Archives Scrapbooks

The image is of a printed page from "The Crimson," dated November 25, 1953. It contains an article titled "The Mail" and a letter to the editor under the section "Fine Arts." The letter is written by F. B. Deknatel.

Here is a summary of the content:

1. Introduction:

   • The writer discusses a meeting on Fine Arts held on November 24, 1953, and outlines four points of objection to the department's current focus.

2. First Objection:

   • The writer argues that Fine Arts should not concentrate solely on a few fields, suggesting that the department should cover a broader range of subjects. The writer believes that the current focus on the history of the period is too narrow.

3. Second Objection:

   • The writer suggests that the study of aesthetics should not be confined to the Fine Arts department. They propose that aesthetics should be studied in conjunction with other fields such as philosophy, psychology, and literature.

4. Third Objection:

   • The writer expresses concern that men interested in modern art should not be limited to the Fine Arts department. They mention that other departments, such as the English department, offer courses that cover modern art and contemporary trends.

5. Fourth Objection:

   • The writer points out that students who aspire to become artists cannot expect to gain sufficient practical training in the studio within the Fine Arts department. They suggest that a separate "art school" might be more appropriate for such training.

6. Conclusion:

   • The writer concludes by mentioning that Fine Arts is the third oldest concentration at Harvard and highlights the achievements of notable figures in the field. They also mention upcoming events such as lectures by foreign scholars and the arrival of the new curator of the Fogg Museum.

The letter is signed by F. B. Deknatel.

The image is a page from a newspaper or student publication titled "THE MAIL" dated March 24, 1953. The letter is addressed to the editor of "The Crimson," a well-known Harvard student newspaper.

The letter, titled "Fine Arts," is written by F. B. Deknatel and addresses several misconceptions about the Fine Arts department at Harvard. Deknatel argues the following points:

1. Concentration Field: He points out that the Fine Arts department is not a superficial field of concentration, but rather a rigorous one requiring deep study and commitment.

2. Training and Courses: Deknatel mentions that courses in painting, drawing, and architectural design are available for concentration. He notes that students who wish to pursue these areas can expect to spend considerable time in the studio.

3. Professors and Chairs: Deknatel mentions the distinguished faculty members in Fine Arts, including Professors Pope, Sachs, and Post, and the renowned chairs held by individuals such as Charles Elliot Norton and Kuno Francke.

4. Aesthetics Study: He clarifies that the department is well-suited for studying the aesthetics of art, including the historical background, various forms, and periods of art, as well as critical works.

5. Modern Art: Deknatel corrects a misunderstanding that the department does not deal with contemporary art. He highlights that the department emphasizes artistic movements from the 19th and 20th centuries and offers courses like "French Painting" and "Modern Sculpture."

6. Concentration for Seniors: He underscores that "Modern Art" is indeed a valid concentration field for seniors.

The letter emphasizes the depth and relevance of the Fine Arts department at Harvard, debunking several common misconceptions about its offerings and focus.

The document is a letter to the editor of the Harvard Crimson, titled 'Fine Arts,' dated March 24, 1953. The author, F. B. Deknatel, criticizes a previous statement about the Fine Arts department, arguing that it was written by someone with limited knowledge. The letter highlights several key points: (1) The Fine Arts concentration involves more than just studio work; it includes historical and theoretical studies. (2) The department caters to students interested in the aesthetics of art, not just its psychological or philosophical aspects. (3) The department does focus on modern art, with courses on contemporary movements and plans to introduce a course on 20th-century architecture. (4) Students aiming to be professional artists should spend more time in studios, but Harvard offers courses in drawing, painting, and design. The letter also mentions distinguished visiting professors and the Charles Eliot Norton and Kuno Francke professorships. The author emphasizes that the Fine Arts department is robust and offers diverse fields of study.

The image shows a newspaper clipping from The Crimson, dated December 24, 1953. The section is titled "THE MAIL" and includes guidelines stating that The Crimson does not necessarily endorse opinions expressed in printed communications and will not pay attention to anonymous letters unless special conditions are met and the writer's name is withheld at their request.

The main content of the clipping is a letter to the editor titled "Fine Arts," written by F. B. Deknatel, responding to a previous statement on Fine Arts as a field of concentration at Harvard.

Key points in Deknatel's letter include:

1. Critique of the Previous Statement:

   • The earlier statement was overly superficial and did not accurately reflect the depth and nature of the Fine Arts concentration.
   • The department's approach is not merely technical training but also includes historical and critical analysis.

