Archives Scrapbooks

The image is a clipping of a newspaper page from the Buffalo, N.Y. Evening News, dated Saturday, December 4, 1948. The page contains three articles related to the art world:

1. New York Auction of Local Paintings Stirs Up Art Storm:

   • This article discusses an auction of local paintings in New York that caused a stir in the art community.
   • The auction, held on December 3, was described as a "misfortune" by the American Artists Professional League, which believed it would devalue the artworks.
   • The article mentions that the auction included works by artists who had passed away and whose families needed to sell the paintings.
   • The prices for the paintings ranged from $100 to $50, with some pieces selling for as little as $10.
   • The article includes quotes from various individuals, including the director of the Albright Art Gallery, Gordon M. Smith, who defended the auction and the quality of the artworks.

2. Ritchie Says Auctioned Art Was Not of Museum Quality:

   • This smaller article is a continuation or related piece to the first article.
   • It quotes Ritchie, who states that the artworks auctioned were not of museum quality and that the auction was a reasonable way to handle the artworks.

3. Buffalo Artist Hits 'Drive on 'Insane' Art:

   • This article discusses a "drive on insane art" by the British Fine Arts Academy, which aimed to raise funds by auctioning off artworks deemed "insane."
   • The article mentions that the academy planned to auction off 500 paintings, including works by artists like Picasso, Matisse, and Klee.
   • The drive was criticized by some, including the artist Alex Levy, who argued that the academy was exploiting the artists and that the artworks were not insane but rather modern and progressive.

The page is yellowed with age, indicating it is an old newspaper clipping, and it has been preserved, possibly in a scrapbook or archive.

The image shows a yellowed, aged newspaper clipping from the "Buffalo Evening News" dated Saturday, December 9, 1950. The main article on the left page is titled "NEW YORK AUCTION OF LOCAL PAINTINGS STIRS UP ART STORM." The article discusses the controversy surrounding an auction at the Albright Art Gallery where several local artists' paintings were sold, including one by an unnamed artist for $100 and another by Frank Kreutzer for $40. The Albright Art Gallery defended its actions, stating that the sale of these paintings was necessary to make room for more important works. The article also mentions that some artists, including Albert H., have threatened legal action.

On the right side of the clipping, there is another article titled "RITCHIE SAYS AUCTIONED ART WAS NOT OF MUSEUM QUALITY." This article features a statement from the director of the Albright Art Gallery, who asserted that the paintings sold at the auction were not of museum quality and that the decision to sell them was made to improve the gallery's collection.

The lower part of the clipping includes another article titled "LANDLORD-TAXPAYER." This article criticizes the decision to use public funds to support what the author considers to be a frivolous and poorly managed art gallery. The author argues that the money could be better spent on other public needs.

The text is somewhat faded and the edges of the clipping show signs of wear and tear.

The image displays two newspaper clippings from the New York Evening News dated Saturday, December 4, 1943.

Left Clipping:

• Title: "New York Auction of Local Paintings Stirs Up Art Storm"
• The article discusses a recent auction of local paintings held at the Albright Art Gallery in Buffalo, New York.
• It highlights that the auction brought to light a controversy over the gallery's decision to dispose of paintings that were previously considered of high quality. The artworks in question were painted by living artists, some of whom were well-known, and were valued at between $1000 and $4000.
• The article mentions that the artists' concerns were not addressed effectively by the gallery's decision-makers. One artist, whose work was auctioned, stated that the gallery's actions were a form of "auction-out" and that the artists were not consulted adequately.

Right Clipping:

• Title: "Ritchie Says Auctioned Art Was Not of Museum Quality" and "Buffalo Artist Proposes Land-Aid-Taxpayer"
  • First Segment (Ritchie):
    • This segment quotes Albright Art Gallery director, Mr. Ritchie, who defends the gallery's decision to auction the paintings. He states that the artworks were not of museum quality and that the gallery was justified in disposing of them.
  • Second Segment (Land-Aid-Taxpayer):
    • This part discusses a proposal by a Buffalo artist, who suggests a Land-Aid-Taxpayer initiative. The artist argues that the community should support local art and education, citing the Buffalo Fine Arts Academy's efforts and the need for a broader cultural appreciation in the city. The writer expresses frustration with the local art scene, mentioning that some people are more concerned with the "saloon literature and vice" rather than promoting art.

