Archives Scrapbooks

The image shows a newspaper clipping from the New York Herald Tribune, dated March 1, 1929. The main headline reads "Duceen Gets Aid Of Ocean Phone, X-Ray and Plane." The article discusses a legal case involving the famous painting "La Belle Ferronnière" by Leonardo da Vinci, which was owned by the Louvre Museum. The case revolves around the authenticity of the painting and the use of X-ray technology to examine it.

Key points from the article include:

1. Legal Dispute: The case involves a lawsuit filed by Mrs. Andrée Hahn against the Louvre Museum, claiming that the painting in the Louvre is a fake and that the original is in her possession.

2. X-Ray Examination: The Louvre painting was X-rayed, and the results were sent to New York for examination. The X-ray revealed that the painting had been altered, with parts of the background and the sitter's hands being overpainted.

3. Expert Testimony: Various experts, including art historians and X-ray specialists, testified in the case. The testimony focused on the differences between the Louvre painting and the one claimed by Mrs. Hahn.

4. Public Interest: The case garnered significant public interest, with the courtroom being crowded with spectators. The article also mentions the presence of a magnifying glass for the jury to examine the paintings closely.

5. Legal Arguments: The lawyers for both sides presented their arguments, with Mrs. Hahn's lawyer, Alfred S. Black, arguing that the Louvre painting was a fake, while the Louvre's lawyer, George W. Wickersham, defended the authenticity of the museum's painting.

The article provides a detailed account of the court proceedings, the expert testimonies, and the public's fascination with the case. It highlights the use of advanced technology, such as X-rays, in determining the authenticity of artworks.

The image shows two pages of a newspaper, the New York Herald Tribune, dated March 11, 1929. The pages include several articles and headlines, with the main ones being:

1. "LOUVRE MUST GIVE ITS PERMISSION: X-Ray of Da Vinci Work Sent to New York" - This article discusses the need for the Louvre to permit the use of X-ray technology on a painting by Leonardo da Vinci, which was sent to the Fogg Museum at Harvard University for analysis in a lawsuit involving the painting "La Belle Ferronnière."

2. "Duveen Gets Aid Of Ocean Phone, X-Ray and Plane: Testimony Affecting 'LaBelle' Suit Given After Sir Joseph Has Talk With Paris" - This article describes how Sir Joseph Duveen used an ocean telephone, X-ray, and plane to provide testimony for the same lawsuit.

3. Smaller articles and advertisements are also present, including one about the exhibition at the Fogg Museum and another about the potential closure of the trial.

The articles are related to the legal dispute over the authenticity of the painting "La Belle Ferronnière," attributed to Leonardo da Vinci, and the use of advanced technology for its analysis. The text is dense and formal, typical of newspaper articles from that era, and includes detailed descriptions of the legal proceedings and technological methods used.

The image displays a spread from the New York Herald Tribune dated March 1, 1929. It features several news articles related to art and legal proceedings, specifically focusing on the authenticity of artworks and a high-profile trial involving art forgery. Here are the main stories covered:

1. Louvre Must Give Its Permission:

   • X-Ray of Da Vinci Work Sent to New York: An X-ray of a painting attributed to Leonardo da Vinci, specifically "La Belle Ferronnière," was sent to New York. The Louvre authorized this action following a request from Harvard University to use their equipment for the examination.

2. Duveen Gets Aid Of Ocean Phone:

   • X-Ray and Plane: Joseph Duveen, an art dealer, utilized an overseas telephone call and other resources to gather evidence related to the authenticity of the painting.

3. Fogg Museum Plates Called in Mrs. Hahn's $500,000 Suit:

   • Mrs. Andrée Hahn is suing Joseph Duveen for $500,000, alleging he publicly questioned the authenticity of her painting, which she claims is a genuine Leonardo da Vinci.

4. Testimony Affecting LaBelle Suit Given After Sir Joseph Has Talk With Paris:

   • Further testimony was provided after Sir Joseph Duveen had a conversation with contacts in Paris.

5. Plate on Way From Boston:

   • An X-ray plate of the disputed painting was en route from Boston to New York, which was expected to be crucial in the trial.

6. Ita Exhibition Will Close Its Trial; Case to Jury Today:

   • The Hahn vs. Duveen trial was nearing its conclusion, with the case expected to go to the jury soon.

7. Called Paris:

   • It is reported that the details of an X-ray examination were discussed with authorities in Paris.

8. By Jabal Ross:

   • The article discusses how X-ray tests conducted on "La Belle Ferronnière" in the Louvre have become a significant factor in the trial. It details the arguments and the evidence presented by both sides.

The articles collectively highlight the intricate details and the high stakes involved in authenticating valuable artworks and the legal ramifications of disputes over their provenance. The trial's outcome hinged significantly on the scientific examination and expert testimony regarding the paintings in question.

The image is a compilation of newspaper clippings from March 1929, specifically from the New York Herald Tribune and the Boston Globe. The articles are related to the examination and testing of the authenticity of the Mona Lisa and other paintings by Leonardo da Vinci.

