Archives Scrapbooks

The image is of a document that appears to be a two-part editorial or opinion piece from the Harvard Crimson, dated November 8, 1931, and April 18, 1932. The document discusses the practice of the Fogg Museum at Harvard University lending framed reproductions of fine art pictures to students for room decoration.

Vivid Art (November 8, 1931)

• Background: The Fogg Museum had been lending reproductions of fine art to students for three years.
• Purpose: The art was intended to enhance students' appreciation and understanding of art.
• Issues: The arts at Harvard were seen as overly scholarly and lacking in humanizing innovations.
• Proposal: The editorial suggests that the museum could expand its offerings to include modern art and original paintings by undergraduates.
• Benefits: This would provide students with a more diverse and engaging art experience, fostering a deeper appreciation for art.

Out of the Fogg (April 18, 1932)

• Recent Changes: The Fogg Museum had recently discontinued the practice of lending framed reproductions to undergraduates due to a perceived lack of interest.
• Criticism: The editorial argues that the museum should not have discontinued the service without proper advertisement and student input.
• Suggestions: The museum could have taken advantage of the opportunity to lend more art, including modern pieces, to foster a greater appreciation for art among students.
• Concerns: The editorial expresses worry that the Fine Arts Department might become isolated if it does not engage more with the university community.
• Recommendations: The editorial suggests that the museum should reconsider its decision and find ways to better integrate art into the broader university experience.

Overall, the document reflects a concern for the role of art in the academic environment and advocates for a more dynamic and inclusive approach to fostering artistic appreciation among students.

The document is a newspaper article from the Harvard Crimson, dated November 7, 1931, titled 'VIVID ART'. The article discusses the Fogg Museum's practice of lending framed reproductions of fine pictures to students for their room decoration, a program that had been discontinued. The author laments the end of this service, highlighting its benefits such as allowing students to live with and appreciate art, and suggests that the museum should reconsider its decision. The article also mentions that the museum's collection could be expanded to include modern art and that the lending program could be extended to the general public. A follow-up note dated April 18, 1932, titled 'OUT OF THE FOG', reveals that the museum has lent only two pictures this year, attributing the lack of interest to inadequate publicity. The author argues that the museum should actively promote this service and cooperate with house exhibitions to foster art appreciation among students.

The image contains a letter to the editor of the Harvard Crimson, dated November 7, 1931. The letter discusses the practice of the Fogg Museum lending framed reproductions of fine art to undergraduates for decorating their rooms.

Key points from the letter:

1. Historical Practice:

   • The Fogg Museum previously allowed students to borrow high-quality reproductions of famous artworks.
   • This practice was stopped, but recently the Museum reinstated it, albeit with only two pictures available this year.

2. Benefits of the Practice:

   • The author argues that living with a painting is a significant way to appreciate and understand art.
   • Harvard's fine arts courses are thought to benefit from such exposure by encouraging genuine appreciation and understanding among students.

3. Criticism and Suggestions:

   • The author expresses disappointment at the limited number of pictures available and the lack of action on expanding the program.
   • The letter suggests that the collection should be expanded to include works by modern artists and other important pieces.
   • The author believes that having more reproductions available would greatly benefit students eager to follow prominent artistic paths and enhance the general public’s appreciation of art.

4. Recommendations:

   • The Fogg Museum should not only maintain but also expand the tradition of lending art to students.
   • The Museum should clear space for well-decorated areas and possibly coordinate with House institutions for larger displays.
   • The author urges the Fogg Museum to reconsider its current limited offering and increase the number of available reproductions.

The letter is signed by "Crimson" and dated 1932 at the bottom right corner, indicating a potential follow-up or publication date.

The image contains two letters to the editor, both discussing the practice of lending artworks from the Fogg Museum at Harvard University.

Left Letter: "VIVID ART"

Date: November 7, 1931

Summary:
The letter praises the Fogg Museum's practice of loaning framed reproductions of fine pictures to students for decorating their rooms. This practice, established three years prior, has been beneficial in several ways:

• It allows students to live with and enjoy art, similar to the Japanese principle of hanging one picture at a time.
• It encourages students to appreciate art genuinely, as opposed to merely studying it in a classroom setting.
• It provides an opportunity for students to interact with art in a personal and enriching way.

The author suggests that this practice should be continued and even expanded to include more modern artworks and potentially loaning original paintings to the public through exhibitions.