The articles collectively reflect a heated debate over the value and handling of local art, the involvement of artists, and the role of galleries in the community.

The image shows a page from the New York Evening News, dated Saturday, December 4, 1943. The page contains several news articles related to the art world and local events in New York City.

1. Main Article (Left Column):

   • Title: "NEW YORK AUCTION OF LOCAL PAINTINGS STIRS UP ART STORM"
   • Content: The article discusses the auction of local paintings by the Albright Art Gallery, which was seen as a controversial move by many artists. The auction was organized by the American Artists' Professional League and included works by prominent artists like Louis Eilshemius and Louis Kronberg. The auction raised around $1000 to $4000 for the gallery's permanent collection. The article mentions that the auction was criticized as an "auction outfit" and that many artists felt their work was being devalued. Louis Kronberg, whose painting sold for $80, expressed his dismay, suggesting that the auction was a form of "knocking down" his work.

2. Top Right Column:

   • Title: "Ritchie Says Auctioned Art Was Not of Museum Quality"
   • Content: This article includes a statement from the director of the Albright Art Gallery, Mr. Ritchie, who asserts that the auctioned art was not of museum quality. He explains that the gallery's decision to auction the art was made due to financial necessity and that the auction was not intended to devalue the art but rather to raise funds for the gallery's operations.

3. Middle Right Column:

   • Title: "2000 Artists in League"
   • Content: This article discusses a league of 2000 artists protesting the auction. The league, which includes well-known artists like John Sloan and Edward Hopper, has started a campaign to raise funds for the Albright Art Gallery. They believe that the auction will not benefit the gallery and that it is a poor way to handle the artworks.

4. Bottom Right Column:

   • Title: "Landmark-Taxpayer"
   • Content: This article discusses a proposed drive in Buffalo to collect funds for the Buffalo Fine Arts Academy. The article highlights the importance of art education and the need to preserve the academy's collection. It mentions the Buffalo Fine Arts Academy's historical significance and its role in educating artists and preserving art.

Overall, the page reflects a heated debate within the art community about the auction of local paintings and the impact it might have on the art world and its institutions.

The image is a collection of newspaper clippings from the New York Evening News, dated September 4, 1943, and September 9, 1943. Here’s a detailed summary of the content:

Top Left Article (September 4, 1943)

Title: NEW YORK AUCTION OF LOCAL PAINTINGS STIRS UP ART STORM

• Summary: The article discusses a controversy surrounding the auction of local paintings at the Albright Art Gallery in Buffalo, NY. The American Artists Professional League has criticized the auction, arguing that it devalues the work of local artists. The auction, which includes works by artists such as Louis Kroneberg, has been criticized for potentially damaging the reputation of local artists. The article mentions that the Albright Art Gallery had planned to auction around 70 paintings, but this decision has caused a stir among local artists who feel that their work is being undervalued.

Top Right Article (September 4, 1943)

Title: Ritchie Says Auctioned Art Was Not of Museum Quality

• Summary: This article features a statement from the director of the Albright Art Gallery, Mr. Ritchie, who clarifies that the auctioned art was not of museum quality. He explains that the decision to auction these pieces was made after consultation with the Art Committee and that the gallery did not intend to devalue the artists' work. The auction was a way to raise funds, and the artworks were considered unsuitable for permanent collection.

Bottom Left Article (September 9, 1943)

Title: 2000 Artists in League

• Summary: This article discusses the American Artists Professional League, a group of over 2000 artists who have united to protest the auction. The League argues that auctioning the paintings could harm the reputation of the artists involved. The article mentions specific artists like Louis Kroneberg, who had their works auctioned for as low as $40. The League’s president, Mr. Reid, expresses concern about the potential damage to artists' reputations and the value of their work.

Bottom Right Article (September 9, 1943)

Title: Landmark-Taxpayer: Buffalo Artist Proposes Drive

• Summary: This article discusses a proposal by a local Buffalo artist to establish a drive to raise funds for the Buffalo Fine Arts Academy. The artist suggests that a tax on art sales could provide funds to support the academy, which is facing budget cuts. The article mentions that the academy is vital for the community and that the proposed tax could help maintain and improve art education in Buffalo.

