Archives Scrapbooks

The image is a page from a book or journal, specifically page 222, which contains a review of a work titled "ANDREA DELLA ROBBIA. By Allan Marquand, Ph.D., Professor: Professor Emeritus, Princeton." The review is written by G. Harold Edgell.

The review begins by praising the book, stating that it is "often regarded" as a work that meets the difficulty of distinguishing the works of Andrea and Luca della Robbia. The reviewer notes that the author, Professor Marquand, has critically examined the evidence and provided a detailed review of the works attributed to the Robbias.

Key points from the review include:

1. Critical Examination: The author has critically examined the evidence, providing a detailed review of the works attributed to the Robbias.
2. Two Volumes: The work is in two volumes, with the first volume containing the text and the second volume containing illustrations.
3. Biographical Information: The first volume includes a biography of Andrea and Luca della Robbia, along with an index of the works.
4. Scholarly Contribution: The reviewer highlights the scholarly contribution of the book, noting that it provides a comprehensive account of the Robbias' works.
5. Critique of Previous Works: The reviewer mentions that previous works on the Robbias have been incomplete or inaccurate, and praises Marquand's work for its thoroughness and accuracy.
6. Illustrations: The reviewer notes that the illustrations in the book are of high quality and provide valuable visual evidence.

The review concludes by recommending the book to students of art history and to anyone interested in the works of the Robbias. The reviewer praises the book for its scholarly rigor and its contribution to the field of art history.

Overall, the review is positive and highlights the book's thoroughness, accuracy, and scholarly contribution.

The image depicts a page from a book review in a scholarly journal. The title of the book reviewed is "An Ideal Work" by Andrea Della Robbia, and it is authored by Allan Margolis. The review is titled "Andrea Della Robbia by Allan Margolis," and it was published in the journal "American Journal of Archaeology" in 1922.

Key points from the review:

1. Reviewer's Opinion on Difficulty: The reviewer notes that the book is difficult to follow due to the author's method of discussing the works without a clear narrative or introduction, which makes it hard to grasp the main ideas.

2. Content and Structure: The book contains two volumes, each with numerous pages, detailing the life and work of Andrea Della Robbia. The second volume is an extensive catalogue of Della Robbia’s sculptures.

3. Historical Context: The work is divided chronologically, starting from the mid-15th century (1470-1480) through to the early 16th century (1500-1553), providing a comprehensive look at each period's artistic production.

4. Critical Analysis: The reviewer highlights the importance of Professor Margolis’ subject matter, which is Andrea Della Robbia, a renowned artist. The review notes the complexity and innovation in Della Robbia's work, particularly his use of terracotta sculptures.

5. Luca and Andrea’s Contributions: The review contrasts Luca della Robbia and Andrea della Robbia, noting that while Luca was a naturalist and lacked artistic depth, Andrea was a more refined and intellectually grounded artist.

6. Contribution to Research: The author of the review praises Professor Margolis for his detailed and meticulous approach to presenting the historical and artistic context of Della Robbia’s work, which includes a rich bibliography.

7. Acknowledgments and Translations: The reviewer mentions the importance of the translations and the extensive bibliography, emphasizing the depth and thoroughness of Margolis’ research.

The review suggests that Margolis’ work is an essential reference for understanding the art and historical context of Andrea Della Robbia's contributions.

The image displays a book review from a publication. The review is titled "An Ideal Work" and is written by an individual with the last name Marzoli. The book being reviewed is "Andrea Della Robbia" by Allan Marini, published by Princeton University Press in 1952. The review is signed by George Harold Edgell from Harvard University.

The reviewer acknowledges the challenge of reviewing a book that presents a difficult subject, such as the life and work of Andrea Della Robbia, a 15th-century Italian sculptor. They praise the author for committing to a comprehensive study, which results in a detailed and well-documented work that is both encyclopedic and insightful. The book is described as having two volumes, with the first containing a brief biography and the second an extensive catalog of Andrea's works, including descriptions and illustrations.

The reviewer highlights the importance of Andrea Della Robbia's work, which has been overshadowed by his more famous uncle, Luca. Andrea is noted for his technical skill and the spiritual and intellectual content of his work. The book is said to provide valuable insights into the history of art, particularly the transition from medieval to modern Italian art.

The reviewer also appreciates the author's careful attention to details and the inclusion of previously unpublished documents. The book is recommended for its thoroughness and the light it sheds on the period's history, art, and culture. The reviewer concludes that the book is a significant contribution to the field of art history and will be of great interest to scholars and enthusiasts alike.

The image is a page from a book or journal containing a review of the work titled "An Ideal Work" by Andrea Della Robbia. The review is authored by Gustav Harzof Ennell, a Princeton University graduate from the class of 1922.

