Archives Scrapbooks

The image shows a small, historical document that appears to be a clipping from a newspaper or a news article. The document is titled "MILLION DOLLAR ART FRAUD SUIT ON IN NEW YORK" and includes a headline about a legal case related to a disputed art piece, specifically a "Virgin and Child" statue. The text mentions Sir Joseph Duveen's response to a lawsuit by G.J. Demotte, an art dealer, for half a million dollars in damages because Duveen questioned the authenticity of the statue. The date of the article is July 17, 1925, and it is dated "18 JUIL 1925" on the document, indicating it was copied or excerpted on that date. The document also includes the address "5 rue Lamartine" and the name of the newspaper, "LE COURRIER DE LA PRESSE," along with the director's name, Ch. DEMOGEOT. The page also has some handwritten notes, including a number "48" and a signature. The background is a plain, light gray surface.

This image shows a historical newspaper clipping alongside a printed form. The clipping is from the "Chicago Tribune" and is dated "18 JUIL 1925," which is July 18, 1925. The headline of the clipping reads "MILLION DOLLAR ART FRAUD SUIT ON IN NEW YORK," and it discusses a legal case involving Sir Joseph Duveen and G. J. Demotte over the authenticity of a statue titled "Virgin and Child."

The printed form is titled "LE COURRIER DE LA PRESSE" and includes the phrase "LIT TOUT RENSEIGNE SUR TOUT," which translates to "READS EVERYTHING INFORMS ABOUT EVERYTHING." It is directed by Ch. DEMOGEOOT and is located at 21, Boulevard Montmartre, PARIS (2°). The form includes fields for the source of the excerpt, address, date, and signature. The source is filled in as "CHICAGO TRIBUNE," the address is "5 me Lamartine," and the date is "18 JUIL 1925." The form is numbered "18" in the top right corner.

The clipping and the form appear to be part of a press clipping service that collects and distributes news articles on various subjects.

This image displays a historical clipping and its accompanying archival slip, documenting a notable art fraud lawsuit from 1925.

Archival Slip (Background Document)

This is a French press clipping slip from “Le Courrier de la Presse”, a service that provided press clippings on various subjects.

• Header: The slip’s header reads: “LE COURRIER DE LA PRESSE —‘LIT TOUT’ ‘RENSEIGNE SUR TOUT’”, meaning “Reads everything, informs on everything.” Below, it states the service provides extracts from journals and publications on all subjects and personalities.
• Director: Ch. DEMOGEOT, Director
• Address: 21, Boulevard Montmartre, PARIS (2e)
• Handwritten Information:
  • In the top-left, “M.” is followed by the handwritten word “Faux” (French for “Fake” or “Counterfeit”).
  • “No.” is followed by the handwritten number “48”.
• Clipping Source: Typed in purple ink: “Extrait de : CHICAGO TRIBUNE”
• Address: Handwritten: “5 rue Lamarck” (likely the recipient’s Paris address).
• Date: Typed in purple ink: “18 JUIL 1925” (July 18, 1925)
• Signed: Left blank.

Newspaper Clipping (Forefront)

This is a physical clipping from the Chicago Tribune, dated July 17, 1925, detailing a high-profile lawsuit.

• Headline: “MILLION DOLLAR ART FRAUD SUIT ON IN NEW YORK”
• Subheadline: “Duveen Insists Belief — Demotte’s Statue Unauthentic”
• Body:

  (Special Cable To The Tribune)
  NEW YORK, July 17.—Sir Joseph Duveen replied in the Supreme Court yesterday to the suit for half a million dollars in damages brought by G. J. Demotte, the art dealer, because Sir Joseph questioned the genuineness of the “Virgin and Child,” which Demotte sold to Michael Dreicer for three hundred and fifty thousand francs...

Summary & Context

This artifact documents a real legal dispute between two major figures in the early 20th-century art world:

• Sir Joseph Duveen: One of the most powerful and influential art dealers of his time, known for selling Old Master paintings to American industrialists. He was also known for his strong opinions on authenticity.
• G. J. Demotte (Georges Jules Demotte): A French art dealer operating in Paris and New York, specializing in medieval and Renaissance art. He is associated with the sale of the disputed statue, "Virgin and Child," to collector Michael Dreicer.

The lawsuit arose when Duveen publicly questioned the authenticity of the statue, prompting Demotte to sue for slander and damages. The clipping notes the statue was sold for 350,000 francs (approximately $70,000 USD at the time), and Demotte sought $500,000 in damages — which may have been why the headline inflated the case to a “million dollar” suit.