2. Correction of Factual Errors:

   • The department offers a more comprehensive study of art history than suggested, including texts by notable scholars such as the Charles Eliot Norton and others.
   • Students have access to significant resources, including the Fogg Museum.

3. Aesthetics and Philosophy:

   • The department addresses aesthetics, primarily through the study of art, which can be as philosophical as other academic fields.

4. Modern Art:

   • The department does not ignore modern art. There is a plan to introduce a course on modern architecture and possibly more contemporary art forms in the future.

Deknatel's letter emphasizes that the Fine Arts concentration at Harvard is robust, offering a well-rounded education that includes historical context, critical analysis, and modern developments.

The image is a page from "The Crimson," the student newspaper of Harvard University, dated March 24, 1953. The page includes a letter to the editor under the heading "Fine Arts."

The letter, signed by F. B. Deknatel, addresses several points regarding the Fine Arts department at Harvard. The writer critiques a statement that appeared in the Crimson, which suggested that Fine Arts is a field of concentration with limited time commitment and superficial acquaintance.

The writer makes four main points:

1. Collateral Reading: The writer emphasizes that a concentration in Fine Arts requires extensive reading, including historical texts and critical works on art from various periods and forms.

2. Qualification for Concentration: The writer clarifies that those interested in the psychological or philosophical aspects of aesthetics should concentrate in those fields rather than Fine Arts, which focuses more on material aspects like painting, drawing, and design.

3. Men in Modern Art: The writer argues that men interested in modern art can concentrate in Fine Arts, as the department deals with contemporary art movements and offers courses on modern art.

4. Time Commitment: The writer notes that students can expect to spend as much time in the studio as in a purely "art school," with courses in painting, drawing, and architectural design being counted for concentration.

The letter also mentions that the Fine Arts department is fortunate to have two professorships with visiting scholars such as Charles Eliot Norton and Kuno Francke, and it lists several distinguished scholars who have held these chairs in the past, including Lawrence Binyon.

The letter concludes by stating that the Crimson does not necessarily endorse opinions expressed in printed communications and that no attention will be paid to anonymous letters unless specifically requested.

The image is a page from a letter dated April 24, 1933, addressed to the Crimson, which is the student newspaper of Harvard University. The letter is from F. B. Deknatel, a contributor, responding to a statement made in a previous Crimson article about Fine Arts as a field of concentration.

Key points of the letter include:

1. Editorial Note: The Crimson does not necessarily endorse opinions expressed in printed communications, and anonymous letters are not acknowledged unless the writer requests their name to be withheld.

2. Correction of Misstatements:

   • Deknatel clarifies that the statement on Fine Arts, which appeared in the Crimson, misrepresented the nature of the work in the department.
   • He corrects three main misconceptions:
     1. Collateral Reading: Deknatel explains that concentrators in Fine Arts must study texts on the history of art and critical works, not just superficial reading of historical backgrounds.
     2. Aesthetics: He states that those interested in the psychological or philosophical aspects of aesthetics can concentrate in Fine Arts. However, the coursework is primarily concerned with the material of Fine Arts, which includes the study of art forms and periods.
     3. Modern Art: Deknatel asserts that the course does not specifically deal with contemporary art but covers a broad range of art movements, including those from the 19th and 20th centuries. He mentions specific courses like "French Painting" and "Modern Sculpture" and notes that modern art may be included in senior-level tutorials.

3. Department Resources:

   • Deknatel highlights the department's resources, including two professors, Charles Eliot Norton and Kuno Francke, who hold alternate chairs as authorities on art.
   • He mentions the upcoming visit of Lawrence Bison, who will give a lecture at the British Museum.

4. Time Commitment:

   • Deknatel notes that students cannot expect to spend as much time in the studio as in a purely "art school," but there is still valuable training in painting, drawing, and architectural design.

The letter aims to clarify the nature and scope of the Fine Arts concentration at Harvard, emphasizing the breadth and depth of study involved.

The image shows a cream-colored paper with a newspaper clipping titled "THE MAIL" attached on the left side. The clipping appears to be a letter to the editor addressing statements about Fine Arts in a department, particularly correcting misunderstandings about the curriculum and concentration offerings. It discusses topics like historical background, aesthetics, contemporary art, and special courses such as "Theory of Representation and Design" and "Modern Art."

