Archives Scrapbooks

The image is of a page from the Harvard Alumni Bulletin, specifically page 577. The article on this page is titled "Can Courses Be Abandoned?" and was written by William Setchel Learned, Ph.D. '12, in 1932. The article discusses the Inglis Lecture for Education, which emphasizes the need for a radical change in the lecture format of teaching.

Key points from the article include:

1. Critique of Traditional Lectures: Dr. Learned argues that the traditional lecture format, which focuses on the lecturer's opinions and accomplishments rather than the students' learning, is outdated and ineffective.

2. Proposed Alternative: He suggests setting up an intellectual objective that is challenging and remote enough to require serious effort from students. The focus should be on measuring the students' learning achievements rather than the lecturer's performance.

3. Challenges of Implementation: Dr. Learned acknowledges that implementing such a scheme would be complex and could fill many volumes. He provides a brief outline of his proposed system in this article.

4. Value of Courses: The article also addresses the argument that courses are valuable because they enable teaching large numbers of students. Dr. Learned counters this by suggesting that large numbers are not a necessary condition for effective teaching and that colleges can find ways to teach effectively without relying on traditional courses.

5. Critique of Marks and Credits: The article criticizes the use of marks and credits, arguing that they obscure the realities of learning and hinder the development of good teaching. It suggests that students should be motivated by the intrinsic value of learning rather than external rewards.

6. Conclusion: Dr. Learned's book is mentioned as a starting point for a vigorous reform in education, aiming to spark discussion and potentially lead to significant changes in educational practices.

Overall, the article calls for a reevaluation of traditional educational methods and advocates for a more student-centered approach to learning.

The image is a page from the Harvard Alumni Bulletin, dated February 10, 1922. The main article on the page discusses the Inglis Lecture of 1932, given by William S. Learned, Ph.D., titled "The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching."

Key points from the article include:

1. Critique of Current Educational Practices:

   • Learned criticizes a growing trend in American education, describing it as a widespread, deep-running tendency to focus on superficial aspects such as counting credits and achievements rather than substantive learning.
   • He argues that this "realism" is counterproductive and leads to a lack of genuine educational progress.

2. The Volume's Impact:

   • The article's author considers the volume by Learned to be significant and praises its potential to spark meaningful discussion.
   • The author plans to discuss the feasibility of implementing some of Learned's suggestions, despite recognizing the objections to the radical nature of the proposed changes.

3. Arguments Against Large Courses:

   • The necessity of large courses in colleges is debated. It is argued that they are not inherently valuable for teaching large numbers of students, as they do not allow for individualized attention and personalized education.
   • The author contends that the college's role is to provide a comprehensive test of intellectual material and that large courses do not adequately fulfill this role.

4. Defense of Group Teaching:

   • The article discusses the merits of group teaching, stating that it should be seen as a unit of credit and a collective learning effort, not just a method to accumulate marks.
   • Group teaching should focus on the dynamics of learning, encouraging discussion and collaboration rather than mere absorption of content.

5. Student Accountability:

   • The author addresses the common practice of holding students accountable only through marks and suggests that this system can hinder genuine learning and freedom.
   • The article implies that students should engage more deeply with the material and be evaluated in a manner that encourages real understanding and growth.

6. Call for Reform:

   • The author supports Learned’s call for educational reform, emphasizing that it should lead to vigorous discussion and a reevaluation of how education is delivered in American colleges.
   • The ultimate goal is to foster an environment where students are genuinely engaged and learning is meaningful.

The overall tone of the article suggests a critical view of the current educational practices and an endorsement of Learned's ideas for reform.

The image is a page from the Harvard Alumni Bulletin, specifically page 577. The article discusses a lecture titled "Can Courses Be Abandoned?" delivered by William Setchel Learned, Ph.D., of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. The lecture critiques the current system of education, particularly the use of courses and credits.

Key points from the article include:

1. Introduction to the Lecture:

   • The lecture is part of a series and is noted for its significant content and potential impact on educational reform.

2. Critique of Courses:

   • Learned argues that courses and credits are not essential to education. Instead, he advocates for a system where students are individually guided in their learning.
   • He suggests that the current system of courses and marks is a form of abandonment of the core principles of education, which should focus on individual learning and achievement.

3. Proposed Changes:

   • Learned proposes replacing courses with a system where teachers guide students to achieve defined objectives.
   • He suggests that the effectiveness of learning should be measured by what students accomplish, not by their teachers' opinions.
   • He advocates for a comprehensive test of intellectual mastery over the entire body of material to be learned.