1. Globe, March 1, 1929:

   • Headline: "LOUVRE MUST GIVE ITS PERMISSION"
   • Subheadline: "X-Ray of Da Vinci Work Sent to New York"
   • Details: The article discusses the testing of "La Belle Ferronniere" using X-ray technology by Alan B. Burroughs. The Louvre Museum in Paris is being asked for permission to use the X-ray method to study the authenticity of this painting, which was originally attributed to Leonardo da Vinci. The article mentions that the X-ray plates were sent to New York, and the Fogg Art Museum is involved in the testing process.

2. New York Herald Tribune, March 11, 1929:

   • Headline: "Duveen Gets Aid Of Ocean Phone, X-Ray and Plane"

   • Subheadline: "Testimony Affecting 'La Belle' Suit Given After Sir Joseph Has Talk With Paris Plate on Way From Boston"

   • Details: This article reports on the legal proceedings involving the painting "La Belle Ferronniere". Joseph Duveen, a prominent art dealer, is using modern technology, including ocean phones and X-ray plates, to support his testimony. The X-ray plates were flown from Boston to New York to be used as evidence. The article also discusses the testimony of witnesses and the scientific developments used in the trial.

   • Additional Article: "La Belle" Trial Will Close Today

     • Details: The trial is nearing its end, with the closing arguments to be given on the same day. The article includes quotes from Mr. Burroughs and other witnesses discussing the scientific analysis of the painting.

   • Side Article: "Left a Hole for the Jewel"

     • Details: This article talks about the restoration of a painting by Sir Joshua Reynolds. The painting had a hole left for a jewel, and the restoration process involved filling this hole.

   • Side Article: "Expert's Testimony"

     • Details: This discusses the testimony of Mr. Burroughs, who used X-ray analysis to determine the authenticity of the paintings. He is questioned about his methods and findings, including the examination of the "La Belle Ferronniere" and the "Mona Lisa".

Overall, these articles provide a detailed look into the legal and scientific examination of artworks attributed to Leonardo da Vinci during the early 1920s, emphasizing the use of advanced technologies like X-ray to authenticate the paintings.

The image displays two newspaper pages from the "Globe" and "New York Herald Tribune," both dated March 1, 1929. Here's a detailed summary of the contents:

Globe (Left Page)

Headline: "LOUVRE MUST GIVE ITS PERMISSION"

Main Article:

• Title: "X-Ray of Da Vinci Work Sent to New York"
• Subtitle: "Fogg Museum Plates Called in Mrs. Hahn's $500,000 Suit"
• Content:
  • Alan Burroughs, an X-ray authority, and Harvard Fogg Museum officials are involved in a legal case involving a $500,000 suit.
  • The Fogg Museum sent X-ray plates of "La Belle Ferronnière," a Leonardo da Vinci painting, to New York for examination.
  • The plates were taken without the Louvre's permission, leading to a dispute over the use of X-ray technology to authenticate artworks.
  • The case involves the authenticity of the painting, with the Fogg Museum's X-ray findings being contested by the Louvre.

New York Herald Tribune (Right Page)

Headline: "Duveen Gets Aid of Ocean Phone"

Main Article:

• Title: "X-Ray and Plane"
• Subtitle: "Testimony Affecting 'La Belle' Suit Given After Sir Joseph Has Talk With Paris"
• Content:
  • Discusses the testimony in the lawsuit involving "La Belle Ferronnière," a Leonardo da Vinci painting.
  • Sir Joseph Duveen, a prominent art dealer, gave testimony in the case.
  • The article mentions the use of X-rays to examine the painting, with the Louvre's permission being sought.
  • The trial's relevance to the authenticity of the painting is emphasized, along with the role of the X-rays and the technical testimony provided by experts.
  • The article also covers a dispute involving the handling of the X-ray plates and the legal procedures in the case.

Other Articles:

• Headline: "Left a Hole for the Jewel"
  • Discusses a legal dispute involving a painting and its authenticity.
  • Details the examination of the painting "La Belle Ferronnière" by experts and the controversy surrounding it.
  • The article mentions the role of Mr. Burroughs, who has been providing testimony in the case.

Technical Details:

• The technical aspects of the X-ray examination of the painting are explained, highlighting the importance of the procedure in determining the authenticity of the artwork.
• The article also touches on the specific techniques used to examine the painting, including the use of X-rays and the opinions of experts.

Overall, both newspapers are covering the legal and technical aspects of the case involving the authenticity of Leonardo da Vinci's "La Belle Ferronnière," with a focus on the role of X-ray technology and the legal proceedings.

The image shows a newspaper clipping from March 1, 1929, containing several articles related to the legal case involving the painting "La Belle Peronne" by Sir Joseph Duveneck.

1. Left Column (Globe):

   • The first article discusses the Louvre's decision to permit the use of X-rays to examine "La Belle Peronne" for authenticity. The article mentions that the Louvre has been accused of withholding permission for X-ray testing, and the Fogg Museum's suit against Harvard Museum authorities is highlighted.