The letter mentions professors, courses about artistic movements, and opportunities for students interested in Fine Arts, including the option to study at Harvard or other colleges. The letter is signed by "F. B. Deknatel."

At the top left of the paper, there is a handwritten note that says "Crimson 24 Mar 1933," indicating the source and date of the clipping. The rest of the paper is blank.

This image shows a printed page from a newspaper or a journal, with the header "THE MAIL" and a subheader "Fine Arts." The content of the page includes a letter to the editor or an article discussing the state of fine arts education, mentioning specific areas such as art history and the study of various periods of art. The page has a date written in the top left corner in handwriting - "Crimson 24 March 1933," suggesting it is from the Harvard Crimson, which is the daily newspaper of Harvard University.

The text addresses the concerns a student might have about art studies, including opportunities for those who want to become artists versus those who simply wish to deepen their appreciation of fine arts. It mentions professors and specialties recognized in the department and suggests their importance to a well-rounded fine arts education, noting that modern art history and certain subjects are designated for seniors' concentration.

At the bottom of the printed portion, the name "F. B. Deknatel" is visible, possibly indicating the author of the letter or article. The paper shows some signs of age with yellowing around the edges and the typographical layout reflects a style typical of the early 20th century.

This image displays a newspaper clipping titled "THE MAIL," dated February 24, 1933, and marked "Crimson" at the top. The text appears to be a letter from F. B. Deknatel to the editor of "The Crimson," discussing the field of Fine Arts at Harvard University.

Key points from the letter include:

1. The writer critiques the representation of the Fine Arts department, emphasizing its importance and the faculty's expertise.
2. They clarify that students interested in studying the aesthetics of art can find relevant coursework in the department, particularly the "Theory of Representation and Design."
3. The letter addresses the misconception that those interested in modern art or contemporary art cannot concentrate in Fine Arts. It outlines the availability of courses in 19th and 20th-century art under professors Sachs and Pope.
4. A note highlights that Fine Arts will be the beneficiary of two professorships from foreign scholars, with references to notable historical academic contributions.

The letter includes details on the curriculum, courses in modern art, and expectations for students aspiring to become artists, contrasting Harvard's offerings with those of traditional art schools.

The image shows a page from a publication titled "The Mail", dated 24th June 1933. The page appears to be from a newspaper or journal, as indicated by the header and the structured layout. The content is a letter or article discussing the Fine Arts department at Harvard University.

Key Details:

1. Header Information:

   • The top of the page includes the title "THE MAIL" and a note at the top left corner stating:
     "Ed. Note: The Crimson does not necessarily endorse opinions expressed in printed communications. No attention will be paid to anonymous letters and only under special conditions, at the request of the writer, will names be withheld."
     This suggests the page is part of a section dedicated to reader submissions or letters to the editor.

2. Main Content:

   • The article is titled "Fine Arts" and is addressed "To the Editor of The Crimson."
   • The author critiques the Fine Arts department at Harvard, raising several concerns about its curriculum and focus. The critique is structured into four main points:
     1. Historical Reading: The author argues that the Fine Arts department places too much emphasis on historical reading, particularly focusing on the history of art rather than the practical aspects of creating art.
     2. Aesthetics: The author questions the department's focus on aesthetics, suggesting that students should not be required to study aesthetics if they are not interested in the psychological or philosophical aspects of art.
     3. Modern Art: The author criticizes the department for not adequately addressing modern art movements, such as those from the 19th and 20th centuries, and notes that there is no specific course dedicated to modern art.
     4. Foreign Scholars: The author highlights the department's benefit from bringing foreign scholars to Harvard, mentioning notable figures such as Charles Eliot Norton, Kuno Francke, and others.

3. Closing:

   • The article concludes with a signature: "F. B. Dekatel."
   • The author expresses hope that the Fine Arts department will correct the issues raised in the letter.

4. Layout and Style:

   • The text is typed in a formal, serif font, typical of early 20th-century printing.
   • The page has a clean, structured layout with clear paragraph breaks and indentation for readability.
   • The paper appears aged, with a light yellow tint and slight wear, suggesting it is an original or archival copy.

Summary:

The image depicts a page from "The Mail", a section of a publication likely from The Harvard Crimson, dated June 24, 1933. The content is a critical letter addressing the Fine Arts department at Harvard University, discussing concerns about the curriculum's focus on historical art, aesthetics, modern art, and the department's international scholarly connections. The letter is signed by F. B. Dekatel.