The review discusses Professor Marquand's comprehensive book on Andrea Della Robbia, a prominent figure in the Italian Renaissance known for his work in ceramics. Here are the key points covered in the review:

1. Initial Praise and Recognition:

   • The reviewer finds the book to be a significant contribution to the study of art history, praising it as an exemplary and meticulous piece of scholarship.

2. Content and Structure:

   • The work is divided into three main volumes, comprising a total of 279 pages of text and 256 plates.
   • The first two volumes contain the biographical and descriptive text, while the third volume features illustrations.

3. Topics Covered:

   • The book starts with an introduction and a detailed biography of Andrea Della Robbia.
   • It then covers the monuments from 1470-1480, 1480-1490, and 1490-1500, each section meticulously analyzed.
   • The work includes a catalog of artworks, an index of the pieces, and a list of volumes that contain exhaustive references.

4. Critique and Analysis:

   • The reviewer acknowledges the book's thoroughness and its contribution to art history but also notes some areas of contention.
   • The book challenges the reputation of Andrea Della Robbia, suggesting that his work might not be as highly regarded if it were better known.
   • The reviewer appreciates the clarity and logic in the arguments presented but points out that the book lacks some interpretative depth regarding the spiritual and intellectual nature of the art.

5. Historical Context and Comparison:

   • The review mentions the lack of comparison with other artists of the period, such as Luca della Robbia (Andrea’s uncle) and Luca Signorelli.
   • It highlights the absence of a broader cultural and philosophical context, which could have enriched the analysis.

6. Conclusion:

   • Despite some criticisms, the review concludes that Professor Marquand’s book is a valuable and thorough contribution to the study of Andrea Della Robbia and Renaissance art.
   • The reviewer commends the extensive research and documentation, suggesting it will be a critical resource for future studies.

The review is part of a larger publication, likely an academic journal, and is situated on page 647. The layout includes a gallery section at the bottom, which lists other related articles and reviews.

The image is a page from a book titled "Andrea Della Robbia" by Allan Marquand, published in 1922 by George Harold Edgell. The page appears to be a review of the book, written by an unnamed reviewer.

Key points from the review include:

1. Critique of the Reviewer's Task: The reviewer notes the difficulty in reviewing a book by a prominent scholar like Allan Marquand, especially when the reviewer is not a specialist in the field.

2. Book Content: The book is described as consisting of two volumes, containing 183 and 276 pages respectively, with 126 photographic illustrations. These illustrations are noted for their high quality and include views of the Robbia works, as well as photographs of the works themselves.

3. Author's Knowledge: The reviewer praises Marquand's extensive knowledge and his ability to convey it in a clear and engaging manner, despite the complexity of the subject matter.

4. Historical Context: The review discusses the historical and artistic significance of Andrea della Robbia, emphasizing his contributions to Florentine sculpture and the Renaissance period.

5. Book's Structure: The book is divided into two sections: a catalogue of works and a general bibliography. The catalogue is praised for its thoroughness, with each work described and illustrated.

6. Style and Presentation: The reviewer commends Marquand's ability to make the subject accessible to a broader audience, including those without a deep background in art history.

7. Engagement with the Subject: The review highlights Marquand’s passion for his subject, which comes through in his writing, making the book engaging and informative for readers.

8. Contribution to Art History: The book is noted for its significant contribution to the understanding of Andrea della Robbia's work and the broader context of Renaissance art.

Overall, the review is positive, highlighting the thoroughness, clarity, and passion of Allan Marquand's work.

The image shows a page from a book, specifically a review article titled "An Ideal Work" by Allan Marquand, which is an essay on Andrea Della Robbia. The review is from the "Princeton University Library Chronicle," Volume 2, Number 2, from 1922. The reviewer, George Harold Edgell from Harvard University, discusses the book written by Allan Marquand, a professor at Princeton University.

The review is divided into several paragraphs:

1. The first paragraph mentions the difficulty of reviewing a work that is already well-known and well-regarded, and how the reviewer is often ungrateful. It notes that the book, "Andrea Della Robbia," is a comprehensive study of the artist.

2. The second paragraph highlights the book's organization into two volumes, with the first containing a brief biography and the second containing an exhaustive catalogue of Andrea Della Robbia’s works.

3. The third paragraph discusses the artistic and intellectual content of the book, noting that it is a significant contribution to the understanding of Renaissance sculpture. The reviewer praises the author's careful research and the inclusion of a variety of sources and interpretations.

4. The fourth paragraph further elaborates on the author's thoroughness, mentioning the meticulous organization of the book, including the detailed descriptions of each piece of work.

5. The fifth paragraph praises the author's ability to combine historical facts with aesthetic insights, making the work both informative and enjoyable to read.