2. Top Right Column (New York Herald Tribune):

   • This article details the testimony given by Mrs. Andrew Harnack during the trial. It explains that she spoke with the Louvre authorities and revealed the Louvre's reluctance to allow the Fogg Museum to use X-rays on the painting.

3. Middle Right Column:

   • The article describes the testimony of Sir Joseph Duveneck, who provided details about the painting's creation and authenticity. The court testimony mentions the exhibition closing and the juries' deliberations.

4. Bottom Right Column:

   • This article focuses on the technical aspects of the X-ray examination, the techniques used, and the examination of the Louvre painting. It includes the expert opinion of Dr. Burroughs, who was consulted regarding the authenticity of the painting. The examination process and the painting's history are discussed, including the use of brush strokes and pigments.

The overall context of the articles revolves around the legal and technical challenges faced in determining the authenticity of the painting "La Belle Peronne," emphasizing the importance of scientific examination methods like X-rays in this high-profile art case.

This image shows a scrapbook or album page containing three newspaper clippings from the New York Herald-Tribune dated March 1, 1929. The clippings are yellowed with age and are arranged side-by-side.

1. The left clipping has the headline "LOUVRE MUST GIVE ITS PERMISSION" and discusses the X-ray examination of Da Vinci works, permissions needed from the Louvre, and related legal and expert opinions about art authentication. It mentions individuals including Fogg Museum staff, experts, and a person named Alan Burroughs.

2. The center clipping's headline reads "Duveen Gets Aid Of Ocean Phone, X-Ray and Plane," focusing on testimony related to "La Belle" and discussions about the X-ray tests, exhibitions, and expert opinions involving the Smithsonian Institution and the Fogg Museum. It details plans for exhibitions and the involvement of experts to study paintings.

3. The right clipping provides a detailed narrative of the art examination and legal proceedings involving paintings attributed to Leonardo da Vinci. It describes X-ray findings, expert testimonies, and technical aspects such as "X-ray Machine Falls to Floor," "Admissibility Contested," and the questioning of the authenticity of certain artworks. It includes comments on artists' techniques, scientific investigations, and court actions.

Overall, the page documents a historical controversy surrounding the authentication of Leonardo da Vinci art pieces, with emphasis on scientific examination, museum involvement, and legal challenges from the late 1920s.

This is an image of a newspaper page. The page headers indicate that it's from the "New York Herald Tribune," and the date marked is March 1, 1949. The page contains text articles, and due to the monochromatic nature of the print, it looks like a historical document. Topics seen involve an X-ray of a Da Vinci work sent to New York, a legal dispute regarding an x-ray and a plane, and a court testimony involving the Duveen art debate.

The page has yellowed with age, suggesting it's an original paper or a copy that's been aged. The newspaper is open and laid flat, capturing the entirety of two columns of text with additional text partially visible on the left edge. The paper has creases and imperfections typical of aged documents. This is likely a photograph of historical interest to someone researching events of that time or the specific topics mentioned in the articles.

The image depicts an open book featuring two newspaper articles from March 1, 1929. The left page is from the Globe and is titled "LOUVRE MUST GIVE ITS PERMISSION", discussing the legal dispute over an X-ray of Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa. The article details the controversy surrounding the use of X-ray technology to examine the painting, including the involvement of the Fogg Art Museum, the Louvre, and the legal proceedings initiated by Sir Joseph Duveen. It mentions the $500,000 suit filed by the Fogg Museum and the challenges faced in obtaining permission from the Louvre.

The right page is from the New York Herald-Tribune and is titled "Duveen Gets Aid Of Ocean Phone, X-Ray and Plane". This article covers the same legal case involving the Mona Lisa but focuses on the testimony of Sir Joseph Duveen and the use of X-ray technology to examine the painting. It discusses the court proceedings, the examination of the painting by experts, and the debate over the authenticity and condition of the artwork. The article also mentions the involvement of the Louvre, the Fogg Museum, and the legal strategies employed by Duveen.

Both articles are densely packed with text, featuring headlines, subheadings, and detailed reporting on the legal and artistic aspects of the case. The layout is typical of early 20th-century newspaper design, with justified text and clear typography. The content reflects the historical and cultural significance of the Mona Lisa and the legal battles surrounding its examination and preservation.

The image is of a newspaper clipping from the New York Herald-Tribune, dated March 1, 1929. The clipping features a headline that reads "Duveen Gets Aid Of Ocean Phone X-Ray and Plane," indicating that the article is about the use of technology, specifically X-rays and ocean telephones, in a legal case involving art. The article discusses the use of X-rays to authenticate a painting, "La Belle Ferronnière," which is in dispute between the Louvre and the Fogg Museum. The article also mentions the use of ocean telephones to communicate with experts in Paris, who are providing testimony in the trial. The article is part of a larger dispute over the ownership of the painting, with the Louvre refusing to allow the Fogg Museum to use X-rays to study the painting. The article also includes quotes from various experts and witnesses involved in the case, as well as commentary on the use of technology in art authentication.