Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V. Rinse, repeat.
ARCH.2003.28, Rendition: VRS249944
This image displays a single printed page from an old magazine or newspaper, likely from the late 1920s or early 1930s, given the content and typography. The page has a distinct aged, yellowed paper tone and shows some wear, including minor tears at the top edge and a larger tear along the left margin.
The page contains an article titled “BY WENDALL HAZEN” and is laid out in two columns of dense, justified text. The article is a critical and humorous commentary on the modern art world, specifically focusing on the painter Pablo Picasso and his reception in the United States, particularly at the Fogg Museum at Harvard University.
Introduction: Picasso’s “Mural” at Harvard
The article opens by describing the arrival of a "monumental" Picasso painting — a 23 by 11 feet canvas — at Harvard. The author, Wendall Hazen, immediately sets a satirical tone, referring to Picasso’s “murals” as “‘Guernica,’” and suggesting the artwork caused logistical nightmares for museum officials due to its massive size.
“HUNK OF WEIRD DISTORTIONS”
Hazen describes the painting as an absurd object, too heavy for regular handling (800 pounds of canvas and paint), requiring three sets of block-and-tackle, and needing to be hoisted with scaffolding. He notes that the painting had to be draped in a cloth while being installed — a detail that adds to the farcical tone.
Expresses Artist’s Indignation
The article shifts to Picasso’s own reactions. Hazen portrays Picasso as having a grievance: he painted his “vast canvas as a gift” for the Loyalist government in Spain during the Civil War, but they refused it. He then sent it to the United States, where it was also rejected by the Modern Art Museum in New York (likely MoMA), deemed “too low for a proper perspective.” The painting finally ended up at Harvard — ironically, as a “property of the author of it,” not the university.
“EYES COCKEYED” — The Artistic Justification
Hazen satirizes Picasso’s defenders, naming figures like Benjamin Howland, Jr. — described as an “associate professor of fine arts at Harvard” — who defend the painting as “good Picasso,” interpreting its grotesque forms as “fantasmagoria of images, memories, etc.” The article mocks Picasso’s “new anatomy” and “abstract” explanations, suggesting his work is really about “mental and physical disintegration and terror of people dying under the bombs.”
“PRODUCT OF ART UPHEAVAL”
This section places Picasso in the broader context of modern art movements — Futurism, Orphism, Expressionism, etc. Hazen notes that “Paris seethed” with new styles and that Picasso, along with Van Gogh, Gauguin, and Matisse, “became the words to work magic with the picture-buying public.” He suggests Picasso’s fame stems from being “the cleverest man in the history of all art” at “biding his time and picked his method with care.”
“HIS STRANGE PORTRAITS”
The final section mocks Picasso’s portraits, particularly those of lovers and family members. Hazen humorously recounts a portrait of a “lozenge” called “a portrait of his mistress” and another of a “cunning of Picasso, together with the happy circumstance, for him, if not for the lovers of classicism…” — implying that Picasso’s fame and commercial success were as much about luck and marketing as art.
The article is a blend of art criticism, satire, and gossipy commentary. It ridicules the pretensions of modernist art, the absurdity of museum logistics, and the cult of personality surrounding artists like Picasso. Hazen’s tone is wry and skeptical, mocking both the artist’s self-importance and the art world’s eagerness to embrace avant-garde work, regardless of its physical or conceptual challenges.
It’s a fascinating historical artifact that captures the public’s ambivalence — and often bemusement — toward modern art in the early 20th century.
Given that the article mentions Guernica — painted in 1937 — and refers to it as a “gift to the loyalist government” and its “tour” through U.S. museums (including Harvard’s Fogg Museum), this article was likely published in 1938 or 1939, during or shortly after the painting’s U.S. exhibition tour, which was part of a fundraising effort for Spanish Republican refugees. The article’s sarcastic tone reflects the broader public and critical debate that surrounded the painting — even within elite circles like Harvard — at the time.
The image you've shared is a page from a publication that appears to be discussing art, specifically focusing on the work of Pablo Picasso. The text is written in a column format, with several headings that suggest the article is analyzing different aspects of Picasso's art and its reception. The style of the text seems to be from a historical review or commentary, possibly from a magazine or newspaper, discussing the challenges of displaying and understanding modern art, particularly Picasso's works like "Guernica."
The article mentions the size and weight of "Guernica," the difficulties in exhibiting it, and the reactions to Picasso's style. It also touches on the broader context of modern art, mentioning other artists like Matisse, Friesz, and Van Dongen, and art movements such as Fauvism and Cubism. The tone of the article is informative and analytical, providing insights into the art world of the time.
The page has a yellowed appearance, suggesting it's from a publication that is quite old. There are some visible creases and marks on the paper, which might indicate it is a scanned copy of an original document. The text is legible and the page is neatly formatted. The article appears to be written in a formal, analytical style, typical of critical essays or reviews from the early to mid-20th century.
This image appears to be a scanned page from an old publication, possibly a magazine or newspaper, discussing Pablo Picasso's mural "Guernica." The page is numbered 88 in the top right corner and has been cut out and pasted onto a brownish paper background. The text is divided into two columns, with the left column titled "BY WENDALL HAZEN" and the right column beginning with "Here and there, as your glance wanders back and forth, like the electric eye of a television scanner..."
