping in the center has the headline "Masterpiece Owner to Press $100,000 Suit Against Harvard." The other clippings have headlines such as "Painting Owner To Press Suit" and "Today's Herald."
The image shows a newspaper clipping with a headline that reads "Masterpiece Owner to Press $100,000 Suit Against Harvard." The clipping is dated July 18, 1946, and appears to be from the Boston Herald. The article discusses a lawsuit filed by Mrs. Jean McIntire against Harvard University over the painting "West Chestnut Street" by George C. McGrew. The painting was damaged during its transportation to the Fogg Art Museum, and Mrs. McIntire is seeking $100,000 in damages. The clipping includes a photograph of Mrs. McIntire and her attorney, Charles S. McLaughlin, standing beside the damaged painting.
The image is a scanned newspaper clipping from the Boston Herald, dated Thursday, July 18, 1916. It features a headline that reads, "Masterpiece Owner to Press $100,000 Suit Against Harvard." The article discusses a legal dispute involving a painting valued at $100,000, which the owner is suing Harvard University over.
The image captures a historical moment involving a high-profile legal dispute over a valuable artwork. The involvement of Harvard University and the significant monetary value of the painting ($100,000 in 1916, equivalent to a much larger sum today) underscores the importance of the case. The photograph of the individuals suggests their relevance to the story, possibly as key figures in the dispute or related to the painting's ownership or exhibition.
Overall, the image provides a glimpse into early 20th-century legal and cultural issues, highlighting the intersection of art, institutions, and litigation.
The image shows clippings of a vintage newspaper article dated Thursday, July 18, 1946, as indicated at the top of the bottom section. The headline of the top portion states "Masterpiece Owner to Press $100,000 Suit Against Harvard," with a subheading including the date, "Today's Herald." The bottom half undertakes to continue the story with the header "Painting Owner To Press Suit." These snippets appear to be part of a legal dispute involving the owner of a painting and Harvard, suggesting a historical context to the content. The paper exhibits aging with its sepia-toned hue, and it is placed against a plain, light grey background. The clippings provide a snapshot that conveys the journalistic style and issues of the mid-20th century.
This is an old newspaper clipping. It features two distinct sections of text and one photograph in the center.
Top part:
Middle section:
Bottom part:
The entire clipping has a cross-like shape due to the continuation of the article vertically below the central photo. The document appears aged, with the discolored paper suggesting that it is quite old.
The image is of a newspaper clipping from the Boston Herald dated Thursday, July 18, 1946. The headline reads: "Masterpiece Owner to Press $100,000 Suit Against Harvard." The article is about Mrs. Jean S. Bullitt Darlington of West Chester, Pennsylvania, who was preparing to sue Harvard University for $100,000 in damages over the handling of a Rubens masterpiece titled "Descent from the Cross."
There is a sepia-toned photograph within the clipping showing four individuals standing on steps, identified as George G. Clauter of Philadelphia, Mrs. Darlington, and Charles S. McLaughlin of Boston, along with another man.
The article details the legal dispute stemming from Harvard's decision not to pack the painting under their arm and return it to Mrs. Darlington, resulting in damage and a $62.95 bill for repair. The owner firmly told Harvard she planned to push the suit until the university settled for the damages.
The text also mentions the involvement of various legal professionals and experts, as well as the history and circumstances around the painting and its storage. The article is structured in two parts, with the continuation of the story on the front page and on the back, providing an in-depth account of the lawsuit and the painting's condition.