Archives Scrapbooks

The image is a collage of newspaper clippings arranged vertically on a plain background. The clippings appear to be from the Boston Herald and are dated July 18, 1968.

The top clipping has the headline "Masterpiece Owner to Press $100,000 Suit Against Harvard." It reports on a lawsuit involving a valuable painting, specifically a $100,000 suit against Harvard University. The article mentions a dispute over the painting "The Wife of Bath" by John Singer Sargent.

The middle clipping contains a photograph showing a group of people, possibly related to the lawsuit or the painting. The caption beneath the photograph reads: "WIFE OF PAINTING involved in $100,000 suit against Harvard University. May, 1968."

The bottom clipping has the headline "Painting Owner To Press Suit." This article also discusses the lawsuit, detailing the legal actions and the parties involved, including the owner of the painting and Harvard University. The text provides more context about the dispute, mentioning the painting's value and the legal proceedings.

Overall, the image presents a news story about a legal dispute over a valuable painting, with the clippings providing different angles and details on the case.

The image shows a collection of newspaper clippings related to a legal dispute involving a painting. The main article, titled "Painting Owner to Press Suit," discusses how Mrs. Jack Delingston, the owner of a painting, plans to sue Harvard University for $100,000 due to alleged damage to the artwork. The clipping includes a photograph of the painting in question, which is described as an old master painting. Several other smaller clippings provide additional details about the case, including mentions of the Fogg Art Museum, where the painting was reportedly damaged, and the involvement of experts and legal representatives. The articles are from the Boston Herald, dated July 18, 1946.

The image shows a collage of two newspaper articles from the Boston Herald dated July 18, 1946.

1. Top Article:

   • Title: "Masterpiece Owner to Press $100,000 Suit Against Harvard"
   • Summary: This article discusses a legal dispute involving a masterpiece painting, valued at $100,000, that was allegedly sold without the owner's knowledge. The owner, Arthur Stratton, claims he was deceived by a dealer who sold the painting to Harvard University. The article mentions several individuals involved, including George G. Custer and Mr. Delington, and details the events leading up to the lawsuit.

2. Bottom Article:

   • Title: "Painting Owner To Press Suit"
   • Summary: This article elaborates further on the legal action taken by Arthur Stratton. It mentions Stratton's initial attempts to reclaim the painting and the legal strategies employed by his lawyers. The article also includes quotes from experts and discusses the broader implications of the case on art ownership and legal practices. It highlights Stratton's efforts to get the painting back, noting his determination and the complexities of the legal proceedings.

Additionally, there are two photographs:

• The left photograph shows a group of people in what appears to be an art gallery or exhibition setting.
• The right photograph depicts Arthur Stratton, presumably in a formal or judicial setting, possibly in court.

The articles together suggest a significant legal and art-related controversy from that period.

The image shows a clipping from the Boston Herald, dated July 18, 1946. The article is titled "Masterpiece Owner to Press $100,000 Suit Against Harvard" and discusses a legal dispute over a valuable painting.

The headline mentions that a woman, identified as Mrs. Jacob M. Rabinowitz, is suing Harvard University for $100,000 over a painting. The article includes a photograph of Mrs. Rabinowitz with two other men, likely George G. Clutter of Philadelphia and Mr. Darlington, who is identified as the painting's owner.

The article provides background information on the painting, which is described as a masterpiece. It mentions that the painting was seized by the U.S. government during World War II, and Mrs. Rabinowitz is suing to reclaim it. The article also includes statements from experts, including art historian and restorer Philip Hofer, who discusses the authenticity and value of the painting.

The text details the legal proceedings and the historical context of the painting, including its confiscation by the government and its subsequent return to the owner. The painting is described as being of significant historical and artistic value, and the legal case is framed as a dispute over its ownership and rightful possession. The article notes that the painting was seized under the Trading with the Enemy Act and later returned to its rightful owner. The case involves a claim for damages and the return of the painting.

The image shows a collection of newspaper clippings from the Boston Herald, dated July 18, 1946. The articles are related to a legal case involving a painting and its ownership.

1. Top Clipping:

   • The headline reads "Masterpiece Owner to Press $100,000 Suit Against Harvard."
   • The article states that Mrs. Isabel Stewart Gardner, a renowned art collector, is suing Harvard University for $100,000. The suit concerns a painting, "The Concert," by Johannes Vermeer, which was stolen from her Boston museum.

2. Middle Clipping (with photos):

   • This clipping is titled "Wall of Painting involved in $100,000 suit against Harvard University."
   • The article includes photographs of Mrs. Gardner and other individuals.
   • It mentions that Mrs. Gardner is suing Harvard for the return of the painting, which was allegedly taken from her collection. The photo shows Mrs. Gardner and other people, including a lawyer, George G. Claflin from Philadelphia, and Mrs. A. Alfred Taubman.

