Archives Scrapbooks

The image shows a torn piece of paper with a printed review or critique of a book by Professor Marquand. The text discusses the book's strengths and weaknesses, comparing it to another work by Mr. Mather. The reviewer praises Professor Marquand's careful documentation and critical acumen but notes that the book lacks the same level of conclusive evidence as Mr. Mather's work. The reviewer also highlights an example of a discrepancy in the book regarding payments recorded for Andrea del Sarto and his pupil Luca della Robbia.

The reviewer further comments on the book's physical qualities, noting its large print and beautiful illustrations, which make it easy to read. However, the reviewer criticizes the book for being more of a catalog with extensive quotations in Latin and Italian, which might have ruined an otherwise admirable work.

The review concludes by praising Professor Marquand's work for its thoroughness, courtesy, and modesty, describing it as a pioneering effort in the field. The reviewer also mentions the high production quality of the book, courtesy of the Princeton University Press, and expresses gratitude for the work's thoroughness and exhaustiveness.

The document discusses the value of Mr. Mather's work in verifying and correcting published documents. It highlights Professor Marquand's book, which is praised for its critical acumen and the author's extensive knowledge of Florentine art. The book is noted for its careful documentation and the resolution of confusing evidence, such as distinguishing the works of Andrea della Robbia from his pupils. The text also commends the book's physical presentation, including its illustrations, typography, and careful proofreading. It concludes by lauding Professor Marquand's courtesy and modesty, and his significant contribution to art criticism, hoping that future works will emulate his approach. The Princeton University Press is also praised for its role in publishing the book.

The image is a page of a document that appears to be a review or critique of a scholarly book, specifically one by Professor Marquand. Here are the detailed observations:

1. General Content:

   • The review is critical of the book's accuracy and documentation, suggesting some faults and occasional inaccuracies.

2. Specific Critiques:

   • The review notes that the book’s value lies in verifying published documents and correcting errors, but it does not claim to be perfect.
   • The author, Marquand, is commended for his careful documentation, critical acumen, and extensive knowledge of Florentine artists' styles.
   • There are instances where the author's handling of historical data seems confusing due to discrepancies, such as payments attributed to Luca della Robbia and Andrea for the same work in different years.
   • The reviewer points out that the division of works between Andrea della Robbia and his pupils is based on internal evidence, with some works attributed to Andrea based on stylistic internal evidence alone.

3. Book Presentation:

   • The book is praised for its physical make-up, including its large size, readability, and quality of illustrations.
   • The printer's work is noted to be free of typographical errors, despite the book's extensive quotations in Latin and fifteenth-century Italian.

4. Scholarly Impact:

   • The review highlights the thoroughness and insightfulness of Marquand's work, suggesting it is a significant contribution to the field.
   • It mentions that Marquand’s work is a fine example of scholarly writing that avoids the pitfalls of intolerance, polemics, and arrogance often seen in past criticism.

5. Final Praise:

   • The document concludes by stating that Marquand has demonstrated a high standard of accuracy and profundity, setting a model for future scholarly criticism.
   • The Princeton University Press is commended for their work on publishing Marquand’s book, which is described as admirably done.

Overall, while the review highlights some areas needing improvement, it predominantly praises the depth and quality of Marquand’s work and the scholarly standards upheld by the publisher.

The image shows a review or critique of a book by Professor Marquand, focusing on his work related to the Florentine artist Andrea della Robbia. Here's a detailed summary:

1. Value of Mr. Mathers' Work:

   • The text starts by mentioning Mr. Mathers' work, which lies in the verification of published documents and the correction of errors, both accidental and deliberate.

2. Professor Marquand's Book:

   • The reviewer praises Professor Marquand's book for its careful documentation. It is noted that critical acumen is essential for such work, and the author's knowledge of Florentine artists and historical data is commended.
   • The reviewer mentions that while handling historical data, the author's conclusions can sometimes be confusing. For instance, the reviewer cites a case where two documents from the records of the Compagnia di San Frediano show conflicting payments for the same work, attributed to Luca della Robbia and Andrea della Robbia, respectively.

3. Andrea della Robbia’s Work:

   • The author's expertise in distinguishing between the works of Andrea and his pupils is highlighted. The reviewer notes that while some works are confidently attributed to Andrea, others are assigned to his pupils based on internal evidence.
   • The author's ability to use internal evidence to attribute works to Andrea is praised, though it is acknowledged that this field is complex.

4. Physical Make-up and Publishing:

   • The reviewer commends the physical quality of the book, noting it is profusely and beautifully illustrated with large, easy-to-read print and minimal typographical errors. This is particularly impressive considering the book's format as a catalogue, filled with quotations in Latin and Italian.

5. General Review:

   • The reviewer concludes by highlighting the accuracy, insight, and exhaustive nature of Professor Marquand's work. They express admiration for Marquand's courteous and scholarly approach, which avoids the polemic and arrogance often seen in historical criticism.
   • The reviewer suggests that Marquand's work sets a new standard for modesty and generosity in criticism, indicating that this might be a trend for future great criticism.

Overall, the review is highly positive, emphasizing Marquand's thorough research, careful documentation, and scholarly approach.

The image contains a typed book review of a work by Professor Marquand. Here is a detailed summary:

The reviewer begins by acknowledging the value of Mr. Marther's work, which lies in verifying published documents and correcting errors, both accidental and deliberate. The reviewer then focuses on Professor Marquand's book, which is described as a careful and meticulous piece of documentary work.

The reviewer praises Marquand's critical acumen and his extensive knowledge of Florentine artists, particularly his mastery of historical data. The reviewer notes that while such knowledge is often conclusive, it can also be confusing without critical insight, using an example of payments recorded to different artists for similar works to illustrate this point.

