Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V. Rinse, repeat.
ARCH.2003.22, Rendition: 809215
The image depicts a newspaper clipping from "The New York Times Book Review" dated June 15, 1924. The article is titled "Eastern Art of the Suiko Period" and is described as the "First Exhaustive Work Ever Written by a Foreigner on Any Important Era of the Art History of East Asia." The review is written by Hamilton Bell.
The article discusses a book about the Suiko period of Eastern art, which is noted for its significant contributions to the art history of East Asia. The review mentions that this is the first comprehensive work on the subject by a foreign author. It also highlights the importance of the Suiko period in the context of Eastern art and its influence on subsequent artistic developments.
The review includes a photograph of an artifact from the Suiko period, specifically a bronze sculpture from the David Haerfield Collection. The sculpture appears to be a detailed and intricate piece, reflecting the artistic style of the era.
The text of the review is partially visible, with some sections obscured by tape and folds in the newspaper. The visible portions discuss the historical context, the author's approach, and the significance of the book in understanding the art of the Suiko period. The review is detailed and appears to provide a thorough analysis of the book's content and its contribution to the field of art history.
The image displays an open book, specifically a page from "The New York Times Book Review" dated June 15, 1924. The page is dedicated to a review of the book "Eastern Art of the Suiko Period" authored by Hamilton Bell. The review is titled "First Exhaustive Work Ever Written by a Foreigner on Any Important Era of the Art History of East Asia."
The layout of the page includes a large heading, with the book title and author's name prominently displayed. The review text, which is quite lengthy, is set in a column format, filling most of the page. The language used is formal and descriptive, providing a detailed critique of the book.
To the right of the text, there is an image of an art piece, a statue, with the caption "From an Imperial Household Collection." The statue appears to be a Buddha, and the photograph is clear, taking up a significant portion of the right side of the page.
The condition of the page shows some signs of aging, with slight yellowing and a few creases, but it is still readable. The overall design is typical of early 20th-century book reviews, with a focus on both text and accompanying imagery to support the content.
The image shows a page from an old newspaper, specifically a book review from The New York Times Book Review dated June 15, 1924. The article is titled "Eastern Art of the Suiko Period" and is reviewed by Hamilton Bell.
Key points from the review include:
Author and Book Context:
Focus and Contributions:
Artistic Characteristics:
Cultural Significance:
Additional Points:
The accompanying photographs show examples of Suiko Period art, illustrating the types of sculptures and artifacts discussed in the review.
The image shows a newspaper clipping from The New York Times Book Review, dated June 15, 1924. The headline of the article is "Eastern Art of the Suiko Period." The review is written by Hamilton Bell and discusses a book titled "Japanese Sculpture of the Suiko Period, 593-628 A.D." by Ernest Fenollosa.
The article highlights that this is the first exhaustive work written by a foreigner on any important era of East Asian art history. It praises the book for its comprehensive study of the Suiko Period's art, covering aspects such as Buddhist sculptures and the influence of Korean and Chinese art on Japanese culture during that time. The review notes the book's detailed examination of the period's art, including its historical context, techniques, and cultural significance.
The review also mentions the importance of the book's illustrations, which are noted for their clarity and relevance. Bell emphasizes that the book provides a thorough and insightful exploration of the Suiko Period, making it a significant contribution to the understanding of early Japanese art.
The clipping includes a small black-and-white illustration of a sculpture, presumably from the book being reviewed, and a note indicating the date June 15, 1924, at the bottom right of the page.
The image shows a newspaper clipping from "The New York Times Book Review," dated June 15, 1924. The article is titled "Eastern Art of the Suiko Period," and it is a review of a book titled "Japanese Sculpture of the Suiko Period" by Ernest Francisco Fenollosa, edited by Mary C. St. Leger Fenollosa.
Key points of the review:
The clipping also includes a photograph of a Japanese sculpture, likely one of the pieces discussed in the book. The photograph is labeled "From a Japanese Household Collection." The overall tone of the review is positive, commending Fenollosa's work as a significant contribution to the study of East Asian art.
The image is a page from the June 15, 1924 issue of The New York Times Book Review. It features a review of a book titled "Eastern Art of the Suiko Period" by Hamilton Bell.