The French clipping slip, labeled “Faux” (“Fake”) by the archivist or collector, suggests the clipping was preserved as evidence of the alleged forgery — implying that the statue may have indeed been a fake, and that Duveen’s suspicions were correct. The fact that “Duveen Insists Belief — Demotte’s Statue Unauthentic” is underlined by hand further emphasizes this interpretation.

This artifact captures a pivotal moment in art history where art authentication, reputation, and financial stakes collided in court — and is a compelling example of archival documentation of art world scandals.

In short: A 1925 Chicago Tribune clipping reports on art dealer Sir Joseph Duveen being sued for half a million dollars by another dealer after questioning the authenticity of a $70,000 statue. The clipping was filed in Paris by a press service under the classification “Faux” (“Fake”), suggesting the artifact was preserved as evidence of an art forgery.

The image shows two pieces of paper with text. The top piece of paper has French text and appears to be a document or a letter. The bottom piece of paper has English text and appears to be a newspaper clipping. The English text reads "Million Dollar Art Fraud Suit On in New York" and "Duveen Insists Belief Demott's Statue Unauthentic." The text on the French paper is difficult to read, but it appears to be a document related to art or a legal matter.

The image shows a piece of paper with a clipping from a newspaper. The clipping is titled "Million Dollar Art Fraud Suit on in New York." It appears to be a news article from the Chicago Tribune, dated July 18, 1928. The article is about a lawsuit involving a million-dollar art fraud in New York. The text is written in black ink on a piece of paper that seems to be an envelope. The envelope is addressed to someone in Paris, France, and is from the Chicago Tribune.

The image depicts a vintage newspaper clipping or excerpt, prominently featuring a headline about an art fraud case. Here is a detailed description:

Visual Elements:

1. Header Information:

   • At the top, there is a header that reads:
     "LE COURRIER DE LA PRESSE"
     "LIT TOUT RENSEIGNE SUR TOUT"
     This translates to "The Courier of the Press" and "Read Everything, Informed About Everything," indicating it is a French newspaper or press service.
   • Below the header, there is a smaller section with the name "Ch. DEMOGEOT, Directeur" and the address "21, Boulevard Montmartre, PARIS", suggesting the director and location of the publication.

2. Excerpt Details:

   • The main body of the clipping is labeled as an "Extrait de : CHICAGO TRIBUNE", meaning it is an excerpt from the Chicago Tribune.
   • The address field is filled in with "5 rue Lamarline", likely a recipient's address.
   • The date is marked as "18 JUL 1928", indicating when the clipping was created or recorded.
   • There is a space labeled "Signé" (Signed), but it appears to be blank.

3. Headline:

   • Overlaid on the clipping is a bold, handwritten or printed text that reads:
     "MILLION DOLLAR ART FRAUD SUIT ON IN NEW YORK"
     This headline emphasizes the central theme of the clipping: a high-profile art fraud case involving a million-dollar lawsuit in New York.

4. Article Content:

   • Below the headline, part of the article is visible. It discusses a legal case involving Sir Joseph Duveen, an art dealer, and G. J. Demotte, another art dealer.
   • The article mentions a lawsuit for half a million dollars in damages, brought by Duveen against Demotte.
   • The dispute centers around the authenticity of a statue titled "Virgin and Child", which Demotte sold to Michael Dreicer for three hundred and fifty thousand francs.
   • Duveen insists that the statue is inauthentic, leading to the legal action.

5. Layout and Design:

   • The clipping has a slightly worn, aged appearance, consistent with a historical document from the early 20th century.
   • The text is typed, with some sections handwritten (e.g., the address and date), giving it a formal yet personal touch.
   • The overlay text ("MILLION DOLLAR ART FRAUD SUIT ON IN NEW YORK") is prominently displayed in large, bold letters, drawing immediate attention to the headline.

Contextual Interpretation:

• The document appears to be a clipping or excerpt from a French newspaper (Le Courrier de la Presse) summarizing a significant legal case reported in the Chicago Tribune on July 18, 1928.
• The case involves a high-profile art fraud lawsuit in New York, highlighting the controversy surrounding the authenticity of a religious sculpture ("Virgin and Child") and the financial stakes involved.
• The inclusion of both the French and American press elements suggests the case had international interest or was being reported across multiple media outlets.

