Archives Scrapbooks

The image is a document dated Saturday, May 16, 1931. It appears to be a printed article or report discussing an issue within the Fine Arts Divisional Department. The text is structured in a formal, essay-like format, critiquing the Fine Arts Department's Final General Examination on the basis of the inclusion of essay subjects in foreign languages. The argument suggests that the examination's requirement for essays in French, German, and Italian was unreasonable and disproportionate, particularly given the majority of students at Harvard are proficient in only one foreign language. It emphasizes that the examination should focus on the candidate's knowledge of the arts subject rather than on their ability to translate foreign languages. The document is typed and has a vintage appearance, with a light yellow-toned paper and a visible margin on the left side, where holes are punched for binding.

This image shows a page of text dated Saturday, May 16, 1931, titled "THE FINE ARTS DIVISIONAL." The page appears to be a printed article or document with text arranged in a single column on the left-hand side of the page, leaving the right side largely blank. The document discusses concerns regarding the final general examination in the Fine Arts Department at Harvard University.

Key points from the text:

1. Date and Title: The document is dated and titled "THE FINE ARTS DIVISIONAL."
2. Examination Criticism: The Fine Arts Department is criticized for proposing essay subjects in foreign languages during the final general examination, which was seen as unreasonable.
3. Language Requirements: The document discusses the language requirements for all undergraduates, noting that most students acquire reading knowledge in only one foreign language.
4. Artificiality and Inequality: The examination's artificiality and inequality are highlighted, as students are limited by their knowledge of one or more languages.
5. Purpose of Examination: The text argues that the examination should test knowledge in the field of Fine Arts, not superficial acquaintance with foreign languages.
6. Impact on Students: The examination's format is said to prevent candidates from fully displaying their grasp of the subject due to translation issues.

The document seems to be a critique of the examination process, emphasizing the need for fair and relevant testing methods in the Fine Arts department. The page has four holes along the left margin, suggesting it was part of a ring binder or similar document storage system. The paper appears aged, with a yellowish tint, indicating it is from the early 20th century.

This image displays a single, aged, off-white sheet of paper, likely typewritten, with three binder holes punched along its left margin. The paper is laid flat on a neutral, light gray surface and casts a soft shadow, indicating it is slightly raised or angled.

At the top, centered, is the date: SATURDAY, MAY 16, 1931.

Below the date is the main heading, also centered and in all caps: THE FINE ARTS DIVISIONAL.

The body of the text is a lengthy, single-column essay or editorial. It critiques a recent examination administered by Harvard University’s Fine Arts Department. The central argument is that the department exceeded reasonable bounds by requiring students to write essays in foreign languages as part of their final divisional exam.

Key points from the text:

• The Complaint: The examination required students to choose one of four excerpts for discussion, but two were in French, one in German, and one in Italian. This forced students to translate, which the author argues is not the purpose of a divisional exam in Fine Arts.
• The Justification (and Rebuttal): The author acknowledges the university’s language requirements (one foreign language for undergraduates) but argues that expecting students to translate multiple languages for an exam is artificial and unfair. It penalizes students who are proficient in only one language, which is the university’s own standard.
• The Purpose of the Exam: The author contends that a divisional exam should test a student’s grasp of the subject matter (Fine Arts), not their proficiency in translating foreign texts. The translation requirement clouds the real purpose of the exam and nullifies the advantages of the university’s tutorial system.
• The Conclusion: The author states that no candidate can fully display their grasp of Fine Arts under such conditions, as they are forced to deal with translation problems rather than engage with the substantive content of the field.

Overall, the text is an impassioned, formal critique of an academic policy, written in a clear, argumentative style typical of early 20th-century university publications or student newspapers. The paper itself shows signs of age, with slightly yellowed edges and a faint, uneven crease near the bottom right corner.

The image shows a page from a book or document, dated Saturday, May 16, 1981, discussing the Fine Arts Divisional. The text is written in a formal style, and the content appears to be an article or essay discussing the examination process in the Fine Arts Department. The article discusses the requirement for students to demonstrate a thorough grasp of a branch of the field they are interested in and to translate quotations in different languages. The article argues that the examination should focus on the student's knowledge and understanding of the subject rather than their ability to translate foreign languages. The text is written in black ink on a white page, and the page has a slight slant, possibly due to the angle of the photograph.