Title and Subtitle:
Content:
The review begins by praising Hamilton Bell, who has written extensively on Japanese sculpture. Bell's latest work focuses on the Suiko Period (550-628 A.D.), a significant era in the art history of East Asia.
Bell's book is noted for its detailed and exhaustive study of the Suiko period, a time when Japanese art was heavily influenced by the introduction of Buddhism from Korea. The author examines various aspects of art from this period, including sculpture, painting, and architecture, and provides a comprehensive analysis.
The reviewer highlights Bell's thorough research and engaging writing style. Bell's previous works are also mentioned, emphasizing his authority and expertise on the subject. The book includes detailed descriptions of significant artifacts and artworks, such as the Kudara Kannon and other masterpieces from the Suiko period.
The review further discusses the cultural and historical context of the Suiko period, illustrating how the influx of new ideas from the Asian continent influenced Japanese art. Bell's work is seen as an important contribution to the understanding of East Asian art history, offering insights that were previously inaccessible to many Western scholars.
Additionally, the review includes a photograph of an important artifact from the Suiko period, specifically a figure from the Imperial Horyuji Collection, which adds a visual element to the discussion.
Overall, the review praises Bell's book for its depth, thoroughness, and its significant contribution to the study of East Asian art.
The image shows a page from an old book or scrapbook featuring a newspaper article titled "Eastern Art of the Suiko Period." The article is from The New York Times Book Review, dated June 15, 1924. The text is a review written by Hamilton Bell, discussing the Suiko Period in East Asian art history, noting it as the first exhaustive work ever written by a foreigner on an important era of East Asian art.
On the right side, there is a black-and-white photo of a sculpture from the Imperial Household Collection depicting a richly adorned figure sitting on an ornate chair. The figure appears to be an Asian deity or bishop-like character with a serene expression, wearing a tall, elaborate headdress and holding an object in his hands. The article is detailed, covering various aspects of Eastern art during the Suiko Period, mentioning historical context, art styles, and scholarly contributions. The page itself appears aged and is mounted on a larger piece of paper, with some handwritten notations on the top.
The image shows an old newspaper page from "The New York Times Book Review" dated June 15, 1924. The paper is open, revealing an article titled "Eastern Art of the Suiko Period," which is described as the "First Exhaustive Work Ever Written by a Foreigner on Any Important Era of the Art History of East Asia." The newspaper page is slightly yellowed and torn, suggesting it is very old and possibly brittle. There is a small photograph or illustration of an artifact on the right, which is presumably related to the article's content about Eastern art. The visible text discusses historical aspects of Eastern art and certain artifacts from various locations such as Japan and China.
There are some handwritten notes scribbled on the margins of the paper, and the article is marked with the number "8" at the top. There is also a stamp or mark on the top right corner saying "New York 1924." The newspaper lies on a flat surface, partially folded over on the left-hand side, and the background of the image is a plain gray surface.
The image shows a clipping from the June 15, 1924, issue of The New York Times Book Review. The article is titled "Eastern Art of the Suiko Period." It is a review by Hamilton Bell and discusses the importance of the Suiko Period in East Asian art history. The article mentions that this is the first exhaustive work ever written by a foreigner on any important era of the art history of East Asia.
The page is numbered 129 and the text of the article is quite dense, spread across multiple columns. There is a photograph of an Asian sculpture, specifically from the Imperial Household Collections, included in the article. The clipping itself appears to have aged, showing signs of yellowing, which is typical of old newspaper articles.
In addition to the main article, there is a narrow column on the right side that seems to be an extension or continuation of the same topic. The clipping itself is glued or taped to a white page, possibly as part of a scrapbook or collection of newspaper articles.
The image shows an open book with two visible pages, displaying a newspaper clipping from The New York Times Book Review, dated June 19, 1924. The article is titled "Eastern Art of the Suiko Period" and is a review of a book by Hamilton Bell, described as "the first exhaustive work ever written by a foreigner on any important era of the art history of East Asia."
This image captures a moment of scholarly engagement with East Asian art history, showcasing both textual and visual elements that highlight the significance of the Suiko Period in the broader context of art and cultural studies.