4. Objections to the Scheme:

   • The article mentions two objections to Learned's proposal: the necessity of courses for teaching large numbers of students efficiently, and the idea that students should be held to their work through marks.

5. Realist's Arguments:

   • A realist would argue that courses are necessary for teaching large numbers of students, and that marks are crucial for maintaining discipline and promoting students.
   • The realist also suggests that using marks as a teaching device is not the main issue; rather, it's the interest and effort of students that should be cultivated.

6. Critique of Marks:

   • The article points out that the use of marks can obscure the realities of learning and may lead to a perfunctory interest in accumulating marks rather than genuine learning.
   • It is suggested that teaching should be done in units of uniform length, focusing on the content of the course and the abilities of students.

7. Conclusion:

   • The article concludes that Dr. Learned's book may spark vigorous discussion and reform, but it should be approached carefully as it presents a radical departure from current educational practices.

The overall message of the article is to provoke thought and discussion about the merits and demerits of the traditional course-based educational system and the potential benefits of an individualized approach to learning.

The image is a page from the Harvard Alumni Bulletin, specifically page 577. The article discusses the Inglis Lecture titled "Realism in American Education" by William Setchel Learned, Ph.D., delivered in 1932. The lecture suggests a radical approach to education by advocating the abandonment of courses and credits as a method of teaching and assessment. Learned proposes replacing this system with a continuous and individualized learning process, guided by teachers who measure students' accomplishments rather than their marks.

Key points include:

1. Critique of Traditional Courses and Credits:

   • Learned argues that the current system of courses and credits is outdated and should be abandoned.
   • He suggests that this system is counterproductive, focusing on marks rather than the actual learning process.

2. Alternative Proposal:

   • The alternative is to set up an intellectual objective that is broad enough to challenge students continuously.
   • Teachers would then assess students based on their comprehensive understanding of the material rather than their performance on tests or coursework.

3. Objections to the Proposal:

   • Critics argue that courses are necessary for teaching large numbers of students efficiently.
   • The author counters that large numbers are not inherently problematic and that individualized teaching is impractical due to the lack of sufficient skilled tutors.

4. Discussion on Marks and Teaching:

   • The author questions why marks are emphasized and why teaching is often conducted in large groups rather than tailored to individual students.
   • It is argued that the current system obscures the true essence of learning and teaching, focusing on administrative convenience rather than actual progress.

5. Conclusion:

   • The author acknowledges the impracticality of the system proposed by Learned but suggests that it sparks important discussions about the true nature of education and the role of marks in the learning process.

The article overall encourages a reevaluation of educational practices, emphasizing the need for a more flexible and individualized approach to learning.

The image displays a page from the Harvard Alumni Bulletin, specifically page 577. The article discusses the Inglis Lecture titled "Can Courses Be Abandoned?" delivered by William Setchel Learned, Ph.D., from the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Learned argues for a shift in the educational approach, advocating for a radical change at Harvard, where the traditional system of counting credits and relying on course completion might be replaced. He emphasizes the need for a more comprehensive and individualized learning approach, guided by intellectual objectives and direct assessments rather than mere course credits. The lecture criticizes the current system, suggesting it encourages superficial learning and discourages deep understanding.

Learned presents two main objections to the current system of courses:

1. Courses are valuable, but they are not necessary for teaching a large number of students.
2. The current system is not conducive to individual learning and development.

He proposes replacing the current credit-based system with a more flexible approach, possibly involving teaching groups in uniform lengths and using tests to evaluate students' mastery of the material. This would allow for more individualized learning and freedom in teaching methods. The article also highlights the concerns that students might be hindered from pursuing their interests and that the current system is administratively cumbersome. Overall, Learned's lecture calls for a thorough reform in education to better address the needs and capabilities of students.

The image shows a page from the "HARVARD ALUMNI BULLETIN" discussing the book "Can Courses Be Abandoned?" by William S. Learned. The review, starting on page 577, highlights Learned's critique of the traditional course system in American education, which he suggests should be abandoned in favor of a more flexible, student-centered approach. Key points include the idea that courses and credits should be replaced with a system where students are guided toward intellectual objectives, and their achievements are comprehensively tested. The review raises two main objections to this idea: the practicality of teaching large numbers of students without courses, and the concern that students might not be adequately motivated without the structure of courses and marks. The review also questions the assumption that group teaching must be uniform and suggests that the focus should shift to the real business of education—individual progress. The review concludes that while the book may not provide a perfect solution, it invites vigorous discussion and reform.

