Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V. Rinse, repeat.
ARCH.2003.22, Rendition: 809106
The image shows a collage of newspaper clippings and a letterhead from a French press agency. The letterhead at the top is from "Le Correspondant de la Presse," which appears to be a press service based in Paris, France. The letterhead includes the motto "Lit Tout" and "Renseigne Sur Tout," which translates to "Reads Everything" and "Informs About Everything." It lists Ch. Demogeot as the Director and provides the address: 24, Boulevard Montmartre, Paris (9e).
Below the letterhead, there are two newspaper clippings:
The first clipping is titled "Fraudulent Art Suit Is Begun." The article discusses a trial involving an art dealer named M. Vignon, who was charged with fraud. The article mentions that the trial was being watched by many interested parties, including art dealers and experts. The trial involved the sale of fake artworks attributed to famous artists like Renoir and Degas.
The second clipping discusses a lawsuit involving The Tribune, a newspaper, and mentions that almost all Americans read it to get unbiased news. The article talks about a legal case where a French wine dealer sued The Tribune for defamation after the newspaper published an article questioning the authenticity of the wine dealer's products. The article mentions that the wine dealer sought damages and that the case involved complex legal issues.
The clippings are arranged vertically, with the letterhead at the top and the two articles below it. The background of the image is a plain light gray color.
The image displays a collection of documents, with the main focus being a newspaper clipping from the Chicago Tribune. The headline of the article is "Fraudulent Art Suit Is Begun," dated April 2, 1921. The article discusses a trial in New York City where a French art dealer, M. Demotte, has been charged with selling forged paintings to prominent institutions such as the Louvre, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and the Boston Museum. The forgeries are said to include supposed works by medieval masters. The article details the background of the case, mentioning that the paintings were created by two French artists, Boussod, Valadon & Co, and the investigation that ensued when the forgeries were discovered.
Additionally, there is a smaller section of the article that mentions other news, including that almost all Americans in Europe read The Tribune to get unbiased news, and a brief about an art dealer, H. O. Havemeyer, who was also involved in the case.
There is also a card or document from "Le Courrier de la Presse" attached, which appears to be related to the newspaper clipping, possibly serving as a reference or a note. The card includes the address of the Chicago Tribune and some handwritten notes, but the specific details of these notes are not entirely clear.
The image is a page from a newspaper clipping, specifically from the Chicago Tribune, which is summarized as follows:
The clipping is titled "Fraudulent Art Suit Is Begun" and discusses a significant art fraud case.
Here are the key points from the article:
Background:
Scandal and Investigation:
Key Events:
Public Reception:
The newspaper clipping is from the section "LIT TOUT" or "Renseigne Sur Tout," indicating it’s an extract from Le Courrier de la Presse, which seems to be a French publication, and it’s addressed to someone in Chicago.
The clipping is neatly folded, showing the name "France Wins Coe" at the bottom, indicating it might have been signed or labeled by a collector or archivist.
The image shows a newspaper clipping from "Le Courrier de la Presse" and "The Chicago Tribune" dated April 24, 1921. The clipping is titled "Fraudulent Art Suit Is Begun" and reports on a legal case involving fraudulent activities related to art.
The article discusses a trial in New York City involving M. Vigoureux, a Parisian dealer who had been accused of selling forged artworks. The case stems from a complaint made by a former employee, M. Demogeot, who alleged that Vigoureux had engaged in fraudulent activities by selling fake art.
The text mentions that Vigoureux was accused of selling numerous fake artworks, including a "Jacqueline de Baïenne" painting that was actually a forgery. Vigoureux had previously been investigated by the French police and had been accused of similar fraudulent activities.
The article also notes that Vigoureux had previously been found guilty of similar charges in Paris and had fled to New York to escape prosecution. The case was significant due to the high-profile nature of the individuals involved and the large sums of money allegedly lost.
The clipping is accompanied by a form from "Le Courrier de la Presse" asking for contact details, such as address, date, and signature, presumably for readers interested in further information or subscriptions. The newspaper's address is listed as 24, Boulevard Montparnasse, Paris 14e.
Additionally, there is a note at the bottom of the clipping indicating that the clipping is from the "Chicago Tribune," and it highlights the newspaper's broad readership among Americans in Europe and Englishmen looking for unbiased news. The author of the article is credited as France Wins Cosé.
The image shows a newspaper clipping from "Le Courrier de la Presse," a French newspaper, featuring an article from the Chicago Tribune. The clipping is titled "Fraudulent Art Suit Is Begun."
The article details a trial that began in New York, involving a former employee of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, Mr. Vigoureux, who was charged with fraud. The trial is being closely watched by art enthusiasts and the legal community.
Key points in the article include:
The clipping is dated and appears to be from the early 20th century, likely around the 1920s. The lower part of the clipping shows a small portion of another article with the heading "France Wins Case."
The image shows a newspaper clipping from the Chicago Tribune, dated April 18, 1932. The headline of the article is "Fraudulent Art Suit Is Begun."
