Archives Scrapbooks

The image depicts an open book with text on the right-hand page and a handwritten note on the facing page. The handwritten note reads: "Report of Mr. Edwin A. Locke, Jr. to the Board of Overseers, June 13, 1963."

The printed text on the right-hand page appears to be a formal report or document, which includes a section discussing financial needs and organizational changes related to a museum. The text mentions the following key points:

1. Financial Needs: The museum requires funds for various purposes, including:

   • Endowment for a half-time teaching curator: $200,000
   • Building improvements: $70,000
   • Publication fund: $20,000
   • Purchase fund: $400,000
   • Total: $690,000

2. Discussion on Fund Utilization: The funds are necessary to add significant works of art to the collection, enhancing the museum's role in education and scholarship.

3. Organizational Changes: The report suggests that the museum should be more closely affiliated with the Visiting Committee of the Department of Fine Arts and the Fogg Museum. It recommends that the current arrangement, where the Busch-Reisinger Museum operates under the Fogg, be formalized. The report argues that this change would clarify administrative structures and better reflect the actual organization, as future curators are likely to be art historians rather than literary historians.

4. Historical Context: The text provides a brief history of the museum's administrative structure, noting that it was previously part of the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures but was later separated to form its own committee.

The document is signed at the bottom by "Edwin A. Locke, Jr., Chairman" and dated June 13, 1963.

The image shows a page from a report addressed to the Board of Overseers by Edwin A. Locke, Jr., dated June 13, 1963. The report discusses the financial needs and future plans of the Busch-Reisinger Museum, which is part of the Department of Fine Arts at a university.

Key points from the report include:

1. Financial Needs and Funds:

   • Endowment for a half-time teaching Curator: $200,000
   • Building improvements: $70,000
   • Publication Fund: $20,000
   • Purchase Fund: $400,000
   • Total financial needs amount to $690,000.

   The report suggests that the university should support these funds as they are justified and consistent with the museum's dual role in education and scholarship.

2. Committee and Structure:

   • The report highlights the importance of the Visiting Committee of the Department of German Languages and Literatures and the Busch-Reisinger Museum.
   • It mentions the past successful division of the committee into sub-committees, one for the Department and one for the Museum, but notes that this arrangement has some disadvantages.

3. Proposed Rearrangement:

   • A more logical arrangement would be to have the Visiting Committee of the Department of Fine Arts and the Busch-Reisinger Museum under the directorship of the Director of the Fogg Museum.
   • The rationale for this is to better align the museum’s focus with the university's administrative structure, emphasizing art historians over literary historians.

4. Historical Context:

   • The report notes that the museum's independence was curtailed after World War II when the Visiting Committee was merged with the Department of German Languages and Literatures.
   • The committee was divided into sub-committees, which was beneficial but had some drawbacks.

The overall aim of the report is to propose changes that will improve the administrative efficiency and focus of the Busch-Reisinger Museum.

The image shows two pages from a document, specifically a report. The report is titled "Report of Mr. Edwin A. Locke, Jr. to the Board of Overseers" and is dated June 13, 1963.

The first page lists the financial needs of the Museum, which include:

• An endowment for a half-time teaching curator: $200,000
• Building improvements: $70,000
• Publication Fund: $20,000
• Purchase Fund: $400,000
  Total: $690,000

The text discusses the Museum's ability to acquire masterpieces with the available funds, particularly mentioning the Antonpaque Duliv Purchase Fund. It emphasizes the dual role of the Museum in education and scholarship and encourages the University authorities to support these needs.

The report also delves into the organizational structure of the Visiting Committee, noting that the committee was originally combined with the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures until World War II. Post-war, the committee was divided due to differing interests, with some members focusing on visual arts and others on languages and literature. The report suggests a more logical affiliation of the Museum sub-committee with the Visiting Committee of the Department of Fine Arts and the Fogg Museum, proposing that future curators would be art historians rather than literary historians. This change is supported by the Curators of both the Busch-Reisinger Museum and the Fogg Museums, as well as the Chairman of the Visiting Committee of the Department of Fine Arts and the Fogg Museum.

The text also mentions that the previous arrangement had its drawbacks and that the current sub-committee structure is more successful.

The image shows a page from a report by Mr. Edwin A. Locke, Jr., Chairman, to the Board of Overseers, dated June 13, 1963. The report discusses the financial needs and organizational structure of the Busch-Reisinger Museum.

