Archives Scrapbooks

The image shows a page from "The New York Times Book Review" dated June 15, 1924. The page is titled "Eastern Art of the Suiko Period" and is described as the "First Exhaustive Work Ever Written by a Foreigner on Any Important Era of the Art History of East Asia." The review is written by Hamilton Bell and discusses a book by Langdon Warner titled "Japanese Sculpture of the Suiko Period." The review mentions the historical and cultural significance of the Suiko period in Japan and its connection to the art history of East Asia. The page also includes a photograph of a statue, which is part of the content being reviewed. The page shows signs of age, with yellowed paper and some wear and tear, indicating that this is a historical document.

The image shows a page from "The New York Times Book Review" dated June 15, 1924. The page number is 8, and it contains a review titled "Eastern Art of the Suiko Period," which is described as "First Exhaustive Work Ever Written by a Foreigner on Any Important Era of the Art History of East Asia." The review is written by Hamilton Bell and discusses the book "Japanese Sculpture of the Suiko Period" by Langdon Warner, a Fellow of the Fogg Museum for Research in Asia, with a historical introduction by Lorraine B. Warner.

The review discusses the significance of this work in the context of East Asian art history, particularly the Suiko period. It mentions Langdon Warner's collaboration with the Japanese scholar Okakura Kakuzo and his extensive research and travels in various parts of the Far East. The review highlights the book's detailed analysis of Japanese sculpture from the Suiko period and its comparison with Chinese and Korean influences. It also mentions the book's illustrations of sculptures, paintings, and other artworks from this period.

On the right side of the page, there is a photograph of a bronze statue, which is likely an example of the Suiko period art discussed in the review. The statue is described as being part of the Imperial Household Collection. The photograph shows a seated figure with detailed features and a serene expression, typical of Buddhist art from that era.

The layout of the page includes the main review text, the photograph, and some additional text at the bottom right corner, which appears to be a continuation of the review or a related article. The overall design is typical of early 20th-century newspaper layouts, with dense text and a single image.

This image displays a page from The New York Times Book Review, dated June 15, 1924. The page is part of a larger, possibly bound, collection, as suggested by the visible page number “8” in the upper-left corner and the adjacent pages.

The main feature on the page is a book review titled:

Eastern Art of the Suiko Period

Subtitled: First Exhaustive Work Ever Written by a Foreigner on Any Important Era of the Art History of East Asia

The review is authored by Hamilton Bell.

The text of the review discusses a scholarly book on Japanese sculptures from the Suiko period, written by Mr. Warner. It notes that this is the first comprehensive work on the subject by a foreigner and praises its scholarship and the author’s background in Oriental studies at Harvard and the Boston Museum. The review highlights the book’s exploration of the influences of Korean, Chinese, and Indian art on early Japanese sculpture, particularly noting the arrival of Buddhism to Japan and the resulting artistic developments.

Accompanying the text are two black-and-white photographs of ancient sculptures:

1. On the right side of the page, there is a prominent image of a seated stone Buddha figure.

   • It is captioned: “From the Imperial Household Collection.”
   • The Buddha is depicted in a meditative pose, with a serene expression and flowing robes. The style is characteristic of early Japanese Buddhist sculpture, likely from the Suiko period (552–645 CE).

2. In the upper-right corner, a smaller, somewhat obscured image or label is attached to the page. It appears to be a clipping or note that reads “JUNE 15 1924” and “8”, reiterating the date and page number.

Additional physical details of the item:

• The paper is aged, yellowed, and shows signs of wear, with frayed edges and slight discoloration.
• Handwritten annotations are visible in pencil or blue ink, including what looks like “129” near the top left and a signature or scribble near the title.
• The page appears to have been preserved within a larger archival or scrapbook context — it’s attached or layered with other paper items, one of which is folded or torn at the left edge.

In summary, this is a historical document capturing early 20th-century Western scholarship on Japanese art, specifically the Suiko period, and it includes both critical commentary and visual examples of the sculptures under discussion. It is a valuable artifact for understanding art historical discourse of the era.

The image is of a book review from The New York Times, dated June 15, 1924. The review is titled "Eastern Art of the SuiKo Period" and is written by Hamilton Bell. The review discusses a book by Mr. Warner, who is described as a Japanese scholar. The book is considered the first exhaustive work ever written by a foreigner on any important era of the art history of East Asia. The review highlights the significance of the book and its content. The image also includes a picture of a statue, which is mentioned in the review.

The image shows a book with its pages open, displaying a review article. The book is titled "Eastern Art of the Suiko Period," and the review is written by Hamilton Bell. The review is dated June 15, 1924, and it is published in the New York Times Book Review. The review article is written in a foreign language, possibly Japanese. The book is about the art of the Suiko period, which is considered an important era in the art history of East Asia. The review article includes a photograph of a statue, possibly a Buddhist statue, which is relevant to the book's topic.

The image shows an open book with two visible pages, displaying a newspaper clipping from The New York Times Book Review, dated June 19, 1924. The article is titled "Eastern Art of the Suiko Period" and is a review of a book by Hamilton Bell, described as "the first exhaustive work ever written by a foreigner on any important era of the art history of East Asia."