This image displays a printed page from the "Harvard Alumni Bulletin." The page number at the top right corner is 577, and the text comprises a detailed discussion regarding education, teaching methods, and possibly the idea of abandoning certain educational practices or lectures.

The heading "Main Courses" is followed by a bold title, "The Inglis Lecture for 1932, by William Stetchnel Learned, Ph.D,” and continues with commentary about the significance and implications of this lecture in the realm of education. The article seems to critically analyze the purpose and effectiveness of lectures in higher education, and there is mention of "Realism in American Education." It also addresses potential reforms, the role of the examination system, and the importance of engaging students more actively in their learning process.

The text being cut off on the left suggests that the page is part of a two-column layout, and there is further text that is not visible in this image. The general tone of the article indicates a reflective and critical approach to the standard methods of teaching and learning in academic institutions.

The image depicts a page from the "Harvard Alumni Bulletin." This page, numbered 577, contains an article regarding whether courses should be abandoned in American education. The text discusses the Inglis Lecture for 1932 given by William Setchel Learned, Ph.D. '12, from the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. The article summarizes Dr. Learned's arguments against the traditional course-based educational system, arguing for a more radical approach to education, including the abandonment of courses and marks in favor of individual intellectual pursuit and achievement. The text acknowledges the complexity of implementing such a system and considers various objections to the proposal. The page has holes punched along the left side, indicating it might have been part of a ring binder or collection.

This image shows a single page from the "Harvard Alumni Bulletin," page number 577. The page features an article titled "Can Courses Be Abandoned?" The article reviews a 1932 lecture by William Setchel Learned, Ph.D., titled "Realism in American Education," and discusses its content and arguments about the role and significance of educational courses, the counting of credits in schools or colleges, and the challenges of course-based learning and grading. The article highlights Learned's advocacy for abandoning courses and marks as units in education and instead focusing on a continuous intellectual challenge tailored individually to students. It debates the value of courses as a teaching device, the administrative implications of grading, and the realism of traditional education methods. The text is printed in two columns and includes some editorial commentary on the lecture's potential impact on educational reform. The page is slightly aged and has three punched holes on the left side, indicating it was likely stored in a binder. There are also handwritten numerical notations at the top left corner of the page.

The image shows a page from the Harvard Alumni Bulletin, specifically page 577. The page features an article titled "The Inglis Lecture for 1932, by William Setchel, Learned, Ph.D." The article discusses a lecture delivered by William Setchel, a recipient of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, on the topic of "Realism in American Education."

Key Details from the Image:

1. Title and Context:

   • The article is part of a lecture series, and it is described as a "remarkable volume" that addresses significant issues in American education.
   • The lecture is noted for its depth and wide-ranging perspective, touching on current trends, achievements, and future directions in education.

2. Content Overview:

   • The lecture is summarized in a brief notice, highlighting its main argument and objections raised against it.
   • The article critiques the idea of abandoning courses in favor of a more comprehensive, intellectual examination of education. It argues that such an approach could lead to a false and perfervid interpretation of learning.

3. Key Arguments:

   • Critique of Abandoning Courses: The author argues against the complete abandonment of courses, stating that they serve as valuable teaching devices and help students understand the realities of learning.
   • Role of Credits and Marks: The article discusses the importance of marks and credits in education, emphasizing that they should not be the sole measure of learning. Instead, they should be used as tools to guide students and encourage continuous effort.
   • Individualized Learning: The text highlights the need to measure students' achievements individually, rather than relying solely on the opinions of teachers or the final objective of a course.
   • Realism in Education: The lecture advocates for a "realism" in education, which involves acknowledging the complexities of teaching and learning, rather than oversimplifying or idealizing the process.

4. Visual Elements:

   • The page has a clean, typed layout typical of early 20th-century publications.
   • There are faint markings or annotations in the top left corner, possibly indicating a catalog or reference number ("HAB 2/2/97").
   • The page number (577) is clearly visible at the top right corner.

5. Tone and Purpose:

   • The article aims to provoke thought and discussion about educational reform, particularly in response to Dr. Learned's ideas. It presents both the lecture's main points and objections to it, encouraging readers to consider the balance between realism and idealism in education.

Summary:

The image depicts a page from the Harvard Alumni Bulletin featuring a summary of a lecture by William Setchel on "Realism in American Education." The text explores the value of courses, the role of marks and credits, and the importance of individualized learning, while also addressing objections to the idea of abandoning courses entirely. The page is part of a broader discussion on educational reform and the challenges of implementing large-scale changes in teaching methods.