Archives Scrapbooks

The image shows a page of a document or newspaper article with the title "The Greeks Would Smile." Here is a detailed summary of the content:

The article discusses a comparison between the works of old schools of art represented by a collection at Fogg Art Museum and contemporary art exhibited by the Harvard Society for Contemporary Art, featuring works by Picasso.

Key points include:

1. Comparative Analysis: The text highlights the basis for comparing the artistic styles of the past with contemporary art, specifically through Picasso’s work.
2. Modern Art Tendencies: There is a noted trend in modern art towards focusing on limited aspects of a subject. The article suggests that many contemporary artists focus on fragmented, abstract, and sometimes bizarre elements, akin to how ancient Greeks might have reacted to these artistic choices.
3. Strengths and Critiques: Despite the apparent flaws and unconventional nature of some modern artworks, there is a hint of strength in certain forms. The text mentions that some productions might be crude but could also have a unique, compelling quality.
4. Traditional vs. Modern: The article reflects on how twentieth-century art has broken from traditional forms and the challenges critics face in understanding new artistic idioms.
5. Public Reception: It is noted that while some people might be jubilant about modern art, others might find it undeniably challenging or even damning. The complacent admiration of established works doesn’t necessarily excite new interest in art development.

Overall, the piece seems to be a critical commentary on the evolution and reception of modern art, emphasizing both its innovative aspects and the challenges it poses to traditional artistic standards.

The image shows a typed document titled 'THE GREEKS WOULD SMILE'. The document discusses comparisons between old and modern art, focusing on an exhibition of Picasso's work at the Harvard Society for Contemporary Art. It highlights how Picasso's drawings and watercolors show a modern tendency to focus on limited aspects of subjects, which the Greeks might have found amusing. The text also mentions that while some contemporary art may lack genius, it possesses a certain strength and originality that breaks from tradition, making it challenging for some critics to understand. The document concludes by noting that modern art, whether admired or criticized, holds a unique attraction that established academic art cannot match. The paper has some punch holes on the left side, and there are a few handwritten notes and a stamp at the top, indicating it might be part of a larger collection or archive.

The image shows a page from what appears to be a newspaper or a magazine article titled "The Greeks Would Smile." The article discusses the comparisons between the work of ancient schools of art and contemporary art, specifically focusing on the collection at the Fogg Museum and the exhibition of Picasso's work by the Harvard Society for Contemporary Art.

Key points from the text include:

1. Picasso's drawings and watercolors show a tendency toward an extremely limited aspect of subjects, which the Greeks would have found amusing or peculiar.
2. Contemporary artists often produce fragmented, abortive works, which might be seen as ingenious rather than genuinely artistic.
3. There is a unique strength in some of these modern art pieces, although it may sometimes be mistaken for a false strength arising from crudeness or a bizarre quality.
4. Twentieth-century art has broken with tradition in many ways, making it difficult for critics to fully understand and appreciate these new forms.
5. Despite the mixed reception, modern art holds an undeniable attraction and fascination, especially as it continues to develop new forms of artistic expression.

The text suggests a critical reflection on the evolving nature of art and the challenges in understanding and appreciating contemporary artistic movements.

The image is of a typewritten page with the title "The Greeks Would Smile." The text discusses a comparison between the works of old schools of art and contemporary art, specifically referencing an exhibition of Picasso's work at the Harvard Society for Contemporary Art.

Key points from the text include:

1. Comparative Analysis: The article sets out to compare the works of old schools of art, represented by the collection at Fogg, with those of contemporary artists, using Picasso's work as an example.

2. Picasso’s Art: The text mentions that in many of Picasso's drawings and watercolors, there is a tendency towards an extremely limited aspect of a subject, which might have evoked smiles from the Greeks for their ecstatic contemplation of a shoulder-blade, heel, or ear from unusual angles.

3. Modern Art Tendency: It notes that many contemporary artists, through their fragmentary and abortive productions, have demonstrated ingenuity but not necessarily genius.

4. Strength in Contemporary Art: Despite the unconventional nature of some works, there is a kind of strength in them that is rare in more established forms. This strength may sometimes be a false impression due to crudeness or bizarre qualities.

5. Judgment of Modern Art: The text acknowledges that final judgment on twentieth-century art is premature, as it has broken completely with tradition and has bewildered many critics.

6. Attraction and Approval: The article concludes by suggesting that modern art holds an undeniable attraction for both admirers and detractors. While academic approval might not always excite the same level of interest, the development of new forms of art continues to captivate.

The page is a part of a larger document, indicated by the three punch holes along the left side, suggesting it was once part of a three-ring binder or similar filing system.

The image shows a typewritten document discussing art, specifically comparing ancient Greek art with modern and contemporary works, using an exhibition of Picasso's art as a reference point.

Key points include:

1. Comparative Basis:

   • The text suggests that the collection at the Fogg Museum, representing old schools of art, and a contemporary artist's work (exhibited by the Harvard Society for Contemporary Art, featuring Picasso) provide an interesting basis for comparison.

2. Picasso's Work:

   • Picasso’s drawings and watercolors exhibit a tendency towards extreme simplification, focusing on a limited aspect of the subject, much like the Greeks who would admire the beauty in simple, everyday forms.