General Context

The clippings collectively illustrate the tensions and debates surrounding the auction of local artworks in Buffalo, NY, during the early 1940s. There is a clear divide between the gallery's need to raise funds and the artists' concerns about the devaluation of their work. The articles also highlight the efforts of the American Artists Professional League to protect the interests of local artists and the proposal for a new funding mechanism to support art education in the community.

The image is a scan of a two-page spread from a newspaper, specifically the "Evening News" published on Saturday, December 5, 1964. The articles on these pages focus on the art scene in New York and Buffalo.

Left Page:

Headline: "New York Auction of Local Paintings Stirs Up Art Storm"

Subheadline: "Buffalo Evening News New York Bureau, NYW YORK, Dec. 4"

Content Summary:

• An auction of paintings by artists associated with the Buffalo Fine Arts Academy has sparked controversy.
• The auction, held by the American Artisanal Galleries, included works that were originally on loan from the Albright Art Gallery.
• The director of the Albright Art Gallery, Gordon M. Smith, expressed dismay and stated that the artists were not informed about their works being auctioned.
• Prices for the artworks ranged from $300 to $840.
• The article mentions that the artists themselves were shocked to find their works up for auction.
• The director of the auction house defended the sale, stating that the artists had donated the works to the gallery.
• Two artists, Virginia Cuthbert and William Kronsbein, have voiced their displeasure, with Kronsbein even considering legal action.
• The article discusses the implications for the gallery and its reputation, noting that the gallery's decision to auction the works could deter future donations.

Right Page:

Headline: "Richie Says Auctioned Art Was Not of Museum Quality"

Content Summary:

• Gordon M. Smith, director of the Albright Art Gallery, clarified that the auctioned artworks were not of museum quality.
• He explained that the artworks were part of the gallery's rental collection, meant for display in homes and offices, not for the museum's permanent collection.
• Smith mentioned that the rental collection had been built over three years with the cooperation of the Art Committee.

Headline: "Buffalo Artists Propose"

Content Summary:

• Buffalo artists are proposing to hold a drive to raise money for the Buffalo Fine Arts Academy.
• This initiative is a response to the auction controversy, aiming to ensure the academy has funds for acquiring new art.
• The article mentions that prominent local artists like Charles Burchfield and Seymour Drumlevitch are involved.
• The Buffalo Print Club has pledged to match the funds raised up to $1,000.
• The goal is to encourage the community to support the academy in the wake of the auction controversy.

Overall, the articles detail the reactions and responses within the art community to the auction of local artists' works, the implications for the Albright Art Gallery, and proposals to support the gallery moving forward.

This image is a photograph of a page featuring newspaper clippings from the Buffalo, N.Y., Evening News, dated December 4 and 8, 1943. The clippings are pasted onto a light brown paper sheet, which shows some signs of aging, indicated by the yellowed color and worn edges.

The largest article is titled "NEW YORK AUCTION OF LOCAL PAINTINGS STIRS UP ART STORM" and is under the "Local News" section of the newspaper. The story discusses the controversy arising from local art pieces being sold outside of their community, stirring up a negative reaction from the Buffalo art scene.

To the right, there's a smaller, partial clipping with the headline "Ritchie Says Auctioned Art Was-Not of Museum Quality" related to the outcome of the aforementioned auction, potentially addressing issues of quality and provenance of the auctioned pieces.

Below the main article are two smaller clippings. The one on the left is not fully visible, but the heading seems to say something about providing items for the "TAXPAYER." The piece on the right is titled "Buffalo Artist Prospers Drive on 'Insane' Art" and discusses an individual's apparent opposition to the prevailing art trends and the impact on local art institutions.

There are two dates visible, "1943" handwritten above the right clipping and the printed dates on both articles indicate the first article is from December 4, 1943, and the other clippings from December 8, 1943. The overall impression is that these articles provide a glimpse into the art community and local opinions at that time in Buffalo, New York.

The image shows a brown paper sheet with three old newspaper clippings attached to it. The clippings are from the Buffalo, N.Y. Evening News, dated December 4, 1943, and December 8, 1943. The articles discuss an art controversy:

1. The largest clipping on the left is titled "NEW YORK AUCTION OF LOCAL PAINTINGS STIRS UP ART STORM." It reports on artists' outrage over the Albright Art Gallery's auction of local paintings at "ridiculous prices," with some works initially purchased for large sums being sold for much less. It mentions that the artists who painted many of the works are still living, and it details complaints about the auction and the gallery's actions.