Key points in the report include:

1. Acquisitions and Financial Needs:

   • Two significant masterpieces were acquired using funds from the Antonin Papecke Duhral Purchase Fund.
   • An additional $300,000 is requested for acquisitions, emphasizing the museum's dual role in education and scholarship.
   • The financial needs are broken down into:
     • Endowment for a half-time teaching Curator: $200,000
     • Building Improvements: $70,000
     • Publication Fund: $20,000
     • Purchase Fund: $400,000
   • Total requested: $690,000

2. Organizational Structure:

   • The museum's Visiting Committee was merged with the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures post-World War II, creating a split focus between visual arts and languages/literatures.
   • The committee was split into two sub-committees: one for the Department and one for the Museum.
   • The report suggests that the museum would benefit from a more logical affiliation with the Visiting Committee of the Department of Fine Arts and the Fogg Museum.

3. Recommendations:

   • A proposal is made to realign the museum’s Visiting Committee with the Department of Fine Arts and the Fogg Museum.
   • This change is expected to better reflect the administrative organization within the university.
   • The proposal is supported by the Curators of both the Busch-Reisinger and Fogg Museums, as well as the Chairman of the Visiting Committee of the Department of Fine Arts and the Fogg Museum.

The report is signed by Edwin A. Locke, Jr., Chairman, on June 13, 1963.

The image displays a page from a report written by Mr. Edwin A. Locke, Jr., to the Board of Overseers, dated June 13, 1963. Here are the key points detailed in the report:

1. Acquisition of Masterpieces:

   • The report discusses the opportunity to acquire two important masterpieces, specifically mentioning the Spoon and Antona Peepske DuBrul Purchase Fund.
   • Additional funding of $300,000 would allow the museum to add significant works to its collection, enhancing its educational and scholarly roles.

2. Financial Needs of the Museum:

   • The report lists the museum's financial requirements:
     • Endowment for a half-time teaching Curator: $200,000
     • Building improvements: $70,000
     • Publication Fund: $20,000
     • Purchase Fund: $400,000
     • Total: $690,000

3. Support from University Authorities:

   • The author expresses confidence that, with careful study, the University authorities will support these financial needs.
   • The Visiting Committee members are expected to participate actively in raising the necessary funds.

4. Reorganization of Museum Oversight:

   • The report notes a significant reorganization involving the Busch-Reisinger Museum, which has always worked closely with the Fogg Museum.
   • The museum was under the oversight of the Visiting Committee of the Department of Fine Arts until World War II.
   • After the war, the Visiting Committee was split to better reflect the interests and specialties of its members, some focusing on visual arts and others on languages and literatures.
   • The arrangement has been less successful due to the division of interests.

5. Proposed Reorganization:

   • The report proposes a new logical alignment:
     • The Museum sub-committee would merge with the Visiting Committee of the Department of Fine Arts.
     • This would abolish the existing separation and integrate the Busch-Reisinger Museum under the direction of the Fogg Art Museum.
     • The new Curator would be a professor in the Department of Fine Arts.
   • This change aims to align the Museum's policy more closely with the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures and reflect the current administrative organization.

6. Conclusion:

   • The proposed changes are intended to enhance the efficiency and focus of the museum's operations and align them with academic departments.

The report is signed by Edwin A. Locke, Jr., Chairman, dated June 13, 1963.

The image shows an open book or report with handwritten annotations at the top. The handwritten text reads: "Report of Mr. Edwin A. Locke, Jr. to the Board of Overseers, June 13, '63." The printed text below discusses the financial and administrative needs of a museum, likely the Fogg Art Museum, and its relationship with the Busch-Reisinger Museum and the Department of Fine Arts.

Key points from the printed text include:

1. Financial Needs:

   • Endowment for a half-time teaching curator: $250,000
   • Building improvements: $70,000
   • Endowment for a full-time curator: $400,000
   • Purchase fund: $500,000

2. Historical Context:

   • The museum lost opportunities to acquire masterpieces due to lack of funds.
   • The museum's role in education and scholarship is emphasized.

3. Administrative Structure:

   • The Visiting Committee was initially focused on the Fogg Art Museum but later included the Busch-Reisinger Museum.
   • The committee was divided into two subcommittees: one for the Department and one for the Museum.
   • The current arrangement has been successful but has disadvantages, such as not reflecting the actual administrative organization.

