Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V. Rinse, repeat.
ARCH.2003.22, Rendition: 809105
This image displays two aged, yellowed newspaper clippings placed on a plain, light gray surface.
The top clipping is smaller and appears to be the continuation of an article from a different page. The visible text discusses an art dealer, Sir Joseph Duveen, and his opinion on a statue’s authenticity (specifically, that it is not champlevé enamel from 13th-century Limoges). It references the Dreicer estate and mentions that Duveen’s opinion was shared with the estate’s trustees. The article also mentions a “plaintiff” named Demotte and includes a quote from Duveen defending his professional right to express his opinion.
The larger clipping sits underneath and features a bold, centered headline: “VIGOUROUX REARRESTED”. The article below this headline reports on legal matters in New York involving M.G.J. Demotte, a Paris art dealer, who is a plaintiff in a suit against Sir Joseph Duveen. It states that Demotte is also involved in another suit against M. Vigouroux, his former manager of an antiquity shop in New York. Vigouroux is accused of defrauding his employer. When brought to trial, Vigouroux asserted he was not under the court’s jurisdiction. The court, agreeing to his request for a change of venue, declared itself incompetent to try the case and ordered his immediate arrest to be bound over to the next court of assizes.
A small, faded blue ink mark or stamp is visible on the lower right side of the “VIGOUROUX REARRESTED” clipping. The bottom portion of the clipping has faded, partially legible text, possibly from the article’s continuation or another article entirely.
Overall, the clippings appear to be from a single newspaper, possibly from the early to mid-20th century, and document a high-profile legal drama involving art dealers, authentication disputes, and fraud allegations tied to the Dreicer estate.
The image shows a piece of paper with a news clipping affixed to it. The clipping is titled "VIGOUROUX REARRESTED" and discusses a legal matter involving M. G. J. Demotte, a Paris art dealer, and M. Vigouroux, who was previously the manager of Demotte's branch antiquity shop in New York. The text mentions a suit against Vigouroux for fraud and details his rearrest following a trial. The overall tone of the text is formal and informative, typical of a newspaper article. The paper itself appears aged, with some wear and tear, and is placed on a light-colored surface.
The image shows a piece of old newspaper clippings mounted or attached to a larger beige-colored cardstock or envelope. The newspaper clippings appear to be from a legal or court-related article, discussing a case involving an art dealer and the Dreicer estate. The text mentions Sir Joseph, an art dealer with thirty-five years of experience, and his opinion regarding a statue in question. The article also discusses legal proceedings involving M. G. J. Demotte, a Paris art dealer, and M. Vigouroux, a former manager of Demotte's branch antiquity shop in New York. The clippings are slightly torn and have some markings, including a blue stamp or ink mark at the bottom right corner. The background is a plain, light gray surface.
The image shows a newspaper clipping with text printed on both sides. The text is about a legal case involving Mr. G.J. Demotte, an art dealer, and Sir Joseph Duveen, a renowned art dealer. The clipping mentions that Mr. Demotte was creating a sensation in New York by filing a lawsuit against Sir Joseph Duveen. The lawsuit was related to a dispute over the authenticity of a statue in the Duveen estate. The clipping also mentions that Mr. Demotte had previously brought a lawsuit against M. Vigouroux, the former manager of Demotte's branch antiquity shop in New York, who was accused of fraudulently bringing an employee to trial. The clipping concludes with information about the court's decision to order Vigouroux's immediate arrest and his subsequent appearance in the next court of assizes.
The image shows two pieces of paper on a gray background. The paper on the right is slightly folded and has some text written on it. The paper on the left has a few lines of text written on it. The text on the paper on the right is about a court case involving an art dealer and a client. The text on the paper on the left is about a court case involving a former manager of an art shop.
The image shows a close-up view of a newspaper clipping or printed document. The text is partially visible and appears to be from a historical or legal context. The document is titled "VIGOUROUX REARRESTED", indicating that it discusses the arrest of an individual named Vigouroux.
Context of the Arrest:
Legal Proceedings:
Content of the Document:
The image captures a snippet of a historical legal or news article, focusing on the arrest and legal troubles of M. Vigouroux, an individual involved in the art trade. The document highlights the complexities of the case, including financial disputes, professional integrity, and legal proceedings. The title "VIGOUROUX REARRESTED" emphasizes the ongoing nature of the legal drama.
The image displays an old newspaper clipping with small, dense text, presenting an article or a series of articles. The paper has yellowed with age, indicating it is likely quite old. The top article appears to be about a dispute involving an art dealer and the Dreicer estate regarding the authenticity and valuation of a statue. Specific names and details are mentioned, but without context, their significance is unclear.
The bottom article, separated from the first by a bold line, is headlined "VIGOUROUX REARRESTED" and discusses the re-arrest of M. Vigouroux, who seems to be involved in a legal issue potentially related to fraud or deception against his employer. The article mentions a trial, the twelfth correctional chamber, and the subject being bound over to the next court of assizes.
The text's size and font are typical of historical newspapers, and use of language like "assizes" suggests the clipping could be from the late 19th to early 20th century, a time when such terms were more commonly used in legal contexts. The nature of the article suggests these clippings were part of a legal or society section of the newspaper.
The image depicts a vintage newspaper clipping attached to a piece of paper. The visible part of the clipping contains text discussing legal matters related to art dealers and an arrest. Specifically, it mentions Sir Joseph, an art dealer with thirty-five years of experience, and his involvement in a dispute with the trustees of the Dreicer estate. Additionally, there is a mention of another legal case involving M. Vigouroux, the former manager of Demotte's branch antiquity shop in New York, who was accused of defrauding his employer. The clipping notes that a court declared itself incompetent to try the case and ordered Vigouroux's immediate arrest, pending a future trial. The clipping is yellowed with age and shows signs of wear, indicative of its historical nature.
This image shows a piece of an old newspaper or article clipping attached to a beige backing. The text is densely packed and appears related to legal or criminal matters involving an "art dealer" and a person referred to as "Vigouroux." The lower section of the clipping has a highlighted title, "VIGOUROUX REARRESTED," in bold letters. Some parts of the text are folded over, revealing additional text from the article. The style of the text and material suggest the document is dated and from an earlier time period.
The image shows a light grey surface with a small piece of beige paper, on which two newspaper clippings are attached, oriented vertically in a slightly overlapping manner. The paper appears to be aged, with the text printed in traditional newspaper font.
The top clipping contains text about Sir Joseph, an art dealer with thirty-five years of experience, discussing a statue and his professional opinion regarding its authenticity. It mentions the Dreicer estate and clarifies that Sir Joseph asserts a qualified art dealer’s right to express personal opinions on art objects.
The bottom clipping, just below the first and partly overlapping it, has a bold headline stating "VIGOUROUX REARRESTED." The article discusses a legal case involving M. G. J. Demotte, a Paris art dealer, and Mr. Vigouroux, the former manager of Demotte’s branch antiquity shop in New York. Vigouroux is accused of defrauding his employer and was rearrested after the court declared it incompetent to try the case, ordering his arrest to be bound over to the next court of assizes.
The text in these clippings reflects legal disputes and professional art dealings from what appears to be an older newspaper. The paper shows signs of yellowing and aging consistent with vintage materials.