Archives Scrapbooks

The image is a document dated Saturday, May 16, 1931. It appears to be a printed article or report discussing an issue within the Fine Arts Divisional Department. The text is structured in a formal, essay-like format, critiquing the Fine Arts Department's Final General Examination on the basis of the inclusion of essay subjects in foreign languages. The argument suggests that the examination's requirement for essays in French, German, and Italian was unreasonable and disproportionate, particularly given the majority of students at Harvard are proficient in only one foreign language. It emphasizes that the examination should focus on the candidate's knowledge of the arts subject rather than on their ability to translate foreign languages. The document is typed and has a vintage appearance, with a light yellow-toned paper and a visible margin on the left side, where holes are punched for binding.

This image shows a page of text dated Saturday, May 16, 1931, titled "THE FINE ARTS DIVISIONAL." The page appears to be a printed article or document with text arranged in a single column on the left-hand side of the page, leaving the right side largely blank. The document discusses concerns regarding the final general examination in the Fine Arts Department at Harvard University.

Key points from the text:

1. Date and Title: The document is dated and titled "THE FINE ARTS DIVISIONAL."
2. Examination Criticism: The Fine Arts Department is criticized for proposing essay subjects in foreign languages during the final general examination, which was seen as unreasonable.
3. Language Requirements: The document discusses the language requirements for all undergraduates, noting that most students acquire reading knowledge in only one foreign language.
4. Artificiality and Inequality: The examination's artificiality and inequality are highlighted, as students are limited by their knowledge of one or more languages.
5. Purpose of Examination: The text argues that the examination should test knowledge in the field of Fine Arts, not superficial acquaintance with foreign languages.
6. Impact on Students: The examination's format is said to prevent candidates from fully displaying their grasp of the subject due to translation issues.

The document seems to be a critique of the examination process, emphasizing the need for fair and relevant testing methods in the Fine Arts department. The page has four holes along the left margin, suggesting it was part of a ring binder or similar document storage system. The paper appears aged, with a yellowish tint, indicating it is from the early 20th century.

This image displays a single, aged, off-white sheet of paper, likely typewritten, with three binder holes punched along its left margin. The paper is laid flat on a neutral, light gray surface and casts a soft shadow, indicating it is slightly raised or angled.

At the top, centered, is the date: SATURDAY, MAY 16, 1931.

Below the date is the main heading, also centered and in all caps: THE FINE ARTS DIVISIONAL.

The body of the text is a lengthy, single-column essay or editorial. It critiques a recent examination administered by Harvard University’s Fine Arts Department. The central argument is that the department exceeded reasonable bounds by requiring students to write essays in foreign languages as part of their final divisional exam.

Key points from the text:

• The Complaint: The examination required students to choose one of four excerpts for discussion, but two were in French, one in German, and one in Italian. This forced students to translate, which the author argues is not the purpose of a divisional exam in Fine Arts.
• The Justification (and Rebuttal): The author acknowledges the university’s language requirements (one foreign language for undergraduates) but argues that expecting students to translate multiple languages for an exam is artificial and unfair. It penalizes students who are proficient in only one language, which is the university’s own standard.
• The Purpose of the Exam: The author contends that a divisional exam should test a student’s grasp of the subject matter (Fine Arts), not their proficiency in translating foreign texts. The translation requirement clouds the real purpose of the exam and nullifies the advantages of the university’s tutorial system.
• The Conclusion: The author states that no candidate can fully display their grasp of Fine Arts under such conditions, as they are forced to deal with translation problems rather than engage with the substantive content of the field.

Overall, the text is an impassioned, formal critique of an academic policy, written in a clear, argumentative style typical of early 20th-century university publications or student newspapers. The paper itself shows signs of age, with slightly yellowed edges and a faint, uneven crease near the bottom right corner.

The image shows a page from a book or document, dated Saturday, May 16, 1981, discussing the Fine Arts Divisional. The text is written in a formal style, and the content appears to be an article or essay discussing the examination process in the Fine Arts Department. The article discusses the requirement for students to demonstrate a thorough grasp of a branch of the field they are interested in and to translate quotations in different languages. The article argues that the examination should focus on the student's knowledge and understanding of the subject rather than their ability to translate foreign languages. The text is written in black ink on a white page, and the page has a slight slant, possibly due to the angle of the photograph.

The image shows a single-page document, which appears to be a newspaper clipping or a document excerpt. The document is titled "SATURDAY, MAY 16, 1931," indicating the date of publication or creation. The text is printed on a beige-colored paper and is organized into a single column.

The content of the document discusses the Fine Arts Divisional Examination, specifically focusing on the Final General Examination conducted by the Fine Arts Department. The text outlines the structure and expectations of the examination, emphasizing the importance of foreign language proficiency.

The document states that the examination has surpassed the bounds of reason by requiring essay subjects in foreign languages. The major portion of the exam, which involves discussing quotations, offers candidates a choice of four quotations in different languages: French, German, and Italian. However, the document criticizes this requirement, arguing that it is unjustifiable for undergraduates and unreasonable for candidates.