4. Proposed Changes:

   • The report suggests reorganizing the committee to better reflect the administrative structure, with clearer roles for the Curators of the Busch-Reisinger and Fogg Museums, and the Chairman of the Visiting Committee.

The text is dated June 13, 1963, and is signed by Edwin A. Locke, Jr., Chairman.

The image shows two open pages of a book or document. On the right-hand side page, there is a title that reads "Report of Mr. Edwin A. Locke, Jr. to the Board of Overseers, June 13th." The rest of the text on both pages is a written report containing various paragraphs. The text appears to be typewritten and discusses topics related to museum acquisitions, funds, curatorial endowments, management, organizational structures, and committee work.

Additionally, there is handwriting in blue ink on the top of the right page, which seems to make a note of the report's recipient and date, likely duplicating the information in the printed title. The tone of the document suggests it is likely a formal report, possibly for an academic or museum institution, detailing specific governance or operational issues. The handwriting is in cursive and adds a personal touch to what seems to be an otherwise typewritten institutional document.

The image depicts two pages from a document, likely a formal report or memorandum, dated June 13, 1963. The left page shows handwritten text at the top, reading: "Report of Mr. Edwin A. Locke, Jr. to the Board of Overseers, June 13, 1963." This suggests that the document is a report authored by Mr. Edwin A. Locke, Jr., addressed to a board of overseers.

The right page contains typed text, formatted in a formal, professional style. The content appears to be a detailed discussion or proposal regarding the organization and funding of a museum, specifically the Fogg Art Museum. Key points from the text include:

1. Museum Acquisitions and Funding: The report mentions the acquisition of masterpieces, including a recent purchase of a Spoorl painting and the potential for additional acquisitions with a proposed purchase fund of $100,000. It highlights the importance of these acquisitions for the museum's collection and educational role.

2. Financial Needs: The report outlines the financial requirements of the museum, including:

   • Endowment for a half-time teaching curator: $200,000
   • Building improvements: $70,000
   • Publication fund: $40,000
   • Purchase fund: $200,000
   • Total: $690,000

3. Visiting Committee and Reorganization: The text discusses the reorganization of the Visiting Committee, which was historically combined with the Department of Germanic Languages. It notes that after World War II, the committee was restructured, leading to a division of interest between the teaching of languages and literatures and the visual arts. The report suggests that the Visiting Committee is no longer meeting as a single body and proposes a more logical affiliation for the museum sub-committee with the Fogg Museum rather than the Department of Germanic Languages.

4. Director and Independence: The report emphasizes the independence of the Busch-Reisinger Museum, which is under the directorship of the Fogg Museum. It notes that the Busch-Reisinger Museum has always received generous help and cooperation from every Fogg Museum director, enabling it to develop independently.

5. Conclusion and Support: The report concludes by stating that the University authorities should consider the financial needs of the museum as worthy of support and consistent with the overall fund-raising program. It also highlights the success of the reorganization and the division of interest within the Visiting Committee.

The document appears to be part of an official record or archival material, likely from an academic or museum setting, discussing administrative, financial, and organizational matters related to the Fogg Art Museum and its associated institutions. The handwritten title at the top indicates that this is a formal report submitted to a board of overseers.

The image shows a book open to a page that appears to be a report or document. The text on the page discusses the financial and operational aspects of a museum, including acquisitions, funding, and organizational structure. The report is titled "Report of Mr. Edwin A. Locke, Jr. to the Board of Overseers," dated June 13, 1963. The text mentions the acquisition of two masterpieces, the $90,000 Antonia Paculka DuBrul Purchase Fund, and additional purchase funds of $100,000. It also discusses the dual role of the museum in education and scholarship and the financial needs of the museum, including the Endowment for a half-time teaching curator, building improvements, and a publication fund. The report suggests that the University should emphasize the division of interest within the museum and recommends a more logical affiliation for the Museum subcommittee with the Visiting Committee of the Department of Fine Arts and the Fogg Museum. The report is signed by Edwin A. Locke, Jr., Chairman.

A book is open to two pages, with a blue handwritten note on the top right corner. The note reads "Report of Mr. Edwin A. Loche, Jr. to the Board of Overseers, June 13, 1963." The book is open to two pages with text. The left page has a paragraph about the museum's financial needs, while the right page has a paragraph about the museum's policy toward the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures.