Archives Scrapbooks

The image contains a page from a magazine or journal article dated June 1976. The text discusses the issue of bribery in the arms industry, particularly focusing on Lockheed, a major U.S. defense contractor.

Key points from the text include:

1. Lockheed's Bribery Practices:

   • Lockheed persuaded Herman Weisbrod to double-deal with Northrop. Weisbrod, a Dutch-born businessman, was a promoter of charitable causes and well-connected in the Netherlands.
   • Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, who was also the Inspector General of the Dutch armed forces, received under-the-table money from Lockheed.
   • Franz Josef Strauss, the defense minister of Germany, also received payments from Lockheed.
   • Lockheed was successful in selling 1,200 Starfighters to a consortium of European countries and 40 F-104s to Turkey, with substantial bribes involved.

2. Impact on Defense Policy:

   • Bribery has influenced defense policies, potentially strengthening Communist takeovers in countries like Italy and Japan.
   • The U.S. government has been complicit by pushing arms sales to foreign governments, often using bribes to secure deals.

3. Economic Dependence:

   • The article questions the economic dependence on arms production, which has been nurtured by illegal foreign payments over the past few years.
   • U.S. arms sales abroad increased from about $1 billion in 1970 to over $12 billion in 1975.

4. Current Climate of Bribery:

   • The climate for corporate bribery is described as disgusting, with bribery being a common business practice.
   • Efforts to curb bribery through legislation and disclosure are discussed, including the Arms Control Act of 1976, which requires disclosure of payments to foreign government officials.
   • The article suggests that disclosure can help reduce bribery by making payments public and subject to legal scrutiny.

5. Legal and Ethical Considerations:

   • The article argues that both the paying and receiving of bribes should be illegal.
   • It highlights the need for stronger legislation and enforcement to control the practice of illicit payments in the arms industry.

Overall, the text critically examines the pervasive issue of bribery in the arms industry and its implications for defense policy and international relations.

The image is a page from a June 1976 news article discussing bribery and corruption within the arms industry. Here are the key points:

1. Background on Lockheed's Dealings:

   • Herman Weisbrod and Lockheed persuaded a Dutch government official named Queen Juliana to support the F-104 aircraft. This involved substantial payments, with one estimate being $1.1 million in under-the-table payments.
   • Franz Josef Strauss, a German politician, received payments from Lockheed.
   • Ernest Hauser, a Lockheed salesman, kept a diary detailing his bribery activities, including payments to officials in Turkey, Germany, and other countries.

2. Corporate Influence and Bribery:

   • The article highlights how Lockheed's actions were part of a broader pattern of corporate bribery in foreign procurement deals.
   • The term "influence" is used loosely to describe the practice of paying bribes to gain favorable treatment in military sales contracts.

3. Impact on Foreign Policies:

   • Bribery has been alleged to have influenced defense policies of several countries, including Japan, Italy, Turkey, West Germany, Indonesia, and South Korea.
   • This practice has weakened the U.S. government's ability to enforce objective foreign policy and has led to the perception that U.S. interests are compromised.

4. Consequences at Home:

   • Bribery scandals have led to significant public backlash, with many U.S. industries facing scrutiny.
   • There have been discussions about legislation to curb bribery and illegal payments, with the Arms Control Act of 1976 being a notable example.

5. Broader Implications:

   • The article points out the moral and ethical issues arising from the practice of bribery within the arms industry, which could have serious implications for the integrity of the U.S. government and its foreign policy.
   • The general climate of distrust and the need for reform in the handling of foreign government officials is emphasized.

6. Legal and Political Discussions:

   • The article suggests that increased disclosure requirements and legislation aimed at controlling bribery practices are necessary.
   • It touches on the potential for stricter laws and enforcement actions, such as those proposed by D.J. Houghton, a Lockheed chairman, to deter illicit payments.

The overall tone is critical, highlighting the detrimental effects of corporate bribery on U.S. defense policies and international relations.

Herman Weisbrod, Lockheed persuaded him to double-deal Northrop. Weisbrod then—according to Lockheed's Kochian—bribed Bernhard, Prince Consort to Queen Juliana of the Netherlands, to enlist his support for the F-104. Bernhard was a perfect contact. Born of a royal German family, he had fought against Hitler and was greatly respected in Europe. After World War II, he became a leading conservationist and a promoter of charitable causes. Most important to Lockheed, he was well thought of as the inspector general of the Dutch armed forces.

Married to Queen Juliana, one of the wealthiest individuals in the world, Prince Bernhard had developed expensive tastes. His services were not cheap. His support allegedly cost Lockheed $1.1 million in under-the-table money. But, like Kodama, he was produced, and the Netherlands purchased the F-104.

There is also evidence that Franz Josef Strauss, defense minister of Germany in the early Sixties and now leader of the Christian Socialist Union Party, received substantial payments from Lockheed. This is hotly denied by Strauss. But Ernest Hauser, a Lockheed salesman in Germany, kept a diary of his dealings with him, which, along with Hauser's own statements to American journalists, seems to involve Strauss.

In any event, Lockheed was successful in selling 1,200 Starfighters to a consortium of European countries, including the Netherlands and West Germany. Later, Lockheed's success spread to the southern flank of NATO in a large sale of F-104s to Turkey. And this sale, too, was made with the help of $876,000 in “gifts” to Turkish officials. A Lockheed document refers to this money by saying, “As you know, this rewording of the agent's contract” will assure Nezih of a thorough- going adequate amount with which to buy real influence, not just intelligence, for which the above expenditures are being used.”

Each bribery story makes a fascinating piece of theater. But one must remember the impact these payments have on United States defense policy. They may have “softened” the governments of our allies, making a Communist takeover from within more likely. This is perhaps especially evident in Italy, where the Communists are capital- izing on the revelations of Christian Democratic corruption. And the bribes have undercut our foreign interests in Japan and the Middle East by persuading those governments to buy more arms than American foreign-policy objectives dictate.

The United States government partially blames itself for American corporate bribery that undercut our foreign and defense policies. Treasury Secretary William Simon and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger have pushed military sales as a means of achieving a better balance of payments and paying the ever- growing oil-import bill.

In July 1974, the Department of Defense sent a document called “Agents' Fees in the Mid-east” to the main American arms producers. Companies, it says, should be ready to pay more in bribes to foreign government officials in order to maximize foreign sales. It says that passing money to foreign agents will allow companies to buy more “influence” toward pushing their sales, and goes on to say: “The term ‘influence’ is used here rather loosely. To be more specific, it can range from normal friend- ships and family ties between local agents and procurement officials to the payment of substantial sums of money to individuals in high government positions with somewhat lesser amounts paid to lower echelon government officials. One local agent had admitted to the writer that he has three members of the national assembly of the country on retainer fees for the purpose of obtaining inner-circle intelligence and to promote the sales potential of his principal's product. . .influence is not always related directly to a cash gratuity. It can include the rent-free use of a villa in France or a flat in London, along with car and servants. Sometimes the government official is a silent partner in the agency or other business completely divorced from his normal activities from which he receives a financial benefit.”

Such advice gained the immediate objective of turning the United States into the world's leading arms salesman—but at a price. The governments of Japan, Italy, Indonesia, South Korea, Turkey, West Germany, and many more of our allies have come under suspicion of widespread graft. Probably their armed forces have been weakened by their procurement system based on bribery rather than objective planning. And, because the United States government and corporations are indistinguishable to many people abroad, both the firms and the government are now viewed as scofflaws.

The American bribes have also had a profound impact at home. Many of the moguls of United States industry have appeared in televised hearings and front- page headlines as bribers, tax evaders, and corruptors. Coupled with Water- gate's illegal campaign-contribution revelations, the bribery scandals have resulted in a growing distaste for big business.

We should ask whether it is healthy for our spirit or our economy to depend so heavily on a weapons production that has been nurtured on illegal foreign payments. The last five years have brought more than a tenfold increase in United States arms sales abroad, up from about a billion dollars in 1970 to over $12 billion in 1975. This rising production creates more arms-industry jobs and results in a political superstructure based on maintaining high levels of foreign sales.

The current climate of disgust over corporate bribery generated by the S.E.C. disclosures will soon pass and with it, one fears, the climate for reform. Unless there is new legislation within the next few months, bribery is likely to continue as a common business practice of the United States' multi- national corporations.

D. J. Houghton, chairman of Lockheed, testified that strong legislation is necessary to curb bribery by arms pro- ducers. He cited fierce competition as a bar to effective individual action by American companies. Congress, encouraged by Houghton and other leading business executives, has begun to take steps to control the practice of illicit payments by the arms industry. In the Arms Control Act of 1976, arms manu- facturers are required to make broad disclosures to the State Department and to Congress of payments to foreign government officials. Similar bills are pending in Congress, requiring dis- closure of such payments by any American firm, not just arms producers. Since most payments are to sensitive to stand sunlight, disclosure tends to kill them. Disclosure also places the burden of policing agents' payments and bribery on the recipient country, where local custom and law can best be weighed. To go further, as some suggest, and legislate that any payment considered illegal in the recipient country be also illegal in the United States would force the Justice Department into a morass of foreign law and put the United States in the ques- tionable position of enforcing foreign laws for acts committed abroad.

The sunlight of broad disclosure ap- pears to be the best remedy.

JUNE 1976 31

The image is a page from a magazine or journal article dated June 1976. The article discusses the issue of bribery by American corporations, particularly focusing on defense contractors and their foreign arms sales.

Key Points:

1. Historical Context of Bribery:

   • The article mentions several high-profile figures involved in defense contracts and bribery, including Herman Weisbrod, Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, and Franz Josef Strauss.
   • Prince Bernhard allegedly accepted bribes to influence the purchase of F-104 jets for the Dutch armed forces.
   • Lockheed Corporation is highlighted for its extensive use of bribery to secure contracts, with notable cases involving European countries, Japan, and others.

2. Extent and Impact of Bribery:

   • The text emphasizes the scale of bribery, noting that Lockheed spent over $250 million on bribes, often with the knowledge of high-ranking officials.
   • These bribes were used to sway decisions on significant arms deals, including the sale of F-104 Starfighters and other military equipment.
   • The article underscores that these payments were not just for intelligence but to buy real influence, impacting the foreign policy objectives of the United States.

3. Governmental and Societal Implications:

   • The bribery scandals have undermined trust in the U.S. government and its corporate allies, suggesting that such practices are more common than previously acknowledged.
   • The U.S. government's partiality to blame others for corporate bribery has led to a crisis of confidence both domestically and internationally.
   • The article notes that these scandals have weakened the armed forces of U.S. allies and have been based more on bribery than on strategic planning.

4. Economic and Legislative Responses:

   • The article highlights the economic impact, noting that illegal campaign contributions and bribery have created a significant issue for businesses.
   • It questions the dependency on weapons production for economic health and the need for diversification.
   • The rising production of arms and related jobs is noted, with a substantial increase in arms sales and dollars from the 1970s.

5. Calls for Reform:

   • The current climate of disgust has prompted the S.E.C. (Securities and Exchange Commission) to push for disclosure requirements.
   • D. J. Houghton from Lockheed supports legislation to curb bribery, indicating that strong competition has led to such practices.
   • The article suggests that broad disclosure of payments to foreign officials is the best remedy to address the issue.

The overall tone of the article is critical of the widespread bribery practices among American defense contractors and calls for greater transparency and reform to restore trust and integrity in international business dealings.

The image contains an excerpt from a June 1976 article discussing the Lockheed bribery scandal and its implications for U.S. foreign policy and business practices.

Key Points:

1. Lockheed Bribery Scandal:

   • Herman Weisbrod: Persuaded Lockheed to double-deal Northrop, leading to a bribery scandal involving Queen Juliana of the Netherlands.
   • Prince Bernhard: A perfect contact for Lockheed, received substantial payments for promoting the F-104 aircraft.
   • Franz Josef Strauss: Defense Minister of Germany, received substantial payments from Lockheed, which he denied.
   • Ernst Hauser: Lockheed salesman in Germany, kept a diary of his dealings, which included payments to Strauss.

2. Impact on U.S. Defense Policy:

   • The bribery practices have influenced U.S. defense policy, potentially undermining U.S. foreign interests.
   • The scandal has led to accusations that bribes were used to secure contracts, especially in countries like Japan and the Middle East.
   • U.S. government officials have been implicated in the bribery, with the Treasury Secretary and others pushing for increased arms sales.

3. Economic Impact:

   • The U.S. economy's reliance on illegal foreign payments has been highlighted.
   • The increase in arms sales abroad has led to a rise in production jobs, but these jobs are part of a political superstructure based on maintaining high levels of foreign sales.

4. Legislative Response:

   • The current climate of disgrace over corporate bribery has led to the S.E.C. disclosure requirements and Senate hearings.
   • D.J. Houghton, chairman of Lockheed, testified that strong legislation is necessary to curb bribery.
   • The Arms Control Act of 1976 and other proposed bills aim to regulate and disclose illegal payments.

5. Public and Political Reactions:

   • The scandal has led to a growing distaste for big business among the public.
   • The U.S. government has been criticized for turning a blind eye to bribery, with many allies being implicated.

The article underscores the seriousness of the Lockheed scandal and its broad implications for U.S. foreign policy, economic practices, and legislative reforms.

The image is a page from a 1976 publication, likely a magazine or newspaper article, discussing the Lockheed bribery scandal. Here's a detailed summary:

Lockheed Bribery Scandal:

• Herman Weisbrod and Bernard Kouchner: The article discusses Herman Weisbrod, who persuaded Lockheed to double-deal on the sale of the F-104 jet to the Netherlands. Weisbrod was linked to Queen Juliana of the Netherlands and was part of a group that included Bernard Kouchner, who was connected to Prince Bernhard.
• Cost and Influence: The article notes that Lockheed allegedly spent $1.1 million in under-the-table money on such deals. It mentions Franz Josef Strauss, the German defense minister, who received substantial payments from Lockheed. Strauss denied receiving the payments, but a Lockheed salesman, Ernst Hauser, kept records of his dealings with Strauss.
• Sales and Influence: Lockheed sold 1,200 Starfighters to European countries, including the Netherlands and West Germany, and later sold F-104s to Turkey with significant bribes.
• Influence on Policy: The article highlights that these bribes influenced foreign policy decisions and undermined American interests, particularly in Japan and the Middle East, by persuading governments to buy more arms than necessary.

Impact and Response:

• Government Response: The U.S. government was criticized for its role in facilitating these bribes. The article mentions that Treasury Secretary William Simon and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger pushed military sales to achieve a better balance of payments.
• Legislative Actions: In 1974, the Department of Defense sent a document to major arms producers, suggesting they pay bribes to foreign officials to ensure sales. This practice was termed "influence fees."
• Public Distaste: The bribery scandals led to a growing distaste for big business and corporate bribery, impacting the public's view of the arms industry.
• Legislation: The article suggests that strong legislation is needed to curb bribery by arms producers, citing the Arms Control Act of 1976 and similar bills in Congress to require disclosures of payments to foreign officials.

Conclusion:

• The article concludes that the revelation of bribery has led to a significant backlash and calls for stricter regulations and transparency in foreign payments to prevent corruption and maintain public trust.

This image shows a page from a magazine or book dated June 1976, page number 31. The content of the page is an article discussing issues about bribery involving Lockheed and its impact on international arms sales, U.S. foreign policy, and corporate practices.

Key points mentioned include:

• Herman Weisbrod persuading Lockheed to double-deal with Northrop.
• Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands allegedly receiving bribes to support Lockheed’s F-104 aircraft.
• Franz Josef Strauss, defense minister of Germany, allegedly receiving payments from Lockheed.
• Lockheed's success in selling Starfighter jets to European countries and Turkey, including under-the-table payments.
• Bribery influencing governments to buy arms beyond American foreign-policy objectives.
• The U.S. government's partial responsibility for enabling bribery, referencing Treasury Secretary William Simon and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.
• A document from the Department of Defense about paying “Agents’ Fees in the Mideast” to maximize foreign sales.
• The negative consequences of bribery, such as political corruption, tax evasion revelations, and the distaste for big business in the U.S.
• Calls for stronger legislation and disclosure requirements to curb bribery in the arms industry.
• D. J. Houghton, chairman of Lockheed, testifying about the necessity of strict anti-bribery laws.
• The article suggests that broad disclosure and transparency are key remedies to bribery issues.

The article presents a critical view of how corporate bribery has affected U.S. defense policy, the economy, and global arms sales, with references to specific political figures and legislation.

This image depicts a page from a publication, possibly a magazine or a report, with a column of text. The text appears to be discussing political and defense-related issues, mentioning figures like Herman Weisbrod from Lockheed and alluding to governmental and corporate affairs that involve foreign arms sales, bribery, and arms manufacturers like Northrop and Lockheed Martin.

At the top right corner, there is a graphic element that looks like a cropped image of what could be a book or report cover, with two visible colors: yellow and green, and a pattern that is not entirely discernible due to the crop. The text below this graphic element blends into a discussion about American defense policies and the impact of corruption and bribery in the arms industry, referencing events and issues from the mid-1970s.

The date "June 1976" is printed at the bottom right corner of the page, suggesting that this document was published or is discussing events from that time. There is also a page number "31" on the bottom right, indicating that this is a single page from a larger document.

The article brings up several topics of international concern, such as the activities of defense contractors, the influence of bribery on international arms sales, and the implications of these activities on U.S. foreign policy. The language of the article is critical and reflective, suggesting a reassessment of defense policies and corporate conduct.

The image shows a page from a publication dated June 1976, likely a magazine or journal, featuring a detailed article discussing corporate bribery, particularly focusing on Lockheed Corporation. The text is formatted in a standard newspaper or magazine layout, with justified text and a clean, serif font.

Key Observations:

1. Content Overview:

   • The article delves into the Lockheed bribery scandals, highlighting how the company persuaded governments to purchase arms, often through illicit means.
   • It discusses the involvement of key individuals, such as Herman Weisbrod, who was instrumental in Lockheed's deals, and Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, who was a key contact.
   • The article references significant transactions, such as the sale of F-104 Starfighters to Turkey and the Netherlands, and the use of bribes to secure these deals.

2. Themes:

   • Corporate Bribery: The article emphasizes the extent of bribery by Lockheed and other American corporations to influence foreign governments to purchase arms.
   • Impact on Foreign Policy: It discusses how these bribes undermined U.S. foreign policy objectives and damaged relationships with allied nations.
   • Political and Economic Consequences: The text explores the broader implications, including the erosion of trust in American institutions and the negative effects on global arms sales and international relations.

3. Visual Elements:

   • Text Layout: The text is organized into paragraphs, with clear headings and subheadings. There are no images or graphics visible on the page.
   • Page Number: The bottom right corner shows the page number "31" and the date "JUNE 1976."
   • Columnar Format: The text is presented in two columns, typical of magazine or newspaper layouts.

4. Contextual Clues:

   • The article references historical events, such as World War II and the Cold War, to provide background on the geopolitical context.
   • It mentions specific individuals and entities, such as William Simon (Treasury Secretary), Henry Kissinger (Secretary of State), and Lockheed's involvement with various governments.

5. Tone and Purpose:

   • The tone is analytical and critical, aiming to expose the unethical practices of Lockheed and similar corporations.
   • The article appears to be part of a larger discussion on corporate ethics, foreign policy, and the consequences of bribery.

Summary:

The image depicts a page from a 1976 publication that critically examines the Lockheed bribery scandals. The article provides an in-depth analysis of how Lockheed used bribery to influence foreign governments to purchase arms, detailing the involvement of key individuals and the broader implications for U.S. foreign policy and international relations. The layout is typical of a magazine or journal, with clear text formatting and a focus on detailed, investigative reporting.

The image is a photograph of a two-page spread from a magazine or journal. The pages are filled with text, organized into columns and paragraphs, indicating an article or report. The text is dense and appears to be a detailed discussion of various topics, likely related to political or economic issues.

Description of the Text Content

Page 1:

• The first column on the left side begins with the text "Herman Weisbrod, Lockheed persuaded him to double-deal Northrop." This suggests the article is discussing corporate or political dealings involving individuals and companies.
• The text continues with references to "Lockheed's Kotchian-bribed Bernhard," indicating allegations of bribery involving a person named Bernhard and a company named Lockheed.
• Further down, the text mentions "Queen Juliana of the Netherlands," suggesting the involvement of a royal figure in the discussed events.
• The column also references "Lockheed's F-104," which is likely a reference to a specific model of aircraft produced by Lockheed.

Page 2:

• The text on the right page starts with "The current climate of disgust over corporate bribery generated by the S.E.C. disclosure requirement and with it, one fears, will soon pass with Senate hearings."
• It continues discussing the implications of corporate bribery and the potential for legislative action, mentioning "D. J. Houghton, chairman of Lockheed," who is cited as testifying that strong legislation is needed to curb bribery by arms producers.
• The text also references "Congress, encouraged by Houghton and other leading business executives," indicating a push for legislative measures to control illicit payments by the arms industry.
• There is mention of the "Arms Control Act of 1976," suggesting that the article is discussing recent legislative efforts to regulate the arms industry.
• The article also touches on the broader implications of bribery, stating, "The spotlight of broad disclosure appears to be the best remedy."

Analysis and Description

The article appears to be a critical examination of corporate bribery, particularly within the arms industry, and the efforts to regulate such practices. It references specific individuals and companies, such as Herman Weisbrod, Lockheed, and Northrop, and discusses the involvement of political and royal figures like Queen Juliana of the Netherlands. The text highlights the role of legislative measures, such as the Arms Control Act of 1976, in addressing these issues.

The article suggests a growing public and political awareness of corporate bribery, driven by disclosures and investigations, and argues for stronger legislative action to prevent such practices. The mention of "broad disclosure" as a remedy indicates a belief in the power of transparency to combat corruption.

Conclusion

The image depicts a detailed and critical article on corporate bribery within the arms industry, discussing specific cases, individuals, and legislative efforts to address the issue. The text is dense and informative, providing a comprehensive overview of the topic.