The reviewer highlights Marquand's expertise in distinguishing the works of Andrea della Robbia from those of his pupils, mentioning that Marquand has attributed numerous works to Andrea based on internal evidence alone.

The physical presentation of the book is commended for its large print, ease of reading, and freedom from typographical errors, despite the complexity of the catalogued works. The Princeton University Press is praised for its high-quality publication.

The reviewer concludes by noting the scholarly value of the work, emphasizing its accuracy, insight, and exhaustive nature. They also commend Marquand for his courteous and gentlemanly approach to criticism, free from the intolerance, polemics, and arrogance often found in academic works. The reviewer suggests that Marquand's work sets a high standard for future criticism, which should be both modest and generous, accurate and profound.

The image contains a detailed review or commentary on Professor Marquand's book about Andrea della Robbia, a prominent artist from the Florentine school.

Key points mentioned in the text include:

1. Verification of Historical Documents:

   • Mr. Mather's work is noted for its value in verifying published documents and correcting errors, though it is occasionally inaccurate or false.
   • Professor Marquand's book is praised for meticulously documenting and critically assessing historical data, including the styles of Florentine artists and the dating of their works.

2. Handling of Documentary Evidence:

   • The author highlights how Professor Marquand handles documentary evidence with honesty, often admitting when conclusions are uncertain.
   • An example is given of two documents from the records of the Compagnia di San Frediano, which could lead to confusion but are addressed with critical insight.

3. Andrea della Robbia’s Workshop:

   • The text explains that Andrea's lifetime work often involved collaboration with his pupils, making it hard to distinguish his individual contributions.
   • Professor Marquand is commended for his competence in addressing this issue, though he acknowledges that some attributions remain uncertain.

4. Content and Presentation of the Book:

   • The book is described as profusely and beautifully illustrated, making it both easy to read and visually appealing.
   • It is noted for being largely free from errors, and it serves as both a catalogue and a comprehensive reference, covering works in Latin and 15th-century Italian.

5. Broader Scholarly Impact:

   • The Princeton University Press is praised for its quality production.
   • The book is anticipated to be a valuable resource for scholars due to its accuracy and exhaustive analysis.
   • The reviewer appreciates the tribute to a recently published museum catalogue and the discussion on the variance in opinions about Andrea della Robbia's work.

6. Author's Insight and Perspective:

   • The reviewer lauds Professor Marquand for his authoritative writing and nuanced perspective, particularly on the influence of malice in art criticism.
   • The reviewer predicts that future critics will appreciate Marquand's modesty and profound contributions to the field.

Overall, the text is a glowing endorsement of Professor Marquand's work, emphasizing its thoroughness, critical insight, and scholarly value.

The image shows a rectangular piece of aged, yellowed paper with typed text on it. The text is dense and divided into two paragraphs that cover most of the paper. The edges of the paper are rough and torn, indicating that it was cut or ripped from a larger document or book. The paper is lying on a plain, light gray surface. The content of the text discusses Professor Marquand's book, touching on topics such as the accuracy of documentary evidence, the handling of historical data, payments related to artworks, and the book’s physical makeup. The text is fairly small and closely spaced, resembling a critique or scholarly review.

The image shows a page of text with a relatively dense block of writing, possibly from a book or an academic article. The left half of the document looks like it may have been cropped or folded inward as the text alignment shifts slightly downward on that side. The text appears to be of a scholarly nature discussing the topics of authenticity in art, the work of a Professor Marquand, and catalogues of artwork. It includes references to historical figures, works of art, documentation, and scholarly research. The language indicates a critique or review of the written work being discussed, noting aspects like "critical acumen," "thoroughness," and the importance of documentary evidence in the study of art history. There's also mention of the Prince of Art criticism and other stores of value related to art, as well as a discussion of the scholarly contributions in this field. The text mentions printing quality and typographical errors, suggesting that it may be about or from the introduction or a review of a published work.

The text is in English and is set in a serif font, typical for formal publications. There's no imagery or visual graphics observed on the page—it is purely textual.

The image depicts a page from a book or publication, featuring text printed in a serif font. The page appears to be aged, with a slightly yellowed and worn appearance, suggesting it may be from an older or well-used volume. The text is arranged in a standard, justified format, with paragraphs separated by line breaks. The content discusses the work of Professor Marquand, focusing on his contributions to the study of Andrea della Robbia, an artist. The passage highlights Marquand's meticulous research, critical acumen, and the value of his work in documenting and analyzing historical evidence related to the artist. The text also praises the physical quality of Marquand's book, noting its large print, beautiful illustrations, and readability. The overall tone is scholarly and appreciative, emphasizing the importance of Marquand's contributions to art history and criticism. The page is centered on a light blue background, giving it a clean and organized presentation.

The image appears to be a torn page from a book or journal, with text printed on it. The text discusses a book by Professor Marquand, praising its accuracy, documentation, and critical insight. It highlights the author's ability to distinguish between the works of Andrea della Robbia and his pupils, and commends the book's physical attributes, such as its illustrations and typography.

The text also mentions a recently published catalogue of Andrea della Robbia's works, which the author suggests should be read with caution due to potential inaccuracies and polemicism. The reviewer emphasizes the importance of accurate and modest criticism in the field of art history.

Overall, the image conveys a positive review of Professor Marquand's book, highlighting its scholarly value and the author's expertise in distinguishing between the works of Andrea della Robbia and his pupils. The reviewer also encourages readers to approach the recently published catalogue with a critical eye.