The text further explains that while the Faculty as a whole requires students to have a reading knowledge of only one foreign language, the Fine Arts Department's exam demands proficiency in multiple languages. This discrepancy is highlighted as problematic, as it places an undue burden on candidates who may not have the necessary language skills.

The document concludes by suggesting that the examination should focus on assessing candidates' understanding of the subject matter rather than their language abilities. It argues that the current system of requiring proficiency in multiple foreign languages is flawed and should be reconsidered.

Overall, the document presents a critical perspective on the Fine Arts Divisional Examination, particularly regarding its foreign language requirements. It advocates for a more balanced and fair assessment approach that prioritizes subject knowledge over language proficiency.

The image shows a scanned page from a document dated Saturday, May 16, 1931, titled "THE FINE ARTS DIVISIONAL". The text discusses the Final General Examination in the Fine Arts Department, focusing on the language requirements for the examination.

Key Points from the Text:

1. Examination Overview:

   • The Fine Arts Department exceeded the bounds of reason by proposing subjects for essay in foreign languages.
   • The major portion of the examination required students to demonstrate a thorough grasp of their chosen branch of the Fine Arts field.

2. Language Requirements:

   • Students were allowed to choose from four quotations for discussion, with two in German and one each in French and Italian.
   • Justification for these language requirements was deemed unreasonable, as it was argued that the majority of candidates for degrees in Fine Arts do not acquire proficiency in more than one foreign language.
   • The Faculty considered a reading knowledge of one foreign tongue sufficient for undergraduate degrees, but the examination demanded knowledge of two languages, which was seen as excessive.

3. Criticism of the Examination:

   • The examination was criticized for testing superficial acquaintance with foreign languages rather than a deep understanding of the Fine Arts field.
   • It was argued that the purpose of a divisional examination is to assess a student's comprehensive grasp of their subject, not to evaluate their ability to translate or handle multiple foreign languages.
   • The examination was described as a "tutorial system," which was seen as an unnecessary burden on students, especially those who had not prepared for such linguistic challenges.

4. Conclusion:

   • The author concludes that the examination, as administered by the Fine Arts Department, fails to accurately assess a student's understanding of the subject. Instead, it forces candidates to grapple with the problem of translating three foreign languages, which detracts from the true purpose of the examination.

The document reflects a critique of the examination's design, emphasizing the mismatch between the linguistic demands and the actual goals of assessing Fine Arts knowledge. The tone is analytical and critical, highlighting perceived flaws in the examination's structure and purpose.

This is an image showing a single page of typed text with the title "SATURDAY, MAY 16, 1931." The document appears to be a historical or archival piece, possibly from a newspaper or journal, given the date format and the typeset style.

The heading at the top of the page reads, "THE FINE ARTS DIVISIONAL," which suggests the document relates to the Fine Arts department of an institution, most likely an educational one. The text below discusses what seems to be a change or an aspect of the Fine Arts Department's General Examination. It mentions how the department offered tests in various languages and the rationale for requiring proficiency in these languages as part of the curriculum or examination process.

The typeset is indicative of an older typewriting machine, and the paper has aged, giving the edge a slightly darker hue than the center. There are no images, only paragraphs of text, with indented beginnings for each paragraph. There are also small, filled circles printed in the margin next to several of the paragraphs, likely serving as bullet points to emphasize key points in the text.

This image showcases a piece of paper with printed text that appears to be from a publication dated Saturday, May 16, 1931. The text is cut off on the right side, suggesting that part of the original document is missing. The page has a heading that reads "THE FINE ARTS DIVISIONAL" and discusses the Fine Arts Department's general examination. The text critiques the department for requiring essay responses in foreign languages (French, German, and Italian) and questions the justification for such requirements in the final examination. The page also has three punched holes along the left side, indicating it might be designed to be placed in a binder or folder. The right side of the paper is faded or worn out, emphasizing the incomplete nature of the document.

• The image shows a single, narrow newspaper clipping taped or mounted along the left side of a blank cream-colored sheet.
• The clipping is about a first-column of dense text with a header at the top: “SATURDAY, MAY 16, 1931” and a subheading that reads “THE FINE ARTS DIVISION.”
• The text runs in a single narrow column and appears as old typewritten print. There are three punched holes along the left margin of the clipping, indicating it was kept in a binder.
• The rest of the backing sheet is plain and empty, giving the impression of an archival or scrapbook page.
• The content of the clipping (as far as can be discerned) discusses an examination or language requirements related to the Fine Arts Department, mentioning languages such as French, German, and Italian.

This image features a rectangular sheet of text from a publication dated Saturday, May 16, 1931, titled "THE FINE ARTS DIVISIONAL." The text appears to be an editorial or formal commentary discussing a final examination for the Fine Arts Department. The writing critiques the examination's boundaries, noting it requires an essay discussion in foreign languages (French, German, and Italian) and assessing its justification in evaluating undergraduate qualifications.

The document expresses concerns about whether such testing adequately measures a candidate's competence in Fine Arts and suggests that translation and understanding of foreign languages are not always indicative of their subject mastery. The document is printed on beige paper with rough edges and hole punches along the left margin, indicative of its use in a binder or archival collection.

The right half of the page is blank.