Right Letter: "OUT OF THE FOGG"

Date: April 18, 1932

Summary:
The letter criticizes the recent discontinuation of the Fogg Museum's practice of loaning framed reproductions of pictures to undergraduates. The author argues that:

• The museum’s decision to stop this service was based on a lack of interest, but this was not properly communicated or advertised to students.
• The practice was valuable for students and should have been maintained.
• The museum's role should be to foster appreciation of art and house exhibitions rather than merely serve as a storage facility for wall decorations.
• The museum should not be isolated and should integrate more with the university community to spread knowledge and appreciation of art.

The author concludes by expressing concern that the Fogg Museum may be doing a disservice by ending this practice, which can only be rectified by renewing the offer to loan pictures.

The image contains two letters discussing the practice of lending framed reproductions of pictures from the Fogg Museum to students at Harvard.

First Letter (dated November 7, 1931):

• The letter, titled "Vivid Art," discusses the Fogg Museum's practice of lending framed reproductions of fine art to students for the decoration of their rooms.
• This practice was considered successful in the past due to several reasons:
  • It allowed students to enjoy and appreciate art in their daily lives.
  • It was a method of humanizing art education, which aligns with the Japanese practice of hanging one picture at a time.
  • It provided students with an opportunity to gain genuine appreciation for art rather than just theoretical knowledge.
  • The museum had a large collection of reproductions, which were well-suited for this purpose.
• The letter argues that reviving this policy would be beneficial, particularly by including modern art and works of permanent importance, and could reach a broader audience through exhibitions.
• The letter also notes that this practice would help students develop a deeper understanding and enjoyment of art.

Second Letter (dated April 18, 1932):

• The letter, titled "Out of the Fog," discusses the recent revival of the practice of lending framed reproductions but notes that it was poorly advertised.
• As a result, only two pictures were lent out this year, which the museum used as an excuse to discontinue the service.
• The letter argues that discontinuing the service prematurely is a mistake, as it would deny students a valuable educational opportunity.
• The letter suggests that the museum should instead consider offering the service again, possibly cooperating with house exhibitions and being more proactive in promoting the program.
• It emphasizes that the museum should not become a mere clearinghouse for wall decorations but should focus on spreading knowledge and appreciation of art.
• The letter concludes by urging the museum to rectify this oversight and renew the offer to loan pictures, as it is a meaningful contribution to the university's educational goals.

The image shows a page from a newspaper or a magazine, dated April 18, 1932, from the Crimson, likely the Harvard student newspaper. The article is divided into two sections titled "Vivid Art" and "Out of the Fog."

Vivid Art:

This section discusses the Fogg Museum's practice of lending framed reproductions of fine art to students. The author argues that this practice was successful and beneficial, offering students an opportunity to appreciate art and learn about it. The Fogg Museum, having a significant collection of fine art, can provide students with a chance to engage with artworks they might not otherwise see. The author suggests that the collection should be expanded to include modern art and that students should have the opportunity to interact with the original artworks through exhibitions. The author also suggests that the lending of pictures could be part of a broader effort to spread appreciation for art across the university.

Out of the Fog:

This section mentions that the Fogg Museum recently discontinued the practice of loaning framed reproductions to students for personal use. The discontinuance occurred without any prior announcement or advertisement, leading students to believe there was no interest in the service. The author argues that this sudden withdrawal is premature and that the museum should continue the practice to foster appreciation for art among students. They suggest that the museum should be seen as a hub for art education and cooperation with house exhibitions to benefit both students and the institution.

The author, presumably responsible for spreading knowledge and appreciation of art, criticizes the hasty discontinuation and emphasizes the importance of maintaining the tradition of lending artworks to students.

The image shows a document with two columns of text on an off-white paper. The left column is titled "VIVID ART" and the right column "OUT OF THE FOG." Both columns are portions of articles that appear to be related to museum exhibits and art. The document is dated at the bottom with "Crimson Nov. 7, 1931," which suggests it's from a publication, possibly a newspaper or magazine, named Crimson, and it was published on November 7, 1931. There is a handwritten annotation on the bottom right that reads "Crimson Nov-19 1932," which might indicate that the document was referred to or revisited on that later date. The text itself discusses topics related to fine arts and exhibitions, but the details are not fully readable from the provided image.

The image contains two columns of text, each discussing a practice at the Fogg Museum. Both texts seem to be excerpts from publications, as indicated by the handwritten notes at the bottom of each column which mark the date and source of publication.