Left Page (Page 8):

• The left page contains the main body of the review. The text is printed in a classic newspaper font and discusses the book, its subject matter, and the author's expertise. The review highlights the significance of the Suiko Period in East Asian art history and praises the author's comprehensive approach.
• The article is structured with paragraphs that delve into the content of the book, its scholarly value, and its contributions to the understanding of East Asian art.
• The text is dense and appears to be a detailed critique, typical of a scholarly review.

Right Page:

• The right page includes a small photograph of an artifact, likely a piece of art from the Suiko Period. The image shows a bronze statue or sculpture, possibly of a deity or historical figure, placed on a pedestal. The statue is detailed, with visible features such as facial expressions and intricate carvings.
• Below the photograph, there is a caption or description, though it is partially obscured. The caption mentions "From the Hōryū-ji Collection," indicating that the artifact is part of the Hōryū-ji temple collection, a significant site for early Japanese Buddhist art.
• The right page also contains additional text, likely continuing the review or providing further context about the artifact depicted in the photograph.

Overall Context:

• The book being reviewed appears to be a scholarly work focusing on the Suiko Period (538–647 CE), a crucial era in Japanese history known for its cultural and artistic developments, particularly in Buddhist art.
• The review emphasizes the book's importance as a pioneering work by a Western scholar on East Asian art, highlighting its value for both specialists and general readers interested in the field.
• The inclusion of the photograph suggests an effort to illustrate the book's subject matter, providing visual context for the reader.

Visual Details:

• The book itself has aged, with visible signs of wear such as discoloration and slight creasing, indicating it is an old or historical document.
• Handwritten notes or markings are visible in the top left corner of the left page, suggesting the book may have been annotated or studied by a previous reader.
• The layout is typical of early 20th-century newspaper clippings, with clear typography and structured formatting.

This image captures a moment of scholarly engagement with East Asian art history, showcasing both textual and visual elements that highlight the significance of the Suiko Period in the broader context of art and cultural studies.

The image shows an old newspaper page from "The New York Times Book Review" dated June 15, 1924. The paper is open, revealing an article titled "Eastern Art of the Suiko Period," which is described as the "First Exhaustive Work Ever Written by a Foreigner on Any Important Era of the Art History of East Asia." The newspaper page is slightly yellowed and torn, suggesting it is very old and possibly brittle. There is a small photograph or illustration of an artifact on the right, which is presumably related to the article's content about Eastern art. The visible text discusses historical aspects of Eastern art and certain artifacts from various locations such as Japan and China.

There are some handwritten notes scribbled on the margins of the paper, and the article is marked with the number "8" at the top. There is also a stamp or mark on the top right corner saying "New York 1924." The newspaper lies on a flat surface, partially folded over on the left-hand side, and the background of the image is a plain gray surface.

The image shows a clipping from the June 15, 1924, issue of The New York Times Book Review. The article is titled "Eastern Art of the Suiko Period." It is a review by Hamilton Bell and discusses the importance of the Suiko Period in East Asian art history. The article mentions that this is the first exhaustive work ever written by a foreigner on any important era of the art history of East Asia.

The page is numbered 129 and the text of the article is quite dense, spread across multiple columns. There is a photograph of an Asian sculpture, specifically from the Imperial Household Collections, included in the article. The clipping itself appears to have aged, showing signs of yellowing, which is typical of old newspaper articles.

In addition to the main article, there is a narrow column on the right side that seems to be an extension or continuation of the same topic. The clipping itself is glued or taped to a white page, possibly as part of a scrapbook or collection of newspaper articles.

This image shows a vintage newspaper or magazine clipping titled "Eastern Art of the Suiko Period" from The New York Times Book Review, June 15, 1924. The publication discusses the Suiko Period of East Asian art and its significance, highlighting a book written by a foreign author—billed as a pioneering accomplishment in the field.

The article includes an image of a sculpture of a seated figure on the right side of the page. The sculpture, labeled as being from the "Imperial Household Collection," seems to depict a serene figure seated on a pedestal, highly stylized in traditional East Asian artistic tradition.

The clipping also features additional columns of text, discussing elements related to art history, cultural influence, and religious sculptures of the Suiko Period. The main article is formatted in columns, with visibly faded sections due to aging. Handwriting or annotations appear at the top, along with a library stamp indicating cataloging or archival context ("June 1926" is stamped in one corner). A small portion of the page overlaps with other papers at the edges.

• A scrapbook-style page with old newspaper clippings mounted on an album page.
• The central clipping is from The New York Times Book Review, dated June 15, 1924, with the headline “Eastern Art of the Suiko Period.” The subheading reads that it’s the first exhaustive work by a foreigner on important East Asian art history.
• A photo/illustration of a seated statue (likely a Buddhist figure) appears on the right side, captioned “From the Imperial Household Collection.”
• There are additional narrow vertical newspaper clippings attached along the right edge and a few smaller cutouts or tissue pieces above, all aged to a sepia tone.
• The overall look is vintage and scholarly, with yellowed paper and uneven torn edges, suggesting an old archival page or scrapbook entry.