Overall Impression:

The image captures a historical moment in the art world, showcasing a legal battle over authenticity and fraud, with clear emphasis on the financial and reputational stakes involved. The document's design and content reflect the journalistic practices of the time, blending formal reporting with personal annotations.

The image depicts a collection of newspaper clippings and a letter, likely from the early 20th century, arranged on a plain gray background. The letter, written in French, appears to be a response to an inquiry about an art fraud suit in New York. It is addressed to the Chicago Tribune and dated July 18, 1928.

The letter is accompanied by two newspaper clippings, one of which reads "MILLION DOLLAR ART FRAUD SUIT ON IN NEW YORK" and another that states "Duveen Insists Belief Demotte's Statue Unauthentic." These clippings are likely related to the art fraud suit mentioned in the letter.

Overall, the image suggests that the letter and newspaper clippings are connected to a significant event or controversy involving art fraud in New York during the late 1920s.

The image depicts a newspaper clipping and a piece of paper with text, both of which appear to be related to a court case involving art fraud.

Newspaper Clipping:

• The clipping is from the "CHICAGO TRIBUNE" and is dated July 18, 1924.
• The headline reads "MILLION DOLLAR ART FRAUD SUIT ON IN NEW YORK."
• The article discusses a lawsuit filed by Sir Joseph Duveen against G. J. DeMotte, an art dealer, alleging that DeMotte sold him a fake statue of the Virgin and Child for $350,000.
• The article also mentions that DeMotte had previously sold the statue to Michael Dreicer for $350,000.

Piece of Paper:

• The paper has a rectangular shape with a cutout in the center.
• It appears to be a receipt or invoice from a French company called "LE COURRIER DE LA PRESSE."
• The paper is dated July 17, 1924, and has a handwritten note that reads "LIT TOUT" (meaning "READ EVERYTHING" in French).
• There is also a handwritten signature at the bottom of the paper.

Background:

• The background of the image is a light gray color.
• There are no other objects or features visible in the image.

Overall, the image suggests that the newspaper clipping and the piece of paper are related to a court case involving art fraud, and that the case was widely reported in the media at the time.

The image presents a vintage newspaper clipping and a related document, likely from the early 20th century. The clipping is from the Chicago Tribune, dated July 18, 1928, and reports on a high-profile art fraud case in New York.

Key Elements:

• Newspaper Clipping:
  • Headline: "MILLION DOLLAR ART FRAUD SUIT ON IN NEW YORK"
  • Subheading: "Duveen Insists Belief Demotte's Statue Unauthentic"
  • Date: July 17 (presumably 1928, based on the date on the accompanying document)
  • Content: The article discusses a lawsuit involving art dealer G.J. Demotte and Sir Joseph Duveen, with Duveen questioning the authenticity of a statue sold by Demotte to Michael Dreicer.
• Accompanying Document:
  • Title: "LE COURRIER DE LA PRESSE 'LIT TOUT' 'RENSEIGNE SUR TOUT'"
  • Address: 21, Boulevard Montmartre, PARIS (2e)
  • Date: 18 JUIL 1928
  • Content: The document appears to be a receipt or confirmation of a subscription to a press clipping service, with the clipping from the Chicago Tribune attached.

Summary:

The image showcases a historical newspaper clipping and a related document, providing insight into a significant art fraud case in 1928. The clipping reports on the lawsuit between Demotte and Duveen, while the accompanying document suggests that the clipping was obtained through a press clipping service.

The image presents a vintage newspaper clipping and a receipt, both yellowed with age, set against a light gray background.

Newspaper Clipping:
The clipping is from the Chicago Tribune, dated July 17 (no year visible). The headline reads "MILLION DOLLAR ART FRAUD SUIT ON IN NEW YORK" in bold black text. Below this, a subheading states "Duveen Insists Belief Demotte's Statue Unauthentic." The article discusses a lawsuit involving Sir Joseph Duveen and G.J. Demotte regarding the authenticity of a statue. The clipping is partially cut off at the bottom.

Receipt:
Above the newspaper clipping lies a receipt, also yellowed with age. It features French text and appears to be from "LE COURRIER DE LA PRESSE." The receipt includes details such as an address, date, and a handwritten note in blue ink. The date on the receipt is July 18, 1928.

Overall Impression:
The image suggests that the newspaper clipping and receipt are related to an art fraud case involving Sir Joseph Duveen and G.J. Demotte. The presence of the receipt implies that the clipping was sent or received by someone, possibly as part of an investigation or legal proceedings. The use of a light gray background helps to highlight the aged appearance of the documents, adding to their historical significance.