6. The sixth paragraph concludes with a positive assessment of the book's impact on the understanding of Andrea Della Robbia's art and its significance in the history of Renaissance sculpture.

The layout of the page includes some text and typographical features typical of older publications, such as columnar text and footnotes, with the review being set in a readable font against a clean background. The page number is 68.

The image shows a page from an old document, possibly a book or manuscript. The paper is yellowed with age, and the top has some visible tears and fraying edges, indicating wear and damage over time. The text is in English, with the title "An Ideal Work" printed in bold at the top of the page, followed by a citation for the work reviewed: "ANDREA DELLA ROBBIA. By Allan MARQUAND. 2 Vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1922."

The text below the title is a review of Allan Marquand's work on Andrea della Robbia, written by George Harold Edgell of Harvard University. The review mentions that the work is composed of two volumes, provides insights into the contents of the books, and praises the thoroughness of the author's research and the quality of the transcriptions of documents related to Andrea della Robbia's life.

There are handwritten notes on the page, including the text "The Literary Review / Dec. 2, '22" in the top left, which suggests the source or date of the review. There's also a number "68" possibly indicating the page number or cataloging reference. The general condition of the document suggests it is a historical artifact and might be part of a collection or library archive.

The image shows a clipped and pasted newspaper or magazine review article titled "An Ideal Work." The review discusses the book "Andrea Della Robbia" by Allan Marquand, published in 1922 by Princeton University Press. The review is written by George Harold Edgell from Harvard University.

The article praises Professor Marquand's work as thorough and highly informative, describing the book's structure, which includes two volumes and detailed catalogues of Andrea della Robbia's works, biographical facts, and supporting documents. Edgell highlights the author's encyclopedic knowledge, open-minded handling of controversial points, and generous acknowledgements.

The review emphasizes the significance of Marquand's subject matter and the book’s impact on the study of fifteenth-century Florentine sculpture. It commends the author's careful handling of chronology and documentary evidence, attributing the meticulous scholarship partly to the assistance of Mr. Rufus G. Mather.

Annotations and handwritten notes are visible at the top of the clipped article, including the date "Dec. 2. 22" and some cursive writing that is partially obscured. Some parts of the article are slightly torn or worn, and the edges are uneven, indicating it was physically cut from a larger publication. The article covers one column of text in a serif font style typical of older print media. The background suggests it was pasted inside a book or scrapbook, as additional text and materials are visible around the clipping.

The image shows a close-up of an open book with two pages visible. The text on the pages appears to be from a historical or academic journal. The left page has a title that reads "An Ideal Work" and mentions "Andrea della Robbia" and "Allan Marquand." The right page contains a review of Marquand's work, discussing the author's knowledge, style, and contributions to the field. The pages are yellowed and have some stains, indicating that the book is old. The text is written in a cursive style, and the paper has a textured surface.

The image shows an open book with two pages visible, displaying text in a classic typographic style. The pages are numbered "22" and "23" at the top, and the text appears to be from a scholarly or academic work. The content is dense and formatted in a traditional, serif font, typical of older printed works or academic publications.

Key Observations:

1. Text Content:

   • The text discusses a historical or academic subject, referencing names such as Andrea della Robbia, Allan Marquand, and Princeton University.
   • It mentions Professor Marquand and his work, An Ideal Work, published in 1922. The text critiques or analyzes this work, discussing its reception and impact.
   • There are references to Andrea Robbia, an artist, and his contributions to sculpture, particularly in the context of the Fiorentine Academy.
   • The passage also touches on themes such as idealism, naturalism, and artistic innovation, suggesting a focus on art history or aesthetics.

2. Layout and Formatting:

   • The text is arranged in justified paragraphs, with consistent line spacing and margins.
   • There are numbered sections or footnotes, indicating a structured and formal academic discussion.
   • The left page includes a header with the title "An Ideal Work" and the author's name, Allan Marquand, along with the publication details: "Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1922."

3. Visual Elements:

   • The pages have a slightly aged appearance, with a warm, sepia-toned hue, suggesting the book may be an older or vintage edition.
   • The text is dense, with minimal white space between lines, typical of academic or scholarly works.
   • There are no illustrations, diagrams, or tables visible on these pages—only text.

4. Contextual Clues:

   • The mention of Professor Marquand and his critique of Andrea Robbia's work implies a focus on Renaissance or early modern art.
   • The discussion of idealism versus naturalism and the critique of Robbia's artistic approach suggests a philosophical or critical analysis of art theory.

Summary:

The image depicts a page from an academic or scholarly text discussing An Ideal Work by Allan Marquand, published in 1922. The content critiques the work and explores themes related to art history, idealism, and the artistic contributions of Andrea Robbia. The visual style is formal, with dense, justified text and a classic typographic appearance, indicative of an older or academic publication.