The left column is titled "VIVID ART" and discusses a practice established three years prior at the Fogg Museum, allowing students to decorate their rooms with high-quality reproductions of artworks from the museum's collection. It highlights the benefits to students, particularly in experiencing art for educational purposes and fostering appreciation for art. The handwritten note at the bottom left corner indicates the source as "Crimson Nov. 7, 1931".

The right column is titled "OUT OF THE FOGG" and describes the recent revival of the practice of loaning framed reproductions to undergraduates at the Fogg Museum. It touches on the benefits of continuing this practice and criticizes the discontinuation of this service despite its potential positive impacts on students' appreciation of art and integration with academic life. The handwritten note at the bottom right corner indicates the source as "Crimson Apr. 18, 1932".

Together, these columns critique the management of art lending practices at the museum, emphasizing its importance to students and the community and advocating for its continuation and expansion.

The image shows a page with two newspaper clippings pasted side by side on a plain sheet of paper. Each clipping contains text about the Fogg Museum.

The left clipping is titled "VIVID ART" and discusses the museum's practice of loaning out reproductions of fine pictures to students to decorate their rooms. It highlights the benefits of experiencing art personally and suggests expanding the collection to include modern artists. The clipping is dated "Crimson Nov. 7, 1931" in handwriting below it.

The right clipping is titled "OUT OF THE FOGG" and talks about the Fogg Museum's recent discontinuation of the framed reproductions loan service due to a lack of student interest. It emphasizes the potential benefits of lending pictures, criticizes the decision to stop the service, and hopes for its renewal. The handwritten date beneath this clipping reads "Crimson Apr. 18, 1932."

The text in both clippings is dense, with a formal tone, and seems to address the museum's relationship with students and the academic community. The page appears to be a collected record of opinions or articles related to the museum's art loan program over time.

The image shows a page from a document titled "VIVID ART" and "OUT OF THE FOGG", which appears to be a letter or editorial discussing the practices of the Fogg Museum at Harvard University. The document is dated November 7, 1931, and is signed by Crimson (likely referring to The Harvard Crimson, the student newspaper). A second signature and date, April 18, 1932, is also present, suggesting a follow-up or related discussion.

Content Overview:

Left Column: "VIVID ART"

• Context: The author discusses the Fogg Museum's practice of loaning reproductions of fine art to students for personal use in their rooms.
• Historical Practice: This practice was established three years prior but has recently lapsed due to the museum's possession of a large collection of fine pictures.
• Benefits: The author highlights the educational value of this practice, noting that it allows students to live with art and gain a deeper appreciation for it. The author emphasizes that hanging a single picture in a room can be more beneficial than visiting a museum, as it provides continuous exposure and reflection.
• Proposal: The author suggests reviving this practice, arguing that it would be beneficial to students and the museum. They propose that the collection should include modern art and permanent works to make it more accessible and relevant to students.
• Impact: The author believes that such a revival would encourage students to explore art independently, fostering a lasting appreciation for the subject.

Right Column: "OUT OF THE FOGG"

• Context: This section addresses the Fogg Museum's recent revival of the practice of loaning reproductions to undergraduates.
• Museum's Decision: The museum has announced and advertised this practice, but it is not yet fully implemented. The author notes that the students are unaware of this new opportunity.
• Reasons for Discontinuation: The author speculates that the discontinuation of the practice may be due to a perceived "lack of interest" among students. However, they argue that this is premature and that the practice has historically been valuable.
• Benefits of Revival: The author suggests that reviving the practice would benefit both the museum and students. It would help integrate the Fine Arts Department more closely with the university at large, fostering greater contact and appreciation for art.
• Call to Action: The author encourages the Fogg Museum to reconsider its decision and to continue offering the loaning service. They argue that such a practice should not be discontinued and that it could enhance the museum's role in the university community.

Visual Elements:

• Layout: The text is formatted in two columns, typical of newspaper or editorial layouts.
• Signatures: The document includes two signatures and dates, indicating a formal or semi-formal communication.
• Typography: The text is typed, suggesting it was produced using a typewriter, consistent with the early 20th-century context.

Overall Theme:

The document reflects a discussion about the educational value of integrating art into daily student life through accessible reproductions. It emphasizes the importance of fostering a deeper appreciation for art among students and critiques the museum's decision to discontinue the practice. The author advocates for a revival of the program, highlighting its benefits for both students and the institution.