The left column discusses the challenges and controversies surrounding the installation of Picasso's mural at the Fogg Museum at Harvard University. It mentions the physical weight and size of the painting, the difficulties in hanging it, and the artistic and political significance of the work. The column also touches on Picasso's status in the art world and the reactions of various critics and scholars.
The right column delves into the artistic techniques and themes present in "Guernica," describing the distortions and abstract elements of the painting. It also provides historical context about the development of modern art movements and Picasso's role within them. The text mentions other artists and art movements, such as the Fauves, Futurism, Orphism, Expressionism, Vorticism, and Purism, and discusses the impact of these movements on the art world.
The overall tone of the text is analytical and somewhat critical, examining both the physical and conceptual aspects of "Guernica" and its place in the history of modern art.
The image appears to be a page from an old magazine or newspaper article. The text is written in a formal style and discusses Pablo Picasso's mural "Guernica" that was recently deposited at the Fogg Museum at Harvard University. The article highlights the difficulties faced in hanging the massive mural, which measures nearly 25 by 11 feet. It also mentions Picasso's use of unconventional materials and techniques in creating the artwork, such as block and tackle, wooden battens, and a battery of kleig lights. The article further explores Picasso's artistic style, his experimentation with different art movements, and his ability to captivate and challenge audiences with his work.
The image is a scanned page from a magazine or book, featuring an article about Pablo Picasso. The page is divided into two columns of text, with the left column containing the main article and the right column containing a continuation of the article. The text is printed in a serif font, and the page has a slightly yellowish tint, suggesting it is an older publication.
The left column of the article begins with the title "By Wendall Hazen" and discusses Picasso's mural "Guernica," which was deposited at the Museum of Modern Art in New York City. The author describes the challenges Picasso faced in creating the mural, including the difficulty of hanging such a large and heavy canvas. The article also mentions Picasso's use of distorted proportions and his experimentation with different art styles.
The right column of the article continues the discussion of Picasso's art, focusing on his use of abstraction and his departure from traditional methods of painting. The author describes Picasso's work as "an abstraction" and notes his use of cubism and other avant-garde techniques. The article also mentions Picasso's influence on modern art and his status as a "bad boy of the art world."
Overall, the article provides a detailed analysis of Picasso's artistic style and his impact on the art world. The author's use of descriptive language and historical context helps to convey the significance of Picasso's work and his place in art history.
The image shows a page from a book or publication titled "BY WENDALL HAZEN", which appears to be a detailed essay or article discussing the work of the artist Pablo Picasso, particularly focusing on his painting "Guernica." The page is formatted in a classic, serif typeface, reminiscent of early 20th-century printing styles. The text is divided into two columns, with the left column labeled "HUNK OF WEIRD DISTORTIONS" and the right column labeled "EXPRESSES ARTIST'S INDIGNATION" and "EYES COCKEYED."
Overall, the image depicts a scholarly analysis of Picasso's "Guernica" and his broader contributions to modern art, highlighting the tensions between innovation and tradition, as well as the political and social implications of his work.
This image shows a vintage newspaper or magazine clipping titled "By Wendall Hazen." The text discusses the modern art of Pablo Picasso, particularly focusing on his mural "Guernica," which was deposited at the Fogg Museum at Harvard University. The article delves into themes such as the challenges of modern art, the physical and conceptual aspects of Picasso's work, and its reception by the public and art critics. The article mentions the artwork's size, the difficulty of hanging it, and its emotional and political impact.
The text is printed in two columns on yellowed, aged paper, suggesting it is an older publication page. There is evidence of wear on the edges and upper corners, adding to the vintage appearance. The writing style is formal and analytical, discussing art theory, technique, and Picasso's influence within the broader context of modern art movements such as Futurism and Cubism. There is also commentary on the artist's intentions and the public's varied reactions to his work.
This image features a single page of an old newspaper or magazine, showcasing an article titled "By Wendall Hazen." The text is densely written and typed in a serif font typical of the mid-20th century. The document appears slightly yellowed with age, adding to its vintage appearance, and it shows minor damage along the edges, with some tears and dark spots, indicating wear over time.
The article discusses art and prominently mentions Pablo Picasso, referring to his mural "Guernica" and providing commentary on modern art, its forms, and its acceptance. Subheadings within the article read:
The text covers Picasso's influence on art, his controversial style, and specific characteristics of his work. It includes descriptions of his artistic approach and reactions from the art world, weaving critical observations and historical context.
The layout is columnar with clear breaks, making it readable, and some parts of the text are slightly skewed, which could be due to age or scanning. This image provides a historical artifact filled with cultural and artistic critique.
This is an image of an old newspaper page with two columns of text. The page header indicates the article title "BY WENDALL HAZEN" which is then followed by the content of the article. The text appears quite small, which is typical for a newspaper layout from the past, where space was optimized for dense information presentation.
The page is filled with commentary and reportage on subjects related to art and specific artists. The text includes references to historical art figures and movements, and it discusses various reactions to art and cultural shifts.
As the printing is dense and small, it may be difficult for some readers to decipher without a physical copy or a zoomed-in digital version. The paper has a yellowish tinge, suggesting it could be quite old and has perhaps aged over time. There are no images, illustrations, or photographs on this particular page, just continuous blocks of text.
Since the resolution is not sufficient to read the finer details of the article texts, specific content cannot be discussed in greater depth. However, judging by the presence of names like "Picasso" and "Cezanne" and terms like "weird distortions" in the visible text, the page seems to cover topics related to modern art and its reception by the public and art community.