The image shows a single-page document, which appears to be a newspaper clipping or a document excerpt. The document is titled "SATURDAY, MAY 16, 1931," indicating the date of publication or creation. The text is printed on a beige-colored paper and is organized into a single column.

The content of the document discusses the Fine Arts Divisional Examination, specifically focusing on the Final General Examination conducted by the Fine Arts Department. The text outlines the structure and expectations of the examination, emphasizing the importance of foreign language proficiency.

The document states that the examination has surpassed the bounds of reason by requiring essay subjects in foreign languages. The major portion of the exam, which involves discussing quotations, offers candidates a choice of four quotations in different languages: French, German, and Italian. However, the document criticizes this requirement, arguing that it is unjustifiable for undergraduates and unreasonable for candidates.

The text further explains that while the Faculty as a whole requires students to have a reading knowledge of only one foreign language, the Fine Arts Department's exam demands proficiency in multiple languages. This discrepancy is highlighted as problematic, as it places an undue burden on candidates who may not have the necessary language skills.

The document concludes by suggesting that the examination should focus on assessing candidates' understanding of the subject matter rather than their language abilities. It argues that the current system of requiring proficiency in multiple foreign languages is flawed and should be reconsidered.

Overall, the document presents a critical perspective on the Fine Arts Divisional Examination, particularly regarding its foreign language requirements. It advocates for a more balanced and fair assessment approach that prioritizes subject knowledge over language proficiency.

The image shows a scanned page from a document dated Saturday, May 16, 1931, titled "THE FINE ARTS DIVISIONAL". The text discusses the Final General Examination in the Fine Arts Department, focusing on the language requirements for the examination.

Key Points from the Text:

1. Examination Overview:

   • The Fine Arts Department exceeded the bounds of reason by proposing subjects for essay in foreign languages.
   • The major portion of the examination required students to demonstrate a thorough grasp of their chosen branch of the Fine Arts field.

2. Language Requirements:

   • Students were allowed to choose from four quotations for discussion, with two in German and one each in French and Italian.
   • Justification for these language requirements was deemed unreasonable, as it was argued that the majority of candidates for degrees in Fine Arts do not acquire proficiency in more than one foreign language.
   • The Faculty considered a reading knowledge of one foreign tongue sufficient for undergraduate degrees, but the examination demanded knowledge of two languages, which was seen as excessive.

3. Criticism of the Examination:

   • The examination was criticized for testing superficial acquaintance with foreign languages rather than a deep understanding of the Fine Arts field.
   • It was argued that the purpose of a divisional examination is to assess a student's comprehensive grasp of their subject, not to evaluate their ability to translate or handle multiple foreign languages.
   • The examination was described as a "tutorial system," which was seen as an unnecessary burden on students, especially those who had not prepared for such linguistic challenges.

4. Conclusion:

   • The author concludes that the examination, as administered by the Fine Arts Department, fails to accurately assess a student's understanding of the subject. Instead, it forces candidates to grapple with the problem of translating three foreign languages, which detracts from the true purpose of the examination.

The document reflects a critique of the examination's design, emphasizing the mismatch between the linguistic demands and the actual goals of assessing Fine Arts knowledge. The tone is analytical and critical, highlighting perceived flaws in the examination's structure and purpose.