3. Contemporary Art:

   • Many contemporary artists in their preliminary and experimental works show more ingenuity than genius. The text acknowledges that while there is some strength in these modern productions, it often stems from unusual or even crude qualities.

4. Judgment and Tradition:

   • The text notes that final judgment on the bizarre quality of some modern art cannot be made yet, as it has broken significantly from tradition and may take time to be fully understood.

5. Reception of Modern Art:

   • The document addresses the polarized reception of modern art. Some people receive it with jubilance, while others dismiss it. It argues that modern art holds an undeniable attraction and that complacently admiring only traditionally acclaimed works can stifle the vital interest that new forms of art can bring.

Overall, the text reflects on the evolution and reception of modern art, advocating for an open-minded approach to new artistic expressions.

The image depicts a single page from a document or article. The page is yellowed with age and has three holes punched along the left edge, suggesting it was once part of a bound collection or notebook. The text is printed in a serif font and is titled "THE GREEKS WOULD SMILE."

The content of the article discusses comparisons between the work of old schools of art and contemporary art, particularly focusing on the work of Pablo Picasso. It mentions an exhibition of Picasso's work held by the Harvard Society for Contemporary Art. The article notes that Picasso's art often focuses on limited aspects of subjects, such as a shoulder blade or a bit of an ear, and compares this to the fragmentary and abbreviated productions of many contemporary artists. It suggests that while some contemporary art may appear crude or bizarre, it can possess a kind of worth, especially in its break from tradition and development of new forms of art. The article concludes that this new art holds an undeniable attraction for both those who receive modern art with jubilance and those who condemn it, and that the development of new forms of art is an essential interest of our time.

This image shows a single sheet of light beige paper with three punched holes on its left side, suggesting it may have been part of a binder or notebook at some point. The paper's top right corner is turned down, and there is visible creasing and slight discoloration that indicates age or frequent handling.

The paper itself contains a typewritten text, with the title "THE GREEKS WOULD SMILE" typed in all uppercase letters. Below the title, the text is organized into compact paragraphs, discussing the subject of art, referring to interesting comparisons to be made between old school art and contemporary work as exhibited at the time of writing. The piece seems to explore the idea that ancient Greek artists might have smiled at the then-modern art given its divergence in form and expression from traditional artistry. It mentions exhibitions at the Harvard Society for Contemporary Art and evaluates the value and impact of modern art through various perspectives.

There's a handwritten note in red ink in the top-left corner of the paper, which looks like "Chris," perhaps a name, followed by underlining or a checkmark, but the handwriting is not entirely clear. The rest of the page appears to be free from additional marks or notes.

The image shows a sheet of beige, slightly yellowed paper with three hole punches along the left side. It appears to have been part of a binder or folder. A newspaper clipping is attached to the top left corner of the page with red crayon markings around its edges. The title of the newspaper clipping is "THE GREEKS WOULD SMILE." It discusses comparisons between old and contemporary art, referencing Picasso's works and the Harvard Society for Contemporary Art's exhibition. Notable pen markings on the page include a date, "2/1/32," which is handwritten next to the clipping. Other than that, the sheet is blank and has no additional text or imagery.

The image shows a piece of paper with a small clipped newspaper or magazine article affixed to it. The article is titled "THE GREEKS WOULD SMILE" and discusses comparisons between traditional art represented by the collection at Fogg and contemporary art, particularly Picasso's work, as exhibited by the Harvard Society for Contemporary Art. The text reflects on the characteristics and perceptions of modern art, mentioning the expression of limited aspects of a subject, the fragmentary nature of contemporary art productions, and the challenges critics face in understanding new idioms of art. There are three hole punches along the left edge of the paper, and there is a small handwritten note in pencil near the top left, which appears to be a date, "2/4/31." The rest of the paper is blank with a light cream color.

The image shows a single page from a book or document titled "THE GREEKS WOULD SMILE". The page contains a block of text discussing the comparison between traditional art forms and contemporary art, particularly focusing on the works of Picasso. The text explores the evolution of modern art, its tendencies, and the critical reception of new artistic idioms. Key points highlighted in the passage include:

1. Comparison with Traditional Art: The text suggests that the Greeks, known for their classical ideals, might have found certain modern artistic tendencies amusing or limited, such as depicting unusual angles (e.g., a shoulder blade, heel, or lobe of an ear) in a way that diverges from traditional aesthetics.

2. Modern Art's Tendencies: It mentions a widespread tendency in modern art toward abstraction and fragmentation, which the author notes can sometimes lack depth or strength.

3. Strength in Modern Art: Despite criticisms, the text acknowledges that some modern works exhibit a rare kind of strength, which may arise from crudeness or a bizarre quality, suggesting that this strength is still developing.

4. Break from Tradition: The passage highlights how 20th-century art has broken with traditional forms, leading to widespread confusion among critics who struggle to understand new idioms.

5. Critical Reception: It notes that both those who embrace modern art and those who dismiss it can find value in the works, as the stamp of academic approval does not diminish the vital interest sparked by the development of new artistic forms.

The page appears to be part of a larger discussion or critique of modern art, offering a nuanced perspective on its evolution and reception. The text is printed in a serif font, and the page is slightly worn, suggesting it may be from an older or well-used document. There are also a few faint markings or stains on the page, adding to its aged appearance.