2. The small clipping at the top right is titled "Ritchie Says Auctioned Art Was Not of Museum Quality." It features a statement by Dr. Andrew C. Ritchie, director of the Albright Art Gallery, defending the decision to auction 142 miscellaneous art objects that were deemed not of museum quality after careful consideration.

3. The medium clipping at the bottom right is dated December 8, 1943, and is titled "Buffalo Artist Proposes Drive on 'Insane' Art." It condemns the Buffalo Fine Arts Academy for selling its permanent art collection secretly and criticizes the institution for potentially wasting public funds. The article calls for citizen action to protest this move and protect the arts. The piece is signed by Alex Levy.

The sheet has two punched holes on the right side and some signs of aging, such as discoloration and slight tears.

The image is a scanned page from a newspaper or magazine, likely from the early 20th century, given the style and the content. The page is slightly aged, with a brownish tint and some visible creases and folds. There are several articles and headlines, each with distinct sections and subheadings.

Top Section:

• The top section features a headline: "NEW YORK AUCTION OF LOCAL PAINTINGS STIRS UP ART STORM."
• Below the headline, there is a subheading: "Artists Complain."
• The article discusses an auction of local paintings in New York, which has caused controversy among artists. The text mentions that some artists are upset about the auction, possibly due to the perceived devaluation of their work or the methods used in the auction.

Middle Section:

• This section has a headline: "Buffalo Artist Proposes Drive on 'Insane' Art."
• The article is about a Buffalo-based artist who is advocating for a campaign against what he considers "insane" art. He suggests that the Buffalo Fine Arts Academy should focus on promoting more traditional and classical art forms instead of contemporary or avant-garde pieces.
• The artist argues that the academy's current direction is leading to the creation of "insane" art, which he believes is detrimental to the art community and the public's appreciation of art.

Bottom Section:

• The bottom section contains another article with the headline: "Ritchie Says Auctioned Art Was Not of Museum Quality."
• This article reports on a statement by Dr. Albright C. Ritchie, likely a critic or curator, who comments on the quality of the art that was auctioned. Dr. Ritchie asserts that the auctioned art did not meet the standards of museum-quality work.
• The article includes quotes from Dr. Ritchie, who explains his reasoning and the criteria he uses to evaluate art.

Additional Details:

• The page has some handwritten notes and annotations, possibly by a reader who marked specific parts of the articles.
• There are also some small advertisements or notices scattered throughout the page, though they are not the main focus.

Analysis:
The page reflects a period of debate and controversy within the art community, particularly around the themes of art valuation, the direction of art institutions, and the quality of art being produced and auctioned. The articles highlight the tensions between traditionalists and modernists in the art world, as well as the concerns of artists about the commercialization and perceived devaluation of their work. The handwritten notes suggest that the reader was engaged with the content, possibly indicating a personal or professional interest in the topics discussed.

The image appears to be a clipping from a newspaper. The clipping is from the Buffalo Evening News and is dated December 4, 1943. The clipping contains an article with the headline "NEW YORK AUCTION OF LOCAL PAINTINGS STIRS UP ART STORM." The article discusses an auction of local paintings in New York that has caused controversy among artists and art enthusiasts.

The article mentions that the American Artists' Professional League, which reports in the December issue of the League's publication, has expressed concern over the auction. The League's director, Dr. Albright, has stated that the auction does not meet the attitude of the American Artists' Professional League and that the gallery's actions are not of museum quality.

The article also discusses the Buffalo Fine Arts Academy's proposal to drive an "insane" auction having a detrimental effect on the local art scene. The Academy's director, Louis Kronberg, argues that the Buffalo Fine Arts Academy, which employs a large number of its artists in a permanent capacity, should not be subject to the whims of a private gallery.

The clipping also includes a letter from a Buffalo artist, Jack Gardner, who purchased a painting by another artist, Warren Quintin, at the auction. Gardner expresses his concern over the gallery's actions and the potential harm it could cause to the reputation of the artists involved.

Overall, the clipping provides insight into the controversy surrounding the auction of local paintings in New York and the concerns of the American Artists' Professional League and other artists and art enthusiasts.