The image shows a piece of paper with a typed article on it, titled "THE FINE ARTS DIVISIONAL" and dated "SATURDAY, MAY 16, 1931." The article discusses the Fine Arts Department's examination in foreign languages and its potential to be a major portion of the examination. It also mentions that the student is expected to show evidence of a thorough grasp of the branch of the field which interested him most, allowed the examinees choice of one of four quotations for discussion. The article further states that two of the excerpts were in French, one in German, and one in Italian. Justification for this action will be sought in the language requirements for all undergraduates. But they are unreasonable defenses in this case. It is probable that the majority of candidates for degrees in any field of concentration at Harvard acquire a reading knowledge of but one foreign tongue. That is all that is required of a student and is considered adequate by the Faculty as a whole. The artificiality and inequality of choice offered those who took this examination is obvious. As a determinant of the knowledge gained by each individual an essay problem of the sort is nearly useless. Choice, in this examination, was limited by ignorance of one or more languages. None can say that the average concentrator in Fine Arts is able to translate more than one foreign tongue because the requirement calls for an elementary knowledge of two languages in addition to that in which the student has gained a reading knowledge. The very term indicates that the candidate for a degree is not expected to be proficient enough in more than one foreign language to be able to answer concisely a question which should be propounded concisely. In the last analysis an examination in Fine Arts ought to be an examination in that field and not a test of whether or not students have attained more than a superficial acquaintance with foreign languages. To cloud the issue with extraneous problems of translation is to defeat the purpose of a divisional examination and nullifies whatever advantages there are in a tutorial system which endeavors to aid the student to a comprehensive grasp of his subject. Confronted with an examination of the sort given yesterday by the Fine Arts Department no candidate for a degree can fully display his grasp of the subject. For he has been prepared to cope with definite propositions and questions of fact, not with the problem of translating three foreign languages and trying to gain a clear understanding of what is required of him.

The image depicts a piece of paper with a typed document, featuring the title "THE FINE ARTS DIVISIONAL" at the top. The document is dated "SATURDAY, MAY 16, 1931," and it appears to be an article or essay discussing the Fine Arts Department's examination process.

The article is typed on a yellowed piece of paper with three holes punched along the left side, suggesting that it was once part of a binder or folder. The text is written in a formal tone and discusses the challenges of translating foreign languages during the examination process. It highlights the difficulties faced by students who are not proficient in multiple languages and argues that the current system is unfair to those who are not fluent in multiple languages.

Overall, the image provides a glimpse into the academic policies and practices of the Fine Arts Department in the early 20th century, highlighting the importance of language proficiency in academic success.

The image shows a scanned or photographed page from a document, likely a newspaper or academic paper, with the title "THE FINE ARTS DIVISIONAL" at the top.

• The page is dated "SATURDAY, MAY 16, 1931" and features a formal, serif font.
• The text discusses the Fine Arts Department's final general examination, criticizing the inclusion of foreign language translation as a requirement.
• The author argues that this requirement is unnecessary and that students should be able to demonstrate their knowledge of the subject without being hindered by language barriers.
• The text is written in a formal, academic tone and includes phrases such as "In its Final General Examination the Fine Arts Department overstepped the bounds of reason" and "It is probable that the majority of candidates for degrees in any field of concentration at Harvard acquire a reading knowledge of but one foreign tongue."
• The page has been punched with six holes on the left side, suggesting that it was once part of a binder or folder.
• The paper is yellowed and has a rough edge on the right side, indicating that it may be an old or vintage document.
• The background of the image is a light gray color, which helps to highlight the details of the page.

Overall, the image appears to be a historical document that provides insight into the academic practices and debates of the time.

The image presents a vintage, aged paper with a typed article titled "THE FINE ARTS DIVISIONAL" and dated "SATURDAY, MAY 16, 1931." The paper is yellowed and features three holes punched along its left edge.

• Title and Date
  • The title "THE FINE ARTS DIVISIONAL" is prominently displayed at the top of the page.
  • The date "SATURDAY, MAY 16, 1931" is printed above the title.
• Article Content
  • The article discusses the Fine Arts Department's final general examination.
  • It criticizes the department for proposing essay questions in foreign languages.
  • The author argues that this approach is unreasonable and unfair to students.
  • The article also mentions that the majority of candidates for degrees in any field of concentration at Harvard acquire a reading knowledge of but one foreign tongue.
  • The author suggests that the examination should be a test of knowledge gained, not a test of whether or not students have attained more than a superficial acquaintance with foreign languages.
• Paper Characteristics
  • The paper is yellowed and aged.
  • It has three holes punched along its left edge.
  • The paper appears to be a photocopy or scan of an original document.

In summary, the image shows a vintage article discussing the Fine Arts Department's examination policies at Harvard University in 1931. The article criticizes the department's approach to language requirements and suggests that the examination should focus on testing students' knowledge rather than their language skills.