Here's a detailed summary of the article:
A legal suit that is expected to have significant repercussions in the art world has been initiated in Paris. The suit was opened by M. Demotte, a Parisian art dealer, against René Gimpel, a New York and Paris art dealer. Gimpel is accused of selling a supposedly ancient statue, allegedly of the Merovingian period (5th to 8th century), which Demotte claims is fraudulent.
Demotte's suit follows an investigation into the statue, which has raised doubts about its authenticity. The case is seen as having the potential to expose a number of similar frauds in the art market.
The article also mentions that The Tribune was one of the few American publications that many Englishmen read to get unbiased news. It references a previous incident involving another art fraud case in February 1931, where M. Vicomte de Montesquiou-Fezensac was convicted in a French court for selling fraudulent historical documents. This earlier case was notable for its dramatic unfolding, with the defendant making several sensational claims and attempts to evade the law, including a four-day chase by police.
The outcome of the current suit involving Demotte and Gimpel is eagerly anticipated due to its potential impact on the art world. The article concludes by mentioning that France won the previous case.
The image shows an old, narrow newspaper clipping titled "Fraudulent Art Suit Is Begun." The clipping appears to be a French excerpt from the Chicago Tribune, with some handwritten and stamped details at the top, including a stamp with the words "CHICAGO TRIBUNE" and some handwritten text. The article discusses a trial in Paris involving a Paris art dealer named M. Demotte and charges of fraud and abuse of confidence against a former employee named M. Vigouroux. It mentions a scandal involving fake statuettes and the involvement of various art pieces and transactions. An additional highlighted section within the clipping notes that "Almost all Americans in Europe read The Tribune, and so do many Englishmen in order to get uncolored and unprejudiced news." The clipping shows signs of aging and wear, including a small tear near the middle. The top part of the clipping includes French text related to the publication details.
The image shows a newspaper clipping and a form or label attached to the top of it. The label is from "Le Courrier de la Presse" and includes a space for the extract's name, which is "CHICAGO TRIBUNE," an address line, a date line, and a signature line, all of which are blank, except for the extract name.
The newspaper clipping is titled "Fraudulent Art Suit Is Begun" and appears to come from the Chicago Tribune. The text discusses a trial regarding art fraud, mentioning various individuals and locations, such as Paris and New York. Specific details are not legible due to the image resolution and portion of text, but it seems to involve a lawsuit or criminal charges related to fraudulent activities in the art world. The end of the visible text references "France Wins Case," although the details of this case are not shown in the image.
The paper looks like it has been torn, with jagged edges visible at the bottom and right side of the newspaper cutting. The background against which the paper is placed is plain, solid, and a uniform greyish tone, focusing attention on the clipping and label.
This image depicts a newspaper clipping. The top part of the clipping includes a header from "Le Courrier de la Presse," which provides information related to press extracts, mentioning "Lit Tout" and "Renseigne Sur Tout." It also includes the name of the director, Ch. Demogot, and an address in Paris. The header specifies that the extract is from the "Chicago Tribune," with space for additional details such as publication date and signature.
Below the header, the newspaper article titled "Fraudulent Art Suit Is Begun" details the beginning of a trial concerning fraudulent art. The article mentions a case involving forged statues and the subsequent charges against certain individuals. It discusses the investigation and the involvement of various parties, including Mr. Demotte, an art dealer, and Mr. Vigoroux, a former employee accused of fraud and abuse of confidence. The article provides information on the various transactions, allegations, and legal proceedings.
Towards the bottom of the clipping, there is an advertisement or endorsement for the "Chicago Tribune," stating its widespread readership among Americans and Englishmen in Europe who seek uncolored and unbiased news.
The clipping ends with a short note titled "France Wins Case," suggesting a conclusion of some legal or competitive matter.
The image shows a historical newspaper clipping or excerpt from a publication titled "Le Courrier de la Presse", specifically the section "Lit Tout" (meaning "Read Everything"). The document is dated June 19, 1952, and is addressed to G. Demoget, Director, located at 24, Boulevard Montmartre, PARIS (2e). The header indicates that this is an excerpt from the Chicago Tribune.
The main content of the clipping discusses a fraudulent art suit that has been initiated. The article highlights a legal case involving M. Victoroux, an art dealer in New York, who is accused of fraud by his former employee, M. Vigouroux. The charges stem from allegations that M. Vigouroux sold forged artworks, including pieces falsely attributed to famous artists such as John Singer Sargent and John Singer Sargent's wife, Mrs. Vigouroux. The article details how these forgeries were discovered through an investigation by the French Sûreté, leading to the initiation of legal proceedings in New York.
The text also provides context about the art market, noting that many Americans and Europeans read The Tribune to access uncolored and unprejudiced news. It mentions specific examples of forged artworks, such as a Sargent painting sold for $600,000 and a Rousseau painting sold for $1,000,000, both of which were later revealed to be forgeries.
The article concludes with a note that the continuation of the trial was postponed for a week, indicating that the case was ongoing at the time of publication. The overall tone suggests a significant scandal involving high-value art fraud and the legal ramifications that followed.