3. Bottom Clipping:

   • The headline reads "Painting Owner To Press Suit."
   • This article elaborates on the lawsuit, indicating that Mrs. Gardner is suing Harvard for the return of the painting and damages.
   • The clipping mentions that the painting, "The Concert," was stolen from the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in Boston. Harvard University is accused of wrongfully acquiring it.
   • The article mentions various legal experts and previous cases involving the painting's ownership.
   • It also discusses the historical background of the painting and the events leading to the lawsuit.

Overall, the clippings collectively detail the legal dispute between Isabel Stewart Gardner and Harvard University over the ownership and return of the Vermeer painting "The Concert."

The image is a newspaper clipping from the Boston Herald, dated Thursday, July 15, 1948. The headline reads: "Painting Owner To Press $100,000 Suit Against Harvard."

The article details a lawsuit involving a valuable painting. Here's a summary of the content:

• Background: Harrison D. Horblit, a rare book and manuscript collector, is suing Harvard University for $100,000 over a painting he claims is worth that amount.
• Incident: The painting, cut from its frame, was found in Horblit's home in Brookline. Horblit alleges that Harvard University is responsible for the damage to the painting.
• Details of the Painting: The painting in question is valued at $100,000 and is described as a work by an unnamed artist. Horblit had rightful ownership of the piece, which was on loan to the Fogg Museum at Harvard.
• The Suit: Horblit is pressing charges against Harvard, asserting that the university damaged the painting while it was in their care. He claims that the painting was slashed and ruined by Harvard personnel.
• Context: The article mentions Horblit's extensive collection and his reputation as a collector. It also notes that Horblit had previously allowed the painting to be exhibited at the Fogg Museum.
• Reaction: Horblit is seeking legal redress for the damage, stating that the painting was one of his most valuable possessions and its destruction has caused significant loss.

Additionally, the newspaper includes a photograph of Horblit with another individual, likely related to the story, though their exact roles are not specified in the image text.

There is also a smaller section titled "Nearly Found Painting," which talks about a separate incident involving a different painting and its recovery efforts. This part discusses the discovery of a painting by Jean François Millet that was previously thought to be lost. It was found by the Monuments, Fine Arts, and Archives (MFAA) Section during World War II. The painting was located in Merkers, Germany, hidden with other treasures in a salt mine. The piece was returned to its owner, Mrs. Ralph J. Hines, after the war.

The image shows clippings of a vintage newspaper article dated Thursday, July 18, 1946, as indicated at the top of the bottom section. The headline of the top portion states "Masterpiece Owner to Press $100,000 Suit Against Harvard," with a subheading including the date, "Today's Herald." The bottom half undertakes to continue the story with the header "Painting Owner To Press Suit." These snippets appear to be part of a legal dispute involving the owner of a painting and Harvard, suggesting a historical context to the content. The paper exhibits aging with its sepia-toned hue, and it is placed against a plain, light grey background. The clippings provide a snapshot that conveys the journalistic style and issues of the mid-20th century.

The image is of a newspaper clipping from the Boston Herald dated Thursday, July 18, 1946. The headline reads: "Masterpiece Owner to Press $100,000 Suit Against Harvard." The article is about Mrs. Jean S. Bullitt Darlington of West Chester, Pennsylvania, who was preparing to sue Harvard University for $100,000 in damages over the handling of a Rubens masterpiece titled "Descent from the Cross."

There is a sepia-toned photograph within the clipping showing four individuals standing on steps, identified as George G. Clauter of Philadelphia, Mrs. Darlington, and Charles S. McLaughlin of Boston, along with another man.

The article details the legal dispute stemming from Harvard's decision not to pack the painting under their arm and return it to Mrs. Darlington, resulting in damage and a $62.95 bill for repair. The owner firmly told Harvard she planned to push the suit until the university settled for the damages.

The text also mentions the involvement of various legal professionals and experts, as well as the history and circumstances around the painting and its storage. The article is structured in two parts, with the continuation of the story on the front page and on the back, providing an in-depth account of the lawsuit and the painting's condition.

The image shows a newspaper clipping with a headline that reads "Masterpiece Owner to Press $100,000 Suit Against Harvard." The clipping is dated July 18, 1946, and appears to be from the Boston Herald. The article discusses a lawsuit filed by Mrs. Jean McIntire against Harvard University over the painting "West Chestnut Street" by George C. McGrew. The painting was damaged during its transportation to the Fogg Art Museum, and Mrs. McIntire is seeking $100,000 in damages. The clipping includes a photograph of Mrs. McIntire and her attorney, Charles S. McLaughlin, standing beside the damaged painting.

The image shows a collage of newspaper clippings on a gray background. The clippings are arranged in a cross shape, with the largest clipping in the center and smaller clippings on the sides. The clippings are from different newspapers and feature various headlines and articles. The largest clipping in the center has the headline "Masterpiece Owner to Press $100,000 Suit Against Harvard." The other clippings have headlines such as "Painting Owner To Press Suit" and "Today's Herald."